Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Children Under the Age of 16 in Mississippi

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Highest Poverty | Child 0-16
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Mississippi
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Children Under the Age of 16 in Mississippi

0.0%
100.0%
Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Children Under the Age of 16 in Mississippi Map

Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Children Under the Age of 16 in Mississippi

City Child Poverty vs State vs National
1. Foxworth 100.0% 27.4% (+72.6)#1 16.9% (+83.1)#66
2. Glen Allan 100.0% 27.4% (+72.6)#2 16.9% (+83.1)#188
3. Bethlehem 100.0% 27.4% (+72.6)#3 16.9% (+83.1)#196
4. Doddsville 100.0% 27.4% (+72.6)#4 16.9% (+83.1)#220
5. Gattman 100.0% 27.4% (+72.6)#5 16.9% (+83.1)#258
6. Glendora 95.0% 27.4% (+67.6)#6 16.9% (+78.1)#516
7. White Oak 92.5% 27.4% (+65.1)#7 16.9% (+75.6)#537
8. Redwater 91.2% 27.4% (+63.8)#8 16.9% (+74.3)#558
9. Renova 89.8% 27.4% (+62.4)#9 16.9% (+72.9)#583
10. Gunnison 87.1% 27.4% (+59.7)#10 16.9% (+70.2)#645
11. Anguilla 86.8% 27.4% (+59.4)#11 16.9% (+69.9)#659
12. Arnold Line 85.9% 27.4% (+58.5)#12 16.9% (+69.0)#684
13. Bond 84.1% 27.4% (+56.6)#13 16.9% (+67.1)#733
14. Rosedale 83.5% 27.4% (+56.1)#14 16.9% (+66.6)#744
15. Crosby 83.3% 27.4% (+55.9)#15 16.9% (+66.4)#753
16. Webb 80.4% 27.4% (+52.9)#16 16.9% (+63.4)#833
17. Lumberton 80.4% 27.4% (+52.9)#17 16.9% (+63.4)#834
18. Scooba 80.0% 27.4% (+52.6)#18 16.9% (+63.1)#837
19. North Carrollton 80.0% 27.4% (+52.6)#19 16.9% (+63.1)#839
20. Nellieburg 79.7% 27.4% (+52.2)#20 16.9% (+62.7)#856
21. Sunflower 77.6% 27.4% (+50.1)#21 16.9% (+60.6)#914
22. Harperville 76.9% 27.4% (+49.5)#22 16.9% (+60.0)#946
23. Cary 76.7% 27.4% (+49.3)#23 16.9% (+59.8)#950
24. Fayette 76.0% 27.4% (+48.6)#24 16.9% (+59.1)#982
25. Jonestown 75.9% 27.4% (+48.5)#25 16.9% (+59.0)#984
26. Braxton 75.6% 27.4% (+48.2)#26 16.9% (+58.7)#998
27. Alligator 75.3% 27.4% (+47.9)#27 16.9% (+58.4)#1,003
28. Eudora 73.0% 27.4% (+45.5)#28 16.9% (+56.0)#1,104
29. Drew 71.9% 27.4% (+44.4)#29 16.9% (+54.9)#1,150
30. De Soto 71.4% 27.4% (+44.0)#30 16.9% (+54.5)#1,163
31. Lula 71.4% 27.4% (+44.0)#31 16.9% (+54.5)#1,165
32. New Augusta 70.9% 27.4% (+43.4)#32 16.9% (+53.9)#1,203
33. Mound Bayou 69.8% 27.4% (+42.4)#33 16.9% (+52.9)#1,251
34. Collins 69.5% 27.4% (+42.1)#34 16.9% (+52.6)#1,265
35. Moorhead 69.2% 27.4% (+41.8)#35 16.9% (+52.3)#1,283
36. Hollandale 67.8% 27.4% (+40.4)#36 16.9% (+50.9)#1,346
37. Tchula 67.2% 27.4% (+39.7)#37 16.9% (+50.2)#1,380
38. Summit 66.4% 27.4% (+39.0)#38 16.9% (+49.5)#1,421
39. Decatur 66.0% 27.4% (+38.5)#39 16.9% (+49.0)#1,453
40. Arcola 65.8% 27.4% (+38.3)#40 16.9% (+48.8)#1,461
41. Silver City 65.5% 27.4% (+38.1)#41 16.9% (+48.6)#1,471
42. Bude 65.2% 27.4% (+37.8)#42 16.9% (+48.3)#1,492
43. Shaw 64.9% 27.4% (+37.5)#43 16.9% (+48.0)#1,509
44. Friars Point 64.4% 27.4% (+37.0)#44 16.9% (+47.5)#1,536
45. Conehatta 64.4% 27.4% (+37.0)#45 16.9% (+47.5)#1,538
46. Derma 64.3% 27.4% (+36.9)#46 16.9% (+47.3)#1,549
47. Walnut 64.0% 27.4% (+36.6)#47 16.9% (+47.1)#1,565
48. Hazlehurst 63.5% 27.4% (+36.1)#48 16.9% (+46.5)#1,598
49. Coahoma 63.5% 27.4% (+36.0)#49 16.9% (+46.5)#1,600
50. Tucker 63.2% 27.4% (+35.8)#50 16.9% (+46.3)#1,621
51. Kilmichael 62.9% 27.4% (+35.4)#51 16.9% (+45.9)#1,648
52. Artesia 61.8% 27.4% (+34.3)#52 16.9% (+44.8)#1,716
53. Bassfield 61.7% 27.4% (+34.3)#53 16.9% (+44.8)#1,721
