Cities with the Highest Percentage of Not-for-profit Organizations in Michigan

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Not-for-profit Organizations
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Michigan
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Percentage of Not-for-profit Organizations in Michigan

0.0%
80.0%
Cities with the Highest Percentage of Not-for-profit Organizations in Michigan Map

Cities with the Highest Percentage of Not-for-profit Organizations in Michigan

City % Employed in Not-for-profit vs State vs National
1. Paris 64.8% 9.6% (+55.2)#1 8.4% (+56.4)#91
2. Maple Grove 47.4% 9.6% (+37.8)#2 8.4% (+39.0)#197
3. Levering 37.5% 9.6% (+27.9)#3 8.4% (+29.1)#346
4. Lost Lake Woods 37.1% 9.6% (+27.5)#4 8.4% (+28.7)#351
5. South Gull Lake 36.8% 9.6% (+27.2)#5 8.4% (+28.4)#355
6. Chums Corner 32.5% 9.6% (+22.8)#6 8.4% (+24.0)#478
7. Spring Arbor 32.0% 9.6% (+22.4)#7 8.4% (+23.6)#494
8. Michiana 29.8% 9.6% (+20.2)#8 8.4% (+21.4)#596
9. Bay View 28.3% 9.6% (+18.7)#9 8.4% (+19.9)#672
10. Beal City 27.0% 9.6% (+17.4)#10 8.4% (+18.6)#746
11. Vineyard Lake 26.7% 9.6% (+17.1)#11 8.4% (+18.3)#763
12. Suttons Bay 25.2% 9.6% (+15.6)#12 8.4% (+16.8)#867
13. Crystal Mountain 25.0% 9.6% (+15.4)#13 8.4% (+16.6)#888
14. Laurium 24.4% 9.6% (+14.8)#14 8.4% (+16.0)#945
15. Delton 24.3% 9.6% (+14.7)#15 8.4% (+15.9)#963
16. Edgemont Park 23.6% 9.6% (+13.9)#16 8.4% (+15.1)#1,041
17. Berrien Springs 22.8% 9.6% (+13.2)#17 8.4% (+14.4)#1,122
18. Linden 22.7% 9.6% (+13.1)#18 8.4% (+14.3)#1,135
19. Hardwood Acres 22.7% 9.6% (+13.0)#19 8.4% (+14.3)#1,138
20. Fulton 22.2% 9.6% (+12.6)#20 8.4% (+13.8)#1,192
21. Walloon Lake 21.7% 9.6% (+12.1)#21 8.4% (+13.3)#1,262
22. Mohawk 21.7% 9.6% (+12.0)#22 8.4% (+13.2)#1,273
23. Chelsea 21.5% 9.6% (+11.8)#23 8.4% (+13.0)#1,295
24. Arcadia 20.5% 9.6% (+10.8)#24 8.4% (+12.0)#1,470
25. Lake Leelanau 20.0% 9.6% (+10.4)#25 8.4% (+11.6)#1,555
26. Crystal Downs Country Club 20.0% 9.6% (+10.4)#26 8.4% (+11.6)#1,566
27. Eureka 19.7% 9.6% (+10.0)#27 8.4% (+11.2)#1,620
28. Bingham Farms 19.7% 9.6% (+10.0)#28 8.4% (+11.2)#1,622
29. Ithaca 19.4% 9.6% (+9.77)#29 8.4% (+11.0)#1,662
30. East Tawas 19.3% 9.6% (+9.62)#30 8.4% (+10.8)#1,694
31. South Boardman 19.2% 9.6% (+9.53)#31 8.4% (+10.7)#1,710
32. Mcbride 19.0% 9.6% (+9.34)#32 8.4% (+10.5)#1,762
33. Albion 18.6% 9.6% (+8.95)#33 8.4% (+10.2)#1,862
34. Nunica 18.4% 9.6% (+8.79)#34 8.4% (+10.00)#1,898
35. St James 18.3% 9.6% (+8.69)#35 8.4% (+9.89)#1,930
36. Hancock 18.2% 9.6% (+8.53)#36 8.4% (+9.73)#1,993
37. Dimondale 18.2% 9.6% (+8.51)#37 8.4% (+9.72)#1,997
38. Elm Hall 18.0% 9.6% (+8.39)#38 8.4% (+9.59)#2,037
39. Alma 17.9% 9.6% (+8.26)#39 8.4% (+9.46)#2,076
40. Grant 17.9% 9.6% (+8.21)#40 8.4% (+9.41)#2,084
41. Nessen City 17.9% 9.6% (+8.21)#41 8.4% (+9.41)#2,087
42. Hubbell 17.8% 9.6% (+8.19)#42 8.4% (+9.39)#2,096
43. Mackinac Island 17.8% 9.6% (+8.11)#43 8.4% (+9.31)#2,114
44. Brimley 17.7% 9.6% (+8.05)#44 8.4% (+9.25)#2,122
45. Ann Arbor 17.7% 9.6% (+8.02)#45 8.4% (+9.22)#2,133
46. Onsted 17.6% 9.6% (+7.98)#46 8.4% (+9.18)#2,149
47. Hesperia 17.4% 9.6% (+7.76)#47 8.4% (+8.96)#2,223
48. Big Bay 17.4% 9.6% (+7.75)#48 8.4% (+8.95)#2,231
49. Bendon 17.4% 9.6% (+7.75)#49 8.4% (+8.95)#2,233
50. Marshall 17.4% 9.6% (+7.71)#50 8.4% (+8.91)#2,257
51. Gaastra 17.3% 9.6% (+7.66)#51 8.4% (+8.86)#2,265
