Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Security & Protection in Michigan

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Security & Protection
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Michigan
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Security & Protection in Michigan

0.0%
40.0%
Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Security & Protection in Michigan Map

Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Security & Protection in Michigan

City % Employed vs State vs National
1. Pelkie 31.6% 1.6% (+29.9)#1 2.1% (+29.4)#106
2. Watersmeet 26.9% 1.6% (+25.2)#2 2.1% (+24.7)#151
3. Bruce Crossing 25.0% 1.6% (+23.4)#3 2.1% (+22.9)#178
4. Zeba 21.4% 1.6% (+19.8)#4 2.1% (+19.3)#245
5. Arcadia 15.9% 1.6% (+14.3)#5 2.1% (+13.8)#440
6. Marenisco 14.3% 1.6% (+12.6)#6 2.1% (+12.1)#540
7. Maple Grove 11.7% 1.6% (+10.0)#7 2.1% (+9.53)#812
8. Jasper 11.2% 1.6% (+9.59)#8 2.1% (+9.08)#877
9. Onekama 10.8% 1.6% (+9.20)#9 2.1% (+8.69)#945
10. Lake Victoria 10.7% 1.6% (+9.03)#10 2.1% (+8.52)#976
11. Alpha 10.6% 1.6% (+9.00)#11 2.1% (+8.49)#987
12. Roscommon 10.4% 1.6% (+8.72)#12 2.1% (+8.22)#1,036
13. Eureka 9.8% 1.6% (+8.19)#13 2.1% (+7.69)#1,126
14. Tower 9.6% 1.6% (+7.96)#14 2.1% (+7.45)#1,180
15. Kincheloe 9.3% 1.6% (+7.64)#15 2.1% (+7.13)#1,248
16. Brimley 8.9% 1.6% (+7.26)#16 2.1% (+6.76)#1,366
17. Manistique 8.9% 1.6% (+7.23)#17 2.1% (+6.72)#1,378
18. Cannonsburg 8.7% 1.6% (+7.10)#18 2.1% (+6.59)#1,418
19. Canada Creek Ranch 8.5% 1.6% (+6.90)#19 2.1% (+6.39)#1,475
20. Hardwood Acres 8.5% 1.6% (+6.87)#20 2.1% (+6.36)#1,487
21. Whitehall 8.5% 1.6% (+6.83)#21 2.1% (+6.32)#1,498
22. Oak Hill 8.1% 1.6% (+6.46)#22 2.1% (+5.95)#1,624
23. Glen Arbor 8.0% 1.6% (+6.32)#23 2.1% (+5.82)#1,671
24. Omena 7.7% 1.6% (+6.05)#24 2.1% (+5.54)#1,761
25. Alba 7.5% 1.6% (+5.81)#25 2.1% (+5.30)#1,879
26. Trowbridge Park 7.3% 1.6% (+5.65)#26 2.1% (+5.15)#1,948
27. Vineyard Lake 7.1% 1.6% (+5.50)#27 2.1% (+4.99)#1,996
28. Pewamo 7.1% 1.6% (+5.50)#28 2.1% (+4.99)#2,002
29. Michigamme 7.0% 1.6% (+5.40)#29 2.1% (+4.89)#2,054
30. Prescott 6.9% 1.6% (+5.26)#30 2.1% (+4.75)#2,136
31. Au Gres 6.8% 1.6% (+5.21)#31 2.1% (+4.70)#2,160
32. Rock 6.7% 1.6% (+5.10)#32 2.1% (+4.59)#2,217
33. Baraga 6.7% 1.6% (+5.09)#33 2.1% (+4.58)#2,227
34. L Anse 6.5% 1.6% (+4.86)#34 2.1% (+4.36)#2,356
35. Snover 6.5% 1.6% (+4.81)#35 2.1% (+4.30)#2,390
36. Mattawan 6.3% 1.6% (+4.69)#36 2.1% (+4.18)#2,481
37. Lake Orion 6.2% 1.6% (+4.54)#37 2.1% (+4.03)#2,572
38. Gibraltar 6.0% 1.6% (+4.38)#38 2.1% (+3.87)#2,693
39. Greenville 6.0% 1.6% (+4.33)#39 2.1% (+3.83)#2,727
40. Dodgeville 5.7% 1.6% (+4.09)#40 2.1% (+3.58)#2,941
41. Lost Lake Woods 5.7% 1.6% (+4.07)#41 2.1% (+3.57)#2,951
42. Mass 5.7% 1.6% (+4.07)#42 2.1% (+3.57)#2,956
43. Inkster 5.6% 1.6% (+3.92)#43 2.1% (+3.41)#3,096
44. Beaverton 5.5% 1.6% (+3.85)#44 2.1% (+3.34)#3,171
45. Twining 5.5% 1.6% (+3.84)#45 2.1% (+3.33)#3,187
46. West Ishpeming 5.5% 1.6% (+3.83)#46 2.1% (+3.32)#3,194
47. Highland Park 5.4% 1.6% (+3.72)#47 2.1% (+3.21)#3,299
48. Fremont 5.3% 1.6% (+3.70)#48 2.1% (+3.19)#3,319
49. Wellston 5.3% 1.6% (+3.69)#49 2.1% (+3.18)#3,326
50. Sheridan 5.2% 1.6% (+3.61)#50 2.1% (+3.10)#3,431
51. Canadian Lakes 5.2% 1.6% (+3.59)#51 2.1% (+3.09)#3,444
52. St Johns 5.2% 1.6% (+3.55)#52 2.1% (+3.04)#3,489
53. Perrinton 5.2% 1.6% (+3.54)#53 2.1% (+3.03)#3,494
