Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Children Under the Age of 16 in North Carolina

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Highest Poverty | Child 0-16
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
North Carolina
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Children Under the Age of 16 in North Carolina

0.0%
100.0%
Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Children Under the Age of 16 in North Carolina Map

Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Children Under the Age of 16 in North Carolina

City Child Poverty vs State vs National
1. Cordova 100.0% 18.9% (+81.1)#1 16.9% (+83.1)#13
2. Silver City 100.0% 18.9% (+81.1)#2 16.9% (+83.1)#45
3. Ivanhoe 100.0% 18.9% (+81.1)#3 16.9% (+83.1)#100
4. Chowan Beach 100.0% 18.9% (+81.1)#4 16.9% (+83.1)#113
5. Greenevers 93.8% 18.9% (+74.9)#5 16.9% (+76.9)#527
6. Norman 90.9% 18.9% (+72.0)#6 16.9% (+74.0)#561
7. Castalia 88.4% 18.9% (+69.4)#7 16.9% (+71.4)#616
8. Brunswick 85.2% 18.9% (+66.3)#8 16.9% (+68.3)#702
9. Mcfarlan 83.9% 18.9% (+64.9)#9 16.9% (+66.9)#739
10. Fairplains 83.6% 18.9% (+64.7)#10 16.9% (+66.7)#743
11. Hamilton 83.3% 18.9% (+64.4)#11 16.9% (+66.4)#754
12. Conetoe 82.8% 18.9% (+63.9)#12 16.9% (+65.9)#765
13. Middleburg 81.7% 18.9% (+62.8)#13 16.9% (+64.8)#795
14. Kelford 80.6% 18.9% (+61.6)#14 16.9% (+63.6)#824
15. Vandemere 80.0% 18.9% (+61.1)#15 16.9% (+63.1)#841
16. Tabor City 79.3% 18.9% (+60.3)#16 16.9% (+62.3)#864
17. Light Oak 77.5% 18.9% (+58.5)#17 16.9% (+60.5)#916
18. Parmele 77.3% 18.9% (+58.3)#18 16.9% (+60.3)#926
19. Belhaven 77.0% 18.9% (+58.1)#19 16.9% (+60.1)#943
20. Momeyer 76.0% 18.9% (+57.0)#20 16.9% (+59.0)#983
21. Fairmont 74.7% 18.9% (+55.7)#21 16.9% (+57.7)#1,034
22. Maury 74.1% 18.9% (+55.1)#22 16.9% (+57.1)#1,057
23. Manns Harbor 72.7% 18.9% (+53.8)#23 16.9% (+55.8)#1,110
24. Love Valley 72.7% 18.9% (+53.8)#24 16.9% (+55.8)#1,114
25. Ramseur 72.4% 18.9% (+53.4)#25 16.9% (+55.4)#1,129
26. Elizabethtown 71.5% 18.9% (+52.6)#26 16.9% (+54.6)#1,158
27. Tar Heel 71.4% 18.9% (+52.5)#27 16.9% (+54.5)#1,170
28. Bonnetsville 71.3% 18.9% (+52.4)#28 16.9% (+54.4)#1,184
29. Bridgeton 70.7% 18.9% (+51.8)#29 16.9% (+53.8)#1,211
30. Fremont 70.5% 18.9% (+51.5)#30 16.9% (+53.5)#1,226
31. Marshallberg 69.0% 18.9% (+50.0)#31 16.9% (+52.0)#1,301
32. Benson 68.9% 18.9% (+49.9)#32 16.9% (+51.9)#1,307
33. Saratoga 68.3% 18.9% (+49.4)#33 16.9% (+51.4)#1,331
34. Wilson S Mills 68.1% 18.9% (+49.1)#34 16.9% (+51.1)#1,340
35. Murfreesboro 67.6% 18.9% (+48.6)#35 16.9% (+50.6)#1,354
36. La Grange 67.4% 18.9% (+48.5)#36 16.9% (+50.5)#1,368
37. Louisburg 67.1% 18.9% (+48.2)#37 16.9% (+50.2)#1,382
38. Fountain 66.7% 18.9% (+47.7)#38 16.9% (+49.7)#1,396
39. Magnolia 65.2% 18.9% (+46.2)#39 16.9% (+48.2)#1,497
40. Williamston 64.5% 18.9% (+45.6)#40 16.9% (+47.6)#1,526
41. Clarkton 64.5% 18.9% (+45.6)#41 16.9% (+47.6)#1,528
42. Bayboro 64.4% 18.9% (+45.5)#42 16.9% (+47.5)#1,535
43. Shannon 64.2% 18.9% (+45.2)#43 16.9% (+47.2)#1,561
44. South Weldon 63.8% 18.9% (+44.9)#44 16.9% (+46.9)#1,572
45. Varnamtown 63.2% 18.9% (+44.3)#45 16.9% (+46.3)#1,620
46. Roper 62.5% 18.9% (+43.6)#46 16.9% (+45.6)#1,662
47. Old Hundred 62.5% 18.9% (+43.6)#47 16.9% (+45.6)#1,665
48. Harrells 62.2% 18.9% (+43.3)#48 16.9% (+45.3)#1,695
49. Garland 61.7% 18.9% (+42.8)#49 16.9% (+44.8)#1,719
50. Roxboro 61.6% 18.9% (+42.7)#50 16.9% (+44.7)#1,725
51. Brogden 61.4% 18.9% (+42.4)#51 16.9% (+44.4)#1,752
52. Biscoe 61.2% 18.9% (+42.3)#52 16.9% (+44.3)#1,757
53. Red Springs 60.6% 18.9% (+41.7)#53 16.9% (+43.7)#1,795
