Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Construction & Extraction in South Dakota

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Construction & Extraction
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
South Dakota
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Construction & Extraction in South Dakota

0.0%
100.0%
Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Construction & Extraction in South Dakota Map

Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Construction & Extraction in South Dakota

City % Employed vs State vs National
1. Kidder 100.0% 5.1% (+94.9)#1 5.0% (+95.0)#32
2. Farmer 77.8% 5.1% (+72.7)#2 5.0% (+72.8)#53
3. Onaka 75.0% 5.1% (+69.9)#3 5.0% (+70.0)#57
4. Vilas 75.0% 5.1% (+69.9)#4 5.0% (+70.0)#58
5. Vivian 62.1% 5.1% (+56.9)#5 5.0% (+57.1)#87
6. Long Lake 55.6% 5.1% (+50.4)#6 5.0% (+50.6)#124
7. White Horse 53.8% 5.1% (+48.7)#7 5.0% (+48.9)#134
8. Bancroft 38.9% 5.1% (+33.8)#8 5.0% (+33.9)#299
9. Central City 33.3% 5.1% (+28.2)#9 5.0% (+28.3)#417
10. Valley Springs 30.0% 5.1% (+24.9)#10 5.0% (+25.0)#546
11. Wonderland Homes 29.6% 5.1% (+24.4)#11 5.0% (+24.6)#563
12. Running Water 28.0% 5.1% (+22.9)#12 5.0% (+23.0)#643
13. Lake City 27.3% 5.1% (+22.1)#13 5.0% (+22.3)#692
14. Fedora 27.3% 5.1% (+22.1)#14 5.0% (+22.3)#694
15. Lane 26.7% 5.1% (+21.5)#15 5.0% (+21.7)#740
16. Wasta 25.8% 5.1% (+20.7)#16 5.0% (+20.8)#781
17. Draper 25.0% 5.1% (+19.9)#17 5.0% (+20.0)#851
18. Stockholm 24.3% 5.1% (+19.2)#18 5.0% (+19.3)#892
19. Marty 24.1% 5.1% (+19.0)#19 5.0% (+19.1)#905
20. Richland 22.9% 5.1% (+17.8)#20 5.0% (+17.9)#1,026
21. Bath Corner 22.2% 5.1% (+17.1)#21 5.0% (+17.2)#1,107
22. Forestburg 22.2% 5.1% (+17.1)#22 5.0% (+17.2)#1,110
23. Roscoe 21.8% 5.1% (+16.7)#23 5.0% (+16.9)#1,147
24. Frankfort 21.1% 5.1% (+15.9)#24 5.0% (+16.1)#1,232
25. Glenham 20.9% 5.1% (+15.8)#25 5.0% (+15.9)#1,256
26. Bryant 19.8% 5.1% (+14.6)#26 5.0% (+14.8)#1,404
27. Kennebec 19.6% 5.1% (+14.5)#27 5.0% (+14.6)#1,433
28. Brentford 19.5% 5.1% (+14.4)#28 5.0% (+14.5)#1,449
29. La Bolt 19.0% 5.1% (+13.9)#29 5.0% (+14.1)#1,528
30. Frederick 18.9% 5.1% (+13.7)#30 5.0% (+13.9)#1,554
31. Orient 18.2% 5.1% (+13.1)#31 5.0% (+13.2)#1,698
32. Buffalo 18.1% 5.1% (+13.0)#32 5.0% (+13.1)#1,708
33. Reliance 17.9% 5.1% (+12.8)#33 5.0% (+13.0)#1,753
34. Fairburn 17.6% 5.1% (+12.5)#34 5.0% (+12.7)#1,820
35. Columbia 17.5% 5.1% (+12.4)#35 5.0% (+12.5)#1,834
36. Fulton 17.5% 5.1% (+12.4)#36 5.0% (+12.5)#1,841
37. Avon 17.2% 5.1% (+12.1)#37 5.0% (+12.2)#1,905
38. Olivet 17.1% 5.1% (+12.0)#38 5.0% (+12.1)#1,928
39. Fruitdale 17.1% 5.1% (+11.9)#39 5.0% (+12.1)#1,947
40. Deadwood 17.0% 5.1% (+11.9)#40 5.0% (+12.0)#1,957
41. Angostura 16.7% 5.1% (+11.5)#41 5.0% (+11.7)#2,053
42. Morristown 16.2% 5.1% (+11.1)#42 5.0% (+11.2)#2,180
43. Gary 16.1% 5.1% (+11.0)#43 5.0% (+11.1)#2,196
44. Utica 16.1% 5.1% (+11.0)#44 5.0% (+11.1)#2,203
45. White River 15.8% 5.1% (+10.6)#45 5.0% (+10.8)#2,318
46. Faulkton 15.2% 5.1% (+10.0)#46 5.0% (+10.2)#2,495
47. Burke 15.1% 5.1% (+10.0)#47 5.0% (+10.1)#2,507
48. Egan 14.9% 5.1% (+9.73)#48 5.0% (+9.86)#2,601
49. Herrick 14.8% 5.1% (+9.69)#49 5.0% (+9.82)#2,627
50. Westport 14.7% 5.1% (+9.58)#50 5.0% (+9.71)#2,669
51. Hayti 14.3% 5.1% (+9.16)#51 5.0% (+9.29)#2,799
52. Chester 14.3% 5.1% (+9.16)#52 5.0% (+9.29)#2,807
53. Altamont 14.3% 5.1% (+9.16)#53 5.0% (+9.29)#2,827
54. Colman 14.0% 5.1% (+8.88)#54 5.0% (+9.01)#2,921
