Cities with the Lowest Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Michigan

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Lowest Renter-Occupied
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Michigan
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Lowest Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Michigan

10.0%
0.0%
Cities with the Lowest Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Michigan Map

Cities with the Lowest Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Michigan

City % Renter-Occupied vs State vs National
1. Walkerville 1.3% 27.5% (-26.2)#1 35.2% (-33.9)#96
2. Grand Beach 1.4% 27.5% (-26.1)#2 35.2% (-33.7)#111
3. Hubbard Lake 1.4% 27.5% (-26.1)#3 35.2% (-33.7)#115
4. Lake Angelus 1.5% 27.5% (-26.0)#4 35.2% (-33.7)#117
5. Lake Leann 1.7% 27.5% (-25.8)#5 35.2% (-33.5)#153
6. Barton Hills 1.7% 27.5% (-25.8)#6 35.2% (-33.5)#166
7. Presque Isle Harbor 1.8% 27.5% (-25.7)#7 35.2% (-33.3)#184
8. Michiana 1.9% 27.5% (-25.6)#8 35.2% (-33.3)#192
9. Michigamme 2.0% 27.5% (-25.5)#9 35.2% (-33.2)#215
10. Fruitport 2.3% 27.5% (-25.2)#10 35.2% (-32.9)#276
11. Brimley 2.4% 27.5% (-25.1)#11 35.2% (-32.8)#305
12. Marenisco 2.5% 27.5% (-25.0)#12 35.2% (-32.7)#347
13. Shorewood Tower Hills Harbert 2.5% 27.5% (-25.0)#13 35.2% (-32.7)#349
14. Vernon 2.5% 27.5% (-25.0)#14 35.2% (-32.7)#363
15. Dorr 2.5% 27.5% (-25.0)#15 35.2% (-32.6)#374
16. Dowling 2.6% 27.5% (-24.9)#16 35.2% (-32.6)#395
17. Fulton 2.9% 27.5% (-24.6)#17 35.2% (-32.2)#484
18. Huntington Woods 3.0% 27.5% (-24.5)#18 35.2% (-32.2)#504
19. Canada Creek Ranch 3.0% 27.5% (-24.5)#19 35.2% (-32.2)#511
20. Quinnesec 3.2% 27.5% (-24.3)#20 35.2% (-32.0)#589
21. Vineyard Lake 3.2% 27.5% (-24.3)#21 35.2% (-31.9)#601
22. Village Of Grosse Pointe Shores 3.3% 27.5% (-24.3)#22 35.2% (-31.9)#603
23. Ramsay 3.4% 27.5% (-24.1)#23 35.2% (-31.8)#649
24. Turner 3.6% 27.5% (-23.9)#24 35.2% (-31.6)#705
25. Orchard Lake Village 3.6% 27.5% (-23.9)#25 35.2% (-31.5)#717
26. De Tour Village 3.9% 27.5% (-23.6)#26 35.2% (-31.2)#825
27. Manitou Beach Devils Lake 4.0% 27.5% (-23.5)#27 35.2% (-31.2)#831
28. Copper Harbor 4.1% 27.5% (-23.4)#28 35.2% (-31.1)#863
29. Grosse Pointe Farms 4.3% 27.5% (-23.3)#29 35.2% (-30.9)#921
30. Twin Lake 4.3% 27.5% (-23.2)#30 35.2% (-30.9)#929
31. Stanwood 4.3% 27.5% (-23.2)#31 35.2% (-30.9)#931
32. Woodland Beach 4.4% 27.5% (-23.1)#32 35.2% (-30.8)#956
33. Attica 4.5% 27.5% (-23.0)#33 35.2% (-30.7)#1,014
34. Delton 4.5% 27.5% (-23.0)#34 35.2% (-30.6)#1,022
35. Advance 4.6% 27.5% (-22.9)#35 35.2% (-30.5)#1,073
36. White Pine 4.7% 27.5% (-22.9)#36 35.2% (-30.5)#1,076
37. Ahmeek 4.7% 27.5% (-22.9)#37 35.2% (-30.5)#1,080
38. Beal City 4.7% 27.5% (-22.8)#38 35.2% (-30.5)#1,088
39. Greenland 4.7% 27.5% (-22.8)#39 35.2% (-30.5)#1,095
40. Lake Isabella 4.8% 27.5% (-22.7)#40 35.2% (-30.4)#1,139
41. East Grand Rapids 5.0% 27.5% (-22.5)#41 35.2% (-30.1)#1,239
42. Pleasant Ridge 5.0% 27.5% (-22.5)#42 35.2% (-30.1)#1,246
43. Level Park Oak Park 5.2% 27.5% (-22.3)#43 35.2% (-29.9)#1,315
44. Riverdale 5.3% 27.5% (-22.2)#44 35.2% (-29.9)#1,325
45. Forest Hills 5.3% 27.5% (-22.2)#45 35.2% (-29.9)#1,344
46. Three Lakes 5.5% 27.5% (-22.0)#46 35.2% (-29.7)#1,431
47. Otter Lake 5.6% 27.5% (-21.9)#47 35.2% (-29.6)#1,483
48. Goodrich 5.9% 27.5% (-21.6)#48 35.2% (-29.3)#1,610
49. Byron Center 5.9% 27.5% (-21.6)#49 35.2% (-29.3)#1,611
50. Eastlake 6.1% 27.5% (-21.4)#50 35.2% (-29.1)#1,669
51. Beverly Hills 6.1% 27.5% (-21.4)#51 35.2% (-29.1)#1,682
