Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Security & Protection in South Dakota

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Security & Protection
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
South Dakota
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Security & Protection in South Dakota

0.0%
50.0%
Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Security & Protection in South Dakota Map

Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Security & Protection in South Dakota

City % Employed vs State vs National
1. Okreek 44.0% 1.8% (+42.2)#1 2.1% (+41.9)#46
2. Little Eagle 41.7% 1.8% (+39.9)#2 2.1% (+39.5)#57
3. Belvidere 35.3% 1.8% (+33.5)#3 2.1% (+33.1)#83
4. Running Water 32.0% 1.8% (+30.2)#4 2.1% (+29.9)#102
5. Marty 31.0% 1.8% (+29.3)#5 2.1% (+28.9)#110
6. Lyons 28.6% 1.8% (+26.8)#6 2.1% (+26.4)#130
7. Rockham 22.2% 1.8% (+20.5)#7 2.1% (+20.1)#233
8. Parmelee 20.6% 1.8% (+18.8)#8 2.1% (+18.4)#264
9. Long Hollow 16.7% 1.8% (+14.9)#9 2.1% (+14.5)#394
10. Glenham 14.9% 1.8% (+13.2)#10 2.1% (+12.8)#492
11. Rosebud 12.8% 1.8% (+11.0)#11 2.1% (+10.6)#683
12. Virgil 12.5% 1.8% (+10.7)#12 2.1% (+10.4)#716
13. Ortley 11.8% 1.8% (+10.0)#13 2.1% (+9.62)#801
14. Dupree 11.0% 1.8% (+9.24)#14 2.1% (+8.85)#924
15. Green Valley 10.7% 1.8% (+8.90)#15 2.1% (+8.51)#979
16. Veblen 10.5% 1.8% (+8.77)#16 2.1% (+8.38)#1,006
17. Brandt 10.0% 1.8% (+8.24)#17 2.1% (+7.85)#1,096
18. Batesland 10.0% 1.8% (+8.24)#18 2.1% (+7.85)#1,097
19. Pine Ridge 9.8% 1.8% (+8.06)#19 2.1% (+7.67)#1,131
20. Wasta 9.7% 1.8% (+7.92)#20 2.1% (+7.53)#1,160
21. New Effington 9.4% 1.8% (+7.65)#21 2.1% (+7.26)#1,221
22. Cherry Creek 8.9% 1.8% (+7.13)#22 2.1% (+6.74)#1,376
23. Fort Thompson 8.3% 1.8% (+6.55)#23 2.1% (+6.16)#1,555
24. Selby 7.9% 1.8% (+6.13)#24 2.1% (+5.74)#1,690
25. Harrold 7.5% 1.8% (+5.79)#25 2.1% (+5.40)#1,830
26. Fulton 7.5% 1.8% (+5.74)#26 2.1% (+5.35)#1,853
27. Mclaughlin 7.3% 1.8% (+5.56)#27 2.1% (+5.17)#1,940
28. Bullhead 7.0% 1.8% (+5.22)#28 2.1% (+4.83)#2,090
29. Lower Brule 6.9% 1.8% (+5.15)#29 2.1% (+4.76)#2,123
30. Bonesteel 6.7% 1.8% (+4.98)#30 2.1% (+4.59)#2,216
31. Springfield 6.6% 1.8% (+4.87)#31 2.1% (+4.48)#2,290
32. St Francis 5.5% 1.8% (+3.77)#32 2.1% (+3.38)#3,130
33. Antelope 5.4% 1.8% (+3.60)#33 2.1% (+3.21)#3,301
34. Piedmont 5.2% 1.8% (+3.43)#34 2.1% (+3.04)#3,491
35. Kyle 4.9% 1.8% (+3.18)#35 2.1% (+2.79)#3,766
36. Dante 4.6% 1.8% (+2.86)#36 2.1% (+2.47)#4,162
37. Isabel 4.3% 1.8% (+2.59)#37 2.1% (+2.20)#4,544
38. Mcintosh 4.3% 1.8% (+2.59)#38 2.1% (+2.20)#4,547
39. Freeman 4.3% 1.8% (+2.53)#39 2.1% (+2.14)#4,629
40. Flandreau 4.3% 1.8% (+2.49)#40 2.1% (+2.10)#4,681
41. Box Elder 4.2% 1.8% (+2.47)#41 2.1% (+2.08)#4,713
42. Eagle Butte 4.2% 1.8% (+2.43)#42 2.1% (+2.04)#4,775
43. Clear Lake 4.2% 1.8% (+2.41)#43 2.1% (+2.02)#4,806
44. Murdo 4.1% 1.8% (+2.34)#44 2.1% (+1.95)#4,933
45. Belle Fourche 4.0% 1.8% (+2.21)#45 2.1% (+1.82)#5,174
46. Sturgis 3.9% 1.8% (+2.18)#46 2.1% (+1.79)#5,222
47. Worthing 3.9% 1.8% (+2.17)#47 2.1% (+1.78)#5,232
48. Summerset 3.9% 1.8% (+2.09)#48 2.1% (+1.70)#5,392
49. Rapid Valley 3.8% 1.8% (+2.08)#49 2.1% (+1.69)#5,429
50. Johnson Siding 3.7% 1.8% (+1.99)#50 2.1% (+1.60)#5,601
51. Warner 3.7% 1.8% (+1.99)#51 2.1% (+1.60)#5,616
52. Faulkton 3.7% 1.8% (+1.96)#52 2.1% (+1.57)#5,673
53. Winner 3.7% 1.8% (+1.94)#53 2.1% (+1.55)#5,711
54. Fort Pierre 3.7% 1.8% (+1.94)#54 2.1% (+1.55)#5,722
