Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Males in Michigan

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Highest Poverty | Single Male
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Michigan
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Males in Michigan

0.0%
100.0%
Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Males in Michigan Map

Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Males in Michigan

City Single Male Poverty vs State vs National
1. Stony Point 100.0% 13.1% (+86.9)#1 12.4% (+87.6)#108
2. Middletown 100.0% 13.1% (+86.9)#2 12.4% (+87.6)#324
3. Rosebush 100.0% 13.1% (+86.9)#3 12.4% (+87.6)#465
4. Eastport 100.0% 13.1% (+86.9)#4 12.4% (+87.6)#500
5. Emmett 100.0% 13.1% (+86.9)#5 12.4% (+87.6)#603
6. Minden City 100.0% 13.1% (+86.9)#6 12.4% (+87.6)#655
7. Conway 100.0% 13.1% (+86.9)#7 12.4% (+87.6)#731
8. Eagle 100.0% 13.1% (+86.9)#8 12.4% (+87.6)#789
9. Houghton 88.5% 13.1% (+75.4)#9 12.4% (+76.0)#961
10. Au Gres 85.7% 13.1% (+72.6)#10 12.4% (+73.3)#997
11. Baldwin 84.6% 13.1% (+71.5)#11 12.4% (+72.2)#1,022
12. Pittsford 84.6% 13.1% (+71.5)#12 12.4% (+72.2)#1,023
13. Galien 83.3% 13.1% (+70.2)#13 12.4% (+70.9)#1,041
14. Winn 82.4% 13.1% (+69.3)#14 12.4% (+69.9)#1,053
15. Hopkins 81.8% 13.1% (+68.7)#15 12.4% (+69.4)#1,064
16. Clayton 80.0% 13.1% (+66.9)#16 12.4% (+67.6)#1,106
17. Charlevoix 75.0% 13.1% (+61.9)#17 12.4% (+62.6)#1,188
18. Mount Morris 72.8% 13.1% (+59.7)#18 12.4% (+60.4)#1,255
19. Mesick 71.4% 13.1% (+58.3)#19 12.4% (+59.0)#1,297
20. Lake Linden 71.0% 13.1% (+57.9)#20 12.4% (+58.5)#1,314
21. Fostoria 70.0% 13.1% (+56.9)#21 12.4% (+57.6)#1,341
22. Port Sanilac 68.4% 13.1% (+55.3)#22 12.4% (+56.0)#1,384
23. St Charles 66.7% 13.1% (+53.6)#23 12.4% (+54.2)#1,422
24. Woodland 66.7% 13.1% (+53.6)#24 12.4% (+54.2)#1,452
25. Eastlake 66.7% 13.1% (+53.6)#25 12.4% (+54.2)#1,470
26. Weidman 65.5% 13.1% (+52.4)#26 12.4% (+53.0)#1,503
27. Onaway 64.1% 13.1% (+51.0)#27 12.4% (+51.7)#1,555
28. Ferrysburg 63.7% 13.1% (+50.6)#28 12.4% (+51.3)#1,560
29. Rothbury 63.6% 13.1% (+50.5)#29 12.4% (+51.2)#1,571
30. Vandercook Lake 63.0% 13.1% (+49.9)#30 12.4% (+50.6)#1,593
31. White Pigeon 62.8% 13.1% (+49.7)#31 12.4% (+50.4)#1,602
32. Elsie 62.5% 13.1% (+49.4)#32 12.4% (+50.1)#1,616
33. Reading 61.5% 13.1% (+48.4)#33 12.4% (+49.1)#1,651
34. Vassar 60.3% 13.1% (+47.2)#34 12.4% (+47.9)#1,700
35. Hermansville 58.3% 13.1% (+45.2)#35 12.4% (+45.9)#1,813
36. Gwinn 57.1% 13.1% (+44.0)#36 12.4% (+44.7)#1,846
37. Atlantic Mine 57.1% 13.1% (+44.0)#37 12.4% (+44.7)#1,858
38. Naubinway 57.1% 13.1% (+44.0)#38 12.4% (+44.7)#1,874
39. Bellaire 56.2% 13.1% (+43.1)#39 12.4% (+43.8)#1,903
40. Brown City 52.3% 13.1% (+39.2)#40 12.4% (+39.8)#2,125
41. Highland Park 51.8% 13.1% (+38.7)#41 12.4% (+39.4)#2,142
42. Westphalia 51.7% 13.1% (+38.6)#42 12.4% (+39.3)#2,148
43. Ravenna 50.0% 13.1% (+36.9)#43 12.4% (+37.6)#2,216
44. Camden 50.0% 13.1% (+36.9)#44 12.4% (+37.6)#2,260
45. Gobles 50.0% 13.1% (+36.9)#45 12.4% (+37.6)#2,264
46. Boyne Falls 50.0% 13.1% (+36.9)#46 12.4% (+37.6)#2,317
47. Henderson 50.0% 13.1% (+36.9)#47 12.4% (+37.6)#2,327
48. Amasa 50.0% 13.1% (+36.9)#48 12.4% (+37.6)#2,340
49. Tustin 50.0% 13.1% (+36.9)#49 12.4% (+37.6)#2,353
50. Garden 50.0% 13.1% (+36.9)#50 12.4% (+37.6)#2,366
51. Wolf Lake 49.3% 13.1% (+36.2)#51 12.4% (+36.9)#2,412
52. Fremont 49.0% 13.1% (+35.9)#52 12.4% (+36.5)#2,423
53. Wakefield 48.7% 13.1% (+35.6)#53 12.4% (+36.3)#2,432
