Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Cleaning & Maintenance in Michigan

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Cleaning & Maintenance
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Michigan
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Cleaning & Maintenance in Michigan

0.0%
40.0%
Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Cleaning & Maintenance in Michigan Map

Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Cleaning & Maintenance in Michigan

City % Employed vs State vs National
1. Eagle River 35.7% 3.4% (+32.3)#1 3.5% (+32.2)#182
2. Caberfae 27.8% 3.4% (+24.4)#2 3.5% (+24.3)#314
3. Marenisco 26.0% 3.4% (+22.6)#3 3.5% (+22.5)#361
4. Norwood 24.4% 3.4% (+21.1)#4 3.5% (+21.0)#413
5. Bergland 23.4% 3.4% (+20.0)#5 3.5% (+19.9)#454
6. Hanover 20.3% 3.4% (+16.9)#6 3.5% (+16.8)#617
7. Weidman 19.0% 3.4% (+15.6)#7 3.5% (+15.5)#705
8. Mears 16.5% 3.4% (+13.2)#8 3.5% (+13.1)#925
9. Walloon Lake 16.1% 3.4% (+12.8)#9 3.5% (+12.7)#972
10. Wellston 16.0% 3.4% (+12.6)#10 3.5% (+12.5)#982
11. Palmer 15.3% 3.4% (+12.0)#11 3.5% (+11.9)#1,066
12. Dodgeville 15.0% 3.4% (+11.6)#12 3.5% (+11.5)#1,118
13. Brutus 15.0% 3.4% (+11.6)#13 3.5% (+11.5)#1,119
14. Parkdale 14.8% 3.4% (+11.5)#14 3.5% (+11.3)#1,136
15. Rosebush 14.5% 3.4% (+11.1)#15 3.5% (+11.0)#1,215
16. Atlantic Mine 14.0% 3.4% (+10.6)#16 3.5% (+10.5)#1,291
17. Buckley 14.0% 3.4% (+10.6)#17 3.5% (+10.5)#1,292
18. Harrietta 14.0% 3.4% (+10.6)#18 3.5% (+10.5)#1,301
19. Kaleva 13.8% 3.4% (+10.4)#19 3.5% (+10.3)#1,355
20. Mount Morris 13.7% 3.4% (+10.4)#20 3.5% (+10.3)#1,358
21. Mohawk 13.7% 3.4% (+10.3)#21 3.5% (+10.2)#1,361
22. Stronach 13.5% 3.4% (+10.2)#22 3.5% (+10.1)#1,401
23. Charlevoix 13.4% 3.4% (+9.99)#23 3.5% (+9.88)#1,439
24. Quinnesec 13.3% 3.4% (+9.94)#24 3.5% (+9.84)#1,458
25. Caseville 13.1% 3.4% (+9.70)#25 3.5% (+9.59)#1,515
26. Fulton 13.0% 3.4% (+9.58)#26 3.5% (+9.48)#1,555
27. Clare 12.9% 3.4% (+9.55)#27 3.5% (+9.44)#1,562
28. Painesdale 12.8% 3.4% (+9.40)#28 3.5% (+9.30)#1,616
29. Kincheloe 12.5% 3.4% (+9.12)#29 3.5% (+9.02)#1,681
30. East Tawas 12.4% 3.4% (+9.03)#30 3.5% (+8.92)#1,735
31. Parma 12.3% 3.4% (+8.94)#31 3.5% (+8.84)#1,753
32. Eastlake 11.9% 3.4% (+8.53)#32 3.5% (+8.42)#1,891
33. Wolverine 11.8% 3.4% (+8.45)#33 3.5% (+8.35)#1,915
34. Mancelona 11.8% 3.4% (+8.42)#34 3.5% (+8.31)#1,919
35. Estral Beach 11.6% 3.4% (+8.24)#35 3.5% (+8.13)#1,973
36. North Branch 11.1% 3.4% (+7.76)#36 3.5% (+7.65)#2,145
37. South Boardman 11.1% 3.4% (+7.73)#37 3.5% (+7.63)#2,154
38. Ithaca 11.1% 3.4% (+7.68)#38 3.5% (+7.57)#2,188
39. Manchester 11.0% 3.4% (+7.60)#39 3.5% (+7.49)#2,212
40. Dowagiac 10.9% 3.4% (+7.55)#40 3.5% (+7.45)#2,235
41. Kinde 10.8% 3.4% (+7.38)#41 3.5% (+7.28)#2,298
42. Edmore 10.6% 3.4% (+7.22)#42 3.5% (+7.12)#2,359
43. Millersburg 10.2% 3.4% (+6.82)#43 3.5% (+6.72)#2,523
44. Beechwood 10.1% 3.4% (+6.71)#44 3.5% (+6.61)#2,571
45. Elm Hall 9.8% 3.4% (+6.46)#45 3.5% (+6.35)#2,726
46. Mesick 9.8% 3.4% (+6.39)#46 3.5% (+6.29)#2,761
47. Highland Park 9.5% 3.4% (+6.08)#47 3.5% (+5.98)#2,910
48. Reed City 9.4% 3.4% (+6.06)#48 3.5% (+5.96)#2,917
49. Jennings 9.4% 3.4% (+6.03)#49 3.5% (+5.93)#2,942
50. Gladwin 9.4% 3.4% (+6.03)#50 3.5% (+5.92)#2,945
51. Grayling 9.4% 3.4% (+6.02)#51 3.5% (+5.92)#2,950
52. Kingston 9.3% 3.4% (+5.94)#52 3.5% (+5.83)#2,989
53. Tekonsha 9.3% 3.4% (+5.93)#53 3.5% (+5.83)#2,993
