Cities with the Highest Female Poverty Level in Michigan

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Highest Poverty | Female
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Michigan
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Female Poverty Level in Michigan

0.0%
80.0%
Cities with the Highest Female Poverty Level in Michigan Map

Cities with the Highest Female Poverty Level in Michigan

City Female Poverty vs State vs National
1. Oden 73.9% 14.3% (+59.6)#1 13.7% (+60.2)#347
2. Twining 64.8% 14.3% (+50.5)#2 13.7% (+51.1)#520
3. Rockland 60.4% 14.3% (+46.1)#3 13.7% (+46.7)#651
4. Elm Hall 58.2% 14.3% (+43.9)#4 13.7% (+44.5)#735
5. Calumet 56.7% 14.3% (+42.4)#5 13.7% (+43.0)#790
6. Benton Harbor 51.3% 14.3% (+37.0)#6 13.7% (+37.6)#1,083
7. Winn 51.1% 14.3% (+36.8)#7 13.7% (+37.4)#1,096
8. Carp Lake 46.6% 14.3% (+32.3)#8 13.7% (+32.9)#1,405
9. Bendon 46.4% 14.3% (+32.1)#9 13.7% (+32.7)#1,421
10. Benton Heights 46.0% 14.3% (+31.7)#10 13.7% (+32.3)#1,450
11. River Rouge 45.1% 14.3% (+30.8)#11 13.7% (+31.4)#1,529
12. Reading 45.0% 14.3% (+30.7)#12 13.7% (+31.3)#1,542
13. Fountain 43.8% 14.3% (+29.5)#13 13.7% (+30.1)#1,653
14. Paris 43.4% 14.3% (+29.1)#14 13.7% (+29.7)#1,696
15. Weidman 41.8% 14.3% (+27.5)#15 13.7% (+28.1)#1,882
16. Walkerville 40.2% 14.3% (+25.9)#16 13.7% (+26.5)#2,076
17. Pierson 40.0% 14.3% (+25.7)#17 13.7% (+26.3)#2,105
18. Hamtramck 39.9% 14.3% (+25.6)#18 13.7% (+26.2)#2,127
19. Skidway Lake 39.9% 14.3% (+25.6)#19 13.7% (+26.2)#2,132
20. Mount Pleasant 38.7% 14.3% (+24.4)#20 13.7% (+25.0)#2,270
21. Bingham Farms 38.1% 14.3% (+23.8)#21 13.7% (+24.4)#2,364
22. Highland Park 37.6% 14.3% (+23.3)#22 13.7% (+23.9)#2,419
23. Turner 37.2% 14.3% (+22.9)#23 13.7% (+23.5)#2,495
24. Muskegon Heights 37.1% 14.3% (+22.8)#24 13.7% (+23.4)#2,507
25. Stanton 37.0% 14.3% (+22.7)#25 13.7% (+23.3)#2,522
26. Millersburg 36.8% 14.3% (+22.6)#26 13.7% (+23.1)#2,552
27. Merrill 36.8% 14.3% (+22.5)#27 13.7% (+23.1)#2,560
28. Beecher 36.7% 14.3% (+22.5)#28 13.7% (+23.0)#2,578
29. Inkster 36.3% 14.3% (+22.0)#29 13.7% (+22.6)#2,654
30. Kaleva 36.2% 14.3% (+22.0)#30 13.7% (+22.5)#2,670
31. Saginaw 36.2% 14.3% (+22.0)#31 13.7% (+22.5)#2,673
32. Pittsford 36.2% 14.3% (+22.0)#32 13.7% (+22.5)#2,674
33. Allendale 36.1% 14.3% (+21.8)#33 13.7% (+22.4)#2,708
34. Charlevoix 36.1% 14.3% (+21.8)#34 13.7% (+22.4)#2,710
35. Farwell 35.9% 14.3% (+21.7)#35 13.7% (+22.2)#2,740
36. Mesick 35.5% 14.3% (+21.2)#36 13.7% (+21.8)#2,848
37. Melvin 35.5% 14.3% (+21.2)#37 13.7% (+21.8)#2,852
38. Lakeview 35.2% 14.3% (+20.9)#38 13.7% (+21.5)#2,895
39. Rose City 35.1% 14.3% (+20.8)#39 13.7% (+21.4)#2,910
40. Harrison 35.0% 14.3% (+20.7)#40 13.7% (+21.3)#2,937
41. Kincheloe 34.9% 14.3% (+20.6)#41 13.7% (+21.2)#2,959
42. Maple Rapids 34.7% 14.3% (+20.4)#42 13.7% (+21.0)#3,009
43. Morley 34.4% 14.3% (+20.1)#43 13.7% (+20.7)#3,078
44. Grayling 34.1% 14.3% (+19.8)#44 13.7% (+20.4)#3,130
45. Bloomingdale 33.8% 14.3% (+19.5)#45 13.7% (+20.1)#3,193
46. Wolverine 33.7% 14.3% (+19.4)#46 13.7% (+20.0)#3,214
47. Flint 33.5% 14.3% (+19.2)#47 13.7% (+19.8)#3,248
48. Dowagiac 33.3% 14.3% (+19.1)#48 13.7% (+19.6)#3,282
49. Lincoln 33.1% 14.3% (+18.8)#49 13.7% (+19.4)#3,359
50. Melvindale 33.0% 14.3% (+18.7)#50 13.7% (+19.3)#3,372
51. Evart 32.9% 14.3% (+18.6)#51 13.7% (+19.2)#3,400
52. White Pigeon 32.7% 14.3% (+18.4)#52 13.7% (+19.0)#3,442
