Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Construction & Extraction in Wisconsin

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Construction & Extraction
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Wisconsin
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Construction & Extraction in Wisconsin

0.0%
100.0%
Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Construction & Extraction in Wisconsin Map

Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Construction & Extraction in Wisconsin

City % Employed vs State vs National
1. Long Lake 81.1% 4.5% (+76.6)#1 5.0% (+76.1)#46
2. Paac Ciinak 56.5% 4.5% (+52.0)#2 5.0% (+51.5)#114
3. Sobieski 42.6% 4.5% (+38.1)#3 5.0% (+37.6)#247
4. Greenbush 41.7% 4.5% (+37.2)#4 5.0% (+36.7)#258
5. Seneca 38.5% 4.5% (+34.0)#5 5.0% (+33.5)#304
6. Jolmaville 38.2% 4.5% (+33.7)#6 5.0% (+33.2)#309
7. Zoar 37.2% 4.5% (+32.7)#7 5.0% (+32.2)#330
8. Summit Lake 29.2% 4.5% (+24.7)#8 5.0% (+24.2)#581
9. Jump River 28.6% 4.5% (+24.1)#9 5.0% (+23.6)#614
10. Dunbar 28.0% 4.5% (+23.5)#10 5.0% (+23.0)#642
11. Easton 24.2% 4.5% (+19.8)#11 5.0% (+19.2)#897
12. Weyerhaeuser 23.7% 4.5% (+19.2)#12 5.0% (+18.7)#955
13. Turtle Lake 23.1% 4.5% (+18.6)#13 5.0% (+18.1)#999
14. Sandy Hook 22.0% 4.5% (+17.5)#14 5.0% (+17.0)#1,129
15. Post Lake 19.8% 4.5% (+15.3)#15 5.0% (+14.8)#1,395
16. Collins 19.5% 4.5% (+15.0)#16 5.0% (+14.5)#1,443
17. Krakow 19.4% 4.5% (+14.9)#17 5.0% (+14.4)#1,460
18. Prairie Farm 18.5% 4.5% (+14.0)#18 5.0% (+13.5)#1,619
19. Birch Hill 18.5% 4.5% (+14.0)#19 5.0% (+13.5)#1,635
20. Stockbridge 18.1% 4.5% (+13.6)#20 5.0% (+13.1)#1,722
21. White Lake 17.8% 4.5% (+13.3)#21 5.0% (+12.8)#1,775
22. Hollandale 17.8% 4.5% (+13.3)#22 5.0% (+12.8)#1,796
23. Florence 17.6% 4.5% (+13.2)#23 5.0% (+12.7)#1,813
24. Mountain 17.4% 4.5% (+12.9)#24 5.0% (+12.4)#1,873
25. Conrath 17.3% 4.5% (+12.8)#25 5.0% (+12.3)#1,887
26. Helenville 16.8% 4.5% (+12.3)#26 5.0% (+11.8)#2,004
27. Elderon 16.7% 4.5% (+12.2)#27 5.0% (+11.7)#2,056
28. Barronett 16.3% 4.5% (+11.8)#28 5.0% (+11.3)#2,157
29. Springbrook 16.2% 4.5% (+11.7)#29 5.0% (+11.2)#2,179
30. Mount Calvary 15.9% 4.5% (+11.5)#30 5.0% (+10.9)#2,249
31. Boyceville 15.9% 4.5% (+11.4)#31 5.0% (+10.9)#2,258
32. Iron River 15.9% 4.5% (+11.4)#32 5.0% (+10.9)#2,270
33. Lewis 15.7% 4.5% (+11.2)#33 5.0% (+10.7)#2,328
34. Knapp 15.6% 4.5% (+11.2)#34 5.0% (+10.7)#2,341
35. Catawba 15.4% 4.5% (+10.9)#35 5.0% (+10.4)#2,415
36. Genoa 15.3% 4.5% (+10.8)#36 5.0% (+10.3)#2,457
37. Spring Valley 15.2% 4.5% (+10.7)#37 5.0% (+10.2)#2,500
38. Melvina 15.0% 4.5% (+10.5)#38 5.0% (+10.0)#2,550
39. Milladore 14.8% 4.5% (+10.3)#39 5.0% (+9.80)#2,629
40. Rewey 14.7% 4.5% (+10.2)#40 5.0% (+9.66)#2,684
41. Kennan 14.5% 4.5% (+10.1)#41 5.0% (+9.55)#2,732
42. Bagley 14.4% 4.5% (+9.89)#42 5.0% (+9.39)#2,778
43. Oliver 14.4% 4.5% (+9.88)#43 5.0% (+9.38)#2,784
44. Forestville 14.2% 4.5% (+9.74)#44 5.0% (+9.24)#2,842
45. Rudolph 13.8% 4.5% (+9.34)#45 5.0% (+8.83)#3,006
46. Fenwood 13.7% 4.5% (+9.21)#46 5.0% (+8.70)#3,056
47. Marengo 13.6% 4.5% (+9.15)#47 5.0% (+8.64)#3,087
48. Wheeler 13.6% 4.5% (+9.11)#48 5.0% (+8.61)#3,098
49. Pembine 13.6% 4.5% (+9.07)#49 5.0% (+8.57)#3,115
50. Lac Du Flambeau 13.5% 4.5% (+9.05)#50 5.0% (+8.54)#3,129
51. Rubicon 13.5% 4.5% (+9.02)#51 5.0% (+8.52)#3,139
52. Butler 13.5% 4.5% (+9.02)#52 5.0% (+8.52)#3,141
53. Pigeon Falls 13.2% 4.5% (+8.76)#53 5.0% (+8.25)#3,258
