Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Females Between Ages 18 and 24 in Michigan

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Highest Poverty | Female 18-24
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Michigan
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Females Between Ages 18 and 24 in Michigan

0.0%
100.0%
Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Females Between Ages 18 and 24 in Michigan Map

Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Females Between Ages 18 and 24 in Michigan

City Female Poverty vs State vs National
1. Hubbell 100.0% 23.3% (+76.7)#1 21.6% (+78.4)#260
2. Harrisville 100.0% 23.3% (+76.7)#2 21.6% (+78.4)#380
3. Winn 100.0% 23.3% (+76.7)#3 21.6% (+78.4)#583
4. Amasa 100.0% 23.3% (+76.7)#4 21.6% (+78.4)#594
5. Bruce Crossing 100.0% 23.3% (+76.7)#5 21.6% (+78.4)#595
6. Michigamme 100.0% 23.3% (+76.7)#6 21.6% (+78.4)#640
7. Twining 100.0% 23.3% (+76.7)#7 21.6% (+78.4)#646
8. Walkerville 100.0% 23.3% (+76.7)#8 21.6% (+78.4)#661
9. Jennings 100.0% 23.3% (+76.7)#9 21.6% (+78.4)#680
10. Rockland 100.0% 23.3% (+76.7)#10 21.6% (+78.4)#697
11. Millersburg 100.0% 23.3% (+76.7)#11 21.6% (+78.4)#745
12. Eagle Harbor 100.0% 23.3% (+76.7)#12 21.6% (+78.4)#795
13. Skidway Lake 93.8% 23.3% (+70.5)#13 21.6% (+72.2)#1,020
14. Pittsford 88.2% 23.3% (+65.0)#14 21.6% (+66.6)#1,102
15. Cement City 81.2% 23.3% (+58.0)#15 21.6% (+59.7)#1,254
16. Rosebush 79.3% 23.3% (+56.1)#16 21.6% (+57.7)#1,318
17. Montrose 76.2% 23.3% (+53.0)#17 21.6% (+54.7)#1,428
18. Richmond 75.0% 23.3% (+51.7)#18 21.6% (+53.4)#1,462
19. Mount Pleasant 73.0% 23.3% (+49.8)#19 21.6% (+51.4)#1,577
20. Port Sanilac 72.7% 23.3% (+49.5)#20 21.6% (+51.1)#1,585
21. Calumet 71.9% 23.3% (+48.7)#21 21.6% (+50.3)#1,631
22. Minden City 71.4% 23.3% (+48.2)#22 21.6% (+49.8)#1,654
23. Shields 71.3% 23.3% (+48.1)#23 21.6% (+49.7)#1,660
24. Houghton 70.9% 23.3% (+47.7)#24 21.6% (+49.3)#1,669
25. Allendale 70.9% 23.3% (+47.6)#25 21.6% (+49.3)#1,671
26. White Cloud 70.0% 23.3% (+46.7)#26 21.6% (+48.4)#1,706
27. Casnovia 69.2% 23.3% (+46.0)#27 21.6% (+47.6)#1,742
28. Benton Heights 68.9% 23.3% (+45.7)#28 21.6% (+47.3)#1,756
29. Brownlee Park 64.4% 23.3% (+41.2)#29 21.6% (+42.8)#2,033
30. Lexington 64.3% 23.3% (+41.0)#30 21.6% (+42.7)#2,042
31. South Haven 64.0% 23.3% (+40.7)#31 21.6% (+42.4)#2,055
32. East Lansing 64.0% 23.3% (+40.7)#32 21.6% (+42.4)#2,059
33. Laurium 63.8% 23.3% (+40.6)#33 21.6% (+42.2)#2,068
34. Ann Arbor 62.9% 23.3% (+39.6)#34 21.6% (+41.3)#2,118
35. Springfield 62.9% 23.3% (+39.6)#35 21.6% (+41.3)#2,119
36. Kalkaska 62.5% 23.3% (+39.2)#36 21.6% (+40.9)#2,140
37. Dowagiac 62.2% 23.3% (+38.9)#37 21.6% (+40.6)#2,182
38. Eagle 60.0% 23.3% (+36.7)#38 21.6% (+38.4)#2,355
39. Quincy 59.6% 23.3% (+36.4)#39 21.6% (+38.0)#2,367
40. Fair Plain 58.9% 23.3% (+35.6)#40 21.6% (+37.3)#2,410
41. Pinconning 57.9% 23.3% (+34.6)#41 21.6% (+36.3)#2,485
42. Litchfield 57.7% 23.3% (+34.4)#42 21.6% (+36.1)#2,510
43. Unionville 57.7% 23.3% (+34.4)#43 21.6% (+36.1)#2,512
44. Elkton 57.1% 23.3% (+33.9)#44 21.6% (+35.5)#2,551
45. Charlevoix 56.8% 23.3% (+33.6)#45 21.6% (+35.2)#2,593
46. Lake Isabella 56.4% 23.3% (+33.2)#46 21.6% (+34.8)#2,617
47. Olivet 56.3% 23.3% (+33.1)#47 21.6% (+34.7)#2,624
48. Westwood 56.3% 23.3% (+33.1)#48 21.6% (+34.7)#2,625
49. Marquette 56.2% 23.3% (+33.0)#49 21.6% (+34.6)#2,633
50. Zeeland 55.8% 23.3% (+32.5)#50 21.6% (+34.2)#2,658
51. Watervliet 55.6% 23.3% (+32.3)#51 21.6% (+34.0)#2,669
52. Pierson 55.6% 23.3% (+32.3)#52 21.6% (+34.0)#2,701
