Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Security & Protection in Alabama

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Security & Protection
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Alabama
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Security & Protection in Alabama

0.0%
50.0%
Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Security & Protection in Alabama Map

Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Security & Protection in Alabama

City % Employed vs State vs National
1. Bellamy 40.7% 2.3% (+38.5)#1 2.1% (+38.6)#63
2. Myrtlewood 37.1% 2.3% (+34.8)#2 2.1% (+34.9)#76
3. Memphis 27.3% 2.3% (+25.0)#3 2.1% (+25.1)#148
4. Riverview 26.5% 2.3% (+24.3)#4 2.1% (+24.4)#155
5. Ethelsville 18.6% 2.3% (+16.4)#5 2.1% (+16.5)#313
6. Blue Springs 18.2% 2.3% (+15.9)#6 2.1% (+16.0)#325
7. Millry 14.4% 2.3% (+12.1)#7 2.1% (+12.2)#531
8. Broomtown 12.9% 2.3% (+10.6)#8 2.1% (+10.7)#675
9. Brighton 11.2% 2.3% (+8.97)#9 2.1% (+9.09)#873
10. Coffeeville 10.8% 2.3% (+8.54)#10 2.1% (+8.66)#951
11. Axis 10.6% 2.3% (+8.31)#11 2.1% (+8.43)#1,001
12. Maplesville 10.2% 2.3% (+7.96)#12 2.1% (+8.09)#1,053
13. Lake View 9.8% 2.3% (+7.57)#13 2.1% (+7.69)#1,124
14. Kimberly 9.7% 2.3% (+7.38)#14 2.1% (+7.50)#1,166
15. Rock Creek 9.4% 2.3% (+7.09)#15 2.1% (+7.21)#1,235
16. Millerville 9.2% 2.3% (+6.93)#16 2.1% (+7.05)#1,266
17. Leroy 8.8% 2.3% (+6.54)#17 2.1% (+6.66)#1,392
18. Mount Vernon 8.8% 2.3% (+6.49)#18 2.1% (+6.61)#1,404
19. Nances Creek 8.6% 2.3% (+6.35)#19 2.1% (+6.47)#1,449
20. Argo 8.5% 2.3% (+6.25)#20 2.1% (+6.37)#1,483
21. Boligee 8.5% 2.3% (+6.24)#21 2.1% (+6.36)#1,488
22. Harvest 8.5% 2.3% (+6.21)#22 2.1% (+6.33)#1,495
23. Magnolia Springs 8.4% 2.3% (+6.15)#23 2.1% (+6.27)#1,516
24. Wedowee 8.3% 2.3% (+6.00)#24 2.1% (+6.12)#1,565
25. Odenville 8.0% 2.3% (+5.73)#25 2.1% (+5.85)#1,662
26. Hazel Green 7.9% 2.3% (+5.59)#26 2.1% (+5.71)#1,700
27. Nauvoo 7.8% 2.3% (+5.57)#27 2.1% (+5.69)#1,710
28. White Plains 7.7% 2.3% (+5.48)#28 2.1% (+5.60)#1,745
29. Pennington 7.6% 2.3% (+5.30)#29 2.1% (+5.42)#1,813
30. Union Springs 7.6% 2.3% (+5.28)#30 2.1% (+5.41)#1,822
31. Cullomburg 7.5% 2.3% (+5.28)#31 2.1% (+5.40)#1,829
32. Hollis Crossroads 7.5% 2.3% (+5.26)#32 2.1% (+5.38)#1,839
33. Leighton 7.5% 2.3% (+5.19)#33 2.1% (+5.31)#1,873
34. Carolina 7.4% 2.3% (+5.17)#34 2.1% (+5.29)#1,886
35. Coosada 7.4% 2.3% (+5.14)#35 2.1% (+5.27)#1,894
36. Cuba 7.2% 2.3% (+4.98)#36 2.1% (+5.10)#1,956
37. Arley 7.2% 2.3% (+4.97)#37 2.1% (+5.09)#1,965
38. Powell 7.1% 2.3% (+4.85)#38 2.1% (+4.97)#2,014
39. Vandiver 7.0% 2.3% (+4.75)#39 2.1% (+4.87)#2,064
40. Ardmore 7.0% 2.3% (+4.70)#40 2.1% (+4.82)#2,095
41. Silas 6.9% 2.3% (+4.63)#41 2.1% (+4.75)#2,137
42. Monroeville 6.9% 2.3% (+4.62)#42 2.1% (+4.74)#2,144
43. Wadley 6.8% 2.3% (+4.55)#43 2.1% (+4.67)#2,175
44. Rockford 6.8% 2.3% (+4.54)#44 2.1% (+4.66)#2,179
45. Perdido 6.7% 2.3% (+4.42)#45 2.1% (+4.55)#2,242
46. Montevallo 6.6% 2.3% (+4.34)#46 2.1% (+4.46)#2,299
47. Clio 6.6% 2.3% (+4.30)#47 2.1% (+4.42)#2,316
48. York 6.5% 2.3% (+4.25)#48 2.1% (+4.38)#2,343
49. Warrior 6.4% 2.3% (+4.15)#49 2.1% (+4.27)#2,415
50. Goodwater 6.3% 2.3% (+4.04)#50 2.1% (+4.16)#2,488
51. Bon Secour 6.3% 2.3% (+4.03)#51 2.1% (+4.15)#2,493
52. Calera 6.3% 2.3% (+4.02)#52 2.1% (+4.14)#2,501
53. Holtville 6.3% 2.3% (+4.02)#53 2.1% (+4.14)#2,504
