Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Children Under the Age of 16 in Nebraska

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Highest Poverty | Child 0-16
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Nebraska
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Children Under the Age of 16 in Nebraska

0.0%
100.0%
Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Children Under the Age of 16 in Nebraska Map

Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Children Under the Age of 16 in Nebraska

City Child Poverty vs State vs National
1. Sunol 100.0% 12.2% (+87.8)#1 16.9% (+83.1)#271
2. Belvidere 100.0% 12.2% (+87.8)#2 16.9% (+83.1)#418
3. Oak 100.0% 12.2% (+87.8)#3 16.9% (+83.1)#447
4. Anoka 100.0% 12.2% (+87.8)#4 16.9% (+83.1)#459
5. Hamlet 100.0% 12.2% (+87.8)#5 16.9% (+83.1)#467
6. Hazard 91.7% 12.2% (+79.5)#6 16.9% (+74.7)#550
7. South Bend 87.5% 12.2% (+75.3)#7 16.9% (+70.6)#633
8. Dunning 87.5% 12.2% (+75.3)#8 16.9% (+70.6)#635
9. Talmage 84.9% 12.2% (+72.7)#9 16.9% (+68.0)#713
10. Bushnell 81.2% 12.2% (+69.1)#10 16.9% (+64.3)#805
11. Farnam 78.6% 12.2% (+66.4)#11 16.9% (+61.6)#884
12. Linwood 77.5% 12.2% (+65.3)#12 16.9% (+60.6)#915
13. Liberty 76.5% 12.2% (+64.3)#13 16.9% (+59.5)#961
14. Boys Town 73.1% 12.2% (+60.9)#14 16.9% (+56.1)#1,098
15. Henry 66.7% 12.2% (+54.5)#15 16.9% (+49.7)#1,408
16. Otoe 65.4% 12.2% (+53.2)#16 16.9% (+48.4)#1,477
17. Center 63.4% 12.2% (+51.2)#17 16.9% (+46.5)#1,606
18. Holbrook 63.3% 12.2% (+51.2)#18 16.9% (+46.4)#1,612
19. Arthur 61.1% 12.2% (+48.9)#19 16.9% (+44.2)#1,770
20. Ruskin 56.2% 12.2% (+44.1)#20 16.9% (+39.3)#2,160
21. Gresham 55.2% 12.2% (+43.0)#21 16.9% (+38.2)#2,250
22. Nickerson 53.5% 12.2% (+41.3)#22 16.9% (+36.5)#2,404
23. Republican City 52.0% 12.2% (+39.8)#23 16.9% (+35.1)#2,559
24. Crawford 50.5% 12.2% (+38.3)#24 16.9% (+33.6)#2,714
25. Harrison 50.0% 12.2% (+37.8)#25 16.9% (+33.1)#2,784
26. Upland 50.0% 12.2% (+37.8)#26 16.9% (+33.1)#2,804
27. Magnet 50.0% 12.2% (+37.8)#27 16.9% (+33.1)#2,821
28. Union 49.0% 12.2% (+36.8)#28 16.9% (+32.0)#2,902
29. Ulysses 47.1% 12.2% (+34.9)#29 16.9% (+30.1)#3,147
30. Macy 46.8% 12.2% (+34.6)#30 16.9% (+29.8)#3,192
31. Litchfield 46.3% 12.2% (+34.1)#31 16.9% (+29.3)#3,279
32. Elk Creek 45.5% 12.2% (+33.3)#32 16.9% (+28.5)#3,415
33. Grafton 44.8% 12.2% (+32.7)#33 16.9% (+27.9)#3,505
34. Terrytown 44.7% 12.2% (+32.5)#34 16.9% (+27.7)#3,519
35. Osmond 43.7% 12.2% (+31.5)#35 16.9% (+26.8)#3,653
36. Beaver Crossing 43.2% 12.2% (+31.1)#36 16.9% (+26.3)#3,734
37. Belgrade 41.9% 12.2% (+29.8)#37 16.9% (+25.0)#3,982
38. Phillips 41.8% 12.2% (+29.7)#38 16.9% (+24.9)#3,996
39. Winnebago 41.8% 12.2% (+29.6)#39 16.9% (+24.9)#4,000
40. Clarks 40.3% 12.2% (+28.2)#40 16.9% (+23.4)#4,252
41. Orchard 40.0% 12.2% (+27.8)#41 16.9% (+23.1)#4,311
42. Hardy 40.0% 12.2% (+27.8)#42 16.9% (+23.1)#4,324
43. Mcgrew 40.0% 12.2% (+27.8)#43 16.9% (+23.1)#4,334
44. Alda 39.8% 12.2% (+27.7)#44 16.9% (+22.9)#4,364
45. Wolbach 39.4% 12.2% (+27.3)#45 16.9% (+22.5)#4,430
46. Santee 39.2% 12.2% (+27.0)#46 16.9% (+22.2)#4,483
47. Lyons 38.9% 12.2% (+26.7)#47 16.9% (+21.9)#4,546
48. Dunbar 35.7% 12.2% (+23.5)#48 16.9% (+18.8)#5,180
49. Verdigre 35.2% 12.2% (+23.0)#49 16.9% (+18.2)#5,312
50. Herman 34.0% 12.2% (+21.9)#50 16.9% (+17.1)#5,573
51. Haigler 34.0% 12.2% (+21.8)#51 16.9% (+17.1)#5,588
52. Broken Bow 33.5% 12.2% (+21.3)#52 16.9% (+16.5)#5,691
53. Benkelman 33.3% 12.2% (+21.2)#53 16.9% (+16.4)#5,718