54. Almont 47.8% 13.1% (+34.7)#54 12.4% (+35.4)#2,472
55. Lowell 47.6% 13.1% (+34.5)#55 12.4% (+35.2)#2,482
56. Essexville 46.8% 13.1% (+33.7)#56 12.4% (+34.4)#2,527
57. Shields 46.5% 13.1% (+33.4)#57 12.4% (+34.0)#2,549
58. Pinckney 46.2% 13.1% (+33.1)#58 12.4% (+33.7)#2,577
59. Durand 46.0% 13.1% (+32.9)#59 12.4% (+33.6)#2,595
60. Richmond 45.9% 13.1% (+32.8)#60 12.4% (+33.4)#2,603
61. South Rockwood 45.8% 13.1% (+32.7)#61 12.4% (+33.4)#2,605
62. River Rouge 44.8% 13.1% (+31.7)#62 12.4% (+32.3)#2,666
63. Port Hope 44.4% 13.1% (+31.3)#63 12.4% (+32.0)#2,700
64. Hillman 42.9% 13.1% (+29.8)#64 12.4% (+30.4)#2,800
65. Benton Heights 41.6% 13.1% (+28.5)#65 12.4% (+29.1)#2,916
66. Breckenridge 41.5% 13.1% (+28.4)#66 12.4% (+29.0)#2,923
67. Lake Isabella 40.5% 13.1% (+27.4)#67 12.4% (+28.1)#2,999
68. South Monroe 40.3% 13.1% (+27.2)#68 12.4% (+27.8)#3,008
69. Britton 40.0% 13.1% (+26.9)#69 12.4% (+27.6)#3,053
70. Gladwin 38.9% 13.1% (+25.8)#70 12.4% (+26.5)#3,170
71. Armada 38.9% 13.1% (+25.8)#71 12.4% (+26.5)#3,171
72. Bessemer 38.8% 13.1% (+25.7)#72 12.4% (+26.3)#3,183
73. Eau Claire 38.5% 13.1% (+25.4)#73 12.4% (+26.0)#3,211
74. Riverdale 38.5% 13.1% (+25.4)#74 12.4% (+26.0)#3,215
75. Whittemore 38.1% 13.1% (+25.0)#75 12.4% (+25.7)#3,235
76. Zilwaukee 37.7% 13.1% (+24.6)#76 12.4% (+25.3)#3,255
77. Webberville 36.8% 13.1% (+23.7)#77 12.4% (+24.4)#3,343
78. Climax 36.4% 13.1% (+23.3)#78 12.4% (+23.9)#3,393
79. Port Austin 36.4% 13.1% (+23.3)#79 12.4% (+23.9)#3,397
80. Sandusky 35.8% 13.1% (+22.7)#80 12.4% (+23.4)#3,448
81. Waldron 35.3% 13.1% (+22.2)#81 12.4% (+22.9)#3,507
82. Shepherd 35.0% 13.1% (+21.9)#82 12.4% (+22.6)#3,538
83. Clare 33.3% 13.1% (+20.2)#83 12.4% (+20.9)#3,667
84. Memphis 33.3% 13.1% (+20.2)#84 12.4% (+20.9)#3,688
85. Coleman 33.3% 13.1% (+20.2)#85 12.4% (+20.9)#3,696
86. Vernon 33.3% 13.1% (+20.2)#86 12.4% (+20.9)#3,725
87. Omer 33.3% 13.1% (+20.2)#87 12.4% (+20.9)#3,789
88. Manistee 32.9% 13.1% (+19.8)#88 12.4% (+20.5)#3,851
89. Kincheloe 32.7% 13.1% (+19.6)#89 12.4% (+20.3)#3,864
90. Bangor 32.5% 13.1% (+19.4)#90 12.4% (+20.1)#3,888
91. Bellevue 32.4% 13.1% (+19.3)#91 12.4% (+20.0)#3,899
92. Hamtramck 32.4% 13.1% (+19.3)#92 12.4% (+20.0)#3,903
93. Belding 32.4% 13.1% (+19.3)#93 12.4% (+20.0)#3,904
94. Fair Plain 32.3% 13.1% (+19.2)#94 12.4% (+19.8)#3,913
95. Hancock 32.1% 13.1% (+19.0)#95 12.4% (+19.7)#3,928
96. Ishpeming 31.5% 13.1% (+18.3)#96 12.4% (+19.0)#4,002
97. Melvindale 31.2% 13.1% (+18.1)#97 12.4% (+18.8)#4,019
98. South Boardman 31.2% 13.1% (+18.1)#98 12.4% (+18.8)#4,038
99. Sault Ste Marie 30.9% 13.1% (+17.8)#99 12.4% (+18.5)#4,056
100. Norway 30.6% 13.1% (+17.5)#100 12.4% (+18.2)#4,096

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Males in Michigan?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Males in Michigan are:
#1
100.0%
#2
100.0%
#3
100.0%
#4
100.0%
#5
100.0%
#6
100.0%
#7
100.0%
#8
100.0%
#9
88.5%
#10
85.7%
What city has the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Males in Michigan?
Stony Point has the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Males in Michigan with 100.0%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Single Males in the State of Michigan?
Poverty Level Among Single Males in Michigan is 13.1%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Single Males in the United States?
Poverty Level Among Single Males in the United States is 12.4%.