Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Retail Trade in Michigan

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Retail Trade
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Michigan
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Retail Trade in Michigan

0.0%
100.0%
Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Retail Trade in Michigan Map

Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Retail Trade in Michigan

City % Employed vs State vs National
1. Hurontown 84.3% 10.8% (+73.5)#1 11.0% (+73.3)#66
2. Pelkie 42.1% 10.8% (+31.3)#2 11.0% (+31.1)#419
3. Copper Harbor 40.7% 10.8% (+29.9)#3 11.0% (+29.8)#460
4. Parkdale 37.8% 10.8% (+27.0)#4 11.0% (+26.8)#564
5. Cross Village 37.5% 10.8% (+26.7)#5 11.0% (+26.5)#578
6. Levering 37.5% 10.8% (+26.7)#6 11.0% (+26.5)#579
7. Carp Lake 37.2% 10.8% (+26.4)#7 11.0% (+26.2)#594
8. Watersmeet 33.6% 10.8% (+22.8)#8 11.0% (+22.6)#767
9. Alpha 30.9% 10.8% (+20.1)#9 11.0% (+19.9)#990
10. Walkerville 29.3% 10.8% (+18.5)#10 11.0% (+18.3)#1,131
11. St Ignace 29.2% 10.8% (+18.4)#11 11.0% (+18.2)#1,146
12. Haring 28.2% 10.8% (+17.4)#12 11.0% (+17.2)#1,261
13. Alden 28.0% 10.8% (+17.2)#13 11.0% (+17.0)#1,285
14. Copper City 27.7% 10.8% (+16.9)#14 11.0% (+16.7)#1,329
15. Millburg 26.8% 10.8% (+16.0)#15 11.0% (+15.8)#1,446
16. Cannonsburg 26.2% 10.8% (+15.4)#16 11.0% (+15.2)#1,523
17. Lupton 25.9% 10.8% (+15.1)#17 11.0% (+14.9)#1,571
18. Lake Linden 25.6% 10.8% (+14.8)#18 11.0% (+14.6)#1,618
19. Oak Hill 25.5% 10.8% (+14.7)#19 11.0% (+14.5)#1,631
20. Pentwater 24.7% 10.8% (+13.9)#20 11.0% (+13.7)#1,813
21. Alba 24.7% 10.8% (+13.9)#21 11.0% (+13.7)#1,814
22. Bay View 24.5% 10.8% (+13.7)#22 11.0% (+13.5)#1,853
23. Birch Run 24.2% 10.8% (+13.4)#23 11.0% (+13.2)#1,928
24. Whittemore 24.0% 10.8% (+13.2)#24 11.0% (+13.0)#1,964
25. Standish 23.9% 10.8% (+13.1)#25 11.0% (+12.9)#1,989
26. Palmer 23.8% 10.8% (+13.0)#26 11.0% (+12.8)#2,003
27. Posen 23.5% 10.8% (+12.7)#27 11.0% (+12.5)#2,074
28. Montrose 23.5% 10.8% (+12.7)#28 11.0% (+12.5)#2,103
29. Three Lakes 23.2% 10.8% (+12.4)#29 11.0% (+12.2)#2,167
30. Elk Rapids 22.7% 10.8% (+11.9)#30 11.0% (+11.7)#2,299
31. Lakes Of The North 22.4% 10.8% (+11.6)#31 11.0% (+11.4)#2,376
32. Atlantic Mine 22.2% 10.8% (+11.4)#32 11.0% (+11.2)#2,448
33. Cheboygan 22.2% 10.8% (+11.4)#33 11.0% (+11.2)#2,455
34. Paw Paw 22.0% 10.8% (+11.3)#34 11.0% (+11.1)#2,486
35. Camden 21.9% 10.8% (+11.1)#35 11.0% (+10.9)#2,528
36. Akron 21.9% 10.8% (+11.1)#36 11.0% (+10.9)#2,533
37. Boon 21.7% 10.8% (+10.9)#37 11.0% (+10.7)#2,584
38. Belding 21.7% 10.8% (+10.9)#38 11.0% (+10.7)#2,592
39. Port Austin 21.6% 10.8% (+10.8)#39 11.0% (+10.6)#2,623
40. Sanford 21.5% 10.8% (+10.8)#40 11.0% (+10.6)#2,644
41. Otter Lake 21.5% 10.8% (+10.7)#41 11.0% (+10.5)#2,661
42. Cassopolis 21.4% 10.8% (+10.6)#42 11.0% (+10.4)#2,672
43. Allen 21.4% 10.8% (+10.6)#43 11.0% (+10.4)#2,675
44. Union City 21.3% 10.8% (+10.5)#44 11.0% (+10.3)#2,745
45. St Helen 21.1% 10.8% (+10.3)#45 11.0% (+10.1)#2,788
46. Mayville 20.9% 10.8% (+10.1)#46 11.0% (+9.89)#2,886
47. Turner 20.8% 10.8% (+10.0)#47 11.0% (+9.84)#2,907
48. Grawn 20.8% 10.8% (+10.0)#48 11.0% (+9.84)#2,911
49. Republic 20.7% 10.8% (+9.95)#49 11.0% (+9.75)#2,935
50. Lake Ann 20.6% 10.8% (+9.83)#50 11.0% (+9.64)#2,983
51. Buena Vista 20.6% 10.8% (+9.78)#51 11.0% (+9.58)#3,010
52. Lennon 20.5% 10.8% (+9.68)#52 11.0% (+9.48)#3,047
53. Barnes Lake 20.4% 10.8% (+9.66)#53 11.0% (+9.46)#3,061
