Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Security & Protection in Oklahoma

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Security & Protection
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Oklahoma
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Security & Protection in Oklahoma

0.0%
40.0%
Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Security & Protection in Oklahoma Map

Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Security & Protection in Oklahoma

City % Employed vs State vs National
1. Ixl 38.5% 2.0% (+36.5)#1 2.1% (+36.3)#66
2. Lucien 30.9% 2.0% (+28.9)#2 2.1% (+28.7)#113
3. Hitchita 27.3% 2.0% (+25.3)#3 2.1% (+25.1)#147
4. Hanna 26.1% 2.0% (+24.1)#4 2.1% (+23.9)#161
5. Dale 25.4% 2.0% (+23.4)#5 2.1% (+23.3)#171
6. Atwood 25.0% 2.0% (+23.0)#6 2.1% (+22.9)#181
7. Bell 24.5% 2.0% (+22.5)#7 2.1% (+22.3)#194
8. Erick 23.6% 2.0% (+21.6)#8 2.1% (+21.4)#211
9. Sweetwater 22.7% 2.0% (+20.7)#9 2.1% (+20.6)#225
10. Fort Coffee 20.6% 2.0% (+18.6)#10 2.1% (+18.4)#265
11. Milfay 18.4% 2.0% (+16.4)#11 2.1% (+16.2)#320
12. Monroe 18.2% 2.0% (+16.2)#12 2.1% (+16.0)#324
13. Medford 17.1% 2.0% (+15.1)#13 2.1% (+15.0)#375
14. Tiawah 16.3% 2.0% (+14.3)#14 2.1% (+14.2)#418
15. Nashoba 15.8% 2.0% (+13.8)#15 2.1% (+13.6)#447
16. Belfonte 15.5% 2.0% (+13.5)#16 2.1% (+13.3)#460
17. Greenville 15.4% 2.0% (+13.4)#17 2.1% (+13.2)#464
18. Gracemont 14.5% 2.0% (+12.5)#18 2.1% (+12.4)#517
19. Little Rock 14.3% 2.0% (+12.3)#19 2.1% (+12.1)#541
20. Skedee 14.3% 2.0% (+12.3)#20 2.1% (+12.1)#547
21. Wyandotte 12.9% 2.0% (+10.9)#21 2.1% (+10.7)#672
22. Edgewater Park 12.8% 2.0% (+10.8)#22 2.1% (+10.7)#677
23. Stringtown 11.2% 2.0% (+9.23)#23 2.1% (+9.09)#876
24. Granite 11.2% 2.0% (+9.22)#24 2.1% (+9.08)#878
25. Bennington 11.1% 2.0% (+9.10)#25 2.1% (+8.96)#898
26. Etowah 11.1% 2.0% (+9.10)#26 2.1% (+8.96)#904
27. Gould 10.5% 2.0% (+8.52)#27 2.1% (+8.38)#1,012
28. Wapanucka 10.4% 2.0% (+8.39)#28 2.1% (+8.25)#1,025
29. Sasakwa 10.0% 2.0% (+7.99)#29 2.1% (+7.85)#1,099
30. Peavine 9.5% 2.0% (+7.48)#30 2.1% (+7.34)#1,200
31. Bromide 9.3% 2.0% (+7.29)#31 2.1% (+7.15)#1,243
32. Martha 9.1% 2.0% (+7.08)#32 2.1% (+6.94)#1,302
33. Blanco 9.1% 2.0% (+7.08)#33 2.1% (+6.94)#1,307
34. White Eagle 8.9% 2.0% (+6.88)#34 2.1% (+6.74)#1,373
35. White Oak 8.5% 2.0% (+6.44)#35 2.1% (+6.30)#1,504
36. Chattanooga 8.4% 2.0% (+6.37)#36 2.1% (+6.23)#1,522
37. Flute Springs 8.3% 2.0% (+6.32)#37 2.1% (+6.18)#1,545
38. Shady Grove Cdp Mcintosh County 7.8% 2.0% (+5.83)#38 2.1% (+5.69)#1,708
39. Wanette 7.8% 2.0% (+5.77)#39 2.1% (+5.63)#1,735
40. Frederick 7.7% 2.0% (+5.73)#40 2.1% (+5.59)#1,748
41. Whitesboro 7.7% 2.0% (+5.68)#41 2.1% (+5.54)#1,764
42. Liberty 7.6% 2.0% (+5.61)#42 2.1% (+5.47)#1,792
43. Langley 7.4% 2.0% (+5.42)#43 2.1% (+5.28)#1,888
44. Hominy 7.4% 2.0% (+5.40)#44 2.1% (+5.26)#1,896
45. Lookeba 7.3% 2.0% (+5.31)#45 2.1% (+5.17)#1,942
46. Wagoner 7.2% 2.0% (+5.23)#46 2.1% (+5.09)#1,966
47. Cave Spring 7.1% 2.0% (+5.13)#47 2.1% (+4.99)#2,009
48. West Peavine 7.0% 2.0% (+5.03)#48 2.1% (+4.89)#2,056
49. Welch 7.0% 2.0% (+4.97)#49 2.1% (+4.83)#2,085
50. Alderson 6.9% 2.0% (+4.89)#50 2.1% (+4.75)#2,140
51. Pittsburg 6.8% 2.0% (+4.77)#51 2.1% (+4.63)#2,198
52. Flint Creek 6.8% 2.0% (+4.76)#52 2.1% (+4.62)#2,201
53. Pin Oak Acres 6.7% 2.0% (+4.68)#53 2.1% (+4.54)#2,244
