Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Manufacturing in Michigan

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Manufacturing
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Michigan
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Manufacturing in Michigan

0.0%
80.0%
Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Manufacturing in Michigan Map

Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Manufacturing in Michigan

City % Employed vs State vs National
1. Boon 60.9% 18.6% (+42.3)#1 10.0% (+50.9)#194
2. Hickory Corners 59.1% 18.6% (+40.6)#2 10.0% (+49.1)#212
3. Nessen City 57.1% 18.6% (+38.6)#3 10.0% (+47.2)#235
4. Burr Oak 56.6% 18.6% (+38.0)#4 10.0% (+46.6)#248
5. Scotts 55.1% 18.6% (+36.5)#5 10.0% (+45.1)#275
6. Bay Shore 45.1% 18.6% (+26.6)#6 10.0% (+35.1)#547
7. Burlington 44.4% 18.6% (+25.9)#7 10.0% (+34.5)#571
8. Detroit Beach 43.2% 18.6% (+24.7)#8 10.0% (+33.2)#644
9. White Pigeon 42.9% 18.6% (+24.4)#9 10.0% (+32.9)#655
10. Bronson 42.9% 18.6% (+24.3)#10 10.0% (+32.9)#656
11. Centreville 40.8% 18.6% (+22.2)#11 10.0% (+30.8)#778
12. Minden City 40.6% 18.6% (+22.1)#12 10.0% (+30.6)#791
13. Marcellus 40.3% 18.6% (+21.7)#13 10.0% (+30.3)#814
14. Sturgis 40.1% 18.6% (+21.5)#14 10.0% (+30.1)#828
15. Three Rivers 39.6% 18.6% (+21.0)#15 10.0% (+29.6)#866
16. Melvin 39.5% 18.6% (+20.9)#16 10.0% (+29.5)#871
17. Hastings 39.2% 18.6% (+20.6)#17 10.0% (+29.2)#886
18. Morenci 38.7% 18.6% (+20.1)#18 10.0% (+28.7)#926
19. Martin 38.5% 18.6% (+20.0)#19 10.0% (+28.5)#936
20. Hubbardston 38.4% 18.6% (+19.8)#20 10.0% (+28.4)#953
21. Homer 38.2% 18.6% (+19.6)#21 10.0% (+28.2)#971
22. Mendon 37.8% 18.6% (+19.3)#22 10.0% (+27.9)#998
23. New Troy 37.8% 18.6% (+19.2)#23 10.0% (+27.8)#1,002
24. Port Hope 37.2% 18.6% (+18.6)#24 10.0% (+27.2)#1,043
25. Eagle 37.1% 18.6% (+18.5)#25 10.0% (+27.1)#1,054
26. Wolf Lake 37.0% 18.6% (+18.5)#26 10.0% (+27.0)#1,061
27. Howard City 36.3% 18.6% (+17.8)#27 10.0% (+26.4)#1,132
28. Clifford 36.2% 18.6% (+17.6)#28 10.0% (+26.2)#1,145
29. Waldron 35.9% 18.6% (+17.3)#29 10.0% (+25.9)#1,174
30. Twin Lake 35.4% 18.6% (+16.8)#30 10.0% (+25.4)#1,252
31. East Jordan 35.0% 18.6% (+16.4)#31 10.0% (+25.0)#1,289
32. Cambria 34.9% 18.6% (+16.3)#32 10.0% (+24.9)#1,298
33. Bay Port 34.7% 18.6% (+16.2)#33 10.0% (+24.8)#1,317
34. Barnes Lake 34.5% 18.6% (+15.9)#34 10.0% (+24.5)#1,347
35. Constantine 34.3% 18.6% (+15.7)#35 10.0% (+24.3)#1,381
36. Kinde 34.2% 18.6% (+15.6)#36 10.0% (+24.2)#1,390
37. Owendale 33.9% 18.6% (+15.3)#37 10.0% (+23.9)#1,432
38. Litchfield 33.8% 18.6% (+15.2)#38 10.0% (+23.8)#1,448
39. Menominee 33.7% 18.6% (+15.1)#39 10.0% (+23.7)#1,453
40. Quincy 33.6% 18.6% (+15.0)#40 10.0% (+23.6)#1,465
41. Palo 33.6% 18.6% (+15.0)#41 10.0% (+23.6)#1,469
42. Amasa 33.3% 18.6% (+14.8)#42 10.0% (+23.3)#1,495
43. Walkerville 33.3% 18.6% (+14.8)#43 10.0% (+23.3)#1,498
44. Nashville 33.2% 18.6% (+14.7)#44 10.0% (+23.2)#1,530
45. Pittsford 33.2% 18.6% (+14.6)#45 10.0% (+23.2)#1,539
46. Manton 32.9% 18.6% (+14.3)#46 10.0% (+22.9)#1,567
47. Weidman 32.8% 18.6% (+14.3)#47 10.0% (+22.8)#1,578
48. Allegan 32.2% 18.6% (+13.6)#48 10.0% (+22.2)#1,662
49. Wellston 32.0% 18.6% (+13.4)#49 10.0% (+22.0)#1,688
50. Farwell 31.8% 18.6% (+13.2)#50 10.0% (+21.8)#1,732
51. Ovid 31.6% 18.6% (+13.1)#51 10.0% (+21.7)#1,761
52. Lyons 31.6% 18.6% (+13.1)#52 10.0% (+21.6)#1,763
53. Vineyard Lake 31.6% 18.6% (+13.0)#53 10.0% (+21.6)#1,778
