Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Installation, Maintenance & Repair in Michigan

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Installation, Maintenance & Repair
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Michigan
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Installation, Maintenance & Repair in Michigan

0.0%
60.0%
Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Installation, Maintenance & Repair in Michigan Map

Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Installation, Maintenance & Repair in Michigan

City % Employed vs State vs National
1. Trimountain 56.2% 3.1% (+53.2)#1 3.1% (+53.2)#53
2. Winn 45.9% 3.1% (+42.8)#2 3.1% (+42.8)#100
3. Conway 38.5% 3.1% (+35.4)#3 3.1% (+35.4)#159
4. Palo 35.5% 3.1% (+32.4)#4 3.1% (+32.5)#188
5. Scotts 28.6% 3.1% (+25.5)#5 3.1% (+25.5)#316
6. Elm Hall 26.2% 3.1% (+23.1)#6 3.1% (+23.2)#376
7. Greilickville 22.7% 3.1% (+19.6)#7 3.1% (+19.7)#515
8. Hickory Corners 21.5% 3.1% (+18.4)#8 3.1% (+18.4)#570
9. Oakley 20.4% 3.1% (+17.3)#9 3.1% (+17.3)#648
10. Twining 16.4% 3.1% (+13.3)#10 3.1% (+13.4)#973
11. Three Lakes 16.2% 3.1% (+13.1)#11 3.1% (+13.1)#1,002
12. Harrietta 16.1% 3.1% (+13.0)#12 3.1% (+13.1)#1,007
13. Maple City 15.2% 3.1% (+12.1)#13 3.1% (+12.1)#1,119
14. Ramsay 14.4% 3.1% (+11.3)#14 3.1% (+11.3)#1,247
15. Painesdale 14.3% 3.1% (+11.2)#15 3.1% (+11.2)#1,263
16. Millersburg 14.3% 3.1% (+11.2)#16 3.1% (+11.2)#1,273
17. Posen 14.1% 3.1% (+11.0)#17 3.1% (+11.1)#1,310
18. Gladwin 13.9% 3.1% (+10.8)#18 3.1% (+10.8)#1,360
19. Camden 13.8% 3.1% (+10.7)#19 3.1% (+10.7)#1,383
20. Omena 13.5% 3.1% (+10.4)#20 3.1% (+10.4)#1,448
21. Brutus 13.4% 3.1% (+10.3)#21 3.1% (+10.3)#1,470
22. Manistee Lake 13.1% 3.1% (+9.98)#22 3.1% (+10.0)#1,545
23. Morley 13.0% 3.1% (+9.86)#23 3.1% (+9.90)#1,579
24. Whittemore 12.8% 3.1% (+9.70)#24 3.1% (+9.73)#1,631
25. Burt 12.6% 3.1% (+9.51)#25 3.1% (+9.54)#1,664
26. Au Sable 12.6% 3.1% (+9.46)#26 3.1% (+9.49)#1,681
27. Lennon 12.3% 3.1% (+9.18)#27 3.1% (+9.21)#1,754
28. Beal City 12.0% 3.1% (+8.95)#28 3.1% (+8.98)#1,812
29. Marcellus 11.9% 3.1% (+8.77)#29 3.1% (+8.80)#1,869
30. Greenland 11.8% 3.1% (+8.74)#30 3.1% (+8.77)#1,877
31. Rockwood 11.8% 3.1% (+8.71)#31 3.1% (+8.74)#1,885
32. Detroit Beach 11.7% 3.1% (+8.56)#32 3.1% (+8.59)#1,928
33. Marine City 11.2% 3.1% (+8.14)#33 3.1% (+8.17)#2,063
34. Burlington 11.1% 3.1% (+8.01)#34 3.1% (+8.04)#2,106
35. Chatham 11.1% 3.1% (+8.01)#35 3.1% (+8.04)#2,112
36. Martin 11.1% 3.1% (+7.97)#36 3.1% (+8.00)#2,131
37. Oak Hill 10.9% 3.1% (+7.83)#37 3.1% (+7.86)#2,161
38. Clayton 10.1% 3.1% (+7.01)#38 3.1% (+7.04)#2,506
39. Oscoda 10.1% 3.1% (+6.97)#39 3.1% (+7.00)#2,523
40. Dundee 10.0% 3.1% (+6.86)#40 3.1% (+6.89)#2,582
41. Shaftsburg 9.8% 3.1% (+6.70)#41 3.1% (+6.73)#2,678
42. Canada Creek Ranch 9.8% 3.1% (+6.66)#42 3.1% (+6.69)#2,693
43. Eagle 9.7% 3.1% (+6.58)#43 3.1% (+6.61)#2,750
44. South Boardman 9.5% 3.1% (+6.38)#44 3.1% (+6.41)#2,849
45. Walloon Lake 9.3% 3.1% (+6.22)#45 3.1% (+6.25)#2,942
46. Vandalia 9.1% 3.1% (+5.99)#46 3.1% (+6.02)#3,054
47. Alanson 9.0% 3.1% (+5.92)#47 3.1% (+5.95)#3,110
48. Atlantic Mine 8.9% 3.1% (+5.85)#48 3.1% (+5.88)#3,153
49. Republic 8.9% 3.1% (+5.79)#49 3.1% (+5.82)#3,190
50. Le Roy 8.9% 3.1% (+5.79)#50 3.1% (+5.82)#3,192
51. Napoleon 8.9% 3.1% (+5.77)#51 3.1% (+5.80)#3,208
52. Woodland Beach 8.8% 3.1% (+5.75)#52 3.1% (+5.78)#3,222
53. New Troy 8.8% 3.1% (+5.72)#53 3.1% (+5.76)#3,236
54. Fowler 8.6% 3.1% (+5.49)#54 3.1% (+5.52)#3,427
