Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Children Under the Age of 16 in Alabama

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Highest Poverty | Child 0-16
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Alabama
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Children Under the Age of 16 in Alabama

0.0%
100.0%
Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Children Under the Age of 16 in Alabama Map

Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Children Under the Age of 16 in Alabama

City Child Poverty vs State vs National
1. St Stephens 100.0% 22.5% (+77.5)#1 16.9% (+83.1)#92
2. Five Points 100.0% 22.5% (+77.5)#2 16.9% (+83.1)#264
3. Chunchula 100.0% 22.5% (+77.5)#3 16.9% (+83.1)#266
4. Yellow Bluff 100.0% 22.5% (+77.5)#4 16.9% (+83.1)#287
5. Bellamy 100.0% 22.5% (+77.5)#5 16.9% (+83.1)#320
6. Panola 100.0% 22.5% (+77.5)#6 16.9% (+83.1)#369
7. Billingsley 100.0% 22.5% (+77.5)#7 16.9% (+83.1)#400
8. Putnam 100.0% 22.5% (+77.5)#8 16.9% (+83.1)#408
9. Bon Air 100.0% 22.5% (+77.5)#9 16.9% (+83.1)#419
10. Epes 94.7% 22.5% (+72.3)#10 16.9% (+77.8)#518
11. Abanda 92.9% 22.5% (+70.4)#11 16.9% (+76.0)#533
12. Vredenburgh 88.9% 22.5% (+66.4)#12 16.9% (+71.9)#603
13. Sanford 88.1% 22.5% (+65.7)#13 16.9% (+71.2)#622
14. Fredonia 86.9% 22.5% (+64.4)#14 16.9% (+70.0)#656
15. Uniontown 84.5% 22.5% (+62.0)#15 16.9% (+67.5)#723
16. Detroit 81.8% 22.5% (+59.3)#16 16.9% (+64.9)#783
17. Brent 81.5% 22.5% (+59.1)#17 16.9% (+64.6)#799
18. Fort Deposit 81.5% 22.5% (+59.0)#18 16.9% (+64.5)#801
19. Brighton 80.6% 22.5% (+58.1)#19 16.9% (+63.6)#823
20. Cusseta 80.0% 22.5% (+57.5)#20 16.9% (+63.1)#844
21. Langston 77.8% 22.5% (+55.3)#21 16.9% (+60.8)#903
22. Ethelsville 77.8% 22.5% (+55.3)#22 16.9% (+60.8)#907
23. Pine Hill 77.6% 22.5% (+55.1)#23 16.9% (+60.7)#912
24. Selmont West Selmont 76.2% 22.5% (+53.8)#24 16.9% (+59.3)#969
25. Goodwater 75.2% 22.5% (+52.7)#25 16.9% (+58.3)#1,006
26. Ridgeville 75.0% 22.5% (+52.5)#26 16.9% (+58.1)#1,021
27. Delta 74.4% 22.5% (+51.9)#27 16.9% (+57.5)#1,043
28. Hayneville 73.6% 22.5% (+51.1)#28 16.9% (+56.6)#1,077
29. Union Springs 73.0% 22.5% (+50.5)#29 16.9% (+56.1)#1,102
30. Pine Apple 66.7% 22.5% (+44.2)#30 16.9% (+49.7)#1,399
31. Atmore 66.1% 22.5% (+43.6)#31 16.9% (+49.2)#1,440
32. Aliceville 66.1% 22.5% (+43.6)#32 16.9% (+49.2)#1,441
33. Lisman 65.3% 22.5% (+42.8)#33 16.9% (+48.4)#1,484
34. Red Level 65.3% 22.5% (+42.8)#34 16.9% (+48.3)#1,487
35. Coats Bend 65.2% 22.5% (+42.8)#35 16.9% (+48.3)#1,489
36. Newbern 64.7% 22.5% (+42.2)#36 16.9% (+47.8)#1,521
37. Newville 64.4% 22.5% (+42.0)#37 16.9% (+47.5)#1,533
38. Ashland 64.4% 22.5% (+41.9)#38 16.9% (+47.5)#1,537
39. Gainesville 63.6% 22.5% (+41.2)#39 16.9% (+46.7)#1,582
40. Fruitdale 63.6% 22.5% (+41.2)#40 16.9% (+46.7)#1,588
41. Shorter 63.5% 22.5% (+41.0)#41 16.9% (+46.6)#1,596
42. South Vinemont 63.3% 22.5% (+40.8)#42 16.9% (+46.4)#1,616
43. Vernon 63.0% 22.5% (+40.5)#43 16.9% (+46.0)#1,638
44. Brilliant 62.9% 22.5% (+40.4)#44 16.9% (+46.0)#1,642
45. Ariton 62.1% 22.5% (+39.6)#45 16.9% (+45.2)#1,701
46. Fairview 61.8% 22.5% (+39.3)#46 16.9% (+44.9)#1,711
47. Gilbertown 61.5% 22.5% (+39.1)#47 16.9% (+44.6)#1,735
48. Clio 60.9% 22.5% (+38.4)#48 16.9% (+44.0)#1,778
49. Fayette 60.3% 22.5% (+37.8)#49 16.9% (+43.4)#1,823
50. Uriah 59.7% 22.5% (+37.2)#50 16.9% (+42.8)#1,888
51. Riverview 59.5% 22.5% (+37.0)#51 16.9% (+42.5)#1,905
52. Slocomb 59.4% 22.5% (+37.0)#52 16.9% (+42.5)#1,907
53. Chatom 59.4% 22.5% (+36.9)#53 16.9% (+42.5)#1,909
