Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Females in Michigan

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Highest Poverty | Single Female
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Michigan
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Females in Michigan

0.0%
100.0%
Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Females in Michigan Map

Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Females in Michigan

City Single Female Poverty vs State vs National
1. Millburg 100.0% 25.4% (+74.6)#1 24.1% (+75.9)#268
2. Dodgeville 100.0% 25.4% (+74.6)#2 24.1% (+75.9)#284
3. Shaftsburg 100.0% 25.4% (+74.6)#3 24.1% (+75.9)#315
4. Palo 100.0% 25.4% (+74.6)#4 24.1% (+75.9)#321
5. Brimley 100.0% 25.4% (+74.6)#5 24.1% (+75.9)#345
6. Oden 100.0% 25.4% (+74.6)#6 24.1% (+75.9)#403
7. Bendon 100.0% 25.4% (+74.6)#7 24.1% (+75.9)#426
8. Falmouth 100.0% 25.4% (+74.6)#8 24.1% (+75.9)#485
9. Hurontown 100.0% 25.4% (+74.6)#9 24.1% (+75.9)#494
10. Mohawk 100.0% 25.4% (+74.6)#10 24.1% (+75.9)#519
11. Allen 100.0% 25.4% (+74.6)#11 24.1% (+75.9)#550
12. Jennings 100.0% 25.4% (+74.6)#12 24.1% (+75.9)#570
13. Ironton 100.0% 25.4% (+74.6)#13 24.1% (+75.9)#632
14. Turner 100.0% 25.4% (+74.6)#14 24.1% (+75.9)#843
15. Calumet 94.4% 25.4% (+69.1)#15 24.1% (+70.4)#983
16. Paris 88.9% 25.4% (+63.5)#16 24.1% (+64.8)#1,067
17. Twining 87.5% 25.4% (+62.1)#17 24.1% (+63.4)#1,100
18. Hopkins 86.7% 25.4% (+61.3)#18 24.1% (+62.6)#1,112
19. Elm Hall 85.7% 25.4% (+60.3)#19 24.1% (+61.6)#1,152
20. Empire 82.4% 25.4% (+57.0)#20 24.1% (+58.3)#1,249
21. Fountain 82.4% 25.4% (+57.0)#21 24.1% (+58.3)#1,252
22. Attica 81.6% 25.4% (+56.2)#22 24.1% (+57.5)#1,280
23. Lakeview 81.0% 25.4% (+55.6)#23 24.1% (+56.9)#1,303
24. Paw Paw Lake 80.2% 25.4% (+54.9)#24 24.1% (+56.2)#1,313
25. Weidman 80.0% 25.4% (+54.6)#25 24.1% (+55.9)#1,318
26. Indian River 79.0% 25.4% (+53.6)#26 24.1% (+55.0)#1,373
27. White Pine 78.6% 25.4% (+53.2)#27 24.1% (+54.5)#1,390
28. Lakes Of The North 78.0% 25.4% (+52.6)#28 24.1% (+53.9)#1,408
29. Onaway 77.1% 25.4% (+51.8)#29 24.1% (+53.1)#1,461
30. Detroit Beach 74.9% 25.4% (+49.5)#30 24.1% (+50.8)#1,597
31. Lake Leann 74.4% 25.4% (+49.0)#31 24.1% (+50.3)#1,610
32. Lawrence 73.8% 25.4% (+48.4)#32 24.1% (+49.7)#1,633
33. Mackinac Island 73.3% 25.4% (+48.0)#33 24.1% (+49.3)#1,655
34. Kalkaska 72.2% 25.4% (+46.8)#34 24.1% (+48.1)#1,715
35. Gagetown 71.4% 25.4% (+46.0)#35 24.1% (+47.4)#1,759
36. Walkerville 69.2% 25.4% (+43.8)#36 24.1% (+45.2)#1,925
37. Parkdale 69.0% 25.4% (+43.7)#37 24.1% (+45.0)#1,937
38. Barnes Lake 69.0% 25.4% (+43.6)#38 24.1% (+44.9)#1,938
39. Atlantic Mine 68.4% 25.4% (+43.0)#39 24.1% (+44.3)#1,992
40. Charlevoix 66.7% 25.4% (+41.3)#40 24.1% (+42.6)#2,080
41. Harrison 66.7% 25.4% (+41.3)#41 24.1% (+42.6)#2,081
42. Amasa 66.7% 25.4% (+41.3)#42 24.1% (+42.6)#2,145
43. Lincoln 66.7% 25.4% (+41.3)#43 24.1% (+42.6)#2,156
44. Millersburg 66.7% 25.4% (+41.3)#44 24.1% (+42.6)#2,183
45. Pierson 66.7% 25.4% (+41.3)#45 24.1% (+42.6)#2,194
46. Morley 63.9% 25.4% (+38.5)#46 24.1% (+39.8)#2,410
47. Minden City 63.6% 25.4% (+38.3)#47 24.1% (+39.6)#2,439
48. Colon 63.0% 25.4% (+37.7)#48 24.1% (+39.0)#2,489
49. Breedsville 62.5% 25.4% (+37.1)#49 24.1% (+38.4)#2,560
50. Marenisco 62.5% 25.4% (+37.1)#50 24.1% (+38.4)#2,564
51. Gladstone 62.4% 25.4% (+37.0)#51 24.1% (+38.3)#2,581
52. Zeba 62.1% 25.4% (+36.7)#52 24.1% (+38.0)#2,601
53. Kincheloe 61.6% 25.4% (+36.2)#53 24.1% (+37.5)#2,644
