Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Families in Michigan

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Highest Family Poverty
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Michigan
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Families in Michigan

0.0%
100.0%
Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Families in Michigan Map

Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Families in Michigan

City Family Poverty vs State vs National
1. Oden 82.8% 8.8% (+74.0)#1 8.8% (+74.0)#155
2. Paris 61.5% 8.8% (+52.8)#2 8.8% (+52.8)#362
3. Elm Hall 52.5% 8.8% (+43.7)#3 8.8% (+43.7)#571
4. Hurontown 50.0% 8.8% (+41.2)#4 8.8% (+41.2)#645
5. Benton Harbor 47.1% 8.8% (+38.3)#5 8.8% (+38.3)#793
6. Calumet 44.2% 8.8% (+35.4)#6 8.8% (+35.4)#919
7. Fountain 42.1% 8.8% (+33.3)#7 8.8% (+33.3)#1,046
8. Mesick 40.2% 8.8% (+31.4)#8 8.8% (+31.4)#1,190
9. Morley 39.9% 8.8% (+31.1)#9 8.8% (+31.1)#1,227
10. Weidman 39.6% 8.8% (+30.8)#10 8.8% (+30.8)#1,240
11. Forestville 37.0% 8.8% (+28.2)#11 8.8% (+28.2)#1,430
12. River Rouge 36.7% 8.8% (+27.9)#12 8.8% (+27.9)#1,452
13. Benton Heights 35.1% 8.8% (+26.3)#13 8.8% (+26.3)#1,602
14. Muskegon Heights 34.1% 8.8% (+25.3)#14 8.8% (+25.3)#1,698
15. Jennings 34.0% 8.8% (+25.2)#15 8.8% (+25.2)#1,716
16. Hamtramck 33.5% 8.8% (+24.7)#16 8.8% (+24.7)#1,761
17. Baldwin 33.1% 8.8% (+24.3)#17 8.8% (+24.3)#1,847
18. Carp Lake 33.0% 8.8% (+24.2)#18 8.8% (+24.2)#1,848
19. Pierson 32.1% 8.8% (+23.4)#19 8.8% (+23.4)#1,915
20. Kincheloe 31.9% 8.8% (+23.1)#20 8.8% (+23.1)#1,946
21. Rockland 31.4% 8.8% (+22.6)#21 8.8% (+22.6)#2,020
22. Dowagiac 30.9% 8.8% (+22.1)#22 8.8% (+22.1)#2,091
23. Evart 30.8% 8.8% (+22.0)#23 8.8% (+22.0)#2,100
24. Highland Park 30.3% 8.8% (+21.5)#24 8.8% (+21.5)#2,174
25. Lakeview 30.0% 8.8% (+21.3)#25 8.8% (+21.3)#2,219
26. Rose City 30.0% 8.8% (+21.2)#26 8.8% (+21.2)#2,220
27. Winn 29.2% 8.8% (+20.4)#27 8.8% (+20.4)#2,355
28. Wolverine 29.2% 8.8% (+20.4)#28 8.8% (+20.4)#2,356
29. Inkster 29.0% 8.8% (+20.2)#29 8.8% (+20.2)#2,382
30. Lawrence 28.8% 8.8% (+20.0)#30 8.8% (+20.0)#2,414
31. Onaway 28.3% 8.8% (+19.5)#31 8.8% (+19.5)#2,511
32. Maple Rapids 28.1% 8.8% (+19.4)#32 8.8% (+19.4)#2,540
33. Saginaw 27.9% 8.8% (+19.1)#33 8.8% (+19.1)#2,600
34. Stanton 27.4% 8.8% (+18.6)#34 8.8% (+18.6)#2,683
35. Montgomery 26.9% 8.8% (+18.1)#35 8.8% (+18.1)#2,782
36. Detroit 26.8% 8.8% (+18.1)#36 8.8% (+18.1)#2,805
37. Charlevoix 26.6% 8.8% (+17.8)#37 8.8% (+17.8)#2,851
38. Flint 26.4% 8.8% (+17.6)#38 8.8% (+17.6)#2,908
39. Beecher 26.3% 8.8% (+17.6)#39 8.8% (+17.6)#2,913
40. Kaleva 26.3% 8.8% (+17.5)#40 8.8% (+17.5)#2,932
41. Beechwood 26.2% 8.8% (+17.4)#41 8.8% (+17.4)#2,938
42. Camden 25.7% 8.8% (+16.9)#42 8.8% (+16.9)#3,070
43. Clare 25.6% 8.8% (+16.8)#43 8.8% (+16.8)#3,083
44. Detroit Beach 25.5% 8.8% (+16.8)#44 8.8% (+16.8)#3,103
45. Reading 25.5% 8.8% (+16.7)#45 8.8% (+16.7)#3,119
46. Melvindale 25.0% 8.8% (+16.2)#46 8.8% (+16.2)#3,274
47. Woodland Beach 24.9% 8.8% (+16.2)#47 8.8% (+16.2)#3,276
48. Harrison 24.4% 8.8% (+15.6)#48 8.8% (+15.6)#3,389
49. Bendon 24.4% 8.8% (+15.6)#49 8.8% (+15.6)#3,390
50. Mears 24.3% 8.8% (+15.5)#50 8.8% (+15.5)#3,428
51. Albion 23.8% 8.8% (+15.0)#51 8.8% (+15.0)#3,536
52. Interlochen 23.8% 8.8% (+15.0)#52 8.8% (+15.0)#3,563
