Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Children Under the Age of 16 in Wisconsin

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Highest Poverty | Child 0-16
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Wisconsin
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Children Under the Age of 16 in Wisconsin

0.0%
100.0%
Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Children Under the Age of 16 in Wisconsin Map

Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Children Under the Age of 16 in Wisconsin

City Child Poverty vs State vs National
1. Big Foot Prairie 100.0% 13.6% (+86.4)#1 16.9% (+83.1)#342
2. Danbury 100.0% 13.6% (+86.4)#2 16.9% (+83.1)#357
3. Barronett 100.0% 13.6% (+86.4)#3 16.9% (+83.1)#364
4. Conrath 100.0% 13.6% (+86.4)#4 16.9% (+83.1)#374
5. Paac Ciinak 100.0% 13.6% (+86.4)#5 16.9% (+83.1)#396
6. Fulton 100.0% 13.6% (+86.4)#6 16.9% (+83.1)#462
7. Birch Hill 89.8% 13.6% (+76.2)#7 16.9% (+72.9)#584
8. Elcho 86.7% 13.6% (+73.1)#8 16.9% (+69.7)#663
9. Radisson 84.9% 13.6% (+71.4)#9 16.9% (+68.0)#711
10. Sister Bay 79.8% 13.6% (+66.2)#10 16.9% (+62.8)#851
11. White Lake 76.5% 13.6% (+62.9)#11 16.9% (+59.5)#958
12. Marquette 74.4% 13.6% (+60.9)#12 16.9% (+57.5)#1,042
13. Pulcifer 70.0% 13.6% (+56.4)#13 16.9% (+53.1)#1,245
14. Ceex Haci 70.0% 13.6% (+56.4)#14 16.9% (+53.1)#1,247
15. Cable 69.6% 13.6% (+56.0)#15 16.9% (+52.6)#1,263
16. Middle Village 67.4% 13.6% (+53.9)#16 16.9% (+50.5)#1,362
17. Embarrass 67.2% 13.6% (+53.6)#17 16.9% (+50.2)#1,378
18. Woodman 65.4% 13.6% (+51.8)#18 16.9% (+48.4)#1,479
19. Dodge 64.3% 13.6% (+50.7)#19 16.9% (+47.3)#1,552
20. Browns Lake 63.2% 13.6% (+49.6)#20 16.9% (+46.2)#1,623
21. Chelsea 63.2% 13.6% (+49.6)#21 16.9% (+46.2)#1,627
22. Dellwood 60.4% 13.6% (+46.8)#22 16.9% (+43.4)#1,815
23. Mole Lake 60.0% 13.6% (+46.4)#23 16.9% (+43.1)#1,844
24. Juda 59.8% 13.6% (+46.3)#24 16.9% (+42.9)#1,873
25. Zoar 59.1% 13.6% (+45.5)#25 16.9% (+42.2)#1,933
26. Saxon 57.1% 13.6% (+43.6)#26 16.9% (+40.2)#2,100
27. Trego 55.6% 13.6% (+42.0)#27 16.9% (+38.6)#2,223
28. Boaz 55.2% 13.6% (+41.6)#28 16.9% (+38.2)#2,253
29. Lake Tomahawk 54.5% 13.6% (+41.0)#29 16.9% (+37.6)#2,314
30. La Farge 54.3% 13.6% (+40.7)#30 16.9% (+37.4)#2,344
31. Keshena 54.2% 13.6% (+40.7)#31 16.9% (+37.3)#2,349
32. Soldiers Grove 54.0% 13.6% (+40.5)#32 16.9% (+37.1)#2,370
33. New Post 53.3% 13.6% (+39.8)#33 16.9% (+36.4)#2,414
34. New Odanah 52.9% 13.6% (+39.3)#34 16.9% (+35.9)#2,466
35. North Freedom 52.7% 13.6% (+39.2)#35 16.9% (+35.8)#2,484
36. Newald 52.5% 13.6% (+38.9)#36 16.9% (+35.6)#2,501
37. Suring 52.1% 13.6% (+38.5)#37 16.9% (+35.1)#2,547
38. Hancock 51.9% 13.6% (+38.3)#38 16.9% (+34.9)#2,572
39. Centuria 51.0% 13.6% (+37.4)#39 16.9% (+34.0)#2,668
40. Oxford 50.5% 13.6% (+37.0)#40 16.9% (+33.6)#2,711
41. Avoca 50.0% 13.6% (+36.4)#41 16.9% (+33.1)#2,761
42. Mission 50.0% 13.6% (+36.4)#42 16.9% (+33.1)#2,768
43. Reserve 50.0% 13.6% (+36.4)#43 16.9% (+33.1)#2,773
44. Baileys Harbor 50.0% 13.6% (+36.4)#44 16.9% (+33.1)#2,787
45. Pine River 50.0% 13.6% (+36.4)#45 16.9% (+33.1)#2,803
46. Fairwater 49.0% 13.6% (+35.5)#46 16.9% (+32.1)#2,900
47. Minong 48.6% 13.6% (+35.1)#47 16.9% (+31.7)#2,943
48. Bagley 48.1% 13.6% (+34.6)#48 16.9% (+31.2)#2,997
49. Lac Du Flambeau 48.0% 13.6% (+34.5)#49 16.9% (+31.1)#3,011
50. Edmund 48.0% 13.6% (+34.4)#50 16.9% (+31.1)#3,020
51. Pepin 45.1% 13.6% (+31.6)#51 16.9% (+28.2)#3,451
52. Fairchild 44.4% 13.6% (+30.9)#52 16.9% (+27.5)#3,556
53. Kellnersville 44.0% 13.6% (+30.4)#53 16.9% (+27.1)#3,617
