Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population with a Degree in Social Sciences in Michigan

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Social Sciences
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Michigan
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population with a Degree in Social Sciences in Michigan

0.0%
50.0%
Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population with a Degree in Social Sciences in Michigan Map

Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population with a Degree in Social Sciences in Michigan

City % Graduates vs State vs National
1. Wellston 46.2% 5.9% (+40.3)#1 8.1% (+38.1)#239
2. Pellston 42.1% 5.9% (+36.3)#2 8.1% (+34.0)#277
3. Zilwaukee 40.1% 5.9% (+34.2)#3 8.1% (+32.0)#301
4. Mears 39.1% 5.9% (+33.3)#4 8.1% (+31.1)#329
5. Jasper 38.1% 5.9% (+32.2)#5 8.1% (+30.0)#343
6. Oakley 35.3% 5.9% (+29.4)#6 8.1% (+27.2)#394
7. Manistee Lake 33.8% 5.9% (+27.9)#7 8.1% (+25.7)#422
8. Wolverine 30.0% 5.9% (+24.1)#8 8.1% (+21.9)#541
9. Newberry 28.3% 5.9% (+22.4)#9 8.1% (+20.2)#622
10. Fulton 26.8% 5.9% (+21.0)#10 8.1% (+18.8)#691
11. Harrisville 26.7% 5.9% (+20.9)#11 8.1% (+18.7)#695
12. Alpha 25.0% 5.9% (+19.1)#12 8.1% (+16.9)#812
13. Beulah 24.6% 5.9% (+18.8)#13 8.1% (+16.5)#855
14. Mecosta 24.3% 5.9% (+18.5)#14 8.1% (+16.3)#868
15. Galien 23.4% 5.9% (+17.5)#15 8.1% (+15.3)#936
16. Bronson 23.2% 5.9% (+17.4)#16 8.1% (+15.2)#946
17. Millersburg 23.1% 5.9% (+17.2)#17 8.1% (+15.0)#958
18. Luther 22.2% 5.9% (+16.4)#18 8.1% (+14.2)#1,037
19. Posen 22.2% 5.9% (+16.4)#19 8.1% (+14.2)#1,040
20. Ironton 22.2% 5.9% (+16.4)#20 8.1% (+14.2)#1,044
21. Lake Gogebic 22.2% 5.9% (+16.4)#21 8.1% (+14.2)#1,048
22. Gaastra 21.4% 5.9% (+15.6)#22 8.1% (+13.4)#1,129
23. Big Bay 20.0% 5.9% (+14.1)#23 8.1% (+11.9)#1,298
24. Otter Lake 20.0% 5.9% (+14.1)#24 8.1% (+11.9)#1,305
25. Paris 20.0% 5.9% (+14.1)#25 8.1% (+11.9)#1,310
26. Armada 19.6% 5.9% (+13.8)#26 8.1% (+11.5)#1,379
27. Dowagiac 19.1% 5.9% (+13.3)#27 8.1% (+11.0)#1,457
28. Cambria 19.0% 5.9% (+13.2)#28 8.1% (+11.0)#1,472
29. Barton Hills 18.2% 5.9% (+12.4)#29 8.1% (+10.2)#1,601
30. Akron 18.2% 5.9% (+12.3)#30 8.1% (+10.1)#1,618
31. Alden 18.2% 5.9% (+12.3)#31 8.1% (+10.1)#1,630
32. Kaleva 17.9% 5.9% (+12.0)#32 8.1% (+9.79)#1,672
33. Boyne Falls 17.1% 5.9% (+11.2)#33 8.1% (+9.00)#1,831
34. Mackinaw City 17.0% 5.9% (+11.1)#34 8.1% (+8.90)#1,853
35. Muir 16.7% 5.9% (+10.8)#35 8.1% (+8.60)#1,929
36. Roscommon 16.4% 5.9% (+10.6)#36 8.1% (+8.35)#2,004
37. Bloomingdale 16.3% 5.9% (+10.4)#37 8.1% (+8.21)#2,030
38. Painesdale 16.1% 5.9% (+10.3)#38 8.1% (+8.06)#2,076
39. Mesick 15.4% 5.9% (+9.53)#39 8.1% (+7.31)#2,274
40. Lake Victoria 15.2% 5.9% (+9.37)#40 8.1% (+7.16)#2,331
41. Mackinac Island 15.2% 5.9% (+9.33)#41 8.1% (+7.12)#2,342
42. Nashville 15.0% 5.9% (+9.10)#42 8.1% (+6.88)#2,419
43. Grosse Pointe Farms 14.9% 5.9% (+9.04)#43 8.1% (+6.83)#2,436
44. Marion 14.6% 5.9% (+8.78)#44 8.1% (+6.56)#2,523
45. Dewitt 14.4% 5.9% (+8.56)#45 8.1% (+6.35)#2,592
46. East Lansing 14.3% 5.9% (+8.45)#46 8.1% (+6.23)#2,616
47. Carney 14.3% 5.9% (+8.43)#47 8.1% (+6.21)#2,656
48. Eastport 14.1% 5.9% (+8.28)#48 8.1% (+6.06)#2,713
49. Concord 14.1% 5.9% (+8.21)#49 8.1% (+5.99)#2,741
50. Durand 13.8% 5.9% (+7.95)#50 8.1% (+5.73)#2,839
51. Empire 13.4% 5.9% (+7.56)#51 8.1% (+5.34)#3,010
52. Lupton 13.3% 5.9% (+7.48)#52 8.1% (+5.26)#3,068
53. Potterville 13.3% 5.9% (+7.44)#53 8.1% (+5.22)#3,091
54. Bay Shore 13.2% 5.9% (+7.34)#54 8.1% (+5.12)#3,139