52. Skanee 6.1% 27.5% (-21.4)#52 35.2% (-29.1)#1,694
53. Gaastra 6.2% 27.5% (-21.3)#53 35.2% (-28.9)#1,738
54. Bingham Farms 6.3% 27.5% (-21.2)#54 35.2% (-28.9)#1,777
55. Linden 6.4% 27.5% (-21.1)#55 35.2% (-28.8)#1,805
56. Honor 6.5% 27.5% (-21.0)#56 35.2% (-28.7)#1,846
57. Canadian Lakes 6.5% 27.5% (-21.0)#57 35.2% (-28.7)#1,860
58. Estral Beach 6.6% 27.5% (-20.9)#58 35.2% (-28.6)#1,895
59. Lakeport 6.8% 27.5% (-20.7)#59 35.2% (-28.4)#1,949
60. Franklin 6.8% 27.5% (-20.7)#60 35.2% (-28.4)#1,970
61. Horton Bay 6.9% 27.5% (-20.6)#61 35.2% (-28.3)#1,988
62. Lambertville 6.9% 27.5% (-20.6)#62 35.2% (-28.3)#2,023
63. Elberta 6.9% 27.5% (-20.6)#63 35.2% (-28.2)#2,029
64. Alba 7.0% 27.5% (-20.5)#64 35.2% (-28.2)#2,069
65. Mulliken 7.3% 27.5% (-20.2)#65 35.2% (-27.9)#2,195
66. New Era 7.3% 27.5% (-20.2)#66 35.2% (-27.8)#2,226
67. Hubbell 7.4% 27.5% (-20.1)#67 35.2% (-27.8)#2,250
68. Eagle Harbor 7.5% 27.5% (-20.0)#68 35.2% (-27.7)#2,287
69. Parkdale 7.6% 27.5% (-19.9)#69 35.2% (-27.6)#2,327
70. Ferrysburg 7.6% 27.5% (-19.9)#70 35.2% (-27.6)#2,334
71. Emmett 7.7% 27.5% (-19.8)#71 35.2% (-27.5)#2,387
72. Lake Leelanau 7.7% 27.5% (-19.8)#72 35.2% (-27.5)#2,394
73. Crystal 7.7% 27.5% (-19.8)#73 35.2% (-27.5)#2,418
74. Trufant 7.7% 27.5% (-19.8)#74 35.2% (-27.4)#2,426
75. Bear Lake 7.9% 27.5% (-19.6)#75 35.2% (-27.3)#2,513
76. Palmer 8.1% 27.5% (-19.4)#76 35.2% (-27.1)#2,582
77. Covington 8.2% 27.5% (-19.3)#77 35.2% (-27.0)#2,621
78. Bay Shore 8.3% 27.5% (-19.2)#78 35.2% (-26.9)#2,666
79. Wacousta 8.3% 27.5% (-19.2)#79 35.2% (-26.9)#2,675
80. Dansville 8.5% 27.5% (-19.0)#80 35.2% (-26.7)#2,762
81. Leonard 8.5% 27.5% (-19.0)#81 35.2% (-26.7)#2,766
82. Essexville 8.6% 27.5% (-18.9)#82 35.2% (-26.6)#2,797
83. Fostoria 8.6% 27.5% (-18.9)#83 35.2% (-26.6)#2,813
84. Cambria 8.8% 27.5% (-18.7)#84 35.2% (-26.4)#2,936
85. Lathrup Village 8.8% 27.5% (-18.7)#85 35.2% (-26.4)#2,953
86. Vandercook Lake 8.8% 27.5% (-18.7)#86 35.2% (-26.3)#2,954
87. Lakes Of The North 9.1% 27.5% (-18.4)#87 35.2% (-26.1)#3,101
88. Burt 9.1% 27.5% (-18.4)#88 35.2% (-26.0)#3,153
89. Lake Fenton 9.2% 27.5% (-18.3)#89 35.2% (-26.0)#3,157
90. Copemish 9.2% 27.5% (-18.3)#90 35.2% (-26.0)#3,167
91. Ironton 9.5% 27.5% (-18.0)#91 35.2% (-25.7)#3,295
92. Owendale 9.5% 27.5% (-18.0)#92 35.2% (-25.7)#3,302
93. Onekama 9.5% 27.5% (-18.0)#93 35.2% (-25.7)#3,326
94. Sand Lake 9.7% 27.5% (-17.8)#94 35.2% (-25.5)#3,402
95. Grawn 9.7% 27.5% (-17.8)#95 35.2% (-25.5)#3,426
96. Lakewood Club 9.8% 27.5% (-17.8)#96 35.2% (-25.4)#3,443
97. Amasa 9.8% 27.5% (-17.7)#97 35.2% (-25.4)#3,447
98. Wolverine 9.8% 27.5% (-17.7)#98 35.2% (-25.4)#3,449
99. Rapid City 9.8% 27.5% (-17.7)#99 35.2% (-25.4)#3,461
100. Pearl Beach 9.8% 27.5% (-17.7)#100 35.2% (-25.4)#3,473

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Lowest Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Michigan?
Top 10 Cities with the Lowest Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Michigan are:
What city has the Lowest Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Michigan?
Walkerville has the Lowest Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Michigan with 1.3%.
What is the Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in the State of Michigan?
Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Michigan is 27.5%.
What is the Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in the United States?
Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in the United States is 35.2%.