Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Children Under the Age of 16 in Minnesota

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Highest Poverty | Child 0-16
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Minnesota
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Children Under the Age of 16 in Minnesota

0.0%
100.0%
Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Children Under the Age of 16 in Minnesota Map

Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Children Under the Age of 16 in Minnesota

City Child Poverty vs State vs National
1. Inger 100.0% 11.1% (+88.9)#1 16.9% (+83.1)#350
2. Goodridge 100.0% 11.1% (+88.9)#2 16.9% (+83.1)#372
3. Kenneth 100.0% 11.1% (+88.9)#3 16.9% (+83.1)#394
4. Funkley 100.0% 11.1% (+88.9)#4 16.9% (+83.1)#412
5. Essig 100.0% 11.1% (+88.9)#5 16.9% (+83.1)#413
6. Nashua 100.0% 11.1% (+88.9)#6 16.9% (+83.1)#425
7. Bruno 100.0% 11.1% (+88.9)#7 16.9% (+83.1)#443
8. Wilder 100.0% 11.1% (+88.9)#8 16.9% (+83.1)#451
9. Farwell 100.0% 11.1% (+88.9)#9 16.9% (+83.1)#464
10. Lengby 92.3% 11.1% (+81.2)#10 16.9% (+75.4)#541
11. Richville 91.7% 11.1% (+80.6)#11 16.9% (+74.7)#551
12. Nielsville 90.9% 11.1% (+79.8)#12 16.9% (+74.0)#562
13. South End 90.9% 11.1% (+79.8)#13 16.9% (+74.0)#563
14. Mahnomen 84.4% 11.1% (+73.4)#14 16.9% (+67.5)#724
15. Halma 81.8% 11.1% (+70.8)#15 16.9% (+64.9)#789
16. Marietta 81.4% 11.1% (+70.3)#16 16.9% (+64.5)#802
17. Bena 81.2% 11.1% (+70.2)#17 16.9% (+64.3)#804
18. Ball Club 78.4% 11.1% (+67.3)#18 16.9% (+61.4)#890
19. Dundee 76.5% 11.1% (+65.4)#19 16.9% (+59.5)#960
20. Ebro 75.0% 11.1% (+63.9)#20 16.9% (+58.1)#1,025
21. Myrtle 75.0% 11.1% (+63.9)#21 16.9% (+58.1)#1,029
22. Squaw Lake 73.7% 11.1% (+62.6)#22 16.9% (+56.7)#1,073
23. Walters 71.4% 11.1% (+60.4)#23 16.9% (+54.5)#1,172
24. New Trier 71.4% 11.1% (+60.4)#24 16.9% (+54.5)#1,173
25. Dent 70.3% 11.1% (+59.2)#25 16.9% (+53.3)#1,233
26. Riverland 63.7% 11.1% (+52.6)#26 16.9% (+46.8)#1,578
27. Lastrup 63.6% 11.1% (+52.6)#27 16.9% (+46.7)#1,590
28. White Earth 63.4% 11.1% (+52.3)#28 16.9% (+46.5)#1,607
29. Kelliher 63.0% 11.1% (+52.0)#29 16.9% (+46.1)#1,632
30. Keewatin 62.8% 11.1% (+51.7)#30 16.9% (+45.8)#1,654
31. Tamarack 62.5% 11.1% (+51.4)#31 16.9% (+45.6)#1,671
32. Finlayson 61.8% 11.1% (+50.7)#32 16.9% (+44.8)#1,717
33. Twin Lakes 60.3% 11.1% (+49.3)#33 16.9% (+43.4)#1,821
34. Remer 59.5% 11.1% (+48.5)#34 16.9% (+42.6)#1,900
35. Jeffers 59.5% 11.1% (+48.4)#35 16.9% (+42.5)#1,904
36. Manchester 58.3% 11.1% (+47.3)#36 16.9% (+41.4)#1,999
37. Delavan 57.1% 11.1% (+46.1)#37 16.9% (+40.2)#2,093
38. Kiester 56.2% 11.1% (+45.2)#38 16.9% (+39.3)#2,156
39. Freeborn 55.6% 11.1% (+44.5)#39 16.9% (+38.6)#2,216
40. Granada 55.3% 11.1% (+44.3)#40 16.9% (+38.4)#2,239
41. Echo 54.5% 11.1% (+43.5)#41 16.9% (+37.6)#2,313
42. Wendell 54.3% 11.1% (+43.2)#42 16.9% (+37.3)#2,347
43. Warba 54.1% 11.1% (+43.0)#43 16.9% (+37.1)#2,368
44. Boyd 52.8% 11.1% (+41.7)#44 16.9% (+35.8)#2,479
45. Walker 52.7% 11.1% (+41.7)#45 16.9% (+35.8)#2,483
46. Vineland 52.2% 11.1% (+41.1)#46 16.9% (+35.3)#2,530
47. Naytahwaush 51.9% 11.1% (+40.9)#47 16.9% (+35.0)#2,563
48. Jasper 51.4% 11.1% (+40.3)#48 16.9% (+34.4)#2,625
49. Elmore 51.2% 11.1% (+40.2)#49 16.9% (+34.3)#2,638
50. Brooten 50.5% 11.1% (+39.4)#50 16.9% (+33.6)#2,715
51. Chandler 50.0% 11.1% (+38.9)#51 16.9% (+33.1)#2,769
52. Hollandale 50.0% 11.1% (+38.9)#52 16.9% (+33.1)#2,772
53. Wright 50.0% 11.1% (+38.9)#53 16.9% (+33.1)#2,809
