Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Children Under the Age of 16 in Oklahoma

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Highest Poverty | Child 0-16
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Oklahoma
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Children Under the Age of 16 in Oklahoma

0.0%
100.0%
Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Children Under the Age of 16 in Oklahoma Map

Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Children Under the Age of 16 in Oklahoma

City Child Poverty vs State vs National
1. Cedar Crest 100.0% 20.7% (+79.3)#1 16.9% (+83.1)#167
2. Bee 100.0% 20.7% (+79.3)#2 16.9% (+83.1)#275
3. Oak Hill-Piney 100.0% 20.7% (+79.3)#3 16.9% (+83.1)#280
4. Platter 100.0% 20.7% (+79.3)#4 16.9% (+83.1)#329
5. Smithville 100.0% 20.7% (+79.3)#5 16.9% (+83.1)#346
6. Hoyt 100.0% 20.7% (+79.3)#6 16.9% (+83.1)#347
7. Blue 100.0% 20.7% (+79.3)#7 16.9% (+83.1)#351
8. Mulberry 100.0% 20.7% (+79.3)#8 16.9% (+83.1)#395
9. Oakwood 100.0% 20.7% (+79.3)#9 16.9% (+83.1)#410
10. Hendrix 100.0% 20.7% (+79.3)#10 16.9% (+83.1)#414
11. Emet 100.0% 20.7% (+79.3)#11 16.9% (+83.1)#430
12. Whippoorwill 100.0% 20.7% (+79.3)#12 16.9% (+83.1)#438
13. Badger Lee 100.0% 20.7% (+79.3)#13 16.9% (+83.1)#444
14. Peckham 100.0% 20.7% (+79.3)#14 16.9% (+83.1)#455
15. Bunch 100.0% 20.7% (+79.3)#15 16.9% (+83.1)#460
16. Rosston 100.0% 20.7% (+79.3)#16 16.9% (+83.1)#472
17. Mutual 100.0% 20.7% (+79.3)#17 16.9% (+83.1)#478
18. Piney 100.0% 20.7% (+79.3)#18 16.9% (+83.1)#481
19. Friendship 100.0% 20.7% (+79.3)#19 16.9% (+83.1)#491
20. Atwood 91.3% 20.7% (+70.6)#20 16.9% (+74.4)#557
21. Yeager 90.0% 20.7% (+69.3)#21 16.9% (+73.1)#581
22. Amorita 88.9% 20.7% (+68.2)#22 16.9% (+71.9)#606
23. Colony 87.5% 20.7% (+66.8)#23 16.9% (+70.6)#632
24. Moffett 85.7% 20.7% (+65.0)#24 16.9% (+68.8)#690
25. Butler 84.1% 20.7% (+63.3)#25 16.9% (+67.1)#734
26. Blanco 83.3% 20.7% (+62.6)#26 16.9% (+66.4)#757
27. Martha 80.6% 20.7% (+59.8)#27 16.9% (+63.6)#826
28. Ratliff City 80.0% 20.7% (+59.3)#28 16.9% (+63.1)#845
29. New Alluwe 77.8% 20.7% (+57.1)#29 16.9% (+60.8)#910
30. Boley 77.3% 20.7% (+56.6)#30 16.9% (+60.3)#924
31. Douglas 76.5% 20.7% (+55.8)#31 16.9% (+59.5)#962
32. Whitesboro 73.7% 20.7% (+53.0)#32 16.9% (+56.7)#1,072
33. Devol 72.7% 20.7% (+52.0)#33 16.9% (+55.8)#1,113
34. Eldorado 71.8% 20.7% (+51.1)#34 16.9% (+54.9)#1,151
35. Little Rock 71.4% 20.7% (+50.7)#35 16.9% (+54.5)#1,167
36. Cowlington 71.4% 20.7% (+50.7)#36 16.9% (+54.5)#1,171
37. Elohim 71.4% 20.7% (+50.7)#37 16.9% (+54.5)#1,182
38. Avard 71.4% 20.7% (+50.7)#38 16.9% (+54.5)#1,183
39. Flint Creek 70.5% 20.7% (+49.8)#39 16.9% (+53.6)#1,221
40. Langston 69.2% 20.7% (+48.5)#40 16.9% (+52.3)#1,282
41. Peoria 69.2% 20.7% (+48.5)#41 16.9% (+52.3)#1,288
42. Bowring 68.8% 20.7% (+48.0)#42 16.9% (+51.8)#1,314
43. Spavinaw 68.5% 20.7% (+47.8)#43 16.9% (+51.6)#1,320
44. Tyrone 68.5% 20.7% (+47.8)#44 16.9% (+51.6)#1,321
45. Hallett 66.7% 20.7% (+45.9)#45 16.9% (+49.7)#1,404
46. River Bottom 65.4% 20.7% (+44.7)#46 16.9% (+48.4)#1,478
47. White Eagle 64.2% 20.7% (+43.5)#47 16.9% (+47.3)#1,556
48. Headrick 62.5% 20.7% (+41.8)#48 16.9% (+45.6)#1,670
49. Dripping Springs 62.5% 20.7% (+41.8)#49 16.9% (+45.6)#1,675
50. Peggs 62.4% 20.7% (+41.7)#50 16.9% (+45.5)#1,679
51. Bell 61.6% 20.7% (+40.9)#51 16.9% (+44.7)#1,728
52. Boswell 61.5% 20.7% (+40.8)#52 16.9% (+44.5)#1,748
53. Mccurtain 60.7% 20.7% (+40.0)#53 16.9% (+43.8)#1,789
