Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Security & Protection in Minnesota

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Security & Protection
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Minnesota
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Security & Protection in Minnesota

0.0%
40.0%
Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Security & Protection in Minnesota Map

Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Security & Protection in Minnesota

City % Employed vs State vs National
1. Ponemah 38.0% 1.3% (+36.7)#1 2.1% (+35.9)#69
2. Kerrick 37.5% 1.3% (+36.2)#2 2.1% (+35.4)#74
3. Strathcona 28.6% 1.3% (+27.3)#3 2.1% (+26.4)#132
4. Red Lake 21.6% 1.3% (+20.3)#4 2.1% (+19.4)#239
5. Northome 14.0% 1.3% (+12.7)#5 2.1% (+11.9)#566
6. Lancaster 12.3% 1.3% (+11.0)#6 2.1% (+10.1)#731
7. Quamba 12.1% 1.3% (+10.8)#7 2.1% (+9.97)#746
8. Chickamaw Beach 11.9% 1.3% (+10.6)#8 2.1% (+9.76)#775
9. Easton 11.0% 1.3% (+9.66)#9 2.1% (+8.83)#930
10. Finlayson 10.1% 1.3% (+8.83)#10 2.1% (+8.00)#1,073
11. Garrison 9.5% 1.3% (+8.20)#11 2.1% (+7.38)#1,192
12. Moose Lake 9.4% 1.3% (+8.13)#12 2.1% (+7.30)#1,211
13. Willow River 9.4% 1.3% (+8.09)#13 2.1% (+7.26)#1,219
14. Beaulieu 9.1% 1.3% (+7.77)#14 2.1% (+6.94)#1,312
15. Shelly 8.3% 1.3% (+7.01)#15 2.1% (+6.18)#1,543
16. Trail 8.3% 1.3% (+7.01)#16 2.1% (+6.18)#1,549
17. Hackensack 8.3% 1.3% (+6.95)#17 2.1% (+6.12)#1,567
18. Cass Lake 8.2% 1.3% (+6.84)#18 2.1% (+6.01)#1,601
19. Storden 8.0% 1.3% (+6.72)#19 2.1% (+5.89)#1,647
20. Sturgeon Lake 7.9% 1.3% (+6.60)#20 2.1% (+5.77)#1,684
21. Forada 7.7% 1.3% (+6.37)#21 2.1% (+5.54)#1,765
22. Hardwick 7.6% 1.3% (+6.29)#22 2.1% (+5.46)#1,798
23. Askov 7.5% 1.3% (+6.20)#23 2.1% (+5.37)#1,845
24. New Auburn 7.4% 1.3% (+6.10)#24 2.1% (+5.27)#1,892
25. Kettle River 7.4% 1.3% (+6.09)#25 2.1% (+5.26)#1,903
26. Eitzen 7.0% 1.3% (+5.66)#26 2.1% (+4.83)#2,088
27. Twin Lakes 6.8% 1.3% (+5.50)#27 2.1% (+4.67)#2,176
28. Rice 6.7% 1.3% (+5.36)#28 2.1% (+4.53)#2,253
29. Scanlon 6.5% 1.3% (+5.15)#29 2.1% (+4.32)#2,374
30. Fisher 6.5% 1.3% (+5.13)#30 2.1% (+4.30)#2,386
31. Millville 6.1% 1.3% (+4.80)#31 2.1% (+3.97)#2,610
32. Silver Creek 6.1% 1.3% (+4.74)#32 2.1% (+3.91)#2,662
33. Whipholt 6.1% 1.3% (+4.74)#33 2.1% (+3.91)#2,663
34. Waubun 6.0% 1.3% (+4.64)#34 2.1% (+3.81)#2,743
35. Roosevelt 5.9% 1.3% (+4.62)#35 2.1% (+3.79)#2,759
36. Bena 5.9% 1.3% (+4.56)#36 2.1% (+3.73)#2,821
37. Fish Lake 5.9% 1.3% (+4.56)#37 2.1% (+3.73)#2,829
38. Hammond 5.7% 1.3% (+4.36)#38 2.1% (+3.53)#2,981
39. Steen 5.7% 1.3% (+4.34)#39 2.1% (+3.51)#3,005
40. Elko New Market 5.6% 1.3% (+4.31)#40 2.1% (+3.48)#3,036
41. Hinckley 5.6% 1.3% (+4.24)#41 2.1% (+3.41)#3,101
42. Hill City 5.5% 1.3% (+4.18)#42 2.1% (+3.35)#3,157
43. Halstad 5.5% 1.3% (+4.14)#43 2.1% (+3.31)#3,205
44. Sandstone 5.4% 1.3% (+4.11)#44 2.1% (+3.28)#3,231
45. Eagle Lake 5.4% 1.3% (+4.10)#45 2.1% (+3.27)#3,241
46. Dilworth 5.4% 1.3% (+4.09)#46 2.1% (+3.26)#3,260
47. Vineland 5.3% 1.3% (+4.01)#47 2.1% (+3.18)#3,332
48. Peterson 5.3% 1.3% (+3.98)#48 2.1% (+3.15)#3,365
49. Nashwauk 5.3% 1.3% (+3.94)#49 2.1% (+3.11)#3,407
50. Meire Grove 5.3% 1.3% (+3.94)#50 2.1% (+3.11)#3,417
51. Kent 5.3% 1.3% (+3.94)#51 2.1% (+3.11)#3,421
52. Mahnomen 5.1% 1.3% (+3.81)#52 2.1% (+2.98)#3,554
53. Ogema 5.1% 1.3% (+3.77)#53 2.1% (+2.94)#3,609