53. Scottville 55.2% 23.3% (+31.9)#53 21.6% (+33.6)#2,718
54. Kalamazoo 54.7% 23.3% (+31.5)#54 21.6% (+33.1)#2,746
55. Beaverton 54.5% 23.3% (+31.3)#55 21.6% (+32.9)#2,762
56. Clare 54.1% 23.3% (+30.8)#56 21.6% (+32.5)#2,805
57. Big Rapids 53.7% 23.3% (+30.4)#57 21.6% (+32.1)#2,856
58. Okemos 53.3% 23.3% (+30.1)#58 21.6% (+31.7)#2,905
59. Rockwood 52.9% 23.3% (+29.7)#59 21.6% (+31.3)#2,922
60. Reading 52.9% 23.3% (+29.7)#60 21.6% (+31.3)#2,927
61. Manitou Beach Devils Lake 52.9% 23.3% (+29.6)#61 21.6% (+31.3)#2,943
62. Mayville 52.5% 23.3% (+29.2)#62 21.6% (+30.9)#2,984
63. Cassopolis 52.4% 23.3% (+29.1)#63 21.6% (+30.8)#2,992
64. Eau Claire 52.4% 23.3% (+29.1)#64 21.6% (+30.8)#2,994
65. Clio 52.2% 23.3% (+28.9)#65 21.6% (+30.6)#3,013
66. Mesick 51.7% 23.3% (+28.5)#66 21.6% (+30.1)#3,051
67. Grayling 50.0% 23.3% (+26.7)#67 21.6% (+28.4)#3,163
68. Bloomingdale 50.0% 23.3% (+26.7)#68 21.6% (+28.4)#3,231
69. River Rouge 49.3% 23.3% (+26.1)#69 21.6% (+27.7)#3,378
70. St Ignace 48.4% 23.3% (+25.1)#70 21.6% (+26.8)#3,448
71. Ypsilanti 48.1% 23.3% (+24.8)#71 21.6% (+26.5)#3,482
72. Addison 47.1% 23.3% (+23.8)#72 21.6% (+25.5)#3,584
73. White Pine 47.1% 23.3% (+23.8)#73 21.6% (+25.5)#3,591
74. Imlay City 46.3% 23.3% (+23.0)#74 21.6% (+24.7)#3,681
75. Eureka 46.2% 23.3% (+22.9)#75 21.6% (+24.6)#3,714
76. Marlette 46.0% 23.3% (+22.7)#76 21.6% (+24.4)#3,722
77. Vassar 45.4% 23.3% (+22.1)#77 21.6% (+23.8)#3,816
78. Caro 45.4% 23.3% (+22.1)#78 21.6% (+23.8)#3,818
79. Bay City 45.3% 23.3% (+22.1)#79 21.6% (+23.7)#3,820
80. Decatur 45.2% 23.3% (+22.0)#80 21.6% (+23.6)#3,829
81. Woodland 45.2% 23.3% (+21.9)#81 21.6% (+23.6)#3,837
82. Corunna 45.1% 23.3% (+21.8)#82 21.6% (+23.5)#3,843
83. Gaastra 44.4% 23.3% (+21.2)#83 21.6% (+22.8)#3,934
84. Hamtramck 44.2% 23.3% (+21.0)#84 21.6% (+22.6)#3,954
85. Centreville 44.1% 23.3% (+20.9)#85 21.6% (+22.5)#3,962
86. St Helen 43.9% 23.3% (+20.6)#86 21.6% (+22.3)#3,983
87. White Pigeon 43.9% 23.3% (+20.6)#87 21.6% (+22.3)#3,989
88. Stony Point 43.3% 23.3% (+20.1)#88 21.6% (+21.7)#4,043
89. Algonac 43.2% 23.3% (+19.9)#89 21.6% (+21.6)#4,057
90. Lawrence 43.1% 23.3% (+19.9)#90 21.6% (+21.5)#4,064
91. Houghton Lake 43.0% 23.3% (+19.7)#91 21.6% (+21.4)#4,072
92. Rapid City 42.9% 23.3% (+19.6)#92 21.6% (+21.3)#4,096
93. Onaway 42.7% 23.3% (+19.5)#93 21.6% (+21.1)#4,149
94. Quinnesec 42.5% 23.3% (+19.2)#94 21.6% (+20.9)#4,173
95. Ecorse 42.3% 23.3% (+19.1)#95 21.6% (+20.7)#4,187
96. Howard City 42.2% 23.3% (+19.0)#96 21.6% (+20.6)#4,197
97. Adrian 42.1% 23.3% (+18.9)#97 21.6% (+20.5)#4,207
98. Camden 41.9% 23.3% (+18.6)#98 21.6% (+20.3)#4,257
99. Parma 41.7% 23.3% (+18.4)#99 21.6% (+20.1)#4,287
100. Marshall 41.6% 23.3% (+18.4)#100 21.6% (+20.0)#4,312

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Females Between Ages 18 and 24 in Michigan?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Females Between Ages 18 and 24 in Michigan are:
#1
100.0%
#2
100.0%
#3
100.0%
#4
100.0%
#5
100.0%
#6
100.0%
#7
100.0%
#8
100.0%
#9
100.0%
#10
93.8%
What city has the Highest Poverty Level Among Females Between Ages 18 and 24 in Michigan?
Hubbell has the Highest Poverty Level Among Females Between Ages 18 and 24 in Michigan with 100.0%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Females Between Ages 18 and 24 in the State of Michigan?
Poverty Level Among Females Between Ages 18 and 24 in Michigan is 23.3%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Females Between Ages 18 and 24 in the United States?
Poverty Level Among Females Between Ages 18 and 24 in the United States is 21.6%.