Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Children Under the Age of 16 in Michigan

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Highest Poverty | Child 0-16
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Michigan
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Children Under the Age of 16 in Michigan

0.0%
100.0%
Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Children Under the Age of 16 in Michigan Map

Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Children Under the Age of 16 in Michigan

City Child Poverty vs State vs National
1. Paris 100.0% 18.2% (+81.8)#1 16.9% (+83.1)#161
2. Riverdale 100.0% 18.2% (+81.8)#2 16.9% (+83.1)#198
3. Cambria 100.0% 18.2% (+81.8)#3 16.9% (+83.1)#229
4. Lake Gogebic 100.0% 18.2% (+81.8)#4 16.9% (+83.1)#311
5. Naubinway 100.0% 18.2% (+81.8)#5 16.9% (+83.1)#385
6. Rockland 88.6% 18.2% (+70.4)#6 16.9% (+71.7)#611
7. Carp Lake 85.0% 18.2% (+66.8)#7 16.9% (+68.1)#707
8. Oden 84.6% 18.2% (+66.4)#8 16.9% (+67.7)#720
9. Turner 81.2% 18.2% (+63.0)#9 16.9% (+64.3)#807
10. Winn 80.6% 18.2% (+62.4)#10 16.9% (+63.7)#822
11. Melvin 80.0% 18.2% (+61.8)#11 16.9% (+63.1)#843
12. Reading 76.8% 18.2% (+58.6)#12 16.9% (+59.9)#949
13. Millburg 73.9% 18.2% (+55.7)#13 16.9% (+57.0)#1,063
14. Pierson 68.8% 18.2% (+50.5)#14 16.9% (+51.8)#1,313
15. River Rouge 68.3% 18.2% (+50.0)#15 16.9% (+51.4)#1,333
16. Maple Rapids 68.1% 18.2% (+49.8)#16 16.9% (+51.1)#1,338
17. Weidman 65.9% 18.2% (+47.6)#17 16.9% (+48.9)#1,455
18. Millersburg 65.2% 18.2% (+47.0)#18 16.9% (+48.3)#1,495
19. Vanderbilt 65.1% 18.2% (+46.8)#19 16.9% (+48.1)#1,501
20. Kaleva 64.4% 18.2% (+46.1)#20 16.9% (+47.4)#1,544
21. Kincheloe 62.9% 18.2% (+44.7)#21 16.9% (+46.0)#1,640
22. Benton Harbor 61.8% 18.2% (+43.5)#22 16.9% (+44.9)#1,713
23. Skidway Lake 61.5% 18.2% (+43.2)#23 16.9% (+44.5)#1,747
24. Wolverine 60.9% 18.2% (+42.6)#24 16.9% (+43.9)#1,780
25. Port Austin 60.6% 18.2% (+42.4)#25 16.9% (+43.7)#1,797
26. Garden 60.0% 18.2% (+41.8)#26 16.9% (+43.1)#1,856
27. Dowagiac 59.4% 18.2% (+41.2)#27 16.9% (+42.5)#1,908
28. Merrill 58.0% 18.2% (+39.8)#28 16.9% (+41.1)#2,018
29. Benton Heights 57.8% 18.2% (+39.5)#29 16.9% (+40.8)#2,037
30. St Helen 56.3% 18.2% (+38.1)#30 16.9% (+39.4)#2,149
31. Elm Hall 56.2% 18.2% (+38.0)#31 16.9% (+39.3)#2,159
32. Fountain 56.1% 18.2% (+37.8)#32 16.9% (+39.2)#2,169
33. Tustin 55.8% 18.2% (+37.5)#33 16.9% (+38.8)#2,197
34. Lakeview 54.8% 18.2% (+36.6)#34 16.9% (+37.9)#2,284
35. Posen 54.7% 18.2% (+36.5)#35 16.9% (+37.8)#2,296
36. Charlevoix 54.2% 18.2% (+36.0)#36 16.9% (+37.3)#2,354
37. Saginaw 53.2% 18.2% (+34.9)#37 16.9% (+36.2)#2,434
38. Mesick 52.8% 18.2% (+34.6)#38 16.9% (+35.9)#2,472
39. Owendale 52.5% 18.2% (+34.3)#39 16.9% (+35.6)#2,500
40. Walkerville 52.1% 18.2% (+33.9)#40 16.9% (+35.2)#2,544
41. Inkster 52.0% 18.2% (+33.8)#41 16.9% (+35.1)#2,550
42. Pittsford 51.9% 18.2% (+33.7)#42 16.9% (+35.0)#2,562
43. Port Sanilac 51.9% 18.2% (+33.6)#43 16.9% (+35.0)#2,564
44. Calumet 51.9% 18.2% (+33.6)#44 16.9% (+34.9)#2,570
45. Rose City 51.9% 18.2% (+33.6)#45 16.9% (+34.9)#2,571
46. Amasa 51.9% 18.2% (+33.6)#46 16.9% (+34.9)#2,575
47. Highland Park 51.8% 18.2% (+33.5)#47 16.9% (+34.8)#2,585
48. Luna Pier 51.5% 18.2% (+33.2)#48 16.9% (+34.6)#2,607
49. Imlay City 51.2% 18.2% (+32.9)#49 16.9% (+34.3)#2,648
50. Muskegon Heights 51.1% 18.2% (+32.9)#50 16.9% (+34.2)#2,656
51. Paw Paw Lake 51.1% 18.2% (+32.9)#51 16.9% (+34.2)#2,657
52. Bendon 51.0% 18.2% (+32.8)#52 16.9% (+34.1)#2,665