54. Winton 59.8% 18.9% (+40.8)#54 16.9% (+42.8)#1,881
55. Mount Olive 59.1% 18.9% (+40.2)#55 16.9% (+42.2)#1,929
56. Maxton 59.1% 18.9% (+40.2)#56 16.9% (+42.2)#1,930
57. Rocky Point 58.8% 18.9% (+39.8)#57 16.9% (+41.8)#1,957
58. Lansing 58.3% 18.9% (+39.4)#58 16.9% (+41.4)#1,990
59. Lawndale 57.7% 18.9% (+38.7)#59 16.9% (+40.7)#2,045
60. Northwest 57.6% 18.9% (+38.7)#60 16.9% (+40.7)#2,050
61. Dover 57.6% 18.9% (+38.6)#61 16.9% (+40.6)#2,053
62. Robbins 57.4% 18.9% (+38.4)#62 16.9% (+40.4)#2,070
63. Arrowhead Beach 57.2% 18.9% (+38.3)#63 16.9% (+40.3)#2,084
64. Rockingham 56.5% 18.9% (+37.6)#64 16.9% (+39.6)#2,140
65. Fallston 56.3% 18.9% (+37.4)#65 16.9% (+39.4)#2,151
66. Woodland 56.2% 18.9% (+37.3)#66 16.9% (+39.3)#2,165
67. Gibson 55.6% 18.9% (+36.7)#67 16.9% (+38.7)#2,204
68. Andrews 55.6% 18.9% (+36.6)#68 16.9% (+38.6)#2,212
69. Pollocksville 55.4% 18.9% (+36.4)#69 16.9% (+38.4)#2,238
70. Mount Gilead 55.3% 18.9% (+36.3)#70 16.9% (+38.3)#2,241
71. Watha 55.3% 18.9% (+36.3)#71 16.9% (+38.3)#2,245
72. Calabash 54.7% 18.9% (+35.8)#72 16.9% (+37.8)#2,294
73. West Marion 54.7% 18.9% (+35.7)#73 16.9% (+37.7)#2,299
74. Atlantic Beach 54.6% 18.9% (+35.7)#74 16.9% (+37.7)#2,303
75. Troy 54.5% 18.9% (+35.5)#75 16.9% (+37.5)#2,327
76. Mount Airy 54.0% 18.9% (+35.1)#76 16.9% (+37.1)#2,369
77. Burnsville 53.9% 18.9% (+34.9)#77 16.9% (+36.9)#2,379
78. St Pauls 53.7% 18.9% (+34.8)#78 16.9% (+36.8)#2,395
79. Kings Mountain 53.5% 18.9% (+34.6)#79 16.9% (+36.6)#2,399
80. Mountain View 53.3% 18.9% (+34.4)#80 16.9% (+36.4)#2,411
81. South Rosemary 53.0% 18.9% (+34.1)#81 16.9% (+36.1)#2,451
82. Yanceyville 53.0% 18.9% (+34.1)#82 16.9% (+36.1)#2,453
83. Farmville 52.9% 18.9% (+34.0)#83 16.9% (+36.0)#2,462
84. Vanceboro 52.4% 18.9% (+33.5)#84 16.9% (+35.5)#2,506
85. Forest City 52.2% 18.9% (+33.3)#85 16.9% (+35.3)#2,529
86. Laurinburg 52.1% 18.9% (+33.2)#86 16.9% (+35.2)#2,542
87. Morganton 52.0% 18.9% (+33.1)#87 16.9% (+35.1)#2,554
88. Gaston 51.6% 18.9% (+32.7)#88 16.9% (+34.7)#2,592
89. Edenton 50.4% 18.9% (+31.4)#89 16.9% (+33.4)#2,721
90. Wilkesboro 50.2% 18.9% (+31.3)#90 16.9% (+33.3)#2,731
91. Pinnacle 50.0% 18.9% (+31.1)#91 16.9% (+33.1)#2,755
92. New London 50.0% 18.9% (+31.1)#92 16.9% (+33.1)#2,758
93. Orrum 50.0% 18.9% (+31.1)#93 16.9% (+33.1)#2,819
94. Barker Heights 49.7% 18.9% (+30.8)#94 16.9% (+32.8)#2,843
95. Columbia 49.3% 18.9% (+30.3)#95 16.9% (+32.3)#2,878
96. Cherokee 48.6% 18.9% (+29.7)#96 16.9% (+31.7)#2,950
97. Dobbins Heights 48.5% 18.9% (+29.6)#97 16.9% (+31.6)#2,958
98. Hot Springs 48.4% 18.9% (+29.5)#98 16.9% (+31.5)#2,969
99. Faison 48.3% 18.9% (+29.4)#99 16.9% (+31.4)#2,983
100. Sparta 47.4% 18.9% (+28.5)#100 16.9% (+30.5)#3,101

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Children Under the Age of 16 in North Carolina?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Children Under the Age of 16 in North Carolina are:
#1
100.0%
#2
100.0%
#3
100.0%
#4
93.8%
#5
90.9%
#6
88.4%
#7
85.2%
#8
83.9%
#9
83.6%
#10
83.3%
What city has the Highest Poverty Level Among Children Under the Age of 16 in North Carolina?
Cordova has the Highest Poverty Level Among Children Under the Age of 16 in North Carolina with 100.0%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Children Under the Age of 16 in the State of North Carolina?
Poverty Level Among Children Under the Age of 16 in North Carolina is 18.9%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Children Under the Age of 16 in the United States?
Poverty Level Among Children Under the Age of 16 in the United States is 16.9%.