54. Cleveland 5.0% 1.3% (+3.69)#54 2.1% (+2.87)#3,672
55. Cook 4.9% 1.3% (+3.60)#55 2.1% (+2.77)#3,785
56. Farwell 4.8% 1.3% (+3.44)#56 2.1% (+2.61)#3,969
57. Middle River 4.7% 1.3% (+3.41)#57 2.1% (+2.58)#3,996
58. Donnelly 4.7% 1.3% (+3.41)#58 2.1% (+2.58)#4,007
59. Redwood Falls 4.7% 1.3% (+3.38)#59 2.1% (+2.56)#4,031
60. Brooten 4.7% 1.3% (+3.35)#60 2.1% (+2.52)#4,086
61. Foley 4.6% 1.3% (+3.29)#61 2.1% (+2.46)#4,167
62. Redby 4.6% 1.3% (+3.28)#62 2.1% (+2.45)#4,188
63. Oklee 4.6% 1.3% (+3.27)#63 2.1% (+2.44)#4,198
64. Foreston 4.6% 1.3% (+3.25)#64 2.1% (+2.42)#4,220
65. Iron Junction 4.4% 1.3% (+3.13)#65 2.1% (+2.30)#4,398
66. Hampton 4.4% 1.3% (+3.07)#66 2.1% (+2.24)#4,483
67. Hayfield 4.4% 1.3% (+3.05)#67 2.1% (+2.22)#4,513
68. La Crescent 4.3% 1.3% (+2.98)#68 2.1% (+2.15)#4,619
69. St James 4.3% 1.3% (+2.96)#69 2.1% (+2.14)#4,636
70. Rice Lake 4.2% 1.3% (+2.91)#70 2.1% (+2.08)#4,707
71. St Clair 4.2% 1.3% (+2.90)#71 2.1% (+2.07)#4,723
72. International Falls 4.2% 1.3% (+2.89)#72 2.1% (+2.06)#4,743
73. Oak Park Heights 4.1% 1.3% (+2.81)#73 2.1% (+1.98)#4,862
74. Pelican Rapids 4.1% 1.3% (+2.81)#74 2.1% (+1.98)#4,874
75. Tyler 4.1% 1.3% (+2.80)#75 2.1% (+1.97)#4,885
76. Riverland 4.1% 1.3% (+2.79)#76 2.1% (+1.96)#4,915
77. Wrenshall 4.0% 1.3% (+2.70)#77 2.1% (+1.87)#5,049
78. Lakeland Shores 4.0% 1.3% (+2.68)#78 2.1% (+1.85)#5,096
79. Mckinley 3.8% 1.3% (+2.53)#79 2.1% (+1.70)#5,422
80. Pine City 3.8% 1.3% (+2.43)#80 2.1% (+1.60)#5,596
81. Elgin 3.7% 1.3% (+2.43)#81 2.1% (+1.60)#5,612
82. Cohasset 3.7% 1.3% (+2.42)#82 2.1% (+1.59)#5,633
83. Pine Island 3.7% 1.3% (+2.38)#83 2.1% (+1.56)#5,689
84. Nelson 3.7% 1.3% (+2.38)#84 2.1% (+1.56)#5,705
85. St. John's University 3.7% 1.3% (+2.37)#85 2.1% (+1.54)#5,747
86. Becker 3.7% 1.3% (+2.35)#86 2.1% (+1.52)#5,777
87. Dover 3.7% 1.3% (+2.33)#87 2.1% (+1.50)#5,820
88. Marble 3.6% 1.3% (+2.30)#88 2.1% (+1.47)#5,885
89. Ebro 3.6% 1.3% (+2.25)#89 2.1% (+1.42)#5,979
90. Baker 3.6% 1.3% (+2.25)#90 2.1% (+1.42)#5,983
91. Buffalo Lake 3.6% 1.3% (+2.23)#91 2.1% (+1.40)#6,004
92. Lindstrom 3.5% 1.3% (+2.23)#92 2.1% (+1.40)#6,009
93. Dundas 3.5% 1.3% (+2.22)#93 2.1% (+1.39)#6,026
94. New Richland 3.5% 1.3% (+2.22)#94 2.1% (+1.39)#6,027
95. Searles 3.4% 1.3% (+2.10)#95 2.1% (+1.27)#6,329
96. Columbus 3.4% 1.3% (+2.09)#96 2.1% (+1.26)#6,353
97. Nisswa 3.3% 1.3% (+2.01)#97 2.1% (+1.18)#6,571
98. Jordan 3.3% 1.3% (+1.99)#98 2.1% (+1.16)#6,611
99. Bigfork 3.3% 1.3% (+1.98)#99 2.1% (+1.15)#6,634
100. Mountain Lake 3.3% 1.3% (+1.97)#100 2.1% (+1.14)#6,653

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Security & Protection in Minnesota?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Security & Protection in Minnesota are:
#1
38.0%
#2
37.5%
#3
28.6%
#4
21.6%
#5
14.0%
#6
12.3%
#7
12.1%
#8
11.9%
#9
11.0%
#10
10.1%
What city has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Security & Protection in Minnesota?
Ponemah has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Security & Protection in Minnesota with 38.0%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Security & Protection in the State of Minnesota?
Percentage of Population Employed in Security & Protection in Minnesota is 1.3%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Security & Protection in the United States?
Percentage of Population Employed in Security & Protection in the United States is 2.1%.