55. North Eagle Butte 3.7% 1.8% (+1.92)#55 2.1% (+1.53)#5,768
56. Lake Andes 3.7% 1.8% (+1.91)#56 2.1% (+1.52)#5,782
57. Timber Lake 3.5% 1.8% (+1.73)#57 2.1% (+1.34)#6,158
58. Tyndall 3.4% 1.8% (+1.69)#58 2.1% (+1.30)#6,246
59. Blunt 3.4% 1.8% (+1.66)#59 2.1% (+1.27)#6,330
60. Sisseton 3.4% 1.8% (+1.61)#60 2.1% (+1.22)#6,447
61. Armour 3.3% 1.8% (+1.58)#61 2.1% (+1.18)#6,546
62. Miller 3.1% 1.8% (+1.33)#62 2.1% (+0.943)#7,188
63. Ethan 3.0% 1.8% (+1.29)#63 2.1% (+0.900)#7,320
64. Wanblee 3.0% 1.8% (+1.24)#64 2.1% (+0.852)#7,490
65. Jefferson 2.9% 1.8% (+1.18)#65 2.1% (+0.793)#7,685
66. Newell 2.9% 1.8% (+1.17)#66 2.1% (+0.782)#7,718
67. De Smet 2.9% 1.8% (+1.17)#67 2.1% (+0.776)#7,741
68. Watertown 2.9% 1.8% (+1.15)#68 2.1% (+0.762)#7,795
69. Wakpala 2.9% 1.8% (+1.10)#69 2.1% (+0.709)#7,959
70. Redfield 2.8% 1.8% (+1.08)#70 2.1% (+0.693)#8,013
71. Mission 2.8% 1.8% (+1.08)#71 2.1% (+0.692)#8,014
72. Wilmot 2.8% 1.8% (+1.00)#72 2.1% (+0.614)#8,271
73. Mobridge 2.7% 1.8% (+0.979)#73 2.1% (+0.589)#8,355
74. Monroe 2.7% 1.8% (+0.969)#74 2.1% (+0.579)#8,385
75. Colman 2.7% 1.8% (+0.945)#75 2.1% (+0.554)#8,480
76. Hartford 2.7% 1.8% (+0.941)#76 2.1% (+0.550)#8,504
77. West Brule 2.6% 1.8% (+0.874)#77 2.1% (+0.483)#8,717
78. Pierre 2.6% 1.8% (+0.856)#78 2.1% (+0.465)#8,778
79. Presho 2.6% 1.8% (+0.795)#79 2.1% (+0.405)#9,009
80. Estelline 2.5% 1.8% (+0.758)#80 2.1% (+0.367)#9,152
81. Buffalo 2.5% 1.8% (+0.693)#81 2.1% (+0.303)#9,393
82. Britton 2.4% 1.8% (+0.673)#82 2.1% (+0.282)#9,466
83. Rapid City 2.4% 1.8% (+0.651)#83 2.1% (+0.260)#9,554
84. Gayville 2.3% 1.8% (+0.577)#84 2.1% (+0.186)#9,859
85. Centerville 2.3% 1.8% (+0.574)#85 2.1% (+0.183)#9,872
86. Baltic 2.3% 1.8% (+0.571)#86 2.1% (+0.180)#9,881
87. North Sioux City 2.3% 1.8% (+0.547)#87 2.1% (+0.156)#9,982
88. Canton 2.3% 1.8% (+0.508)#88 2.1% (+0.117)#10,150
89. Blackhawk 2.3% 1.8% (+0.498)#89 2.1% (+0.107)#10,181
90. Harrisburg 2.2% 1.8% (+0.484)#90 2.1% (+0.094)#10,249
91. Irene 2.2% 1.8% (+0.481)#91 2.1% (+0.090)#10,267
92. Parker 2.2% 1.8% (+0.464)#92 2.1% (+0.074)#10,332
93. Spearfish 2.1% 1.8% (+0.335)#93 2.1% (-0.056)#10,918
94. Mitchell 2.1% 1.8% (+0.320)#94 2.1% (-0.071)#10,998
95. Yankton 2.1% 1.8% (+0.302)#95 2.1% (-0.089)#11,098
96. Tea 2.1% 1.8% (+0.297)#96 2.1% (-0.093)#11,119
97. Big Stone City 2.0% 1.8% (+0.248)#97 2.1% (-0.143)#11,346
98. Clark 2.0% 1.8% (+0.239)#98 2.1% (-0.152)#11,398
99. Faith 1.9% 1.8% (+0.178)#99 2.1% (-0.213)#11,714
100. Lead 1.8% 1.8% (+0.043)#100 2.1% (-0.348)#12,383

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Security & Protection in South Dakota?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Security & Protection in South Dakota are:
#1
44.0%
#2
41.7%
#3
35.3%
#4
32.0%
#5
31.0%
#6
22.2%
#7
20.6%
#8
16.7%
#9
14.9%
#10
12.8%
What city has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Security & Protection in South Dakota?
Okreek has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Security & Protection in South Dakota with 44.0%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Security & Protection in the State of South Dakota?
Percentage of Population Employed in Security & Protection in South Dakota is 1.8%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Security & Protection in the United States?
Percentage of Population Employed in Security & Protection in the United States is 2.1%.