Cities with the Highest Percentage of Private Company Employees in Michigan

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Private Company Employees
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Michigan
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Percentage of Private Company Employees in Michigan

0.0%
100.0%
Cities with the Highest Percentage of Private Company Employees in Michigan Map

Cities with the Highest Percentage of Private Company Employees in Michigan

City % Private Company Employees vs State vs National
1. Millers Lake 100.0% 70.8% (+29.2)#1 66.9% (+33.1)#57
2. Oden 100.0% 70.8% (+29.2)#2 66.9% (+33.1)#110
3. Winn 100.0% 70.8% (+29.2)#3 66.9% (+33.1)#141
4. Boon 100.0% 70.8% (+29.2)#4 66.9% (+33.1)#623
5. Hurontown 91.9% 70.8% (+21.1)#5 66.9% (+25.0)#1,285
6. Mecosta 91.2% 70.8% (+20.4)#6 66.9% (+24.3)#1,355
7. Interlochen 90.8% 70.8% (+20.0)#7 66.9% (+23.9)#1,386
8. Jennings 90.6% 70.8% (+19.8)#8 66.9% (+23.7)#1,400
9. Burr Oak 90.4% 70.8% (+19.6)#9 66.9% (+23.5)#1,424
10. Palo 90.1% 70.8% (+19.4)#10 66.9% (+23.2)#1,451
11. Trimountain 90.0% 70.8% (+19.2)#11 66.9% (+23.1)#1,460
12. Elberta 89.9% 70.8% (+19.1)#12 66.9% (+23.0)#1,485
13. Tower 89.7% 70.8% (+19.0)#13 66.9% (+22.9)#1,501
14. Otisville 89.7% 70.8% (+18.9)#14 66.9% (+22.8)#1,513
15. Pierson 87.8% 70.8% (+17.0)#15 66.9% (+20.9)#1,765
16. Robin Glen Indiantown 87.5% 70.8% (+16.8)#16 66.9% (+20.7)#1,800
17. Carp Lake 87.5% 70.8% (+16.7)#17 66.9% (+20.6)#1,805
18. Manistee Lake 87.5% 70.8% (+16.7)#18 66.9% (+20.6)#1,806
19. Woodland Beach 87.4% 70.8% (+16.6)#19 66.9% (+20.5)#1,841
20. Fennville 86.8% 70.8% (+16.0)#20 66.9% (+19.9)#1,940
21. Haring 86.5% 70.8% (+15.8)#21 66.9% (+19.7)#1,985
22. Kinde 86.5% 70.8% (+15.7)#22 66.9% (+19.6)#1,997
23. Fowlerville 86.4% 70.8% (+15.6)#23 66.9% (+19.5)#2,011
24. Rothbury 86.3% 70.8% (+15.5)#24 66.9% (+19.4)#2,031
25. Detroit Beach 86.2% 70.8% (+15.4)#25 66.9% (+19.3)#2,047
26. Emmett 86.2% 70.8% (+15.4)#26 66.9% (+19.3)#2,050
27. Clio 85.8% 70.8% (+15.0)#27 66.9% (+18.9)#2,131
28. Constantine 85.8% 70.8% (+15.0)#28 66.9% (+18.9)#2,134
29. Riverview 85.6% 70.8% (+14.8)#29 66.9% (+18.7)#2,186
30. Oakley 85.6% 70.8% (+14.8)#30 66.9% (+18.7)#2,191
31. Marcellus 85.0% 70.8% (+14.2)#31 66.9% (+18.1)#2,355
32. New Troy 84.9% 70.8% (+14.1)#32 66.9% (+18.0)#2,364
33. Luther 84.8% 70.8% (+14.0)#33 66.9% (+17.9)#2,393
34. Barryton 84.7% 70.8% (+14.0)#34 66.9% (+17.8)#2,400
35. Caseville 84.6% 70.8% (+13.8)#35 66.9% (+17.7)#2,453
36. Litchfield 84.4% 70.8% (+13.7)#36 66.9% (+17.5)#2,491
37. Omer 84.4% 70.8% (+13.6)#37 66.9% (+17.5)#2,505
38. Ravenna 84.3% 70.8% (+13.5)#38 66.9% (+17.4)#2,512
39. Wolf Lake 84.3% 70.8% (+13.5)#39 66.9% (+17.4)#2,513
40. Palmer 84.1% 70.8% (+13.4)#40 66.9% (+17.2)#2,569
41. Stony Point 84.1% 70.8% (+13.3)#41 66.9% (+17.2)#2,578
42. Allen 84.1% 70.8% (+13.3)#42 66.9% (+17.2)#2,592
43. Beechwood 83.9% 70.8% (+13.1)#43 66.9% (+17.0)#2,645
44. Rapid River 83.8% 70.8% (+13.0)#44 66.9% (+16.9)#2,664
45. Bellevue 83.6% 70.8% (+12.9)#45 66.9% (+16.7)#2,702
46. Clifford 83.6% 70.8% (+12.9)#46 66.9% (+16.7)#2,703
47. Coleman 83.5% 70.8% (+12.8)#47 66.9% (+16.7)#2,726
48. Filer City 83.5% 70.8% (+12.7)#48 66.9% (+16.6)#2,740
49. Middletown 83.3% 70.8% (+12.6)#49 66.9% (+16.4)#2,773
50. Naubinway 83.3% 70.8% (+12.6)#50 66.9% (+16.4)#2,804
51. Grawn 83.1% 70.8% (+12.3)#51 66.9% (+16.2)#2,866
52. Hartland 83.0% 70.8% (+12.2)#52 66.9% (+16.1)#2,888