54. Okeene 60.6% 20.7% (+39.9)#54 16.9% (+43.7)#1,800
55. Twin Oaks 60.5% 20.7% (+39.8)#55 16.9% (+43.6)#1,805
56. Lebanon 60.4% 20.7% (+39.7)#56 16.9% (+43.5)#1,811
57. Dustin 59.8% 20.7% (+39.1)#57 16.9% (+42.9)#1,875
58. Fitzhugh 59.8% 20.7% (+39.1)#58 16.9% (+42.8)#1,880
59. Clayton 59.3% 20.7% (+38.6)#59 16.9% (+42.4)#1,915
60. Gregory 58.9% 20.7% (+38.2)#60 16.9% (+41.9)#1,943
61. Carlisle 58.9% 20.7% (+38.1)#61 16.9% (+41.9)#1,946
62. Wapanucka 58.6% 20.7% (+37.8)#62 16.9% (+41.6)#1,969
63. Vici 57.9% 20.7% (+37.2)#63 16.9% (+41.0)#2,024
64. Dover 57.1% 20.7% (+36.4)#64 16.9% (+40.2)#2,091
65. Drummond 57.0% 20.7% (+36.3)#65 16.9% (+40.1)#2,108
66. Langley 56.7% 20.7% (+36.0)#66 16.9% (+39.8)#2,130
67. Temple 56.0% 20.7% (+35.3)#67 16.9% (+39.1)#2,173
68. Foss 56.0% 20.7% (+35.3)#68 16.9% (+39.1)#2,181
69. Toppers 56.0% 20.7% (+35.2)#69 16.9% (+39.0)#2,184
70. Big Cabin 55.9% 20.7% (+35.2)#70 16.9% (+38.9)#2,189
71. Gans 55.1% 20.7% (+34.4)#71 16.9% (+38.1)#2,259
72. Monroe 54.8% 20.7% (+34.0)#72 16.9% (+37.8)#2,292
73. Colcord 54.5% 20.7% (+33.8)#73 16.9% (+37.6)#2,309
74. Blackburn 54.5% 20.7% (+33.8)#74 16.9% (+37.6)#2,317
75. Bennington 53.5% 20.7% (+32.8)#75 16.9% (+36.6)#2,401
76. Carmen 53.4% 20.7% (+32.7)#76 16.9% (+36.5)#2,407
77. Waurika 53.3% 20.7% (+32.6)#77 16.9% (+36.4)#2,423
78. Keota 52.8% 20.7% (+32.1)#78 16.9% (+35.9)#2,471
79. Hobart 52.5% 20.7% (+31.8)#79 16.9% (+35.6)#2,495
80. Yale 52.4% 20.7% (+31.6)#80 16.9% (+35.4)#2,519
81. Heavener 52.0% 20.7% (+31.2)#81 16.9% (+35.0)#2,560
82. Grandview 51.9% 20.7% (+31.1)#82 16.9% (+34.9)#2,569
83. Elm Grove 51.6% 20.7% (+30.9)#83 16.9% (+34.6)#2,601
84. Salina 51.3% 20.7% (+30.6)#84 16.9% (+34.4)#2,629
85. Glencoe 51.0% 20.7% (+30.3)#85 16.9% (+34.1)#2,664
86. Wetumka 50.7% 20.7% (+30.0)#86 16.9% (+33.8)#2,690
87. Dewey 50.3% 20.7% (+29.6)#87 16.9% (+33.4)#2,723
88. Watts 50.0% 20.7% (+29.3)#88 16.9% (+33.1)#2,780
89. Burbank 50.0% 20.7% (+29.3)#89 16.9% (+33.1)#2,806
90. Redbird 50.0% 20.7% (+29.3)#90 16.9% (+33.1)#2,811
91. Loco 50.0% 20.7% (+29.3)#91 16.9% (+33.1)#2,818
92. Sallisaw 49.6% 20.7% (+28.9)#92 16.9% (+32.7)#2,855
93. Colbert 49.5% 20.7% (+28.8)#93 16.9% (+32.5)#2,861
94. Okemah 49.3% 20.7% (+28.5)#94 16.9% (+32.3)#2,879
95. Tenkiller 49.3% 20.7% (+28.5)#95 16.9% (+32.3)#2,881
96. Tishomingo 48.7% 20.7% (+28.0)#96 16.9% (+31.8)#2,938
97. Belfonte 48.5% 20.7% (+27.8)#97 16.9% (+31.5)#2,965
98. Boynton 48.1% 20.7% (+27.4)#98 16.9% (+31.2)#3,001
99. Afton 48.1% 20.7% (+27.4)#99 16.9% (+31.1)#3,008
100. North Miami 47.9% 20.7% (+27.2)#100 16.9% (+30.9)#3,034

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Children Under the Age of 16 in Oklahoma?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Children Under the Age of 16 in Oklahoma are:
#1
100.0%
#2
100.0%
#3
100.0%
#4
100.0%
#5
100.0%
#6
100.0%
#7
100.0%
#8
100.0%
#9
100.0%
#10
100.0%
What city has the Highest Poverty Level Among Children Under the Age of 16 in Oklahoma?
Cedar Crest has the Highest Poverty Level Among Children Under the Age of 16 in Oklahoma with 100.0%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Children Under the Age of 16 in the State of Oklahoma?
Poverty Level Among Children Under the Age of 16 in Oklahoma is 20.7%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Children Under the Age of 16 in the United States?
Poverty Level Among Children Under the Age of 16 in the United States is 16.9%.