Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Children Under the Age of 16 in Indiana

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Highest Poverty | Child 0-16
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Indiana
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Children Under the Age of 16 in Indiana

0.0%
100.0%
Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Children Under the Age of 16 in Indiana Map

Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Children Under the Age of 16 in Indiana

City Child Poverty vs State vs National
1. Lewis 100.0% 16.4% (+83.6)#1 16.9% (+83.1)#67
2. Prairie Creek 100.0% 16.4% (+83.6)#2 16.9% (+83.1)#165
3. Abington 100.0% 16.4% (+83.6)#3 16.9% (+83.1)#169
4. Brimfield 100.0% 16.4% (+83.6)#4 16.9% (+83.1)#186
5. Marion 100.0% 16.4% (+83.6)#5 16.9% (+83.1)#211
6. Burnett 100.0% 16.4% (+83.6)#6 16.9% (+83.1)#219
7. Arthur 100.0% 16.4% (+83.6)#7 16.9% (+83.1)#221
8. Millville 100.0% 16.4% (+83.6)#8 16.9% (+83.1)#227
9. Adams 100.0% 16.4% (+83.6)#9 16.9% (+83.1)#230
10. Alford 100.0% 16.4% (+83.6)#10 16.9% (+83.1)#235
11. Deer Creek 100.0% 16.4% (+83.6)#11 16.9% (+83.1)#245
12. Pence 100.0% 16.4% (+83.6)#12 16.9% (+83.1)#251
13. Eugene 100.0% 16.4% (+83.6)#13 16.9% (+83.1)#256
14. Billtown 100.0% 16.4% (+83.6)#14 16.9% (+83.1)#272
15. Grayford 100.0% 16.4% (+83.6)#15 16.9% (+83.1)#302
16. Linn Grove 100.0% 16.4% (+83.6)#16 16.9% (+83.1)#312
17. Otisco 100.0% 16.4% (+83.6)#17 16.9% (+83.1)#322
18. St. Omer 100.0% 16.4% (+83.6)#18 16.9% (+83.1)#353
19. Hobbs 100.0% 16.4% (+83.6)#19 16.9% (+83.1)#358
20. Cross Plains 100.0% 16.4% (+83.6)#20 16.9% (+83.1)#363
21. Florence 100.0% 16.4% (+83.6)#21 16.9% (+83.1)#375
22. Penntown 100.0% 16.4% (+83.6)#22 16.9% (+83.1)#381
23. Pleasantville 100.0% 16.4% (+83.6)#23 16.9% (+83.1)#382
24. Pulaski 100.0% 16.4% (+83.6)#24 16.9% (+83.1)#449
25. Lake Holiday Hideaway 95.0% 16.4% (+78.6)#25 16.9% (+78.1)#515
26. Alamo 87.5% 16.4% (+71.1)#26 16.9% (+70.6)#636
27. Hartz Lake 87.0% 16.4% (+70.5)#27 16.9% (+70.0)#651
28. Hanna 85.3% 16.4% (+68.9)#28 16.9% (+68.4)#699
29. English 76.3% 16.4% (+59.8)#29 16.9% (+59.3)#968
30. La Paz 76.1% 16.4% (+59.6)#30 16.9% (+59.1)#978
31. Leiters Ford 74.4% 16.4% (+57.9)#31 16.9% (+57.4)#1,045
32. Patriot 74.2% 16.4% (+57.7)#32 16.9% (+57.3)#1,053
33. Mauckport 72.7% 16.4% (+56.3)#33 16.9% (+55.8)#1,117
34. Switz City 71.4% 16.4% (+55.0)#34 16.9% (+54.5)#1,162
35. Laconia 71.4% 16.4% (+55.0)#35 16.9% (+54.5)#1,176
36. Thayer 68.8% 16.4% (+52.3)#36 16.9% (+51.8)#1,311
37. Roseland 66.7% 16.4% (+50.2)#37 16.9% (+49.7)#1,392
38. Coal 66.7% 16.4% (+50.2)#38 16.9% (+49.7)#1,405
39. Boston 66.0% 16.4% (+49.6)#39 16.9% (+49.1)#1,452
40. Ambia 66.0% 16.4% (+49.5)#40 16.9% (+49.0)#1,454
41. Poneto 65.4% 16.4% (+48.9)#41 16.9% (+48.4)#1,481
42. Kewanna 63.0% 16.4% (+46.5)#42 16.9% (+46.0)#1,635
43. Rockville 60.9% 16.4% (+44.5)#43 16.9% (+44.0)#1,777
44. Otwell 58.4% 16.4% (+42.0)#44 16.9% (+41.5)#1,978
45. Boswell 56.8% 16.4% (+40.4)#45 16.9% (+39.9)#2,122
46. Hudson 55.5% 16.4% (+39.0)#46 16.9% (+38.5)#2,229
47. New Salisbury 55.2% 16.4% (+38.7)#47 16.9% (+38.2)#2,248
48. Gary 54.4% 16.4% (+38.0)#48 16.9% (+37.5)#2,336
49. Jasonville 54.2% 16.4% (+37.7)#49 16.9% (+37.2)#2,359
50. Kempton 53.8% 16.4% (+37.4)#50 16.9% (+36.9)#2,383
51. Crane 53.3% 16.4% (+36.9)#51 16.9% (+36.4)#2,415
52. Jonesville 52.0% 16.4% (+35.6)#52 16.9% (+35.1)#2,557
53. Servia 51.7% 16.4% (+35.2)#53 16.9% (+34.7)#2,591