54. South Haven 61.3% 25.4% (+35.9)#54 24.1% (+37.2)#2,677
55. Schoolcraft 60.6% 25.4% (+35.2)#55 24.1% (+36.5)#2,744
56. Manistique 60.3% 25.4% (+34.9)#56 24.1% (+36.2)#2,773
57. Benton Harbor 60.0% 25.4% (+34.7)#57 24.1% (+36.0)#2,784
58. Port Hope 60.0% 25.4% (+34.6)#58 24.1% (+35.9)#2,839
59. Mcbride 60.0% 25.4% (+34.6)#59 24.1% (+35.9)#2,854
60. Arcadia 60.0% 25.4% (+34.6)#60 24.1% (+35.9)#2,866
61. Port Sanilac 59.6% 25.4% (+34.2)#61 24.1% (+35.5)#2,906
62. New Lothrop 59.3% 25.4% (+33.9)#62 24.1% (+35.2)#2,940
63. Harrisville 59.3% 25.4% (+33.9)#63 24.1% (+35.2)#2,942
64. Imlay City 59.2% 25.4% (+33.8)#64 24.1% (+35.1)#2,946
65. Alma 58.9% 25.4% (+33.6)#65 24.1% (+34.9)#2,980
66. Woodland 58.8% 25.4% (+33.4)#66 24.1% (+34.7)#3,001
67. Tustin 58.3% 25.4% (+33.0)#67 24.1% (+34.3)#3,062
68. Camden 58.2% 25.4% (+32.8)#68 24.1% (+34.1)#3,070
69. Freeport 57.4% 25.4% (+32.1)#69 24.1% (+33.4)#3,126
70. River Rouge 57.1% 25.4% (+31.7)#70 24.1% (+33.0)#3,223
71. Evart 56.9% 25.4% (+31.5)#71 24.1% (+32.8)#3,239
72. Yale 56.8% 25.4% (+31.4)#72 24.1% (+32.7)#3,252
73. Luna Pier 56.6% 25.4% (+31.2)#73 24.1% (+32.5)#3,271
74. South Boardman 56.5% 25.4% (+31.1)#74 24.1% (+32.4)#3,282
75. Almont 56.1% 25.4% (+30.7)#75 24.1% (+32.0)#3,342
76. Saranac 55.1% 25.4% (+29.7)#76 24.1% (+31.0)#3,473
77. Kingston 54.5% 25.4% (+29.2)#77 24.1% (+30.5)#3,543
78. Clare 54.5% 25.4% (+29.1)#78 24.1% (+30.4)#3,559
79. Jasper 54.2% 25.4% (+28.8)#79 24.1% (+30.1)#3,595
80. Napoleon 53.7% 25.4% (+28.3)#80 24.1% (+29.6)#3,664
81. Hersey 53.3% 25.4% (+28.0)#81 24.1% (+29.3)#3,722
82. Dowagiac 53.1% 25.4% (+27.7)#82 24.1% (+29.0)#3,760
83. Mesick 52.9% 25.4% (+27.6)#83 24.1% (+28.9)#3,784
84. Manitou Beach Devils Lake 52.9% 25.4% (+27.5)#84 24.1% (+28.8)#3,795
85. Alpena 52.8% 25.4% (+27.4)#85 24.1% (+28.7)#3,806
86. Whitehall 52.6% 25.4% (+27.2)#86 24.1% (+28.5)#3,838
87. Maple Rapids 52.3% 25.4% (+26.9)#87 24.1% (+28.2)#3,878
88. Millington 52.2% 25.4% (+26.9)#88 24.1% (+28.2)#3,880
89. Scottville 51.9% 25.4% (+26.5)#89 24.1% (+27.8)#3,933
90. Crystal Falls 51.8% 25.4% (+26.4)#90 24.1% (+27.7)#3,946
91. Cassopolis 51.8% 25.4% (+26.4)#91 24.1% (+27.7)#3,947
92. Bloomingdale 51.5% 25.4% (+26.1)#92 24.1% (+27.4)#3,983
93. Fennville 51.3% 25.4% (+25.9)#93 24.1% (+27.2)#4,012
94. Springport 50.9% 25.4% (+25.6)#94 24.1% (+26.9)#4,048
95. Deckerville 50.7% 25.4% (+25.3)#95 24.1% (+26.6)#4,072
96. Ortonville 50.6% 25.4% (+25.3)#96 24.1% (+26.6)#4,079
97. Woodland Beach 50.5% 25.4% (+25.1)#97 24.1% (+26.4)#4,089
98. Mackinaw City 50.0% 25.4% (+24.6)#98 24.1% (+25.9)#4,193
99. Thompsonville 50.0% 25.4% (+24.6)#99 24.1% (+25.9)#4,241
100. Copper City 50.0% 25.4% (+24.6)#100 24.1% (+25.9)#4,337

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Females in Michigan?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Females in Michigan are:
#1
100.0%
#2
100.0%
#3
100.0%
#4
100.0%
#5
100.0%
#6
100.0%
#7
94.4%
#8
87.5%
#9
86.7%
#10
82.4%
What city has the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Females in Michigan?
Oden has the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Females in Michigan with 100.0%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Single Females in the State of Michigan?
Poverty Level Among Single Females in Michigan is 25.4%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Single Females in the United States?
Poverty Level Among Single Females in the United States is 24.1%.