54. Packwaukee 13.2% 4.5% (+8.75)#54 5.0% (+8.24)#3,266
55. Wind Lake 12.9% 4.5% (+8.37)#55 5.0% (+7.86)#3,457
56. Cable 12.8% 4.5% (+8.35)#56 5.0% (+7.85)#3,466
57. Lime Ridge 12.7% 4.5% (+8.26)#57 5.0% (+7.75)#3,518
58. Big Bend 12.5% 4.5% (+8.04)#58 5.0% (+7.54)#3,608
59. Lebanon 12.5% 4.5% (+8.01)#59 5.0% (+7.51)#3,637
60. Grand View 12.5% 4.5% (+8.01)#60 5.0% (+7.51)#3,639
61. Plain 12.4% 4.5% (+7.95)#61 5.0% (+7.45)#3,681
62. Navarino 12.3% 4.5% (+7.82)#62 5.0% (+7.31)#3,747
63. Barneveld 12.3% 4.5% (+7.80)#63 5.0% (+7.30)#3,756
64. Marquette 12.2% 4.5% (+7.73)#64 5.0% (+7.23)#3,796
65. Evansville 12.0% 4.5% (+7.54)#65 5.0% (+7.04)#3,900
66. Allens Grove 12.0% 4.5% (+7.51)#66 5.0% (+7.01)#3,920
67. Dresser 11.9% 4.5% (+7.43)#67 5.0% (+6.93)#3,980
68. Stone Lake 11.9% 4.5% (+7.41)#68 5.0% (+6.91)#3,999
69. Fairchild 11.8% 4.5% (+7.33)#69 5.0% (+6.82)#4,043
70. Lake Nebagamon 11.8% 4.5% (+7.30)#70 5.0% (+6.80)#4,059
71. Westboro 11.7% 4.5% (+7.21)#71 5.0% (+6.71)#4,136
72. Gibbsville 11.6% 4.5% (+7.13)#72 5.0% (+6.63)#4,195
73. Haugen 11.5% 4.5% (+6.98)#73 5.0% (+6.47)#4,291
74. Rochester 11.5% 4.5% (+6.96)#74 5.0% (+6.46)#4,299
75. Egg Harbor 11.3% 4.5% (+6.85)#75 5.0% (+6.35)#4,385
76. Campbellsport 11.3% 4.5% (+6.76)#76 5.0% (+6.26)#4,454
77. Lone Rock 11.2% 4.5% (+6.72)#77 5.0% (+6.22)#4,481
78. Three Lakes 11.2% 4.5% (+6.72)#78 5.0% (+6.21)#4,484
79. Embarrass 11.2% 4.5% (+6.69)#79 5.0% (+6.19)#4,502
80. Glidden 11.1% 4.5% (+6.62)#80 5.0% (+6.12)#4,587
81. Ogdensburg 11.1% 4.5% (+6.62)#81 5.0% (+6.12)#4,591
82. Waukau 11.0% 4.5% (+6.54)#82 5.0% (+6.04)#4,639
83. Hurley 10.9% 4.5% (+6.43)#83 5.0% (+5.93)#4,724
84. Casco 10.9% 4.5% (+6.41)#84 5.0% (+5.91)#4,744
85. Rosholt 10.9% 4.5% (+6.37)#85 5.0% (+5.87)#4,778
86. Chili 10.8% 4.5% (+6.32)#86 5.0% (+5.82)#4,808
87. Hager City 10.8% 4.5% (+6.30)#87 5.0% (+5.80)#4,827
88. Hatfield 10.8% 4.5% (+6.28)#88 5.0% (+5.78)#4,843
89. New Munster 10.7% 4.5% (+6.25)#89 5.0% (+5.75)#4,867
90. Kewaunee 10.7% 4.5% (+6.20)#90 5.0% (+5.69)#4,917
91. Camp Douglas 10.7% 4.5% (+6.18)#91 5.0% (+5.67)#4,938
92. Gilmanton 10.7% 4.5% (+6.18)#92 5.0% (+5.67)#4,942
93. Bohners Lake 10.7% 4.5% (+6.17)#93 5.0% (+5.66)#4,951
94. Blue River 10.6% 4.5% (+6.13)#94 5.0% (+5.63)#4,973
95. New Odanah 10.6% 4.5% (+6.07)#95 5.0% (+5.56)#5,016
96. Westby 10.5% 4.5% (+6.04)#96 5.0% (+5.54)#5,033
97. Gratiot 10.5% 4.5% (+6.04)#97 5.0% (+5.53)#5,051
98. Pulaski 10.4% 4.5% (+5.93)#98 5.0% (+5.43)#5,134
99. Brooklyn 10.4% 4.5% (+5.92)#99 5.0% (+5.42)#5,145
100. Cazenovia 10.3% 4.5% (+5.85)#100 5.0% (+5.35)#5,216

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Construction & Extraction in Wisconsin?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Construction & Extraction in Wisconsin are:
#1
81.1%
#2
42.6%
#3
41.7%
#4
37.2%
#5
29.2%
#6
28.6%
#7
28.0%
#8
23.7%
#9
23.1%
#10
22.0%
What city has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Construction & Extraction in Wisconsin?
Long Lake has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Construction & Extraction in Wisconsin with 81.1%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Construction & Extraction in the State of Wisconsin?
Percentage of Population Employed in Construction & Extraction in Wisconsin is 4.5%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Construction & Extraction in the United States?
Percentage of Population Employed in Construction & Extraction in the United States is 5.0%.