Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Personal Care and Service in Michigan

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Personal Care and Service
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Michigan
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Personal Care and Service in Michigan

0.0%
50.0%
Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Personal Care and Service in Michigan Map

Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Personal Care and Service in Michigan

City % Employed vs State vs National
1. Cedar 45.0% 2.4% (+42.6)#1 2.6% (+42.4)#54
2. Paris 44.4% 2.4% (+42.0)#2 2.6% (+41.9)#56
3. Elberta 33.3% 2.4% (+30.9)#3 2.6% (+30.8)#93
4. Ahmeek 18.2% 2.4% (+15.8)#4 2.6% (+15.6)#302
5. Millburg 17.5% 2.4% (+15.1)#5 2.6% (+14.9)#321
6. Horton Bay 14.8% 2.4% (+12.4)#6 2.6% (+12.3)#434
7. Spring Arbor 14.5% 2.4% (+12.1)#7 2.6% (+12.0)#448
8. Eagle River 14.3% 2.4% (+11.9)#8 2.6% (+11.7)#471
9. Filer City 13.8% 2.4% (+11.4)#9 2.6% (+11.2)#503
10. Saranac 13.7% 2.4% (+11.3)#10 2.6% (+11.2)#506
11. Skanee 12.8% 2.4% (+10.4)#11 2.6% (+10.3)#573
12. Rapid River 12.7% 2.4% (+10.3)#12 2.6% (+10.1)#584
13. Newberry 12.1% 2.4% (+9.68)#13 2.6% (+9.52)#656
14. Ruby 11.7% 2.4% (+9.33)#14 2.6% (+9.17)#691
15. Gaastra 10.6% 2.4% (+8.18)#15 2.6% (+8.01)#837
16. Ossineke 9.6% 2.4% (+7.19)#16 2.6% (+7.03)#1,011
17. Pellston 9.4% 2.4% (+7.01)#17 2.6% (+6.84)#1,054
18. Wellston 9.3% 2.4% (+6.93)#18 2.6% (+6.77)#1,071
19. Cannonsburg 8.7% 2.4% (+6.34)#19 2.6% (+6.18)#1,222
20. Stevensville 8.6% 2.4% (+6.21)#20 2.6% (+6.05)#1,254
21. Harrisville 8.5% 2.4% (+6.09)#21 2.6% (+5.92)#1,292
22. Hart 8.5% 2.4% (+6.08)#22 2.6% (+5.92)#1,293
23. Beal City 8.4% 2.4% (+6.04)#23 2.6% (+5.87)#1,303
24. Stronach 8.3% 2.4% (+5.93)#24 2.6% (+5.77)#1,329
25. Napoleon 8.2% 2.4% (+5.81)#25 2.6% (+5.64)#1,370
26. Beecher 8.2% 2.4% (+5.77)#26 2.6% (+5.61)#1,379
27. Harvey 8.0% 2.4% (+5.61)#27 2.6% (+5.45)#1,431
28. Fremont 7.9% 2.4% (+5.51)#28 2.6% (+5.34)#1,467
29. Grant 7.8% 2.4% (+5.41)#29 2.6% (+5.25)#1,507
30. New Lothrop 7.5% 2.4% (+5.14)#30 2.6% (+4.97)#1,621
31. Mesick 7.5% 2.4% (+5.12)#31 2.6% (+4.96)#1,624
32. Bridgman 7.3% 2.4% (+4.90)#32 2.6% (+4.74)#1,698
33. Bad Axe 7.3% 2.4% (+4.89)#33 2.6% (+4.72)#1,702
34. Bloomingdale 7.1% 2.4% (+4.74)#34 2.6% (+4.58)#1,757
35. Lupton 7.1% 2.4% (+4.66)#35 2.6% (+4.50)#1,800
36. Alma 7.0% 2.4% (+4.61)#36 2.6% (+4.45)#1,827
37. Byron Center 6.9% 2.4% (+4.54)#37 2.6% (+4.38)#1,863
38. Memphis 6.9% 2.4% (+4.47)#38 2.6% (+4.31)#1,903
39. Charlevoix 6.9% 2.4% (+4.46)#39 2.6% (+4.29)#1,914
40. St Helen 6.7% 2.4% (+4.31)#40 2.6% (+4.15)#1,987
41. Dodgeville 6.6% 2.4% (+4.21)#41 2.6% (+4.05)#2,037
42. Dowling 6.6% 2.4% (+4.17)#42 2.6% (+4.01)#2,059
43. Daggett 6.5% 2.4% (+4.09)#43 2.6% (+3.93)#2,105
44. Grawn 6.5% 2.4% (+4.08)#44 2.6% (+3.92)#2,111
45. Roscommon 6.4% 2.4% (+4.04)#45 2.6% (+3.88)#2,138
46. Twin Lake 6.4% 2.4% (+4.03)#46 2.6% (+3.87)#2,149
47. Cambria 6.4% 2.4% (+4.02)#47 2.6% (+3.86)#2,154
48. Woodland 6.4% 2.4% (+3.96)#48 2.6% (+3.80)#2,194
49. Mio 6.3% 2.4% (+3.91)#49 2.6% (+3.75)#2,232
50. Vandalia 6.2% 2.4% (+3.85)#50 2.6% (+3.69)#2,285
51. Walloon Lake 6.2% 2.4% (+3.81)#51 2.6% (+3.65)#2,319
52. South Boardman 6.2% 2.4% (+3.81)#52 2.6% (+3.65)#2,320
53. Glen Arbor 6.2% 2.4% (+3.80)#53 2.6% (+3.63)#2,335
54. Sheridan 6.2% 2.4% (+3.77)#54 2.6% (+3.61)#2,346