54. Norwalk 43.7% 13.6% (+30.1)#54 16.9% (+26.8)#3,657
55. Friendship 43.2% 13.6% (+29.7)#55 16.9% (+26.3)#3,740
56. Ironton 43.2% 13.6% (+29.7)#56 16.9% (+26.3)#3,741
57. Hayward 43.1% 13.6% (+29.5)#57 16.9% (+26.1)#3,763
58. Bancroft 43.0% 13.6% (+29.5)#58 16.9% (+26.1)#3,770
59. Amberg 42.9% 13.6% (+29.3)#59 16.9% (+25.9)#3,812
60. North Fond Du Lac 42.6% 13.6% (+29.0)#60 16.9% (+25.7)#3,854
61. Nichols 41.5% 13.6% (+28.0)#61 16.9% (+24.6)#4,039
62. Cumberland 41.5% 13.6% (+27.9)#62 16.9% (+24.6)#4,043
63. Frederic 41.4% 13.6% (+27.8)#63 16.9% (+24.4)#4,073
64. Wausaukee 41.1% 13.6% (+27.6)#64 16.9% (+24.2)#4,118
65. Bell Center 40.0% 13.6% (+26.4)#65 16.9% (+23.1)#4,333
66. Park Falls 38.9% 13.6% (+25.3)#66 16.9% (+21.9)#4,544
67. Chetek 37.6% 13.6% (+24.0)#67 16.9% (+20.6)#4,775
68. Phillips 37.5% 13.6% (+24.0)#68 16.9% (+20.6)#4,783
69. Boscobel 37.5% 13.6% (+24.0)#69 16.9% (+20.6)#4,786
70. Neshkoro 37.5% 13.6% (+23.9)#70 16.9% (+20.6)#4,797
71. Allens Grove 37.5% 13.6% (+23.9)#71 16.9% (+20.6)#4,807
72. Waterloo 37.4% 13.6% (+23.9)#72 16.9% (+20.5)#4,824
73. Mattoon 37.3% 13.6% (+23.7)#73 16.9% (+20.3)#4,852
74. Lake Sherwood 36.8% 13.6% (+23.3)#74 16.9% (+19.9)#4,937
75. Hawkins 36.6% 13.6% (+23.1)#75 16.9% (+19.7)#4,997
76. Iron River 36.1% 13.6% (+22.5)#76 16.9% (+19.1)#5,098
77. Richland Center 35.5% 13.6% (+21.9)#77 16.9% (+18.5)#5,234
78. Marion 35.4% 13.6% (+21.8)#78 16.9% (+18.5)#5,250
79. Abrams 35.3% 13.6% (+21.7)#79 16.9% (+18.4)#5,269
80. Egg Harbor 34.8% 13.6% (+21.2)#80 16.9% (+17.8)#5,405
81. Markesan 34.3% 13.6% (+20.8)#81 16.9% (+17.4)#5,495
82. Milwaukee 33.9% 13.6% (+20.4)#82 16.9% (+17.0)#5,600
83. Unity 33.7% 13.6% (+20.2)#83 16.9% (+16.8)#5,652
84. Chief Lake 33.3% 13.6% (+19.8)#84 16.9% (+16.4)#5,731
85. Cobb 33.3% 13.6% (+19.8)#85 16.9% (+16.4)#5,744
86. Rewey 33.3% 13.6% (+19.8)#86 16.9% (+16.4)#5,756
87. Sand Pillow 33.3% 13.6% (+19.8)#87 16.9% (+16.4)#5,758
88. Milltown 33.0% 13.6% (+19.4)#88 16.9% (+16.0)#5,857
89. Nekoosa 32.8% 13.6% (+19.2)#89 16.9% (+15.9)#5,893
90. Siren 32.4% 13.6% (+18.8)#90 16.9% (+15.4)#5,997
91. Kennan 32.4% 13.6% (+18.8)#91 16.9% (+15.4)#5,999
92. Endeavor 32.2% 13.6% (+18.6)#92 16.9% (+15.3)#6,047
93. Waubeka 31.2% 13.6% (+17.7)#93 16.9% (+14.3)#6,313
94. Boyd 31.2% 13.6% (+17.6)#94 16.9% (+14.3)#6,330
95. Grand View 30.8% 13.6% (+17.2)#95 16.9% (+13.8)#6,462
96. Almena 30.7% 13.6% (+17.1)#96 16.9% (+13.7)#6,494
97. Doylestown 30.4% 13.6% (+16.9)#97 16.9% (+13.5)#6,563
98. Eland 30.0% 13.6% (+16.4)#98 16.9% (+13.1)#6,691
99. Wabeno 29.6% 13.6% (+16.1)#99 16.9% (+12.7)#6,790
100. Dalton 29.5% 13.6% (+15.9)#100 16.9% (+12.5)#6,827

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Children Under the Age of 16 in Wisconsin?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Children Under the Age of 16 in Wisconsin are:
#1
100.0%
#2
100.0%
#3
100.0%
#4
89.8%
#5
86.7%
#6
84.9%
#7
79.8%
#8
76.5%
#9
74.4%
#10
70.0%
What city has the Highest Poverty Level Among Children Under the Age of 16 in Wisconsin?
Danbury has the Highest Poverty Level Among Children Under the Age of 16 in Wisconsin with 100.0%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Children Under the Age of 16 in the State of Wisconsin?
Poverty Level Among Children Under the Age of 16 in Wisconsin is 13.6%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Children Under the Age of 16 in the United States?
Poverty Level Among Children Under the Age of 16 in the United States is 16.9%.