55. Leslie 12.9% 5.9% (+7.08)#55 8.1% (+4.86)#3,282
56. Huntington Woods 12.8% 5.9% (+6.94)#56 8.1% (+4.72)#3,355
57. Wolf Lake 12.6% 5.9% (+6.70)#57 8.1% (+4.48)#3,480
58. Mass 12.5% 5.9% (+6.65)#58 8.1% (+4.43)#3,553
59. St Ignace 12.4% 5.9% (+6.53)#59 8.1% (+4.32)#3,611
60. Constantine 12.4% 5.9% (+6.52)#60 8.1% (+4.30)#3,617
61. Niles 12.0% 5.9% (+6.15)#61 8.1% (+3.93)#3,820
62. Marenisco 12.0% 5.9% (+6.15)#62 8.1% (+3.93)#3,829
63. Lathrup Village 11.9% 5.9% (+6.05)#63 8.1% (+3.84)#3,874
64. Plainwell 11.8% 5.9% (+5.97)#64 8.1% (+3.76)#3,913
65. Port Sanilac 11.6% 5.9% (+5.77)#65 8.1% (+3.56)#4,050
66. Copper Harbor 11.6% 5.9% (+5.77)#66 8.1% (+3.56)#4,056
67. Beecher 11.6% 5.9% (+5.75)#67 8.1% (+3.53)#4,075
68. Perrinton 11.5% 5.9% (+5.68)#68 8.1% (+3.47)#4,128
69. Beverly Hills 11.4% 5.9% (+5.55)#69 8.1% (+3.34)#4,211
70. Petoskey 11.4% 5.9% (+5.50)#70 8.1% (+3.28)#4,254
71. Chesaning 11.2% 5.9% (+5.35)#71 8.1% (+3.14)#4,361
72. Bloomfield Hills 11.2% 5.9% (+5.34)#72 8.1% (+3.12)#4,373
73. Comstock Park 11.2% 5.9% (+5.30)#73 8.1% (+3.08)#4,390
74. Lake Michigan Beach 11.1% 5.9% (+5.29)#74 8.1% (+3.07)#4,393
75. Olivet 11.1% 5.9% (+5.26)#75 8.1% (+3.04)#4,416
76. Turner 11.1% 5.9% (+5.26)#76 8.1% (+3.04)#4,480
77. Hartford 11.0% 5.9% (+5.15)#77 8.1% (+2.93)#4,557
78. Lincoln Park 11.0% 5.9% (+5.13)#78 8.1% (+2.92)#4,566
79. Ravenna 10.9% 5.9% (+5.04)#79 8.1% (+2.82)#4,629
80. Ishpeming 10.8% 5.9% (+4.95)#80 8.1% (+2.73)#4,703
81. Davison 10.7% 5.9% (+4.86)#81 8.1% (+2.64)#4,780
82. Belleville 10.7% 5.9% (+4.80)#82 8.1% (+2.58)#4,846
83. Auburn 10.6% 5.9% (+4.79)#83 8.1% (+2.57)#4,857
84. Port Austin 10.6% 5.9% (+4.78)#84 8.1% (+2.57)#4,862
85. Keego Harbor 10.6% 5.9% (+4.76)#85 8.1% (+2.55)#4,880
86. Orchard Lake Village 10.6% 5.9% (+4.76)#86 8.1% (+2.54)#4,883
87. Arcadia 10.6% 5.9% (+4.75)#87 8.1% (+2.53)#4,894
88. Sturgis 10.6% 5.9% (+4.72)#88 8.1% (+2.50)#4,919
89. Manistee 10.6% 5.9% (+4.70)#89 8.1% (+2.48)#4,928
90. Dundee 10.5% 5.9% (+4.65)#90 8.1% (+2.44)#4,988
91. Grosse Pointe Woods 10.5% 5.9% (+4.61)#91 8.1% (+2.40)#5,012
92. Breckenridge 10.4% 5.9% (+4.58)#92 8.1% (+2.37)#5,039
93. Clio 10.4% 5.9% (+4.56)#93 8.1% (+2.34)#5,068
94. Grand Beach 10.4% 5.9% (+4.53)#94 8.1% (+2.31)#5,095
95. Birmingham 10.4% 5.9% (+4.51)#95 8.1% (+2.29)#5,111
96. Coldwater 10.2% 5.9% (+4.38)#96 8.1% (+2.17)#5,228
97. Shepherd 10.2% 5.9% (+4.37)#97 8.1% (+2.16)#5,245
98. Ypsilanti 10.2% 5.9% (+4.35)#98 8.1% (+2.13)#5,270
99. Muskegon Heights 10.1% 5.9% (+4.29)#99 8.1% (+2.07)#5,319
100. Suttons Bay 10.1% 5.9% (+4.29)#100 8.1% (+2.07)#5,320

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population with a Degree in Social Sciences in Michigan?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population with a Degree in Social Sciences in Michigan are:
#1
46.2%
#2
42.1%
#3
40.1%
#4
38.1%
#5
35.3%
#6
33.8%
#7
30.0%
#8
28.3%
#9
26.7%
#10
25.0%
What city has the Highest Percentage of Population with a Degree in Social Sciences in Michigan?
Wellston has the Highest Percentage of Population with a Degree in Social Sciences in Michigan with 46.2%.
What is the Percentage of Population with a Degree in Social Sciences in the State of Michigan?
Percentage of Population with a Degree in Social Sciences in Michigan is 5.9%.
What is the Percentage of Population with a Degree in Social Sciences in the United States?
Percentage of Population with a Degree in Social Sciences in the United States is 8.1%.