55. Manchester 6.1% 2.4% (+3.73)#55 2.6% (+3.57)#2,370
56. St Johns 6.0% 2.4% (+3.59)#56 2.6% (+3.43)#2,474
57. Ferrysburg 6.0% 2.4% (+3.57)#57 2.6% (+3.40)#2,489
58. Sylvan Lake 5.9% 2.4% (+3.53)#58 2.6% (+3.37)#2,515
59. Copemish 5.9% 2.4% (+3.48)#59 2.6% (+3.32)#2,562
60. Lake Odessa 5.9% 2.4% (+3.47)#60 2.6% (+3.30)#2,577
61. Jonesville 5.8% 2.4% (+3.42)#61 2.6% (+3.26)#2,615
62. Wacousta 5.8% 2.4% (+3.40)#62 2.6% (+3.24)#2,636
63. Paw Paw Lake 5.7% 2.4% (+3.29)#63 2.6% (+3.13)#2,736
64. New Haven 5.7% 2.4% (+3.28)#64 2.6% (+3.12)#2,741
65. Eastwood 5.6% 2.4% (+3.25)#65 2.6% (+3.08)#2,781
66. Chums Corner 5.6% 2.4% (+3.16)#66 2.6% (+2.99)#2,856
67. Au Gres 5.5% 2.4% (+3.08)#67 2.6% (+2.92)#2,935
68. Auburn 5.4% 2.4% (+3.04)#68 2.6% (+2.88)#2,967
69. Harrietta 5.4% 2.4% (+2.98)#69 2.6% (+2.81)#3,036
70. Augusta 5.4% 2.4% (+2.96)#70 2.6% (+2.79)#3,050
71. Walkerville 5.3% 2.4% (+2.93)#71 2.6% (+2.77)#3,068
72. Ravenna 5.3% 2.4% (+2.93)#72 2.6% (+2.77)#3,077
73. Marshall 5.3% 2.4% (+2.93)#73 2.6% (+2.76)#3,083
74. Harbor Beach 5.3% 2.4% (+2.92)#74 2.6% (+2.76)#3,085
75. Mount Pleasant 5.3% 2.4% (+2.88)#75 2.6% (+2.71)#3,127
76. South Range 5.2% 2.4% (+2.82)#76 2.6% (+2.65)#3,196
77. Corunna 5.1% 2.4% (+2.74)#77 2.6% (+2.57)#3,278
78. Burr Oak 5.1% 2.4% (+2.72)#78 2.6% (+2.56)#3,298
79. Paw Paw 5.1% 2.4% (+2.72)#79 2.6% (+2.56)#3,307
80. Clinton 5.1% 2.4% (+2.71)#80 2.6% (+2.55)#3,314
81. Millington 5.1% 2.4% (+2.71)#81 2.6% (+2.55)#3,317
82. Hazel Park 5.1% 2.4% (+2.68)#82 2.6% (+2.52)#3,346
83. Buckley 5.0% 2.4% (+2.64)#83 2.6% (+2.48)#3,398
84. Gagetown 5.0% 2.4% (+2.64)#84 2.6% (+2.48)#3,399
85. Gaylord 5.0% 2.4% (+2.60)#85 2.6% (+2.43)#3,485
86. Richmond 4.9% 2.4% (+2.53)#86 2.6% (+2.36)#3,562
87. Reese 4.9% 2.4% (+2.52)#87 2.6% (+2.36)#3,565
88. Olivet 4.9% 2.4% (+2.51)#88 2.6% (+2.35)#3,580
89. Colon 4.9% 2.4% (+2.48)#89 2.6% (+2.32)#3,608
90. Canada Creek Ranch 4.9% 2.4% (+2.48)#90 2.6% (+2.32)#3,616
91. Baraga 4.9% 2.4% (+2.47)#91 2.6% (+2.31)#3,628
92. Sault Ste Marie 4.9% 2.4% (+2.47)#92 2.6% (+2.31)#3,638
93. Hancock 4.9% 2.4% (+2.46)#93 2.6% (+2.30)#3,645
94. Gladwin 4.8% 2.4% (+2.43)#94 2.6% (+2.27)#3,688
95. East Lansing 4.7% 2.4% (+2.34)#95 2.6% (+2.17)#3,803
96. Adrian 4.7% 2.4% (+2.33)#96 2.6% (+2.17)#3,817
97. Posen 4.7% 2.4% (+2.31)#97 2.6% (+2.14)#3,843
98. Grayling 4.7% 2.4% (+2.30)#98 2.6% (+2.14)#3,851
99. Ida 4.7% 2.4% (+2.28)#99 2.6% (+2.12)#3,875
100. Hesperia 4.6% 2.4% (+2.25)#100 2.6% (+2.08)#3,934

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Personal Care and Service in Michigan?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Personal Care and Service in Michigan are:
#1
45.0%
#2
33.3%
#3
18.2%
#4
14.8%
#5
14.5%
#6
14.3%
#7
13.8%
#8
13.7%
#9
12.1%
#10
10.6%
What city has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Personal Care and Service in Michigan?
Cedar has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Personal Care and Service in Michigan with 45.0%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Personal Care and Service in the State of Michigan?
Percentage of Population Employed in Personal Care and Service in Michigan is 2.4%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Personal Care and Service in the United States?
Percentage of Population Employed in Personal Care and Service in the United States is 2.6%.