54. Denton 33.3% 12.2% (+21.2)#54 16.9% (+16.4)#5,766
55. Salem 33.3% 12.2% (+21.2)#55 16.9% (+16.4)#5,782
56. Richland 33.3% 12.2% (+21.2)#56 16.9% (+16.4)#5,794
57. Tekamah 33.0% 12.2% (+20.8)#57 16.9% (+16.0)#5,859
58. Pilger 32.4% 12.2% (+20.3)#58 16.9% (+15.5)#5,978
59. Scotia 31.7% 12.2% (+19.5)#59 16.9% (+14.8)#6,177
60. Fordyce 31.6% 12.2% (+19.4)#60 16.9% (+14.6)#6,211
61. Beatrice 31.5% 12.2% (+19.4)#61 16.9% (+14.6)#6,226
62. Lexington 31.4% 12.2% (+19.2)#62 16.9% (+14.4)#6,278
63. Bassett 31.2% 12.2% (+19.0)#63 16.9% (+14.2)#6,333
64. Beaver City 31.0% 12.2% (+18.9)#64 16.9% (+14.1)#6,376
65. Holdrege 30.9% 12.2% (+18.7)#65 16.9% (+13.9)#6,428
66. Ashton 30.8% 12.2% (+18.6)#66 16.9% (+13.8)#6,455
67. Cody 30.8% 12.2% (+18.6)#67 16.9% (+13.8)#6,458
68. Ravenna 30.5% 12.2% (+18.4)#68 16.9% (+13.6)#6,530
69. Callaway 30.1% 12.2% (+17.9)#69 16.9% (+13.2)#6,659
70. Harvard 29.9% 12.2% (+17.7)#70 16.9% (+12.9)#6,719
71. Minatare 29.7% 12.2% (+17.6)#71 16.9% (+12.8)#6,761
72. Table Rock 29.7% 12.2% (+17.6)#72 16.9% (+12.8)#6,765
73. Steinauer 29.7% 12.2% (+17.6)#73 16.9% (+12.8)#6,767
74. Ewing 29.6% 12.2% (+17.4)#74 16.9% (+12.7)#6,799
75. Newman Grove 29.6% 12.2% (+17.4)#75 16.9% (+12.6)#6,808
76. Roca 29.4% 12.2% (+17.2)#76 16.9% (+12.5)#6,849
77. Crete 29.0% 12.2% (+16.9)#77 16.9% (+12.1)#6,955
78. Oxford 28.9% 12.2% (+16.7)#78 16.9% (+12.0)#6,988
79. Fullerton 28.6% 12.2% (+16.4)#79 16.9% (+11.6)#7,071
80. Kilgore 28.6% 12.2% (+16.4)#80 16.9% (+11.6)#7,105
81. Axtell 28.3% 12.2% (+16.1)#81 16.9% (+11.4)#7,168
82. Glenvil 28.3% 12.2% (+16.1)#82 16.9% (+11.4)#7,171
83. Brule 28.3% 12.2% (+16.1)#83 16.9% (+11.3)#7,179
84. Weston 28.3% 12.2% (+16.1)#84 16.9% (+11.3)#7,180
85. Max 26.5% 12.2% (+14.3)#85 16.9% (+9.53)#7,825
86. Holstein 26.3% 12.2% (+14.2)#86 16.9% (+9.38)#7,885
87. Osceola 25.9% 12.2% (+13.8)#87 16.9% (+8.99)#8,019
88. Brady 25.9% 12.2% (+13.8)#88 16.9% (+8.99)#8,020
89. Scribner 25.9% 12.2% (+13.7)#89 16.9% (+8.96)#8,028
90. Indianola 25.7% 12.2% (+13.6)#90 16.9% (+8.80)#8,101
91. Auburn 25.4% 12.2% (+13.2)#91 16.9% (+8.42)#8,226
92. Bancroft 25.2% 12.2% (+13.1)#92 16.9% (+8.29)#8,273
93. Oakdale 25.0% 12.2% (+12.8)#93 16.9% (+8.06)#8,352
94. Hubbard 25.0% 12.2% (+12.8)#94 16.9% (+8.06)#8,362
95. Alexandria 25.0% 12.2% (+12.8)#95 16.9% (+8.06)#8,389
96. Farwell 25.0% 12.2% (+12.8)#96 16.9% (+8.06)#8,395
97. Hoskins 24.2% 12.2% (+12.0)#97 16.9% (+7.25)#8,652
98. Campbell 24.1% 12.2% (+12.0)#98 16.9% (+7.20)#8,673
99. Martinsburg 23.8% 12.2% (+11.6)#99 16.9% (+6.87)#8,783
100. Nebraska City 23.6% 12.2% (+11.4)#100 16.9% (+6.61)#8,856

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Children Under the Age of 16 in Nebraska?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Children Under the Age of 16 in Nebraska are:
#1
100.0%
#2
100.0%
#3
100.0%
#4
100.0%
#5
100.0%
#6
91.7%
#7
87.5%
#8
87.5%
#9
84.9%
#10
81.2%
What city has the Highest Poverty Level Among Children Under the Age of 16 in Nebraska?
Sunol has the Highest Poverty Level Among Children Under the Age of 16 in Nebraska with 100.0%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Children Under the Age of 16 in the State of Nebraska?
Poverty Level Among Children Under the Age of 16 in Nebraska is 12.2%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Children Under the Age of 16 in the United States?
Poverty Level Among Children Under the Age of 16 in the United States is 16.9%.