54. Weir 61.6% 27.4% (+34.2)#54 16.9% (+44.7)#1,726
55. Okolona 61.4% 27.4% (+34.0)#55 16.9% (+44.5)#1,750
56. Belzoni 61.0% 27.4% (+33.6)#56 16.9% (+44.1)#1,775
57. Isola 61.0% 27.4% (+33.6)#57 16.9% (+44.1)#1,776
58. Crenshaw 60.4% 27.4% (+32.9)#58 16.9% (+43.4)#1,818
59. Macon 60.2% 27.4% (+32.8)#59 16.9% (+43.3)#1,832
60. Tremont 60.0% 27.4% (+32.6)#60 16.9% (+43.1)#1,851
61. Satartia 60.0% 27.4% (+32.6)#61 16.9% (+43.1)#1,865
62. Potts Camp 59.7% 27.4% (+32.3)#62 16.9% (+42.8)#1,884
63. Yazoo City 59.1% 27.4% (+31.6)#63 16.9% (+42.1)#1,936
64. Laurel 58.2% 27.4% (+30.8)#64 16.9% (+41.3)#2,004
65. Louisville 58.1% 27.4% (+30.7)#65 16.9% (+41.2)#2,011
66. Taylorsville 57.9% 27.4% (+30.5)#66 16.9% (+41.0)#2,023
67. Agricola 57.8% 27.4% (+30.4)#67 16.9% (+40.9)#2,031
68. Clarksdale 57.8% 27.4% (+30.3)#68 16.9% (+40.8)#2,038
69. De Kalb 57.7% 27.4% (+30.3)#69 16.9% (+40.8)#2,041
70. Lucedale 56.6% 27.4% (+29.2)#70 16.9% (+39.7)#2,136
71. Water Valley 56.2% 27.4% (+28.8)#71 16.9% (+39.3)#2,162
72. Eden 55.8% 27.4% (+28.3)#72 16.9% (+38.8)#2,196
73. Puckett 55.7% 27.4% (+28.2)#73 16.9% (+38.7)#2,202
74. Lambert 55.6% 27.4% (+28.2)#74 16.9% (+38.7)#2,206
75. Wesson 55.5% 27.4% (+28.0)#75 16.9% (+38.5)#2,231
76. Port Gibson 55.1% 27.4% (+27.7)#76 16.9% (+38.2)#2,256
77. Plantersville 54.7% 27.4% (+27.3)#77 16.9% (+37.8)#2,295
78. Crystal Springs 54.7% 27.4% (+27.2)#78 16.9% (+37.7)#2,298
79. Paris 54.5% 27.4% (+27.1)#79 16.9% (+37.6)#2,312
80. Canton 54.2% 27.4% (+26.8)#80 16.9% (+37.3)#2,355
81. Crowder 54.2% 27.4% (+26.8)#81 16.9% (+37.3)#2,356
82. Leakesville 54.2% 27.4% (+26.7)#82 16.9% (+37.2)#2,361
83. Shelby 54.0% 27.4% (+26.6)#83 16.9% (+37.1)#2,371
84. Byhalia 53.8% 27.4% (+26.3)#84 16.9% (+36.8)#2,391
85. Quitman 53.4% 27.4% (+26.0)#85 16.9% (+36.5)#2,408
86. Pearl River 53.4% 27.4% (+26.0)#86 16.9% (+36.5)#2,409
87. Pachuta 53.3% 27.4% (+25.9)#87 16.9% (+36.4)#2,416
88. Flora 53.2% 27.4% (+25.8)#88 16.9% (+36.3)#2,426
89. Elliott 53.2% 27.4% (+25.8)#89 16.9% (+36.3)#2,432
90. Taylor 52.8% 27.4% (+25.3)#90 16.9% (+35.8)#2,478
91. Shuqualak 52.5% 27.4% (+25.1)#91 16.9% (+35.6)#2,497
92. Grenada 52.1% 27.4% (+24.7)#92 16.9% (+35.2)#2,539
93. Philadelphia 51.6% 27.4% (+24.2)#93 16.9% (+34.7)#2,595
94. Winona 51.2% 27.4% (+23.7)#94 16.9% (+34.2)#2,649
95. Gloster 51.0% 27.4% (+23.5)#95 16.9% (+34.0)#2,669
96. Natchez 50.9% 27.4% (+23.5)#96 16.9% (+34.0)#2,675
97. Greenville 50.7% 27.4% (+23.3)#97 16.9% (+33.8)#2,689
98. Stonewall 50.7% 27.4% (+23.3)#98 16.9% (+33.8)#2,692
99. Meridian 50.6% 27.4% (+23.2)#99 16.9% (+33.7)#2,698
100. Randolph 50.2% 27.4% (+22.8)#100 16.9% (+33.3)#2,733

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Children Under the Age of 16 in Mississippi?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Children Under the Age of 16 in Mississippi are:
#1
100.0%
#2
100.0%
#3
100.0%
#4
95.0%
#5
92.5%
#6
91.2%
#7
89.8%
#8
87.1%
#9
86.8%
#10
85.9%
What city has the Highest Poverty Level Among Children Under the Age of 16 in Mississippi?
Foxworth has the Highest Poverty Level Among Children Under the Age of 16 in Mississippi with 100.0%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Children Under the Age of 16 in the State of Mississippi?
Poverty Level Among Children Under the Age of 16 in Mississippi is 27.4%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Children Under the Age of 16 in the United States?
Poverty Level Among Children Under the Age of 16 in the United States is 16.9%.