54. Grass Lake 20.4% 10.8% (+9.63)#54 11.0% (+9.43)#3,068
55. Beulah 20.4% 10.8% (+9.62)#55 11.0% (+9.42)#3,076
56. Onsted 20.3% 10.8% (+9.51)#56 11.0% (+9.31)#3,120
57. Caspian 20.1% 10.8% (+9.29)#57 11.0% (+9.10)#3,213
58. West Branch 20.0% 10.8% (+9.21)#58 11.0% (+9.01)#3,245
59. Ossineke 20.0% 10.8% (+9.21)#59 11.0% (+9.01)#3,250
60. Interlochen 20.0% 10.8% (+9.21)#60 11.0% (+9.01)#3,254
61. Stanton 20.0% 10.8% (+9.16)#61 11.0% (+8.96)#3,314
62. Hermansville 19.8% 10.8% (+9.01)#62 11.0% (+8.81)#3,370
63. Custer 19.7% 10.8% (+8.94)#63 11.0% (+8.74)#3,397
64. Escanaba 19.6% 10.8% (+8.85)#64 11.0% (+8.65)#3,436
65. Lincoln 19.5% 10.8% (+8.72)#65 11.0% (+8.52)#3,502
66. White Pine 19.5% 10.8% (+8.70)#66 11.0% (+8.50)#3,517
67. Oakley 19.5% 10.8% (+8.68)#67 11.0% (+8.48)#3,530
68. Plainwell 19.5% 10.8% (+8.66)#68 11.0% (+8.46)#3,536
69. Waldron 19.4% 10.8% (+8.57)#69 11.0% (+8.38)#3,569
70. White Cloud 19.4% 10.8% (+8.57)#70 11.0% (+8.37)#3,571
71. Snover 19.4% 10.8% (+8.56)#71 11.0% (+8.37)#3,574
72. Davison 19.3% 10.8% (+8.50)#72 11.0% (+8.30)#3,605
73. Suttons Bay 19.3% 10.8% (+8.47)#73 11.0% (+8.28)#3,618
74. Benzonia 19.2% 10.8% (+8.42)#74 11.0% (+8.22)#3,660
75. Crystal Falls 19.2% 10.8% (+8.39)#75 11.0% (+8.19)#3,667
76. Ferrysburg 19.1% 10.8% (+8.33)#76 11.0% (+8.13)#3,694
77. Onaway 19.1% 10.8% (+8.29)#77 11.0% (+8.09)#3,711
78. Beechwood 18.9% 10.8% (+8.11)#78 11.0% (+7.92)#3,823
79. Kalkaska 18.8% 10.8% (+8.05)#79 11.0% (+7.85)#3,852
80. Kaleva 18.8% 10.8% (+8.05)#80 11.0% (+7.85)#3,853
81. Vernon 18.7% 10.8% (+7.91)#81 11.0% (+7.71)#3,939
82. Mecosta 18.7% 10.8% (+7.86)#82 11.0% (+7.66)#3,965
83. Bad Axe 18.5% 10.8% (+7.75)#83 11.0% (+7.55)#4,018
84. Bendon 18.5% 10.8% (+7.69)#84 11.0% (+7.49)#4,069
85. Maple Rapids 18.5% 10.8% (+7.68)#85 11.0% (+7.49)#4,074
86. Buchanan 18.5% 10.8% (+7.68)#86 11.0% (+7.48)#4,076
87. Gaylord 18.4% 10.8% (+7.65)#87 11.0% (+7.45)#4,098
88. Lapeer 18.4% 10.8% (+7.63)#88 11.0% (+7.43)#4,102
89. Ionia 18.4% 10.8% (+7.57)#89 11.0% (+7.37)#4,140
90. South Range 18.3% 10.8% (+7.47)#90 11.0% (+7.27)#4,198
91. Muir 18.1% 10.8% (+7.32)#91 11.0% (+7.12)#4,303
92. Melvindale 18.1% 10.8% (+7.32)#92 11.0% (+7.12)#4,308
93. Casnovia 18.1% 10.8% (+7.30)#93 11.0% (+7.11)#4,316
94. Norway 18.1% 10.8% (+7.29)#94 11.0% (+7.09)#4,322
95. Mesick 18.0% 10.8% (+7.25)#95 11.0% (+7.06)#4,350
96. Port Sanilac 18.0% 10.8% (+7.24)#96 11.0% (+7.04)#4,364
97. Hartland 18.0% 10.8% (+7.19)#97 11.0% (+6.99)#4,397
98. Carleton 18.0% 10.8% (+7.16)#98 11.0% (+6.96)#4,412
99. Buckley 17.9% 10.8% (+7.14)#99 11.0% (+6.94)#4,425
100. Montgomery 17.9% 10.8% (+7.12)#100 11.0% (+6.92)#4,435

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Retail Trade in Michigan?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Retail Trade in Michigan are:
#1
40.7%
#2
37.8%
#3
37.5%
#4
37.5%
#5
37.2%
#6
33.6%
#7
30.9%
#8
29.3%
#9
29.2%
#10
28.2%
What city has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Retail Trade in Michigan?
Copper Harbor has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Retail Trade in Michigan with 40.7%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Retail Trade in the State of Michigan?
Percentage of Population Employed in Retail Trade in Michigan is 10.8%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Retail Trade in the United States?
Percentage of Population Employed in Retail Trade in the United States is 11.0%.