54. Correll 50.0% 11.1% (+38.9)#54 16.9% (+33.1)#2,826
55. Orr 47.2% 11.1% (+36.1)#55 16.9% (+30.3)#3,124
56. South Haven 47.1% 11.1% (+36.0)#56 16.9% (+30.1)#3,148
57. Floodwood 46.8% 11.1% (+35.7)#57 16.9% (+29.8)#3,188
58. Evansville 46.7% 11.1% (+35.6)#58 16.9% (+29.8)#3,200
59. Winger 46.7% 11.1% (+35.6)#59 16.9% (+29.7)#3,215
60. Graceville 46.5% 11.1% (+35.4)#60 16.9% (+29.5)#3,238
61. Blackduck 46.3% 11.1% (+35.2)#61 16.9% (+29.3)#3,277
62. Mckinley 46.2% 11.1% (+35.1)#62 16.9% (+29.2)#3,297
63. Grove City 45.8% 11.1% (+34.7)#63 16.9% (+28.8)#3,355
64. Waite Park 45.5% 11.1% (+34.4)#64 16.9% (+28.6)#3,397
65. Redby 45.1% 11.1% (+34.0)#65 16.9% (+28.1)#3,455
66. Iona 45.0% 11.1% (+33.9)#66 16.9% (+28.1)#3,471
67. Chisholm 43.1% 11.1% (+32.0)#67 16.9% (+26.2)#3,756
68. Walnut Grove 42.9% 11.1% (+31.8)#68 16.9% (+25.9)#3,798
69. Perley 42.9% 11.1% (+31.8)#69 16.9% (+25.9)#3,813
70. Pelican Rapids 42.8% 11.1% (+31.7)#70 16.9% (+25.8)#3,829
71. Belview 42.1% 11.1% (+31.0)#71 16.9% (+25.2)#3,953
72. Ponemah 41.8% 11.1% (+30.7)#72 16.9% (+24.9)#3,998
73. Pine Point 41.8% 11.1% (+30.7)#73 16.9% (+24.8)#4,009
74. Ogema 41.5% 11.1% (+30.4)#74 16.9% (+24.6)#4,045
75. Backus 40.4% 11.1% (+29.4)#75 16.9% (+23.5)#4,233
76. St Joseph 40.1% 11.1% (+29.0)#76 16.9% (+23.2)#4,294
77. Evan 40.0% 11.1% (+28.9)#77 16.9% (+23.1)#4,336
78. Leonidas 40.0% 11.1% (+28.9)#78 16.9% (+23.1)#4,338
79. Pine River 39.8% 11.1% (+28.7)#79 16.9% (+22.8)#4,371
80. Bigfork 39.5% 11.1% (+28.5)#80 16.9% (+22.6)#4,409
81. Lyle 39.0% 11.1% (+28.0)#81 16.9% (+22.1)#4,510
82. Bluffton 38.9% 11.1% (+27.8)#82 16.9% (+21.9)#4,541
83. Geneva 38.5% 11.1% (+27.4)#83 16.9% (+21.5)#4,612
84. Lake Lillian 38.1% 11.1% (+27.0)#84 16.9% (+21.2)#4,696
85. Holland 37.5% 11.1% (+26.4)#85 16.9% (+20.6)#4,804
86. Pine Bend 37.5% 11.1% (+26.4)#86 16.9% (+20.6)#4,813
87. Fosston 37.3% 11.1% (+26.2)#87 16.9% (+20.4)#4,850
88. Magnolia 37.1% 11.1% (+26.1)#88 16.9% (+20.2)#4,883
89. Osage 36.8% 11.1% (+25.8)#89 16.9% (+19.9)#4,940
90. Minnesota City 36.8% 11.1% (+25.8)#90 16.9% (+19.9)#4,941
91. Lucan 36.6% 11.1% (+25.5)#91 16.9% (+19.6)#5,007
92. Garrison 36.4% 11.1% (+25.3)#92 16.9% (+19.4)#5,053
93. Staples 35.6% 11.1% (+24.5)#93 16.9% (+18.6)#5,206
94. Rushmore 35.6% 11.1% (+24.5)#94 16.9% (+18.6)#5,214
95. Emmons 35.6% 11.1% (+24.5)#95 16.9% (+18.6)#5,216
96. Wilton 34.8% 11.1% (+23.7)#96 16.9% (+17.8)#5,406
97. Calumet 34.5% 11.1% (+23.5)#97 16.9% (+17.6)#5,457
98. Verndale 34.4% 11.1% (+23.3)#98 16.9% (+17.5)#5,484
99. St James 34.3% 11.1% (+23.3)#99 16.9% (+17.4)#5,493
100. Browns Valley 33.6% 11.1% (+22.5)#100 16.9% (+16.6)#5,673

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Children Under the Age of 16 in Minnesota?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Children Under the Age of 16 in Minnesota are:
#1
100.0%
#2
100.0%
#3
100.0%
#4
100.0%
#5
100.0%
#6
100.0%
#7
100.0%
#8
100.0%
#9
92.3%
#10
91.7%
What city has the Highest Poverty Level Among Children Under the Age of 16 in Minnesota?
Inger has the Highest Poverty Level Among Children Under the Age of 16 in Minnesota with 100.0%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Children Under the Age of 16 in the State of Minnesota?
Poverty Level Among Children Under the Age of 16 in Minnesota is 11.1%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Children Under the Age of 16 in the United States?
Poverty Level Among Children Under the Age of 16 in the United States is 16.9%.