53. Manton 83.0% 70.8% (+12.2)#53 66.9% (+16.1)#2,891
54. Falmouth 83.0% 70.8% (+12.2)#54 66.9% (+16.1)#2,895
55. Alpha 83.0% 70.8% (+12.2)#55 66.9% (+16.1)#2,896
56. Carsonville 83.0% 70.8% (+12.2)#56 66.9% (+16.1)#2,906
57. Sparta 82.9% 70.8% (+12.1)#57 66.9% (+16.0)#2,933
58. Beaverton 82.9% 70.8% (+12.1)#58 66.9% (+16.0)#2,939
59. Otter Lake 82.8% 70.8% (+12.1)#59 66.9% (+16.0)#2,949
60. Muir 82.8% 70.8% (+12.0)#60 66.9% (+15.9)#2,955
61. Oscoda 82.8% 70.8% (+12.0)#61 66.9% (+15.9)#2,962
62. Kalkaska 82.8% 70.8% (+12.0)#62 66.9% (+15.9)#2,977
63. South Rockwood 82.7% 70.8% (+12.0)#63 66.9% (+15.8)#2,983
64. Howell 82.7% 70.8% (+11.9)#64 66.9% (+15.8)#2,990
65. Waldron 82.7% 70.8% (+11.9)#65 66.9% (+15.8)#2,992
66. Woodland 82.7% 70.8% (+11.9)#66 66.9% (+15.8)#2,996
67. Otsego 82.6% 70.8% (+11.9)#67 66.9% (+15.7)#3,003
68. Kent City 82.6% 70.8% (+11.8)#68 66.9% (+15.7)#3,024
69. Millburg 82.5% 70.8% (+11.8)#69 66.9% (+15.6)#3,040
70. Vandalia 82.4% 70.8% (+11.6)#70 66.9% (+15.5)#3,088
71. Brownlee Park 82.3% 70.8% (+11.6)#71 66.9% (+15.4)#3,120
72. West Monroe 82.2% 70.8% (+11.5)#72 66.9% (+15.3)#3,142
73. Mayville 82.2% 70.8% (+11.4)#73 66.9% (+15.3)#3,162
74. Nessen City 82.1% 70.8% (+11.4)#74 66.9% (+15.3)#3,170
75. Burlington 82.1% 70.8% (+11.3)#75 66.9% (+15.2)#3,183
76. Pinconning 82.1% 70.8% (+11.3)#76 66.9% (+15.2)#3,184
77. Taylor 82.1% 70.8% (+11.3)#77 66.9% (+15.2)#3,203
78. Mears 82.0% 70.8% (+11.2)#78 66.9% (+15.1)#3,247
79. Deerfield 81.7% 70.8% (+11.0)#79 66.9% (+14.8)#3,342
80. Scotts 81.6% 70.8% (+10.9)#80 66.9% (+14.7)#3,384
81. Dowagiac 81.6% 70.8% (+10.8)#81 66.9% (+14.7)#3,402
82. Melvin 81.6% 70.8% (+10.8)#82 66.9% (+14.7)#3,415
83. Auburn Hills 81.5% 70.8% (+10.7)#83 66.9% (+14.6)#3,455
84. Morley 81.2% 70.8% (+10.5)#84 66.9% (+14.4)#3,535
85. Posen 81.2% 70.8% (+10.4)#85 66.9% (+14.3)#3,581
86. Lincoln Park 81.1% 70.8% (+10.4)#86 66.9% (+14.3)#3,596
87. Montrose 81.1% 70.8% (+10.4)#87 66.9% (+14.2)#3,603
88. Alba 81.1% 70.8% (+10.3)#88 66.9% (+14.2)#3,605
89. Cadillac 80.8% 70.8% (+10.0)#89 66.9% (+13.9)#3,722
90. Norway 80.7% 70.8% (+9.92)#90 66.9% (+13.8)#3,783
91. Beecher 80.6% 70.8% (+9.82)#91 66.9% (+13.7)#3,830
92. Westland 80.6% 70.8% (+9.80)#92 66.9% (+13.7)#3,834
93. Owendale 80.6% 70.8% (+9.79)#93 66.9% (+13.7)#3,843
94. Garden City 80.5% 70.8% (+9.76)#94 66.9% (+13.6)#3,859
95. Bay Shore 80.5% 70.8% (+9.71)#95 66.9% (+13.6)#3,874
96. Romulus 80.4% 70.8% (+9.66)#96 66.9% (+13.5)#3,895
97. Ponshewaing 80.4% 70.8% (+9.63)#97 66.9% (+13.5)#3,915
98. Nashville 80.4% 70.8% (+9.62)#98 66.9% (+13.5)#3,916
99. Bronson 80.4% 70.8% (+9.61)#99 66.9% (+13.5)#3,919
100. Petersburg 80.4% 70.8% (+9.59)#100 66.9% (+13.5)#3,925

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Private Company Employees in Michigan?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Private Company Employees in Michigan are:
#1
100.0%
#2
100.0%
#3
91.2%
#4
90.8%
#5
90.6%
#6
90.4%
#7
89.9%
#8
89.7%
#9
87.8%
#10
87.5%
What city has the Highest Percentage of Private Company Employees in Michigan?
Oden has the Highest Percentage of Private Company Employees in Michigan with 100.0%.
What is the Percentage of Private Company Employees in the State of Michigan?
Percentage of Private Company Employees in Michigan is 70.8%.
What is the Percentage of Private Company Employees in the United States?
Percentage of Private Company Employees in the United States is 66.9%.