54. Lookout Mountain 58.9% 22.5% (+36.4)#54 16.9% (+41.9)#1,944
55. Bessemer 58.8% 22.5% (+36.4)#55 16.9% (+41.9)#1,947
56. Blue Springs 58.3% 22.5% (+35.9)#56 16.9% (+41.4)#1,994
57. Reeltown 57.8% 22.5% (+35.3)#57 16.9% (+40.9)#2,034
58. Heath 57.7% 22.5% (+35.2)#58 16.9% (+40.8)#2,044
59. Mosses 57.4% 22.5% (+34.9)#59 16.9% (+40.5)#2,067
60. Lakeview 57.1% 22.5% (+34.7)#60 16.9% (+40.2)#2,098
61. River Falls 56.9% 22.5% (+34.4)#61 16.9% (+40.0)#2,117
62. Vincent 56.5% 22.5% (+34.0)#62 16.9% (+39.5)#2,145
63. Flomaton 56.1% 22.5% (+33.6)#63 16.9% (+39.2)#2,168
64. White Hall 55.9% 22.5% (+33.4)#64 16.9% (+39.0)#2,186
65. Belle Fontaine 55.8% 22.5% (+33.3)#65 16.9% (+38.8)#2,198
66. Cedar Bluff 54.2% 22.5% (+31.8)#66 16.9% (+37.3)#2,352
67. Brundidge 53.9% 22.5% (+31.4)#67 16.9% (+36.9)#2,380
68. West Blocton 53.7% 22.5% (+31.3)#68 16.9% (+36.8)#2,394
69. Camden 53.5% 22.5% (+31.0)#69 16.9% (+36.5)#2,403
70. Jackson 53.1% 22.5% (+30.6)#70 16.9% (+36.1)#2,442
71. Camp Hill 53.1% 22.5% (+30.6)#71 16.9% (+36.1)#2,446
72. Arley 52.8% 22.5% (+30.4)#72 16.9% (+35.9)#2,468
73. Dutton 52.4% 22.5% (+29.9)#73 16.9% (+35.5)#2,507
74. Marion 52.4% 22.5% (+29.9)#74 16.9% (+35.5)#2,509
75. Courtland 51.6% 22.5% (+29.1)#75 16.9% (+34.7)#2,596
76. Bon Secour 51.5% 22.5% (+29.0)#76 16.9% (+34.5)#2,611
77. Lanett 51.3% 22.5% (+28.8)#77 16.9% (+34.3)#2,634
78. Chickasaw 51.2% 22.5% (+28.7)#78 16.9% (+34.3)#2,647
79. Trafford 51.2% 22.5% (+28.7)#79 16.9% (+34.2)#2,650
80. Lynn 50.9% 22.5% (+28.5)#80 16.9% (+34.0)#2,674
81. Horn Hill 50.0% 22.5% (+27.5)#81 16.9% (+33.1)#2,781
82. Red Bay 49.6% 22.5% (+27.1)#82 16.9% (+32.7)#2,857
83. Rutledge 49.3% 22.5% (+26.8)#83 16.9% (+32.4)#2,877
84. Talladega 49.2% 22.5% (+26.7)#84 16.9% (+32.3)#2,885
85. Cottonwood 49.0% 22.5% (+26.5)#85 16.9% (+32.0)#2,904
86. Talladega Springs 48.6% 22.5% (+26.1)#86 16.9% (+31.6)#2,952
87. Bridgeport 47.8% 22.5% (+25.3)#87 16.9% (+30.9)#3,046
88. Allgood 47.6% 22.5% (+25.1)#88 16.9% (+30.7)#3,062
89. Pisgah 47.6% 22.5% (+25.1)#89 16.9% (+30.6)#3,072
90. Gallant 46.9% 22.5% (+24.4)#90 16.9% (+29.9)#3,169
91. Tarrant 46.7% 22.5% (+24.2)#91 16.9% (+29.8)#3,202
92. Town Creek 46.7% 22.5% (+24.2)#92 16.9% (+29.8)#3,203
93. Lester 46.7% 22.5% (+24.2)#93 16.9% (+29.7)#3,216
94. Selma 46.5% 22.5% (+24.0)#94 16.9% (+29.5)#3,243
95. Hanceville 46.5% 22.5% (+24.0)#95 16.9% (+29.5)#3,244
96. Double Springs 46.4% 22.5% (+23.9)#96 16.9% (+29.4)#3,256
97. Lineville 46.3% 22.5% (+23.8)#97 16.9% (+29.4)#3,266
98. Tuscumbia 46.3% 22.5% (+23.8)#98 16.9% (+29.3)#3,276
99. Coffeeville 46.2% 22.5% (+23.7)#99 16.9% (+29.2)#3,295
100. Vina 46.0% 22.5% (+23.5)#100 16.9% (+29.0)#3,320

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Children Under the Age of 16 in Alabama?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Children Under the Age of 16 in Alabama are:
#1
100.0%
#2
100.0%
#3
100.0%
#4
100.0%
#5
100.0%
#6
100.0%
#7
100.0%
#8
100.0%
#9
100.0%
#10
94.7%
What city has the Highest Poverty Level Among Children Under the Age of 16 in Alabama?
St Stephens has the Highest Poverty Level Among Children Under the Age of 16 in Alabama with 100.0%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Children Under the Age of 16 in the State of Alabama?
Poverty Level Among Children Under the Age of 16 in Alabama is 22.5%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Children Under the Age of 16 in the United States?
Poverty Level Among Children Under the Age of 16 in the United States is 16.9%.