Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Fathers in Michigan

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Highest Poverty | Single Father
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Michigan
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Fathers in Michigan

0.0%
100.0%
Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Fathers in Michigan Map

Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Fathers in Michigan

City Single Father Poverty vs State vs National
1. Fremont 100.0% 15.1% (+84.9)#1 13.7% (+86.3)#93
2. Norway 100.0% 15.1% (+84.9)#2 13.7% (+86.3)#181
3. Detroit Beach 100.0% 15.1% (+84.9)#3 13.7% (+86.3)#245
4. Evart 100.0% 15.1% (+84.9)#4 13.7% (+86.3)#304
5. Lake Linden 100.0% 15.1% (+84.9)#5 13.7% (+86.3)#426
6. Baldwin 100.0% 15.1% (+84.9)#6 13.7% (+86.3)#469
7. Au Gres 100.0% 15.1% (+84.9)#7 13.7% (+86.3)#514
8. Hopkins 100.0% 15.1% (+84.9)#8 13.7% (+86.3)#573
9. Middletown 100.0% 15.1% (+84.9)#9 13.7% (+86.3)#601
10. Tekonsha 100.0% 15.1% (+84.9)#10 13.7% (+86.3)#622
11. Vernon 100.0% 15.1% (+84.9)#11 13.7% (+86.3)#655
12. Hermansville 100.0% 15.1% (+84.9)#12 13.7% (+86.3)#664
13. Galien 100.0% 15.1% (+84.9)#13 13.7% (+86.3)#733
14. Rosebush 100.0% 15.1% (+84.9)#14 13.7% (+86.3)#792
15. Zeba 100.0% 15.1% (+84.9)#15 13.7% (+86.3)#813
16. Eastport 100.0% 15.1% (+84.9)#16 13.7% (+86.3)#836
17. Eastlake 100.0% 15.1% (+84.9)#17 13.7% (+86.3)#905
18. Owendale 100.0% 15.1% (+84.9)#18 13.7% (+86.3)#917
19. Amasa 100.0% 15.1% (+84.9)#19 13.7% (+86.3)#938
20. Tustin 100.0% 15.1% (+84.9)#20 13.7% (+86.3)#998
21. Minden City 100.0% 15.1% (+84.9)#21 13.7% (+86.3)#1,003
22. Eagle 100.0% 15.1% (+84.9)#22 13.7% (+86.3)#1,122
23. Ferrysburg 88.7% 15.1% (+73.6)#23 13.7% (+75.0)#1,245
24. Woodland 85.7% 15.1% (+70.6)#24 13.7% (+72.0)#1,279
25. Pittsford 84.6% 15.1% (+69.5)#25 13.7% (+70.9)#1,297
26. Richmond 82.5% 15.1% (+67.4)#26 13.7% (+68.7)#1,331
27. Winn 82.4% 15.1% (+67.3)#27 13.7% (+68.6)#1,334
28. Clayton 80.0% 15.1% (+64.9)#28 13.7% (+66.3)#1,387
29. Vassar 75.9% 15.1% (+60.9)#29 13.7% (+62.2)#1,446
30. Onaway 75.8% 15.1% (+60.7)#30 13.7% (+62.0)#1,448
31. Charlevoix 75.0% 15.1% (+59.9)#31 13.7% (+61.3)#1,460
32. White Pigeon 75.0% 15.1% (+59.9)#32 13.7% (+61.3)#1,465
33. St Charles 73.3% 15.1% (+58.3)#33 13.7% (+59.6)#1,517
34. Mount Morris 72.8% 15.1% (+57.8)#34 13.7% (+59.1)#1,528
35. Brown City 71.9% 15.1% (+56.8)#35 13.7% (+58.2)#1,553
36. Lake Isabella 71.4% 15.1% (+56.4)#36 13.7% (+57.7)#1,560
37. Mio 70.6% 15.1% (+55.5)#37 13.7% (+56.9)#1,594
38. Fostoria 70.0% 15.1% (+54.9)#38 13.7% (+56.3)#1,609
39. Frankfort 66.7% 15.1% (+51.6)#39 13.7% (+53.0)#1,696
40. Rothbury 66.7% 15.1% (+51.6)#40 13.7% (+53.0)#1,729
41. Skidway Lake 64.6% 15.1% (+49.6)#41 13.7% (+50.9)#1,783
42. Elsie 62.5% 15.1% (+47.4)#42 13.7% (+48.8)#1,837
43. Bellaire 62.5% 15.1% (+47.4)#43 13.7% (+48.8)#1,839
44. Westphalia 62.5% 15.1% (+47.4)#44 13.7% (+48.8)#1,840
45. River Rouge 60.6% 15.1% (+45.6)#45 13.7% (+46.9)#1,909
46. Essexville 59.3% 15.1% (+44.2)#46 13.7% (+45.5)#1,972
47. Wakefield 57.6% 15.1% (+42.5)#47 13.7% (+43.9)#2,034
48. Pinckney 57.1% 15.1% (+42.1)#48 13.7% (+43.4)#2,043
49. Fair Plain 54.1% 15.1% (+39.0)#49 13.7% (+40.4)#2,186
50. Deckerville 53.8% 15.1% (+38.8)#50 13.7% (+40.1)#2,200
51. Sandusky 53.7% 15.1% (+38.6)#51 13.7% (+40.0)#2,205
52. Almont 53.7% 15.1% (+38.6)#52 13.7% (+39.9)#2,206
53. Athens 53.3% 15.1% (+38.3)#53 13.7% (+39.6)#2,224