54. Concord 6.0% 2.3% (+3.77)#54 2.1% (+3.89)#2,678
55. Elkmont 6.0% 2.3% (+3.75)#55 2.1% (+3.88)#2,690
56. Moundville 5.9% 2.3% (+3.66)#56 2.1% (+3.78)#2,771
57. Section 5.9% 2.3% (+3.63)#57 2.1% (+3.75)#2,794
58. Glencoe 5.8% 2.3% (+3.56)#58 2.1% (+3.68)#2,859
59. Pike Road 5.8% 2.3% (+3.49)#59 2.1% (+3.62)#2,916
60. Bay Minette 5.7% 2.3% (+3.40)#60 2.1% (+3.52)#2,987
61. Egypt 5.6% 2.3% (+3.36)#61 2.1% (+3.48)#3,037
62. Midfield 5.6% 2.3% (+3.29)#62 2.1% (+3.41)#3,093
63. Heath 5.5% 2.3% (+3.22)#63 2.1% (+3.35)#3,167
64. Shorter 5.5% 2.3% (+3.21)#64 2.1% (+3.33)#3,185
65. Frisco City 5.5% 2.3% (+3.20)#65 2.1% (+3.33)#3,193
66. Madrid 5.5% 2.3% (+3.18)#66 2.1% (+3.31)#3,212
67. Pickensville 5.4% 2.3% (+3.15)#67 2.1% (+3.28)#3,240
68. Goldville 5.4% 2.3% (+3.14)#68 2.1% (+3.26)#3,259
69. Cherokee 5.4% 2.3% (+3.10)#69 2.1% (+3.22)#3,285
70. Dunnavant 5.4% 2.3% (+3.09)#70 2.1% (+3.21)#3,294
71. East Brewton 5.3% 2.3% (+3.07)#71 2.1% (+3.19)#3,315
72. Cottonwood 5.3% 2.3% (+3.05)#72 2.1% (+3.17)#3,338
73. Twin 5.3% 2.3% (+3.03)#73 2.1% (+3.15)#3,373
74. Hackneyville 5.2% 2.3% (+2.93)#74 2.1% (+3.05)#3,484
75. Hillsboro 5.1% 2.3% (+2.85)#75 2.1% (+2.97)#3,565
76. New Site 5.1% 2.3% (+2.85)#76 2.1% (+2.97)#3,566
77. Childersburg 5.1% 2.3% (+2.84)#77 2.1% (+2.96)#3,581
78. Trussville 5.1% 2.3% (+2.80)#78 2.1% (+2.92)#3,622
79. Sheffield 5.0% 2.3% (+2.77)#79 2.1% (+2.89)#3,652
80. Jackson 5.0% 2.3% (+2.72)#80 2.1% (+2.84)#3,707
81. Rutledge 5.0% 2.3% (+2.68)#81 2.1% (+2.80)#3,744
82. Citronelle 4.8% 2.3% (+2.50)#82 2.1% (+2.62)#3,951
83. Pinson 4.7% 2.3% (+2.47)#83 2.1% (+2.59)#3,982
84. Cottondale 4.7% 2.3% (+2.46)#84 2.1% (+2.58)#3,994
85. Belk 4.7% 2.3% (+2.45)#85 2.1% (+2.57)#4,015
86. Kinston 4.7% 2.3% (+2.43)#86 2.1% (+2.55)#4,037
87. Pleasant Grove 4.5% 2.3% (+2.27)#87 2.1% (+2.39)#4,266
88. Walnut Grove 4.5% 2.3% (+2.22)#88 2.1% (+2.34)#4,334
89. Pine Hill 4.5% 2.3% (+2.20)#89 2.1% (+2.32)#4,355
90. Selma 4.5% 2.3% (+2.20)#90 2.1% (+2.32)#4,368
91. Guin 4.5% 2.3% (+2.20)#91 2.1% (+2.32)#4,369
92. Hayden 4.5% 2.3% (+2.19)#92 2.1% (+2.31)#4,379
93. Hayneville 4.5% 2.3% (+2.19)#93 2.1% (+2.31)#4,380
94. Ballplay 4.4% 2.3% (+2.14)#94 2.1% (+2.27)#4,446
95. White Hall 4.4% 2.3% (+2.14)#95 2.1% (+2.26)#4,447
96. Phil Campbell 4.4% 2.3% (+2.13)#96 2.1% (+2.25)#4,466
97. Goshen 4.4% 2.3% (+2.13)#97 2.1% (+2.25)#4,472
98. Eufaula 4.4% 2.3% (+2.10)#98 2.1% (+2.22)#4,506
99. Union Grove 4.3% 2.3% (+2.08)#99 2.1% (+2.20)#4,551
100. Brantleyville 4.3% 2.3% (+2.06)#100 2.1% (+2.18)#4,570

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Security & Protection in Alabama?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Security & Protection in Alabama are:
#1
40.7%
#2
37.1%
#3
27.3%
#4
26.5%
#5
18.6%
#6
18.2%
#7
14.4%
#8
12.9%
#9
11.2%
#10
10.8%
What city has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Security & Protection in Alabama?
Bellamy has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Security & Protection in Alabama with 40.7%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Security & Protection in the State of Alabama?
Percentage of Population Employed in Security & Protection in Alabama is 2.3%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Security & Protection in the United States?
Percentage of Population Employed in Security & Protection in the United States is 2.1%.