Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Children Under the Age of 16 in Iowa

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Highest Poverty | Child 0-16
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Iowa
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Children Under the Age of 16 in Iowa

0.0%
100.0%
Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Children Under the Age of 16 in Iowa Map

Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Children Under the Age of 16 in Iowa

City Child Poverty vs State vs National
1. Oto 100.0% 13.2% (+86.8)#1 16.9% (+83.1)#376
2. Swan 100.0% 13.2% (+86.8)#2 16.9% (+83.1)#417
3. Aspinwall 100.0% 13.2% (+86.8)#3 16.9% (+83.1)#475
4. Zwingle 88.9% 13.2% (+75.7)#4 16.9% (+71.9)#605
5. Randalia 88.2% 13.2% (+75.1)#5 16.9% (+71.3)#620
6. Woodburn 87.0% 13.2% (+73.8)#6 16.9% (+70.0)#652
7. Osterdock 86.4% 13.2% (+73.2)#7 16.9% (+69.4)#673
8. Kiron 83.3% 13.2% (+70.2)#8 16.9% (+66.4)#752
9. Decatur City 76.7% 13.2% (+63.5)#9 16.9% (+59.7)#955
10. Casey 75.0% 13.2% (+61.8)#10 16.9% (+58.1)#1,015
11. Soldier 75.0% 13.2% (+61.8)#11 16.9% (+58.1)#1,019
12. Morley 75.0% 13.2% (+61.8)#12 16.9% (+58.1)#1,030
13. Moorhead 72.0% 13.2% (+58.8)#13 16.9% (+55.1)#1,144
14. Castalia 71.4% 13.2% (+58.3)#14 16.9% (+54.5)#1,169
15. Grant 71.4% 13.2% (+58.3)#15 16.9% (+54.5)#1,175
16. Meservey 66.7% 13.2% (+53.5)#16 16.9% (+49.7)#1,397
17. Colwell 66.7% 13.2% (+53.5)#17 16.9% (+49.7)#1,407
18. Millerton 66.7% 13.2% (+53.5)#18 16.9% (+49.7)#1,411
19. Cotter 66.7% 13.2% (+53.5)#19 16.9% (+49.7)#1,413
20. Galt 64.7% 13.2% (+51.5)#20 16.9% (+47.8)#1,522
21. Chelsea 64.4% 13.2% (+51.2)#21 16.9% (+47.4)#1,541
22. Bradgate 64.3% 13.2% (+51.1)#22 16.9% (+47.3)#1,553
23. Melvin 63.0% 13.2% (+49.8)#23 16.9% (+46.1)#1,634
24. Wyoming 62.9% 13.2% (+49.7)#24 16.9% (+45.9)#1,644
25. Brayton 62.5% 13.2% (+49.3)#25 16.9% (+45.6)#1,668
26. Ferguson 58.3% 13.2% (+45.2)#26 16.9% (+41.4)#1,995
27. Ackworth 58.1% 13.2% (+44.9)#27 16.9% (+41.1)#2,017
28. Burr Oak 57.8% 13.2% (+44.6)#28 16.9% (+40.9)#2,033
29. Thor 57.4% 13.2% (+44.3)#29 16.9% (+40.5)#2,064
30. Turin 57.1% 13.2% (+44.0)#30 16.9% (+40.2)#2,097
31. Derby 56.8% 13.2% (+43.6)#31 16.9% (+39.8)#2,129
32. Bagley 55.6% 13.2% (+42.4)#32 16.9% (+38.6)#2,217
33. Maysville 55.6% 13.2% (+42.4)#33 16.9% (+38.6)#2,218
34. Coburg 55.6% 13.2% (+42.4)#34 16.9% (+38.6)#2,225
35. Nodaway 54.5% 13.2% (+41.4)#35 16.9% (+37.6)#2,320
36. Victor 54.5% 13.2% (+41.3)#36 16.9% (+37.6)#2,324
37. Lockridge 53.9% 13.2% (+40.8)#37 16.9% (+37.0)#2,376
38. Onslow 52.1% 13.2% (+38.9)#38 16.9% (+35.2)#2,541
39. Havelock 51.6% 13.2% (+38.4)#39 16.9% (+34.7)#2,598
40. Kimballton 51.1% 13.2% (+38.0)#40 16.9% (+34.2)#2,653
41. Villisca 51.1% 13.2% (+37.9)#41 16.9% (+34.1)#2,661
42. Oakville 50.0% 13.2% (+36.8)#42 16.9% (+33.1)#2,792
43. Delaware 50.0% 13.2% (+36.8)#43 16.9% (+33.1)#2,800
44. Promise City 50.0% 13.2% (+36.8)#44 16.9% (+33.1)#2,815
45. Curlew 50.0% 13.2% (+36.8)#45 16.9% (+33.1)#2,825
46. Marathon 47.8% 13.2% (+34.6)#46 16.9% (+30.9)#3,044
47. Alexander 47.7% 13.2% (+34.5)#47 16.9% (+30.8)#3,051
48. Blakesburg 47.5% 13.2% (+34.3)#48 16.9% (+30.6)#3,084
49. Stockton 47.4% 13.2% (+34.2)#49 16.9% (+30.4)#3,106
50. Cushing 46.9% 13.2% (+33.8)#50 16.9% (+30.0)#3,164
51. Milton 46.8% 13.2% (+33.6)#51 16.9% (+29.8)#3,193
52. Allerton 46.7% 13.2% (+33.5)#52 16.9% (+29.7)#3,209
53. Ireton 46.6% 13.2% (+33.4)#53 16.9% (+29.6)#3,225