54. Potterville 5.1% 1.6% (+3.50)#54 2.1% (+3.00)#3,536
55. Harbor Springs 5.0% 1.6% (+3.37)#55 2.1% (+2.86)#3,675
56. Laingsburg 4.9% 1.6% (+3.29)#56 2.1% (+2.78)#3,769
57. Buchanan 4.8% 1.6% (+3.11)#57 2.1% (+2.60)#3,974
58. Michigan Center 4.7% 1.6% (+3.09)#58 2.1% (+2.58)#3,993
59. Dimondale 4.7% 1.6% (+3.06)#59 2.1% (+2.56)#4,029
60. New Era 4.7% 1.6% (+3.02)#60 2.1% (+2.51)#4,095
61. Ramsay 4.5% 1.6% (+2.90)#61 2.1% (+2.40)#4,248
62. Gwinn 4.5% 1.6% (+2.89)#62 2.1% (+2.39)#4,274
63. Marion 4.5% 1.6% (+2.88)#63 2.1% (+2.37)#4,286
64. Grayling 4.5% 1.6% (+2.87)#64 2.1% (+2.36)#4,300
65. Fowlerville 4.5% 1.6% (+2.86)#65 2.1% (+2.36)#4,312
66. Norway 4.5% 1.6% (+2.86)#66 2.1% (+2.35)#4,318
67. Ithaca 4.5% 1.6% (+2.84)#67 2.1% (+2.34)#4,336
68. Lawrence 4.5% 1.6% (+2.83)#68 2.1% (+2.32)#4,363
69. Quincy 4.5% 1.6% (+2.83)#69 2.1% (+2.32)#4,364
70. Hopkins 4.4% 1.6% (+2.73)#70 2.1% (+2.22)#4,505
71. Big Bay 4.3% 1.6% (+2.71)#71 2.1% (+2.20)#4,538
72. Hartford 4.3% 1.6% (+2.67)#72 2.1% (+2.17)#4,593
73. White Pine 4.2% 1.6% (+2.60)#73 2.1% (+2.09)#4,702
74. Palmer 4.2% 1.6% (+2.59)#74 2.1% (+2.08)#4,708
75. Levering 4.2% 1.6% (+2.53)#75 2.1% (+2.02)#4,809
76. Robin Glen Indiantown 4.2% 1.6% (+2.51)#76 2.1% (+2.00)#4,835
77. Lake Michigan Beach 4.1% 1.6% (+2.46)#77 2.1% (+1.95)#4,938
78. Stephenson 4.1% 1.6% (+2.44)#78 2.1% (+1.93)#4,963
79. Beulah 4.1% 1.6% (+2.44)#79 2.1% (+1.93)#4,970
80. Ontonagon 4.1% 1.6% (+2.42)#80 2.1% (+1.91)#4,996
81. Goodrich 4.0% 1.6% (+2.41)#81 2.1% (+1.90)#5,009
82. Sebewaing 4.0% 1.6% (+2.38)#82 2.1% (+1.88)#5,047
83. Saranac 4.0% 1.6% (+2.37)#83 2.1% (+1.86)#5,072
84. Baldwin 4.0% 1.6% (+2.36)#84 2.1% (+1.85)#5,088
85. Trenton 4.0% 1.6% (+2.35)#85 2.1% (+1.84)#5,125
86. Brooklyn 3.9% 1.6% (+2.27)#86 2.1% (+1.76)#5,270
87. Port Hope 3.8% 1.6% (+2.20)#87 2.1% (+1.70)#5,410
88. Shields 3.8% 1.6% (+2.19)#88 2.1% (+1.69)#5,440
89. Houghton Lake 3.8% 1.6% (+2.13)#89 2.1% (+1.63)#5,538
90. Big Rapids 3.7% 1.6% (+2.06)#90 2.1% (+1.56)#5,688
91. Morley 3.7% 1.6% (+2.06)#91 2.1% (+1.56)#5,694
92. Metamora 3.7% 1.6% (+2.06)#92 2.1% (+1.56)#5,696
93. Fulton 3.7% 1.6% (+2.06)#93 2.1% (+1.56)#5,703
94. Marysville 3.7% 1.6% (+2.04)#94 2.1% (+1.53)#5,756
95. Coloma 3.7% 1.6% (+2.03)#95 2.1% (+1.52)#5,771
96. Parchment 3.7% 1.6% (+2.01)#96 2.1% (+1.51)#5,810
97. Ionia 3.7% 1.6% (+2.01)#97 2.1% (+1.51)#5,811
98. Ruby 3.6% 1.6% (+1.99)#98 2.1% (+1.48)#5,857
99. Sault Ste Marie 3.6% 1.6% (+1.92)#99 2.1% (+1.42)#5,989
100. Munising 3.5% 1.6% (+1.91)#100 2.1% (+1.40)#6,008

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Security & Protection in Michigan?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Security & Protection in Michigan are:
#1
26.9%
#2
21.4%
#3
15.9%
#4
14.3%
#5
11.7%
#6
11.2%
#7
10.8%
#8
10.7%
#9
10.6%
#10
10.4%
What city has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Security & Protection in Michigan?
Watersmeet has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Security & Protection in Michigan with 26.9%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Security & Protection in the State of Michigan?
Percentage of Population Employed in Security & Protection in Michigan is 1.6%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Security & Protection in the United States?
Percentage of Population Employed in Security & Protection in the United States is 2.1%.