55. East Tawas 8.6% 3.1% (+5.49)#55 3.1% (+5.52)#3,428
56. Lewiston 8.6% 3.1% (+5.46)#56 3.1% (+5.50)#3,456
57. Gaines 8.5% 3.1% (+5.41)#57 3.1% (+5.44)#3,489
58. Palmer 8.5% 3.1% (+5.37)#58 3.1% (+5.40)#3,532
59. Lake Michigan Beach 8.4% 3.1% (+5.30)#59 3.1% (+5.33)#3,579
60. Hartland 8.4% 3.1% (+5.28)#60 3.1% (+5.31)#3,602
61. St Helen 8.3% 3.1% (+5.22)#61 3.1% (+5.26)#3,658
62. Alba 8.2% 3.1% (+5.14)#62 3.1% (+5.17)#3,731
63. Copemish 8.2% 3.1% (+5.14)#63 3.1% (+5.17)#3,734
64. De Tour Village 8.2% 3.1% (+5.12)#64 3.1% (+5.15)#3,745
65. Manton 8.2% 3.1% (+5.08)#65 3.1% (+5.11)#3,779
66. Beechwood 8.1% 3.1% (+5.00)#66 3.1% (+5.03)#3,853
67. Attica 8.0% 3.1% (+4.94)#67 3.1% (+4.97)#3,903
68. Dowling 8.0% 3.1% (+4.93)#68 3.1% (+4.96)#3,914
69. South Gull Lake 7.9% 3.1% (+4.85)#69 3.1% (+4.88)#3,977
70. Bronson 7.9% 3.1% (+4.80)#70 3.1% (+4.83)#4,021
71. Carleton 7.8% 3.1% (+4.72)#71 3.1% (+4.76)#4,085
72. Kingsley 7.8% 3.1% (+4.69)#72 3.1% (+4.72)#4,111
73. Swartz Creek 7.8% 3.1% (+4.67)#73 3.1% (+4.71)#4,126
74. Prescott 7.8% 3.1% (+4.66)#74 3.1% (+4.69)#4,140
75. Marlette 7.7% 3.1% (+4.62)#75 3.1% (+4.66)#4,169
76. Fennville 7.7% 3.1% (+4.61)#76 3.1% (+4.64)#4,178
77. Lakes Of The North 7.6% 3.1% (+4.54)#77 3.1% (+4.57)#4,280
78. Bay Port 7.6% 3.1% (+4.53)#78 3.1% (+4.56)#4,289
79. Kinde 7.6% 3.1% (+4.50)#79 3.1% (+4.53)#4,323
80. Brethren 7.6% 3.1% (+4.48)#80 3.1% (+4.51)#4,343
81. Howard City 7.5% 3.1% (+4.40)#81 3.1% (+4.44)#4,423
82. North Adams 7.5% 3.1% (+4.40)#82 3.1% (+4.43)#4,427
83. Dodgeville 7.5% 3.1% (+4.39)#83 3.1% (+4.42)#4,448
84. Carsonville 7.4% 3.1% (+4.29)#84 3.1% (+4.32)#4,534
85. Filer City 7.3% 3.1% (+4.24)#85 3.1% (+4.27)#4,594
86. Essexville 7.3% 3.1% (+4.21)#86 3.1% (+4.24)#4,638
87. Caspian 7.3% 3.1% (+4.17)#87 3.1% (+4.20)#4,694
88. West Branch 7.2% 3.1% (+4.10)#88 3.1% (+4.13)#4,774
89. Comstock Northwest 7.1% 3.1% (+4.02)#89 3.1% (+4.06)#4,855
90. Ossineke 7.1% 3.1% (+4.02)#90 3.1% (+4.06)#4,856
91. Gobles 7.1% 3.1% (+4.02)#91 3.1% (+4.05)#4,867
92. Horton Bay 7.1% 3.1% (+4.00)#92 3.1% (+4.03)#4,896
93. Skidway Lake 7.1% 3.1% (+3.99)#93 3.1% (+4.02)#4,911
94. Temperance 7.1% 3.1% (+3.96)#94 3.1% (+3.99)#4,939
95. Lawrence 7.1% 3.1% (+3.96)#95 3.1% (+3.99)#4,940
96. Imlay City 6.8% 3.1% (+3.74)#96 3.1% (+3.78)#5,183
97. Concord 6.8% 3.1% (+3.73)#97 3.1% (+3.76)#5,214
98. Buchanan 6.8% 3.1% (+3.69)#98 3.1% (+3.73)#5,272
99. Ferrysburg 6.8% 3.1% (+3.66)#99 3.1% (+3.69)#5,315
100. Fountain 6.8% 3.1% (+3.66)#100 3.1% (+3.69)#5,320

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Installation, Maintenance & Repair in Michigan?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Installation, Maintenance & Repair in Michigan are:
#1
38.5%
#2
22.7%
#3
21.5%
#4
20.4%
#5
16.4%
#6
16.1%
#7
15.2%
#8
14.3%
#9
14.1%
#10
13.9%
What city has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Installation, Maintenance & Repair in Michigan?
Conway has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Installation, Maintenance & Repair in Michigan with 38.5%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Installation, Maintenance & Repair in the State of Michigan?
Percentage of Population Employed in Installation, Maintenance & Repair in Michigan is 3.1%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Installation, Maintenance & Repair in the United States?
Percentage of Population Employed in Installation, Maintenance & Repair in the United States is 3.1%.