53. Detroit 32.5% 14.3% (+18.2)#53 13.7% (+18.8)#3,478
54. Palo 32.4% 14.3% (+18.1)#54 13.7% (+18.7)#3,505
55. Cassopolis 32.0% 14.3% (+17.7)#55 13.7% (+18.3)#3,613
56. East Lansing 31.8% 14.3% (+17.5)#56 13.7% (+18.1)#3,653
57. Amasa 31.7% 14.3% (+17.5)#57 13.7% (+18.0)#3,661
58. Naubinway 31.7% 14.3% (+17.4)#58 13.7% (+18.0)#3,669
59. Beechwood 31.7% 14.3% (+17.4)#59 13.7% (+18.0)#3,678
60. Edmore 31.6% 14.3% (+17.4)#60 13.7% (+17.9)#3,681
61. Alpha 31.6% 14.3% (+17.3)#61 13.7% (+17.9)#3,685
62. Marlette 31.2% 14.3% (+16.9)#62 13.7% (+17.5)#3,804
63. Imlay City 30.9% 14.3% (+16.7)#63 13.7% (+17.2)#3,868
64. Harrisville 30.9% 14.3% (+16.6)#64 13.7% (+17.2)#3,874
65. Beaverton 30.6% 14.3% (+16.3)#65 13.7% (+16.9)#3,967
66. Camden 30.2% 14.3% (+15.9)#66 13.7% (+16.5)#4,101
67. Jennings 30.2% 14.3% (+15.9)#67 13.7% (+16.5)#4,103
68. Oakley 30.1% 14.3% (+15.9)#68 13.7% (+16.4)#4,107
69. Buena Vista 30.0% 14.3% (+15.7)#69 13.7% (+16.3)#4,165
70. Onaway 29.9% 14.3% (+15.6)#70 13.7% (+16.2)#4,180
71. Scottville 29.8% 14.3% (+15.6)#71 13.7% (+16.1)#4,199
72. Big Rapids 29.7% 14.3% (+15.4)#72 13.7% (+16.0)#4,231
73. Lawrence 29.5% 14.3% (+15.2)#73 13.7% (+15.8)#4,276
74. Fair Plain 29.3% 14.3% (+15.0)#74 13.7% (+15.6)#4,333
75. Springfield 29.3% 14.3% (+15.0)#75 13.7% (+15.6)#4,334
76. Montrose 29.3% 14.3% (+15.0)#76 13.7% (+15.6)#4,339
77. Mount Morris 29.3% 14.3% (+15.0)#77 13.7% (+15.6)#4,348
78. Tower 29.3% 14.3% (+15.0)#78 13.7% (+15.6)#4,349
79. Ypsilanti 29.3% 14.3% (+15.0)#79 13.7% (+15.6)#4,351
80. Fennville 29.2% 14.3% (+14.9)#80 13.7% (+15.5)#4,361
81. Prescott 29.2% 14.3% (+14.9)#81 13.7% (+15.5)#4,377
82. St Helen 29.1% 14.3% (+14.8)#82 13.7% (+15.4)#4,415
83. Big Bay 28.7% 14.3% (+14.4)#83 13.7% (+15.0)#4,516
84. Kalkaska 28.5% 14.3% (+14.2)#84 13.7% (+14.8)#4,611
85. Baldwin 28.4% 14.3% (+14.1)#85 13.7% (+14.7)#4,625
86. Montgomery 28.4% 14.3% (+14.1)#86 13.7% (+14.7)#4,630
87. Kalamazoo 28.4% 14.3% (+14.1)#87 13.7% (+14.7)#4,639
88. Deckerville 28.4% 14.3% (+14.1)#88 13.7% (+14.7)#4,648
89. Forestville 28.4% 14.3% (+14.1)#89 13.7% (+14.7)#4,654
90. Allen 28.3% 14.3% (+14.0)#90 13.7% (+14.6)#4,670
91. Tustin 28.3% 14.3% (+14.0)#91 13.7% (+14.6)#4,671
92. Cedar Springs 28.3% 14.3% (+14.0)#92 13.7% (+14.6)#4,677
93. Mcbride 28.3% 14.3% (+14.0)#93 13.7% (+14.6)#4,686
94. Houghton Lake 28.0% 14.3% (+13.7)#94 13.7% (+14.3)#4,778
95. Pontiac 27.9% 14.3% (+13.6)#95 13.7% (+14.2)#4,810
96. Brimley 27.8% 14.3% (+13.5)#96 13.7% (+14.1)#4,842
97. Mohawk 27.7% 14.3% (+13.4)#97 13.7% (+14.0)#4,871
98. Laurium 27.5% 14.3% (+13.2)#98 13.7% (+13.8)#4,967
99. Bay City 27.4% 14.3% (+13.1)#99 13.7% (+13.7)#4,996
100. Luna Pier 27.3% 14.3% (+13.0)#100 13.7% (+13.6)#5,036

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Female Poverty Level in Michigan?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Female Poverty Level in Michigan are:
#1
73.9%
#2
64.8%
#3
56.7%
#4
51.3%
#5
46.6%
#6
46.4%
#7
46.0%
#8
45.1%
#9
45.0%
#10
43.8%
What city has the Highest Female Poverty Level in Michigan?
Oden has the Highest Female Poverty Level in Michigan with 73.9%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Females in the State of Michigan?
Poverty Level Among Females in Michigan is 14.3%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Females in the United States?
Poverty Level Among Females in the United States is 13.7%.