54. Otsego 31.6% 18.6% (+13.0)#54 10.0% (+21.6)#1,779
55. Newaygo 31.5% 18.6% (+12.9)#55 10.0% (+21.5)#1,790
56. Oden 31.4% 18.6% (+12.9)#56 10.0% (+21.4)#1,801
57. Hubbard Lake 31.3% 18.6% (+12.8)#57 10.0% (+21.4)#1,816
58. South Rockwood 31.3% 18.6% (+12.7)#58 10.0% (+21.3)#1,824
59. Stephenson 31.1% 18.6% (+12.6)#59 10.0% (+21.1)#1,858
60. Romeo 30.9% 18.6% (+12.4)#60 10.0% (+20.9)#1,881
61. Delton 30.8% 18.6% (+12.2)#61 10.0% (+20.8)#1,904
62. Whitehall 30.8% 18.6% (+12.2)#62 10.0% (+20.8)#1,921
63. Scottville 30.7% 18.6% (+12.2)#63 10.0% (+20.7)#1,928
64. Auburn Hills 30.6% 18.6% (+12.0)#64 10.0% (+20.6)#1,962
65. Luther 30.6% 18.6% (+12.0)#65 10.0% (+20.6)#1,968
66. Tower 30.4% 18.6% (+11.8)#66 10.0% (+20.4)#1,998
67. Middleville 30.3% 18.6% (+11.8)#67 10.0% (+20.4)#2,005
68. Stanwood 30.3% 18.6% (+11.7)#68 10.0% (+20.3)#2,017
69. Omer 30.2% 18.6% (+11.6)#69 10.0% (+20.2)#2,034
70. Otter Lake 29.9% 18.6% (+11.4)#70 10.0% (+20.0)#2,092
71. Falmouth 29.7% 18.6% (+11.1)#71 10.0% (+19.7)#2,130
72. Hudson 29.6% 18.6% (+11.0)#72 10.0% (+19.6)#2,149
73. Reading 29.5% 18.6% (+10.9)#73 10.0% (+19.5)#2,169
74. Jennings 29.4% 18.6% (+10.8)#74 10.0% (+19.4)#2,185
75. Bear Lake 29.2% 18.6% (+10.7)#75 10.0% (+19.3)#2,222
76. Port Austin 29.2% 18.6% (+10.7)#76 10.0% (+19.2)#2,224
77. Bancroft 29.2% 18.6% (+10.6)#77 10.0% (+19.2)#2,235
78. Ubly 29.1% 18.6% (+10.6)#78 10.0% (+19.2)#2,249
79. Elkton 29.1% 18.6% (+10.5)#79 10.0% (+19.1)#2,265
80. Lawton 29.0% 18.6% (+10.4)#80 10.0% (+19.0)#2,288
81. Vandalia 29.0% 18.6% (+10.4)#81 10.0% (+19.0)#2,295
82. Edwardsburg 28.9% 18.6% (+10.4)#82 10.0% (+19.0)#2,298
83. Loomis 28.9% 18.6% (+10.3)#83 10.0% (+18.9)#2,321
84. St Joseph 28.8% 18.6% (+10.2)#84 10.0% (+18.8)#2,334
85. Sheridan 28.7% 18.6% (+10.1)#85 10.0% (+18.7)#2,354
86. Morley 28.7% 18.6% (+10.1)#86 10.0% (+18.7)#2,355
87. Shelby 28.7% 18.6% (+10.1)#87 10.0% (+18.7)#2,356
88. Gagetown 28.6% 18.6% (+10.0)#88 10.0% (+18.6)#2,387
89. Daggett 28.6% 18.6% (+10.0)#89 10.0% (+18.6)#2,391
90. Lake Gogebic 28.6% 18.6% (+10.0)#90 10.0% (+18.6)#2,396
91. Free Soil 28.6% 18.6% (+10.0)#91 10.0% (+18.6)#2,399
92. Burt 28.5% 18.6% (+9.93)#92 10.0% (+18.5)#2,422
93. Dowling 28.5% 18.6% (+9.90)#93 10.0% (+18.5)#2,426
94. Decatur 28.4% 18.6% (+9.79)#94 10.0% (+18.4)#2,451
95. North Adams 28.3% 18.6% (+9.77)#95 10.0% (+18.3)#2,455
96. Woodland 28.3% 18.6% (+9.76)#96 10.0% (+18.3)#2,461
97. Buchanan 28.3% 18.6% (+9.72)#97 10.0% (+18.3)#2,470
98. Coleman 28.3% 18.6% (+9.69)#98 10.0% (+18.3)#2,482
99. Lake City 28.3% 18.6% (+9.69)#99 10.0% (+18.3)#2,484
100. Concord 28.1% 18.6% (+9.52)#100 10.0% (+18.1)#2,537

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Manufacturing in Michigan?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Manufacturing in Michigan are:
#1
60.9%
#2
59.1%
#3
57.1%
#4
56.6%
#5
45.1%
#6
44.4%
#7
43.2%
#8
42.9%
#9
42.9%
#10
40.8%
What city has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Manufacturing in Michigan?
Boon has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Manufacturing in Michigan with 60.9%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Manufacturing in the State of Michigan?
Percentage of Population Employed in Manufacturing in Michigan is 18.6%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Manufacturing in the United States?
Percentage of Population Employed in Manufacturing in the United States is 10.0%.