54. Loogootee 50.8% 16.4% (+34.3)#54 16.9% (+33.8)#2,688
55. Spring Grove 50.0% 16.4% (+33.6)#55 16.9% (+33.1)#2,763
56. Peru 49.8% 16.4% (+33.4)#56 16.9% (+32.9)#2,835
57. Campbellsburg 49.2% 16.4% (+32.8)#57 16.9% (+32.3)#2,886
58. Redkey 48.9% 16.4% (+32.5)#58 16.9% (+32.0)#2,914
59. Crows Nest 48.0% 16.4% (+31.6)#59 16.9% (+31.1)#3,022
60. Dubois 47.3% 16.4% (+30.9)#60 16.9% (+30.4)#3,114
61. Hatfield 46.9% 16.4% (+30.5)#61 16.9% (+30.0)#3,167
62. Laurel 46.2% 16.4% (+29.8)#62 16.9% (+29.3)#3,280
63. Russellville 45.7% 16.4% (+29.3)#63 16.9% (+28.8)#3,359
64. La Fontaine 45.6% 16.4% (+29.2)#64 16.9% (+28.7)#3,374
65. Marengo 45.6% 16.4% (+29.2)#65 16.9% (+28.7)#3,375
66. Seelyville 44.9% 16.4% (+28.5)#66 16.9% (+28.0)#3,483
67. Hardinsburg 44.6% 16.4% (+28.2)#67 16.9% (+27.7)#3,534
68. Roachdale 44.3% 16.4% (+27.9)#68 16.9% (+27.4)#3,580
69. Montpelier 44.1% 16.4% (+27.6)#69 16.9% (+27.2)#3,610
70. Springport 44.0% 16.4% (+27.6)#70 16.9% (+27.1)#3,618
71. Kentland 44.0% 16.4% (+27.5)#71 16.9% (+27.1)#3,620
72. Staunton 43.5% 16.4% (+27.1)#72 16.9% (+26.6)#3,676
73. Lawrenceburg 43.5% 16.4% (+27.1)#73 16.9% (+26.6)#3,682
74. Hymera 43.3% 16.4% (+26.9)#74 16.9% (+26.4)#3,714
75. Fairmount 42.9% 16.4% (+26.5)#75 16.9% (+26.0)#3,786
76. Monroe City 42.9% 16.4% (+26.4)#76 16.9% (+25.9)#3,796
77. Mount Etna 42.9% 16.4% (+26.4)#77 16.9% (+25.9)#3,807
78. Pittsburg 42.9% 16.4% (+26.4)#78 16.9% (+25.9)#3,810
79. Newberry 42.9% 16.4% (+26.4)#79 16.9% (+25.9)#3,811
80. Worthington 42.5% 16.4% (+26.0)#80 16.9% (+25.5)#3,874
81. Mount Ayr 42.1% 16.4% (+25.7)#81 16.9% (+25.2)#3,955
82. Waynetown 41.2% 16.4% (+24.8)#82 16.9% (+24.3)#4,096
83. Amboy 41.2% 16.4% (+24.7)#83 16.9% (+24.2)#4,106
84. Liberty Mills 41.2% 16.4% (+24.7)#84 16.9% (+24.2)#4,108
85. Orestes 41.1% 16.4% (+24.7)#85 16.9% (+24.2)#4,122
86. Millersburg 40.8% 16.4% (+24.3)#86 16.9% (+23.8)#4,180
87. Pine Village 40.7% 16.4% (+24.2)#87 16.9% (+23.7)#4,195
88. Amity 40.5% 16.4% (+24.1)#88 16.9% (+23.6)#4,217
89. Grissom Afb 40.5% 16.4% (+24.0)#89 16.9% (+23.5)#4,230
90. Matthews 40.4% 16.4% (+23.9)#90 16.9% (+23.4)#4,240
91. East Chicago 40.3% 16.4% (+23.8)#91 16.9% (+23.4)#4,259
92. Mount Summit 40.0% 16.4% (+23.6)#92 16.9% (+23.1)#4,309
93. Cromwell 39.9% 16.4% (+23.4)#93 16.9% (+23.0)#4,353
94. Merom 39.7% 16.4% (+23.2)#94 16.9% (+22.7)#4,385
95. Orleans 39.3% 16.4% (+22.9)#95 16.9% (+22.4)#4,447
96. Dillsboro 39.3% 16.4% (+22.8)#96 16.9% (+22.3)#4,460
97. Milroy 39.1% 16.4% (+22.7)#97 16.9% (+22.2)#4,495
98. Scottsburg 38.8% 16.4% (+22.3)#98 16.9% (+21.9)#4,553
99. Leavenworth 38.7% 16.4% (+22.3)#99 16.9% (+21.8)#4,569
100. Crandall 38.5% 16.4% (+22.0)#100 16.9% (+21.5)#4,613

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Children Under the Age of 16 in Indiana?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Children Under the Age of 16 in Indiana are:
#1
100.0%
#2
100.0%
#3
87.5%
#4
85.3%
#5
76.3%
#6
76.1%
#7
74.2%
#8
72.7%
#9
71.4%
#10
71.4%
What city has the Highest Poverty Level Among Children Under the Age of 16 in Indiana?
Marion has the Highest Poverty Level Among Children Under the Age of 16 in Indiana with 100.0%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Children Under the Age of 16 in the State of Indiana?
Poverty Level Among Children Under the Age of 16 in Indiana is 16.4%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Children Under the Age of 16 in the United States?
Poverty Level Among Children Under the Age of 16 in the United States is 16.9%.