54. Gladwin 51.9% 15.1% (+36.8)#54 13.7% (+38.1)#2,280
55. Wayne 51.5% 15.1% (+36.4)#55 13.7% (+37.8)#2,298
56. South Monroe 51.0% 15.1% (+35.9)#56 13.7% (+37.3)#2,313
57. Armada 50.0% 15.1% (+34.9)#57 13.7% (+36.3)#2,356
58. Camden 50.0% 15.1% (+34.9)#58 13.7% (+36.3)#2,413
59. Gobles 50.0% 15.1% (+34.9)#59 13.7% (+36.3)#2,417
60. Eau Claire 50.0% 15.1% (+34.9)#60 13.7% (+36.3)#2,420
61. Mecosta 50.0% 15.1% (+34.9)#61 13.7% (+36.3)#2,435
62. Sterling 50.0% 15.1% (+34.9)#62 13.7% (+36.3)#2,442
63. Boyne Falls 50.0% 15.1% (+34.9)#63 13.7% (+36.3)#2,466
64. Highland Park 49.1% 15.1% (+34.0)#64 13.7% (+35.4)#2,530
65. Cassopolis 48.3% 15.1% (+33.2)#65 13.7% (+34.6)#2,554
66. Lowell 47.6% 15.1% (+32.5)#66 13.7% (+33.9)#2,578
67. Belleville 47.1% 15.1% (+32.0)#67 13.7% (+33.3)#2,599
68. Ishpeming 47.0% 15.1% (+31.9)#68 13.7% (+33.3)#2,609
69. Morrice 46.7% 15.1% (+31.6)#69 13.7% (+33.0)#2,617
70. Shepherd 45.8% 15.1% (+30.8)#70 13.7% (+32.1)#2,655
71. New Baltimore 44.7% 15.1% (+29.6)#71 13.7% (+31.0)#2,702
72. Belding 44.0% 15.1% (+29.0)#72 13.7% (+30.3)#2,736
73. Coleman 42.9% 15.1% (+27.8)#73 13.7% (+29.1)#2,808
74. Benton Heights 42.7% 15.1% (+27.6)#74 13.7% (+29.0)#2,826
75. Wolf Lake 41.0% 15.1% (+25.9)#75 13.7% (+27.3)#2,912
76. Kincheloe 40.6% 15.1% (+25.6)#76 13.7% (+26.9)#2,926
77. Springfield 40.5% 15.1% (+25.5)#77 13.7% (+26.8)#2,929
78. Climax 40.0% 15.1% (+24.9)#78 13.7% (+26.3)#2,976
79. St Johns 39.4% 15.1% (+24.4)#79 13.7% (+25.7)#3,033
80. Bessemer 38.8% 15.1% (+23.7)#80 13.7% (+25.1)#3,072
81. Whittemore 38.1% 15.1% (+23.0)#81 13.7% (+24.4)#3,110
82. Zilwaukee 37.5% 15.1% (+22.4)#82 13.7% (+23.8)#3,137
83. Bellevue 37.5% 15.1% (+22.4)#83 13.7% (+23.8)#3,143
84. Lincoln 37.5% 15.1% (+22.4)#84 13.7% (+23.8)#3,158
85. Norton Shores 37.4% 15.1% (+22.3)#85 13.7% (+23.7)#3,163
86. St Helen 37.2% 15.1% (+22.1)#86 13.7% (+23.5)#3,170
87. Port Austin 36.4% 15.1% (+21.3)#87 13.7% (+22.7)#3,234
88. Brownlee Park 36.1% 15.1% (+21.0)#88 13.7% (+22.4)#3,248
89. Algonac 36.0% 15.1% (+20.9)#89 13.7% (+22.3)#3,257
90. Hillsdale 35.6% 15.1% (+20.5)#90 13.7% (+21.9)#3,292
91. Hudson 34.6% 15.1% (+19.5)#91 13.7% (+20.9)#3,359
92. Albion 33.3% 15.1% (+18.3)#92 13.7% (+19.6)#3,435
93. Reading 33.3% 15.1% (+18.3)#93 13.7% (+19.6)#3,468
94. Concord 33.3% 15.1% (+18.3)#94 13.7% (+19.6)#3,469
95. Britton 33.3% 15.1% (+18.3)#95 13.7% (+19.6)#3,499
96. Millersburg 33.3% 15.1% (+18.3)#96 13.7% (+19.6)#3,561
97. Grosse Pointe Park 32.1% 15.1% (+17.0)#97 13.7% (+18.4)#3,622
98. Pontiac 31.9% 15.1% (+16.8)#98 13.7% (+18.2)#3,634
99. Detroit 31.6% 15.1% (+16.5)#99 13.7% (+17.9)#3,653
100. Carleton 31.6% 15.1% (+16.5)#100 13.7% (+17.9)#3,659

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Fathers in Michigan?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Fathers in Michigan are:
#1
100.0%
#2
100.0%
#3
100.0%
#4
100.0%
#5
100.0%
#6
100.0%
#7
100.0%
#8
100.0%
#9
100.0%
#10
100.0%
What city has the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Fathers in Michigan?
Fremont has the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Fathers in Michigan with 100.0%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Single Fathers in the State of Michigan?
Poverty Level Among Single Fathers in Michigan is 15.1%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Single Fathers in the United States?
Poverty Level Among Single Fathers in the United States is 13.7%.