53. Allen 50.0% 18.2% (+31.8)#53 16.9% (+33.1)#2,786
54. Arcadia 50.0% 18.2% (+31.8)#54 16.9% (+33.1)#2,797
55. Prescott 49.4% 18.2% (+31.1)#55 16.9% (+32.4)#2,870
56. Harrison 49.3% 18.2% (+31.0)#56 16.9% (+32.3)#2,880
57. Flint 49.2% 18.2% (+31.0)#57 16.9% (+32.3)#2,882
58. Tower 48.8% 18.2% (+30.6)#58 16.9% (+31.9)#2,927
59. Coleman 48.3% 18.2% (+30.0)#59 16.9% (+31.3)#2,986
60. Hamtramck 47.4% 18.2% (+29.2)#60 16.9% (+30.5)#3,098
61. Mohawk 47.4% 18.2% (+29.1)#61 16.9% (+30.4)#3,105
62. Houghton Lake 47.1% 18.2% (+28.9)#62 16.9% (+30.2)#3,140
63. Alma 46.3% 18.2% (+28.1)#63 16.9% (+29.4)#3,265
64. Morley 46.3% 18.2% (+28.0)#64 16.9% (+29.4)#3,269
65. Luther 45.9% 18.2% (+27.7)#65 16.9% (+29.0)#3,325
66. Daggett 45.9% 18.2% (+27.7)#66 16.9% (+29.0)#3,340
67. Newberry 45.6% 18.2% (+27.4)#67 16.9% (+28.7)#3,373
68. Melvindale 45.5% 18.2% (+27.2)#68 16.9% (+28.5)#3,398
69. Napoleon 45.1% 18.2% (+26.8)#69 16.9% (+28.1)#3,457
70. Detroit 45.0% 18.2% (+26.7)#70 16.9% (+28.0)#3,480
71. Parkdale 44.4% 18.2% (+26.2)#71 16.9% (+27.5)#3,555
72. Detroit Beach 44.4% 18.2% (+26.2)#72 16.9% (+27.5)#3,575
73. Mount Morris 44.2% 18.2% (+25.9)#73 16.9% (+27.2)#3,600
74. Empire 43.7% 18.2% (+25.4)#74 16.9% (+26.7)#3,661
75. Albion 43.2% 18.2% (+25.0)#75 16.9% (+26.3)#3,736
76. St Ignace 43.2% 18.2% (+24.9)#76 16.9% (+26.2)#3,748
77. Springfield 43.0% 18.2% (+24.8)#77 16.9% (+26.1)#3,766
78. New Lothrop 43.0% 18.2% (+24.7)#78 16.9% (+26.0)#3,777
79. Ludington 42.3% 18.2% (+24.0)#79 16.9% (+25.4)#3,917
80. Laingsburg 42.1% 18.2% (+23.9)#80 16.9% (+25.2)#3,947
81. Onaway 41.8% 18.2% (+23.6)#81 16.9% (+24.9)#3,992
82. Farwell 41.8% 18.2% (+23.6)#82 16.9% (+24.9)#3,994
83. Bloomingdale 41.4% 18.2% (+23.1)#83 16.9% (+24.4)#4,070
84. Oakley 41.3% 18.2% (+23.0)#84 16.9% (+24.3)#4,090
85. New Troy 41.2% 18.2% (+22.9)#85 16.9% (+24.2)#4,107
86. Mayville 41.1% 18.2% (+22.8)#86 16.9% (+24.1)#4,127
87. Montrose 40.8% 18.2% (+22.5)#87 16.9% (+23.8)#4,178
88. Vermontville 40.1% 18.2% (+21.9)#88 16.9% (+23.2)#4,291
89. West Monroe 40.0% 18.2% (+21.8)#89 16.9% (+23.1)#4,301
90. Wakefield 40.0% 18.2% (+21.8)#90 16.9% (+23.1)#4,302
91. Lakeport 39.9% 18.2% (+21.6)#91 16.9% (+22.9)#4,356
92. White Pigeon 39.5% 18.2% (+21.2)#92 16.9% (+22.6)#4,418
93. Evart 39.5% 18.2% (+21.2)#93 16.9% (+22.5)#4,426
94. Cassopolis 39.4% 18.2% (+21.2)#94 16.9% (+22.5)#4,431
95. Minden City 39.4% 18.2% (+21.1)#95 16.9% (+22.5)#4,440
96. Lake Linden 39.0% 18.2% (+20.7)#96 16.9% (+22.0)#4,522
97. Tekonsha 38.3% 18.2% (+20.0)#97 16.9% (+21.3)#4,658
98. Stephenson 37.9% 18.2% (+19.7)#98 16.9% (+21.0)#4,726
99. Pontiac 37.9% 18.2% (+19.6)#99 16.9% (+21.0)#4,728
100. Camden 37.6% 18.2% (+19.3)#100 16.9% (+20.6)#4,780

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Children Under the Age of 16 in Michigan?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Children Under the Age of 16 in Michigan are:
#1
85.0%
#2
84.6%
#3
81.2%
#4
80.0%
#5
76.8%
#6
68.8%
#7
68.3%
#8
68.1%
#9
65.9%
#10
65.2%
What city has the Highest Poverty Level Among Children Under the Age of 16 in Michigan?
Carp Lake has the Highest Poverty Level Among Children Under the Age of 16 in Michigan with 85.0%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Children Under the Age of 16 in the State of Michigan?
Poverty Level Among Children Under the Age of 16 in Michigan is 18.2%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Children Under the Age of 16 in the United States?
Poverty Level Among Children Under the Age of 16 in the United States is 16.9%.