54. Swea City 46.0% 13.2% (+32.8)#54 16.9% (+29.1)#3,315
55. Elma 44.9% 13.2% (+31.7)#55 16.9% (+28.0)#3,487
56. Lansing 44.6% 13.2% (+31.4)#56 16.9% (+27.7)#3,536
57. Bayard 44.4% 13.2% (+31.3)#57 16.9% (+27.5)#3,557
58. Rembrandt 44.4% 13.2% (+31.3)#58 16.9% (+27.5)#3,563
59. Marne 44.4% 13.2% (+31.3)#59 16.9% (+27.5)#3,567
60. Coppock 44.4% 13.2% (+31.3)#60 16.9% (+27.5)#3,573
61. Rake 43.6% 13.2% (+30.4)#61 16.9% (+26.7)#3,671
62. Searsboro 43.6% 13.2% (+30.4)#62 16.9% (+26.7)#3,672
63. Olin 43.4% 13.2% (+30.2)#63 16.9% (+26.5)#3,700
64. Atlantic 43.4% 13.2% (+30.2)#64 16.9% (+26.5)#3,707
65. Rome 42.9% 13.2% (+29.7)#65 16.9% (+25.9)#3,817
66. Lorimor 42.6% 13.2% (+29.4)#66 16.9% (+25.6)#3,859
67. Malcom 42.4% 13.2% (+29.2)#67 16.9% (+25.5)#3,883
68. Vail 42.2% 13.2% (+29.0)#68 16.9% (+25.3)#3,932
69. Zearing 41.9% 13.2% (+28.7)#69 16.9% (+25.0)#3,986
70. Ringsted 41.3% 13.2% (+28.1)#70 16.9% (+24.4)#4,080
71. Aurora 41.1% 13.2% (+27.9)#71 16.9% (+24.1)#4,126
72. Marquette 40.4% 13.2% (+27.2)#72 16.9% (+23.4)#4,245
73. Charter Oak 40.0% 13.2% (+26.8)#73 16.9% (+23.1)#4,308
74. Mondamin 40.0% 13.2% (+26.8)#74 16.9% (+23.1)#4,310
75. Postville 39.5% 13.2% (+26.3)#75 16.9% (+22.5)#4,421
76. Shambaugh 39.5% 13.2% (+26.3)#76 16.9% (+22.5)#4,424
77. Burt 39.4% 13.2% (+26.2)#77 16.9% (+22.5)#4,437
78. Bode 39.1% 13.2% (+26.0)#78 16.9% (+22.2)#4,496
79. Sibley 39.1% 13.2% (+25.9)#79 16.9% (+22.2)#4,499
80. Emmetsburg 38.9% 13.2% (+25.7)#80 16.9% (+22.0)#4,535
81. Hampton 38.1% 13.2% (+24.9)#81 16.9% (+21.1)#4,700
82. Granville 37.5% 13.2% (+24.3)#82 16.9% (+20.6)#4,803
83. St Marys 37.5% 13.2% (+24.3)#83 16.9% (+20.6)#4,808
84. Guernsey 37.5% 13.2% (+24.3)#84 16.9% (+20.6)#4,810
85. Cherokee 36.2% 13.2% (+23.0)#85 16.9% (+19.3)#5,079
86. What Cheer 35.9% 13.2% (+22.7)#86 16.9% (+18.9)#5,142
87. Lu Verne 35.9% 13.2% (+22.7)#87 16.9% (+18.9)#5,144
88. Andover 35.4% 13.2% (+22.2)#88 16.9% (+18.5)#5,247
89. Garden Grove 35.3% 13.2% (+22.1)#89 16.9% (+18.4)#5,271
90. Chariton 35.2% 13.2% (+22.0)#90 16.9% (+18.2)#5,307
91. New Hartford 35.1% 13.2% (+21.9)#91 16.9% (+18.1)#5,328
92. Eddyville 34.9% 13.2% (+21.8)#92 16.9% (+18.0)#5,362
93. Rowan 34.6% 13.2% (+21.4)#93 16.9% (+17.7)#5,444
94. Dedham 34.4% 13.2% (+21.2)#94 16.9% (+17.5)#5,482
95. Evansdale 34.0% 13.2% (+20.8)#95 16.9% (+17.1)#5,590
96. Centerville 33.8% 13.2% (+20.6)#96 16.9% (+16.8)#5,644
97. Gilman 33.6% 13.2% (+20.4)#97 16.9% (+16.7)#5,672
98. Armstrong 33.3% 13.2% (+20.2)#98 16.9% (+16.4)#5,723
99. Terril 33.3% 13.2% (+20.2)#99 16.9% (+16.4)#5,751
100. St Donatus 33.3% 13.2% (+20.2)#100 16.9% (+16.4)#5,772

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Children Under the Age of 16 in Iowa?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Children Under the Age of 16 in Iowa are:
#1
100.0%
#2
100.0%
#3
100.0%
#4
88.9%
#5
88.2%
#6
87.0%
#7
86.4%
#8
83.3%
#9
76.7%
#10
75.0%
What city has the Highest Poverty Level Among Children Under the Age of 16 in Iowa?
Oto has the Highest Poverty Level Among Children Under the Age of 16 in Iowa with 100.0%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Children Under the Age of 16 in the State of Iowa?
Poverty Level Among Children Under the Age of 16 in Iowa is 13.2%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Children Under the Age of 16 in the United States?
Poverty Level Among Children Under the Age of 16 in the United States is 16.9%.