52. Copemish 17.3% 9.6% (+7.64)#52 8.4% (+8.84)#2,274
53. Ruby 16.9% 9.6% (+7.26)#53 8.4% (+8.46)#2,407
54. Ironton 16.9% 9.6% (+7.26)#54 8.4% (+8.46)#2,409
55. Manchester 16.8% 9.6% (+7.18)#55 8.4% (+8.38)#2,426
56. Rockford 16.7% 9.6% (+7.02)#56 8.4% (+8.22)#2,458
57. Unionville 16.6% 9.6% (+6.96)#57 8.4% (+8.16)#2,517
58. Chassell 16.4% 9.6% (+6.73)#58 8.4% (+7.93)#2,603
59. Grand Rapids 16.4% 9.6% (+6.71)#59 8.4% (+7.91)#2,613
60. Harrisville 16.4% 9.6% (+6.71)#60 8.4% (+7.91)#2,617
61. Barton Hills 16.3% 9.6% (+6.62)#61 8.4% (+7.82)#2,657
62. East Grand Rapids 16.2% 9.6% (+6.51)#62 8.4% (+7.71)#2,710
63. Buckley 16.1% 9.6% (+6.50)#63 8.4% (+7.70)#2,716
64. Milan 16.0% 9.6% (+6.40)#64 8.4% (+7.60)#2,756
65. Climax 16.0% 9.6% (+6.31)#65 8.4% (+7.51)#2,811
66. Applegate 15.9% 9.6% (+6.28)#66 8.4% (+7.48)#2,822
67. Deckerville 15.9% 9.6% (+6.27)#67 8.4% (+7.47)#2,827
68. Rockwood 15.7% 9.6% (+6.10)#68 8.4% (+7.30)#2,920
69. Eastwood 15.6% 9.6% (+5.96)#69 8.4% (+7.16)#2,977
70. Lincoln 15.6% 9.6% (+5.94)#70 8.4% (+7.14)#2,992
71. Sunfield 15.6% 9.6% (+5.91)#71 8.4% (+7.11)#3,010
72. Petoskey 15.5% 9.6% (+5.86)#72 8.4% (+7.06)#3,036
73. Hermansville 15.3% 9.6% (+5.70)#73 8.4% (+6.90)#3,126
74. Pleasant Ridge 15.3% 9.6% (+5.69)#74 8.4% (+6.89)#3,131
75. Breckenridge 15.2% 9.6% (+5.57)#75 8.4% (+6.77)#3,192
76. Wacousta 15.2% 9.6% (+5.51)#76 8.4% (+6.72)#3,222
77. Lake Linden 15.1% 9.6% (+5.49)#77 8.4% (+6.69)#3,244
78. Spring Lake 15.0% 9.6% (+5.35)#78 8.4% (+6.55)#3,340
79. Walker 14.9% 9.6% (+5.25)#79 8.4% (+6.45)#3,393
80. Mason 14.9% 9.6% (+5.24)#80 8.4% (+6.44)#3,395
81. Grandville 14.8% 9.6% (+5.14)#81 8.4% (+6.34)#3,464
82. Eau Claire 14.8% 9.6% (+5.12)#82 8.4% (+6.32)#3,478
83. Forest Hills 14.7% 9.6% (+5.08)#83 8.4% (+6.29)#3,498
84. East Lansing 14.7% 9.6% (+5.03)#84 8.4% (+6.23)#3,538
85. Flushing 14.7% 9.6% (+5.02)#85 8.4% (+6.22)#3,542
86. Huntington Woods 14.7% 9.6% (+5.01)#86 8.4% (+6.21)#3,552
87. Dowling 14.6% 9.6% (+4.95)#87 8.4% (+6.15)#3,589
88. Vandercook Lake 14.6% 9.6% (+4.93)#88 8.4% (+6.13)#3,603
89. Grosse Pointe 14.6% 9.6% (+4.91)#89 8.4% (+6.11)#3,619
90. Copper City 14.5% 9.6% (+4.87)#90 8.4% (+6.07)#3,647
91. Rosebush 14.5% 9.6% (+4.81)#91 8.4% (+6.01)#3,683
92. Rogers City 14.4% 9.6% (+4.70)#92 8.4% (+5.91)#3,746
93. Painesdale 14.3% 9.6% (+4.64)#93 8.4% (+5.84)#3,788
94. Custer 14.3% 9.6% (+4.64)#94 8.4% (+5.84)#3,791
95. Garden 14.3% 9.6% (+4.64)#95 8.4% (+5.84)#3,804
96. Free Soil 14.3% 9.6% (+4.64)#96 8.4% (+5.84)#3,815
97. Eagle River 14.3% 9.6% (+4.64)#97 8.4% (+5.84)#3,823
98. Imlay City 14.2% 9.6% (+4.60)#98 8.4% (+5.80)#3,858
99. Lake Leann 14.2% 9.6% (+4.59)#99 8.4% (+5.79)#3,863
100. Iron River 14.2% 9.6% (+4.57)#100 8.4% (+5.77)#3,875

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Not-for-profit Organizations in Michigan?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Not-for-profit Organizations in Michigan are:
What city has the Highest Percentage of Not-for-profit Organizations in Michigan?
Maple Grove has the Highest Percentage of Not-for-profit Organizations in Michigan with 47.4%.
What is the Percentage of Not-for-profit Organizations in the State of Michigan?
Percentage of Not-for-profit Organizations in Michigan is 9.6%.
What is the Percentage of Not-for-profit Organizations in the United States?
Percentage of Not-for-profit Organizations in the United States is 8.4%.