Cities with the Lowest Child Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in Michigan

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Lowest Poverty | Girls 0-16
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Michigan
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Lowest Child Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in Michigan

8.0%
0.0%
Cities with the Lowest Child Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in Michigan Map

Cities with the Lowest Child Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in Michigan

City Child Poverty (Girls) vs State vs National
1. Plymouth 0.55% 18.3% (-17.8)#1 17.0% (-16.4)#51
2. Hudsonville 0.74% 18.3% (-17.6)#2 17.0% (-16.2)#82
3. Berkley 0.83% 18.3% (-17.5)#3 17.0% (-16.1)#104
4. Caledonia 0.87% 18.3% (-17.5)#4 17.0% (-16.1)#116
5. Grosse Pointe Park 0.89% 18.3% (-17.4)#5 17.0% (-16.1)#131
6. Canadian Lakes 1.0% 18.3% (-17.3)#6 17.0% (-15.9)#178
7. Burr Oak 1.2% 18.3% (-17.1)#7 17.0% (-15.7)#242
8. Kingsford 1.3% 18.3% (-17.0)#8 17.0% (-15.7)#263
9. South Lyon 1.4% 18.3% (-17.0)#9 17.0% (-15.6)#298
10. East Grand Rapids 1.4% 18.3% (-17.0)#10 17.0% (-15.6)#303
11. Ferndale 1.5% 18.3% (-16.8)#11 17.0% (-15.5)#359
12. Allendale 1.6% 18.3% (-16.7)#12 17.0% (-15.4)#393
13. Concord 1.6% 18.3% (-16.7)#13 17.0% (-15.4)#394
14. Centreville 1.7% 18.3% (-16.6)#14 17.0% (-15.3)#432
15. Dexter 1.8% 18.3% (-16.6)#15 17.0% (-15.2)#473
16. Bronson 2.0% 18.3% (-16.3)#16 17.0% (-15.0)#581
17. North Muskegon 2.2% 18.3% (-16.1)#17 17.0% (-14.8)#707
18. Sterling 2.3% 18.3% (-16.0)#18 17.0% (-14.7)#783
19. Whitmore Lake 2.6% 18.3% (-15.8)#19 17.0% (-14.4)#927
20. Brighton 2.7% 18.3% (-15.6)#20 17.0% (-14.2)#1,019
21. Fruitport 2.8% 18.3% (-15.6)#21 17.0% (-14.2)#1,025
22. Grosse Pointe Farms 2.9% 18.3% (-15.4)#22 17.0% (-14.1)#1,100
23. Litchfield 3.0% 18.3% (-15.3)#23 17.0% (-14.0)#1,177
24. Wolverine Lake 3.1% 18.3% (-15.2)#24 17.0% (-13.9)#1,242
25. Haslett 3.1% 18.3% (-15.2)#25 17.0% (-13.9)#1,244
26. Farmington Hills 3.2% 18.3% (-15.2)#26 17.0% (-13.8)#1,267
27. Birmingham 3.2% 18.3% (-15.1)#27 17.0% (-13.8)#1,279
28. Whitehall 3.2% 18.3% (-15.1)#28 17.0% (-13.8)#1,299
29. Metamora 3.2% 18.3% (-15.1)#29 17.0% (-13.8)#1,305
30. East Lansing 3.2% 18.3% (-15.1)#30 17.0% (-13.7)#1,315
31. Chelsea 3.3% 18.3% (-15.1)#31 17.0% (-13.7)#1,343
32. Spring Arbor 3.3% 18.3% (-15.0)#32 17.0% (-13.7)#1,348
33. New Baltimore 3.3% 18.3% (-15.0)#33 17.0% (-13.7)#1,362
34. Grass Lake 3.4% 18.3% (-14.9)#34 17.0% (-13.6)#1,404
35. Williamston 3.4% 18.3% (-14.9)#35 17.0% (-13.6)#1,411
36. Royal Oak 3.4% 18.3% (-14.9)#36 17.0% (-13.6)#1,425
37. Watervliet 3.4% 18.3% (-14.9)#37 17.0% (-13.6)#1,436
38. Petoskey 3.5% 18.3% (-14.8)#38 17.0% (-13.5)#1,472
39. Farmington 3.6% 18.3% (-14.8)#39 17.0% (-13.4)#1,528
40. Montague 3.6% 18.3% (-14.7)#40 17.0% (-13.4)#1,559
41. Rochester 3.6% 18.3% (-14.7)#41 17.0% (-13.3)#1,565
42. Bay Shore 3.7% 18.3% (-14.6)#42 17.0% (-13.3)#1,603
43. Chesaning 3.7% 18.3% (-14.6)#43 17.0% (-13.3)#1,610
44. Jenison 3.8% 18.3% (-14.5)#44 17.0% (-13.2)#1,652
45. Wixom 3.9% 18.3% (-14.4)#45 17.0% (-13.0)#1,754
46. Munising 3.9% 18.3% (-14.4)#46 17.0% (-13.0)#1,756
47. Tecumseh 4.0% 18.3% (-14.3)#47 17.0% (-13.0)#1,780
48. New Era 4.0% 18.3% (-14.3)#48 17.0% (-13.0)#1,794
49. Rochester Hills 4.0% 18.3% (-14.3)#49 17.0% (-13.0)#1,798
50. Lake Fenton 4.2% 18.3% (-14.2)#50 17.0% (-12.8)#1,890
51. Mason 4.2% 18.3% (-14.1)#51 17.0% (-12.8)#1,910