54. Muldrow 6.6% 2.0% (+4.59)#54 2.1% (+4.45)#2,306
55. Avant 6.5% 2.0% (+4.51)#55 2.1% (+4.37)#2,347
56. Latta 6.5% 2.0% (+4.45)#56 2.1% (+4.31)#2,379
57. Bowlegs 6.5% 2.0% (+4.44)#57 2.1% (+4.30)#2,387
58. Wynnewood 6.4% 2.0% (+4.43)#58 2.1% (+4.29)#2,402
59. Calvin 6.4% 2.0% (+4.39)#59 2.1% (+4.25)#2,424
60. Caddo 6.3% 2.0% (+4.33)#60 2.1% (+4.19)#2,474
61. Moodys 6.2% 2.0% (+4.24)#61 2.1% (+4.10)#2,523
62. Tyrone 6.2% 2.0% (+4.24)#62 2.1% (+4.10)#2,524
63. Washington 6.2% 2.0% (+4.24)#63 2.1% (+4.10)#2,526
64. Okeene 6.2% 2.0% (+4.23)#64 2.1% (+4.09)#2,536
65. Spencer 6.2% 2.0% (+4.19)#65 2.1% (+4.05)#2,564
66. Alex 6.1% 2.0% (+4.08)#66 2.1% (+3.94)#2,636
67. Wewoka 6.1% 2.0% (+4.05)#67 2.1% (+3.91)#2,651
68. Apache 6.1% 2.0% (+4.05)#68 2.1% (+3.91)#2,655
69. Eufaula 6.1% 2.0% (+4.04)#69 2.1% (+3.90)#2,670
70. Oktaha 6.0% 2.0% (+4.03)#70 2.1% (+3.89)#2,683
71. Roosevelt 6.0% 2.0% (+3.99)#71 2.1% (+3.85)#2,709
72. Braman 6.0% 2.0% (+3.99)#72 2.1% (+3.85)#2,710
73. Okmulgee 6.0% 2.0% (+3.97)#73 2.1% (+3.83)#2,726
74. Ringling 5.8% 2.0% (+3.83)#74 2.1% (+3.69)#2,856
75. Greasy 5.8% 2.0% (+3.81)#75 2.1% (+3.67)#2,871
76. Binger 5.7% 2.0% (+3.71)#76 2.1% (+3.57)#2,950
77. Oakwood 5.7% 2.0% (+3.71)#77 2.1% (+3.57)#2,960
78. Cheyenne 5.7% 2.0% (+3.69)#78 2.1% (+3.55)#2,968
79. Ripley 5.7% 2.0% (+3.65)#79 2.1% (+3.51)#3,000
80. Weleetka 5.6% 2.0% (+3.60)#80 2.1% (+3.46)#3,050
81. Taloga 5.6% 2.0% (+3.55)#81 2.1% (+3.41)#3,108
82. Haywood 5.6% 2.0% (+3.55)#82 2.1% (+3.41)#3,112
83. Terral 5.5% 2.0% (+3.50)#83 2.1% (+3.36)#3,144
84. Welling 5.5% 2.0% (+3.50)#84 2.1% (+3.36)#3,149
85. Temple 5.5% 2.0% (+3.48)#85 2.1% (+3.34)#3,175
86. Freedom 5.3% 2.0% (+3.31)#86 2.1% (+3.17)#3,342
87. Tonkawa 5.3% 2.0% (+3.28)#87 2.1% (+3.14)#3,382
88. Glencoe 5.3% 2.0% (+3.25)#88 2.1% (+3.11)#3,408
89. Tushka 5.3% 2.0% (+3.25)#89 2.1% (+3.11)#3,409
90. Talala 5.2% 2.0% (+3.21)#90 2.1% (+3.08)#3,460
91. Verdigris 5.2% 2.0% (+3.21)#91 2.1% (+3.07)#3,461
92. Newkirk 5.2% 2.0% (+3.17)#92 2.1% (+3.03)#3,496
93. Blackwell 5.2% 2.0% (+3.15)#93 2.1% (+3.01)#3,523
94. Whitehorn Cove 5.1% 2.0% (+3.14)#94 2.1% (+3.00)#3,533
95. Buffalo 5.1% 2.0% (+3.12)#95 2.1% (+2.98)#3,548
96. Tupelo 5.1% 2.0% (+3.12)#96 2.1% (+2.98)#3,553
97. Yeager 5.1% 2.0% (+3.12)#97 2.1% (+2.98)#3,555
98. Wainwright 5.1% 2.0% (+3.12)#98 2.1% (+2.98)#3,556
99. El Reno 5.1% 2.0% (+3.06)#99 2.1% (+2.92)#3,620
100. Chouteau 5.0% 2.0% (+3.04)#100 2.1% (+2.90)#3,639

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Security & Protection in Oklahoma?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Security & Protection in Oklahoma are:
#1
38.5%
#2
30.9%
#3
27.3%
#4
26.1%
#5
25.4%
#6
25.0%
#7
24.5%
#8
23.6%
#9
22.7%
#10
20.6%
What city has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Security & Protection in Oklahoma?
IXL has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Security & Protection in Oklahoma with 38.5%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Security & Protection in the State of Oklahoma?
Percentage of Population Employed in Security & Protection in Oklahoma is 2.0%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Security & Protection in the United States?
Percentage of Population Employed in Security & Protection in the United States is 2.1%.