55. Grenville 14.0% 5.1% (+8.83)#55 5.0% (+8.96)#2,943
56. Stratford 13.5% 5.1% (+8.39)#56 5.0% (+8.52)#3,140
57. Leola 13.4% 5.1% (+8.31)#57 5.0% (+8.44)#3,176
58. New Underwood 13.2% 5.1% (+8.08)#58 5.0% (+8.21)#3,277
59. Millerdale Colony 12.5% 5.1% (+7.38)#59 5.0% (+7.51)#3,643
60. Kadoka 12.3% 5.1% (+7.21)#60 5.0% (+7.33)#3,734
61. Milbank 12.3% 5.1% (+7.20)#61 5.0% (+7.33)#3,738
62. Willow Lake 12.3% 5.1% (+7.16)#62 5.0% (+7.29)#3,765
63. Emery 12.0% 5.1% (+6.88)#63 5.0% (+7.01)#3,915
64. Lake Poinsett 11.9% 5.1% (+6.81)#64 5.0% (+6.94)#3,968
65. Claire City 11.8% 5.1% (+6.64)#65 5.0% (+6.77)#4,095
66. Ortley 11.8% 5.1% (+6.64)#66 5.0% (+6.77)#4,101
67. Wolsey 11.7% 5.1% (+6.62)#67 5.0% (+6.75)#4,112
68. Agar 11.5% 5.1% (+6.42)#68 5.0% (+6.54)#4,247
69. Glendale Colony 11.3% 5.1% (+6.13)#69 5.0% (+6.26)#4,459
70. Irene 11.2% 5.1% (+6.07)#70 5.0% (+6.20)#4,491
71. Hermosa 11.2% 5.1% (+6.05)#71 5.0% (+6.18)#4,519
72. Mountain Plains 11.1% 5.1% (+5.96)#72 5.0% (+6.08)#4,618
73. Redfield 10.9% 5.1% (+5.78)#73 5.0% (+5.91)#4,739
74. Trent 10.8% 5.1% (+5.72)#74 5.0% (+5.85)#4,786
75. Sturgis 10.8% 5.1% (+5.69)#75 5.0% (+5.82)#4,805
76. Antelope 10.7% 5.1% (+5.59)#76 5.0% (+5.72)#4,889
77. Pringle 10.5% 5.1% (+5.36)#77 5.0% (+5.49)#5,090
78. Ethan 10.4% 5.1% (+5.24)#78 5.0% (+5.37)#5,189
79. Badger 10.3% 5.1% (+5.13)#79 5.0% (+5.26)#5,307
80. Fort Pierre 10.1% 5.1% (+5.02)#80 5.0% (+5.15)#5,397
81. Fort Thompson 10.1% 5.1% (+4.97)#81 5.0% (+5.09)#5,452
82. Agency Village 10.0% 5.1% (+4.90)#82 5.0% (+5.03)#5,515
83. Piedmont 10.0% 5.1% (+4.89)#83 5.0% (+5.02)#5,519
84. Lake Andes 10.0% 5.1% (+4.88)#84 5.0% (+5.01)#5,527
85. Astoria 10.0% 5.1% (+4.88)#85 5.0% (+5.01)#5,557
86. Erwin 10.0% 5.1% (+4.88)#86 5.0% (+5.01)#5,578
87. Newell 9.9% 5.1% (+4.77)#87 5.0% (+4.90)#5,669
88. Lake Preston 9.9% 5.1% (+4.76)#88 5.0% (+4.89)#5,680
89. Big Stone City 9.7% 5.1% (+4.62)#89 5.0% (+4.75)#5,818
90. Bridgewater 9.7% 5.1% (+4.55)#90 5.0% (+4.68)#5,875
91. Quinn 9.7% 5.1% (+4.55)#91 5.0% (+4.68)#5,884
92. Nisland 9.5% 5.1% (+4.40)#92 5.0% (+4.53)#6,046
93. Bruce 9.4% 5.1% (+4.33)#93 5.0% (+4.45)#6,125
94. Dell Rapids 9.4% 5.1% (+4.25)#94 5.0% (+4.37)#6,203
95. Beresford 9.4% 5.1% (+4.24)#95 5.0% (+4.37)#6,204
96. Whitewood 9.3% 5.1% (+4.21)#96 5.0% (+4.34)#6,243
97. Doland 9.3% 5.1% (+4.21)#97 5.0% (+4.34)#6,245
98. Alexandria 9.3% 5.1% (+4.16)#98 5.0% (+4.29)#6,308
99. Lennox 9.3% 5.1% (+4.16)#99 5.0% (+4.29)#6,312
100. Dante 9.2% 5.1% (+4.11)#100 5.0% (+4.24)#6,369

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Construction & Extraction in South Dakota?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Construction & Extraction in South Dakota are:
#1
100.0%
#2
77.8%
#3
75.0%
#4
75.0%
#5
62.1%
#6
55.6%
#7
53.8%
#8
38.9%
#9
33.3%
#10
30.0%
What city has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Construction & Extraction in South Dakota?
Kidder has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Construction & Extraction in South Dakota with 100.0%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Construction & Extraction in the State of South Dakota?
Percentage of Population Employed in Construction & Extraction in South Dakota is 5.1%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Construction & Extraction in the United States?
Percentage of Population Employed in Construction & Extraction in the United States is 5.0%.