52. Boyne City 4.2% 18.3% (-14.1)#52 17.0% (-12.8)#1,915
53. Mcbain 4.2% 18.3% (-14.1)#53 17.0% (-12.8)#1,937
54. Bath 4.3% 18.3% (-14.1)#54 17.0% (-12.7)#1,958
55. Huntington Woods 4.4% 18.3% (-13.9)#55 17.0% (-12.6)#2,049
56. Vicksburg 4.5% 18.3% (-13.9)#56 17.0% (-12.5)#2,098
57. Quincy 4.5% 18.3% (-13.9)#57 17.0% (-12.5)#2,103
58. Greilickville 4.5% 18.3% (-13.8)#58 17.0% (-12.5)#2,113
59. Atlanta 4.5% 18.3% (-13.8)#59 17.0% (-12.4)#2,152
60. Kinde 4.5% 18.3% (-13.8)#60 17.0% (-12.4)#2,158
61. Flushing 4.7% 18.3% (-13.6)#61 17.0% (-12.3)#2,263
62. Northville 4.7% 18.3% (-13.6)#62 17.0% (-12.2)#2,274
63. Livonia 4.8% 18.3% (-13.5)#63 17.0% (-12.2)#2,307
64. Beverly Hills 4.8% 18.3% (-13.5)#64 17.0% (-12.2)#2,323
65. Middleville 4.8% 18.3% (-13.5)#65 17.0% (-12.1)#2,327
66. Sandusky 4.9% 18.3% (-13.5)#66 17.0% (-12.1)#2,357
67. Custer 4.9% 18.3% (-13.4)#67 17.0% (-12.1)#2,368
68. Trenton 5.0% 18.3% (-13.3)#68 17.0% (-12.0)#2,464
69. Saline 5.0% 18.3% (-13.3)#69 17.0% (-11.9)#2,485
70. Grand Ledge 5.1% 18.3% (-13.2)#70 17.0% (-11.9)#2,497
71. Hubbardston 5.1% 18.3% (-13.2)#71 17.0% (-11.8)#2,537
72. Troy 5.2% 18.3% (-13.1)#72 17.0% (-11.8)#2,571
73. Wolf Lake 5.3% 18.3% (-13.0)#73 17.0% (-11.7)#2,644
74. Auburn 5.5% 18.3% (-12.9)#74 17.0% (-11.5)#2,706
75. Grosse Pointe Woods 5.6% 18.3% (-12.8)#75 17.0% (-11.4)#2,746
76. Sherwood 5.6% 18.3% (-12.8)#76 17.0% (-11.4)#2,763
77. Utica 5.8% 18.3% (-12.5)#77 17.0% (-11.2)#2,896
78. Mio 5.9% 18.3% (-12.4)#78 17.0% (-11.1)#2,947
79. Portage 6.1% 18.3% (-12.2)#79 17.0% (-10.9)#3,075
80. Marysville 6.1% 18.3% (-12.2)#80 17.0% (-10.9)#3,078
81. Bangor 6.1% 18.3% (-12.2)#81 17.0% (-10.8)#3,106
82. Berrien Springs 6.1% 18.3% (-12.2)#82 17.0% (-10.8)#3,110
83. Fostoria 6.2% 18.3% (-12.1)#83 17.0% (-10.7)#3,165
84. Snover 6.2% 18.3% (-12.1)#84 17.0% (-10.7)#3,184
85. Hermansville 6.3% 18.3% (-12.0)#85 17.0% (-10.6)#3,226
86. Dryden 6.4% 18.3% (-11.9)#86 17.0% (-10.6)#3,234
87. Traverse City 6.5% 18.3% (-11.8)#87 17.0% (-10.5)#3,289
88. Harvey 6.6% 18.3% (-11.7)#88 17.0% (-10.3)#3,379
89. Novi 6.7% 18.3% (-11.6)#89 17.0% (-10.2)#3,452
90. Alanson 6.8% 18.3% (-11.6)#90 17.0% (-10.2)#3,476
91. Pinconning 6.8% 18.3% (-11.5)#91 17.0% (-10.2)#3,487
92. Hersey 6.8% 18.3% (-11.5)#92 17.0% (-10.2)#3,515
93. Center Line 6.8% 18.3% (-11.5)#93 17.0% (-10.2)#3,516
94. Ann Arbor 7.0% 18.3% (-11.3)#94 17.0% (-9.99)#3,614
95. Houghton 7.1% 18.3% (-11.2)#95 17.0% (-9.83)#3,691
96. Decatur 7.1% 18.3% (-11.2)#96 17.0% (-9.83)#3,695
97. Kingsley 7.3% 18.3% (-11.0)#97 17.0% (-9.70)#3,797
98. Walker 7.3% 18.3% (-11.0)#98 17.0% (-9.66)#3,822
99. Okemos 7.3% 18.3% (-11.0)#99 17.0% (-9.65)#3,823
100. Milan 7.4% 18.3% (-10.9)#100 17.0% (-9.56)#3,880

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Lowest Child Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in Michigan?
Top 10 Cities with the Lowest Child Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in Michigan are:
What city has the Lowest Child Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in Michigan?
Plymouth has the Lowest Child Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in Michigan with 0.55%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in the State of Michigan?
Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in Michigan is 18.3%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in the United States?
Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in the United States is 17.0%.