53. Bloomingdale 23.7% 8.8% (+14.9)#53 8.8% (+14.9)#3,569
54. Mount Morris 23.7% 8.8% (+14.9)#54 8.8% (+14.9)#3,579
55. Lincoln 23.5% 8.8% (+14.7)#55 8.8% (+14.7)#3,616
56. Vanderbilt 23.2% 8.8% (+14.4)#56 8.8% (+14.4)#3,703
57. Scottville 23.2% 8.8% (+14.4)#57 8.8% (+14.4)#3,710
58. Springfield 23.1% 8.8% (+14.4)#58 8.8% (+14.4)#3,720
59. Skidway Lake 23.0% 8.8% (+14.2)#59 8.8% (+14.2)#3,775
60. Minden City 23.0% 8.8% (+14.2)#60 8.8% (+14.2)#3,776
61. Pittsford 22.9% 8.8% (+14.1)#61 8.8% (+14.1)#3,784
62. Melvin 22.9% 8.8% (+14.1)#62 8.8% (+14.1)#3,799
63. Mohawk 22.7% 8.8% (+13.9)#63 8.8% (+13.9)#3,841
64. Zeba 22.5% 8.8% (+13.7)#64 8.8% (+13.7)#3,919
65. Walkerville 22.4% 8.8% (+13.7)#65 8.8% (+13.7)#3,926
66. Cannonsburg 22.4% 8.8% (+13.6)#66 8.8% (+13.6)#3,934
67. Kalkaska 22.3% 8.8% (+13.6)#67 8.8% (+13.6)#3,957
68. Bridgeport 22.3% 8.8% (+13.5)#68 8.8% (+13.5)#3,963
69. Paw Paw Lake 22.1% 8.8% (+13.3)#69 8.8% (+13.3)#4,051
70. Luna Pier 22.0% 8.8% (+13.3)#70 8.8% (+13.3)#4,071
71. Cassopolis 22.0% 8.8% (+13.2)#71 8.8% (+13.2)#4,094
72. West Monroe 21.5% 8.8% (+12.7)#72 8.8% (+12.7)#4,255
73. Deckerville 21.4% 8.8% (+12.6)#73 8.8% (+12.6)#4,297
74. Naubinway 21.2% 8.8% (+12.4)#74 8.8% (+12.4)#4,366
75. Parkdale 21.2% 8.8% (+12.4)#75 8.8% (+12.4)#4,375
76. Port Sanilac 21.0% 8.8% (+12.2)#76 8.8% (+12.2)#4,455
77. Pontiac 20.8% 8.8% (+12.1)#77 8.8% (+12.1)#4,501
78. Hartford 20.8% 8.8% (+12.0)#78 8.8% (+12.0)#4,529
79. Brethren 20.7% 8.8% (+11.9)#79 8.8% (+11.9)#4,546
80. Farwell 20.7% 8.8% (+11.9)#80 8.8% (+11.9)#4,555
81. Garden 20.6% 8.8% (+11.8)#81 8.8% (+11.8)#4,604
82. Marlette 20.5% 8.8% (+11.7)#82 8.8% (+11.7)#4,637
83. Wakefield 20.5% 8.8% (+11.7)#83 8.8% (+11.7)#4,649
84. Standish 20.4% 8.8% (+11.6)#84 8.8% (+11.6)#4,692
85. Fair Plain 20.2% 8.8% (+11.5)#85 8.8% (+11.5)#4,740
86. Brimley 20.2% 8.8% (+11.4)#86 8.8% (+11.4)#4,757
87. Imlay City 20.2% 8.8% (+11.4)#87 8.8% (+11.4)#4,764
88. Ypsilanti 20.0% 8.8% (+11.2)#88 8.8% (+11.2)#4,805
89. Napoleon 19.9% 8.8% (+11.1)#89 8.8% (+11.1)#4,917
90. Edmore 19.5% 8.8% (+10.8)#90 8.8% (+10.8)#5,033
91. Muskegon 19.4% 8.8% (+10.6)#91 8.8% (+10.6)#5,100
92. Fennville 19.3% 8.8% (+10.5)#92 8.8% (+10.5)#5,128
93. Twining 19.0% 8.8% (+10.3)#93 8.8% (+10.3)#5,235
94. Houghton Lake 19.0% 8.8% (+10.2)#94 8.8% (+10.2)#5,245
95. Tustin 19.0% 8.8% (+10.2)#95 8.8% (+10.2)#5,272
96. Jonesville 18.9% 8.8% (+10.2)#96 8.8% (+10.2)#5,278
97. Hillman 18.8% 8.8% (+9.97)#97 8.8% (+9.97)#5,366
98. Vermontville 18.8% 8.8% (+9.97)#98 8.8% (+9.97)#5,367
99. Dearborn 18.7% 8.8% (+9.94)#99 8.8% (+9.95)#5,394
100. Adrian 18.7% 8.8% (+9.90)#100 8.8% (+9.90)#5,414

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Families in Michigan?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Families in Michigan are:
#1
82.8%
#2
47.1%
#3
44.2%
#4
42.1%
#5
40.2%
#6
39.9%
#7
39.6%
#8
37.0%
#9
36.7%
#10
35.1%
What city has the Highest Poverty Level Among Families in Michigan?
Oden has the Highest Poverty Level Among Families in Michigan with 82.8%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Families in the State of Michigan?
Poverty Level Among Families in Michigan is 8.8%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Families in the United States?
Poverty Level Among Families in the United States is 8.8%.