54. Brownlee Park 9.3% 3.4% (+5.87)#54 3.5% (+5.77)#3,023
55. Napoleon 9.1% 3.4% (+5.71)#55 3.5% (+5.61)#3,093
56. Rockland 9.1% 3.4% (+5.71)#56 3.5% (+5.61)#3,107
57. Montague 9.1% 3.4% (+5.70)#57 3.5% (+5.60)#3,129
58. Brimley 8.9% 3.4% (+5.52)#58 3.5% (+5.42)#3,235
59. Bay Port 8.9% 3.4% (+5.52)#59 3.5% (+5.42)#3,243
60. Sherwood 8.9% 3.4% (+5.51)#60 3.5% (+5.41)#3,254
61. Atlanta 8.8% 3.4% (+5.46)#61 3.5% (+5.36)#3,302
62. Buena Vista 8.8% 3.4% (+5.46)#62 3.5% (+5.36)#3,304
63. Rose City 8.8% 3.4% (+5.42)#63 3.5% (+5.31)#3,326
64. Alanson 8.8% 3.4% (+5.37)#64 3.5% (+5.27)#3,361
65. Middletown 8.7% 3.4% (+5.32)#65 3.5% (+5.21)#3,386
66. Skidway Lake 8.7% 3.4% (+5.28)#66 3.5% (+5.18)#3,432
67. Pontiac 8.6% 3.4% (+5.19)#67 3.5% (+5.09)#3,498
68. Caspian 8.5% 3.4% (+5.17)#68 3.5% (+5.06)#3,507
69. Shaftsburg 8.4% 3.4% (+5.07)#69 3.5% (+4.96)#3,583
70. Almont 8.3% 3.4% (+4.95)#70 3.5% (+4.85)#3,650
71. Turner 8.3% 3.4% (+4.95)#71 3.5% (+4.85)#3,682
72. Thompsonville 8.3% 3.4% (+4.88)#72 3.5% (+4.78)#3,732
73. Grawn 8.3% 3.4% (+4.87)#73 3.5% (+4.77)#3,739
74. Breckenridge 8.2% 3.4% (+4.86)#74 3.5% (+4.75)#3,758
75. Copemish 8.2% 3.4% (+4.86)#75 3.5% (+4.75)#3,763
76. Farwell 8.1% 3.4% (+4.69)#76 3.5% (+4.59)#3,899
77. Hesperia 8.0% 3.4% (+4.67)#77 3.5% (+4.57)#3,922
78. Holly 8.0% 3.4% (+4.63)#78 3.5% (+4.53)#3,956
79. Pellston 7.9% 3.4% (+4.54)#79 3.5% (+4.44)#4,031
80. Lake Victoria 7.9% 3.4% (+4.54)#80 3.5% (+4.43)#4,037
81. Nashville 7.8% 3.4% (+4.46)#81 3.5% (+4.35)#4,113
82. Athens 7.8% 3.4% (+4.45)#82 3.5% (+4.35)#4,119
83. Paw Paw 7.8% 3.4% (+4.42)#83 3.5% (+4.31)#4,150
84. Oscoda 7.8% 3.4% (+4.41)#84 3.5% (+4.31)#4,154
85. Interlochen 7.7% 3.4% (+4.31)#85 3.5% (+4.21)#4,225
86. Watervliet 7.6% 3.4% (+4.26)#86 3.5% (+4.15)#4,292
87. Ramsay 7.6% 3.4% (+4.20)#87 3.5% (+4.09)#4,351
88. Paw Paw Lake 7.5% 3.4% (+4.16)#88 3.5% (+4.06)#4,381
89. North Adams 7.5% 3.4% (+4.12)#89 3.5% (+4.02)#4,413
90. Alpha 7.4% 3.4% (+4.07)#90 3.5% (+3.96)#4,474
91. Colon 7.4% 3.4% (+4.03)#91 3.5% (+3.92)#4,500
92. Amasa 7.4% 3.4% (+4.03)#92 3.5% (+3.92)#4,507
93. Grant 7.4% 3.4% (+3.99)#93 3.5% (+3.88)#4,557
94. Filer City 7.3% 3.4% (+3.96)#94 3.5% (+3.86)#4,592
95. Iron River 7.3% 3.4% (+3.88)#95 3.5% (+3.77)#4,668
96. Hart 7.2% 3.4% (+3.86)#96 3.5% (+3.76)#4,693
97. Robin Glen Indiantown 7.2% 3.4% (+3.79)#97 3.5% (+3.69)#4,754
98. Ishpeming 7.1% 3.4% (+3.76)#98 3.5% (+3.66)#4,770
99. Mulliken 7.1% 3.4% (+3.76)#99 3.5% (+3.66)#4,774
100. Calumet 7.1% 3.4% (+3.67)#100 3.5% (+3.57)#4,864

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Cleaning & Maintenance in Michigan?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Cleaning & Maintenance in Michigan are:
#1
35.7%
#2
27.8%
#3
26.0%
#4
24.4%
#5
20.3%
#6
19.0%
#7
16.1%
#8
16.0%
#9
15.3%
#10
15.0%
What city has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Cleaning & Maintenance in Michigan?
Eagle River has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Cleaning & Maintenance in Michigan with 35.7%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Cleaning & Maintenance in the State of Michigan?
Percentage of Population Employed in Cleaning & Maintenance in Michigan is 3.4%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Cleaning & Maintenance in the United States?
Percentage of Population Employed in Cleaning & Maintenance in the United States is 3.5%.