Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Security & Protection in Iowa

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Security & Protection
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Iowa
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Security & Protection in Iowa

0.0%
100.0%
Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Security & Protection in Iowa Map

Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Security & Protection in Iowa

City % Employed vs State vs National
1. River Sioux 100.0% 1.4% (+98.6)#1 2.1% (+97.9)#6
2. Trenton 36.7% 1.4% (+35.3)#2 2.1% (+34.5)#79
3. Kingston 28.0% 1.4% (+26.6)#3 2.1% (+25.9)#137
4. Kinross 19.4% 1.4% (+18.0)#4 2.1% (+17.2)#293
5. Durango 16.7% 1.4% (+15.3)#5 2.1% (+14.5)#401
6. Clare 14.5% 1.4% (+13.1)#6 2.1% (+12.3)#523
7. Udell 14.3% 1.4% (+12.9)#7 2.1% (+12.1)#549
8. Archer 13.1% 1.4% (+11.7)#8 2.1% (+11.0)#648
9. Duncombe 12.7% 1.4% (+11.3)#9 2.1% (+10.5)#692
10. Sperry 12.1% 1.4% (+10.7)#10 2.1% (+9.94)#748
11. South Amana 11.8% 1.4% (+10.4)#11 2.1% (+9.62)#798
12. Rake 11.4% 1.4% (+10.1)#12 2.1% (+9.28)#845
13. Saylorville 11.3% 1.4% (+9.94)#13 2.1% (+9.16)#863
14. Blanchard 11.1% 1.4% (+9.74)#14 2.1% (+8.96)#907
15. Haverhill 10.9% 1.4% (+9.50)#15 2.1% (+8.72)#942
16. Fruitland 10.8% 1.4% (+9.38)#16 2.1% (+8.61)#962
17. Coalville 10.7% 1.4% (+9.31)#17 2.1% (+8.53)#973
18. Marne 10.6% 1.4% (+9.27)#18 2.1% (+8.49)#990
19. Gray 10.0% 1.4% (+8.63)#19 2.1% (+7.85)#1,098
20. Okoboji 9.8% 1.4% (+8.44)#20 2.1% (+7.66)#1,138
21. Rinard 8.7% 1.4% (+7.32)#21 2.1% (+6.55)#1,438
22. Bouton 8.6% 1.4% (+7.20)#22 2.1% (+6.42)#1,463
23. Clemons 8.0% 1.4% (+6.63)#23 2.1% (+5.85)#1,660
24. Hartwick 7.8% 1.4% (+6.47)#24 2.1% (+5.69)#1,711
25. Hansell 7.5% 1.4% (+6.17)#25 2.1% (+5.40)#1,831
26. Callender 6.9% 1.4% (+5.56)#26 2.1% (+4.79)#2,111
27. Mcgregor 6.9% 1.4% (+5.48)#27 2.1% (+4.71)#2,159
28. Woodburn 6.7% 1.4% (+5.29)#28 2.1% (+4.52)#2,269
29. Beaman 6.6% 1.4% (+5.22)#29 2.1% (+4.44)#2,310
30. Whittemore 6.6% 1.4% (+5.18)#30 2.1% (+4.41)#2,327
31. Leland 6.5% 1.4% (+5.11)#31 2.1% (+4.33)#2,368
32. Swan 6.5% 1.4% (+5.08)#32 2.1% (+4.30)#2,397
33. Sandyville 6.2% 1.4% (+4.88)#33 2.1% (+4.10)#2,533
34. Rembrandt 6.2% 1.4% (+4.81)#34 2.1% (+4.04)#2,568
35. Lanesboro 6.1% 1.4% (+4.69)#35 2.1% (+3.91)#2,664
36. Bedford 6.0% 1.4% (+4.67)#36 2.1% (+3.89)#2,679
37. Dow City 6.0% 1.4% (+4.66)#37 2.1% (+3.89)#2,680
38. Doon 5.8% 1.4% (+4.45)#38 2.1% (+3.67)#2,865
39. Kellogg 5.8% 1.4% (+4.42)#39 2.1% (+3.64)#2,892
40. Clarksville 5.6% 1.4% (+4.22)#40 2.1% (+3.44)#3,067
41. Wayland 5.2% 1.4% (+3.87)#41 2.1% (+3.10)#3,432
42. Tama 5.2% 1.4% (+3.85)#42 2.1% (+3.07)#3,464
43. Evansdale 5.2% 1.4% (+3.81)#43 2.1% (+3.03)#3,497
44. Jewell Junction 5.1% 1.4% (+3.77)#44 2.1% (+3.00)#3,535
45. Gilbert 5.1% 1.4% (+3.72)#45 2.1% (+2.95)#3,591
46. Pierson 5.0% 1.4% (+3.66)#46 2.1% (+2.89)#3,651
47. Denmark 5.0% 1.4% (+3.63)#47 2.1% (+2.85)#3,690
48. Marquette 4.9% 1.4% (+3.57)#48 2.1% (+2.79)#3,754
49. Mount Pleasant 4.9% 1.4% (+3.53)#49 2.1% (+2.75)#3,808
50. Goose Lake 4.8% 1.4% (+3.47)#50 2.1% (+2.69)#3,886
51. Silver City 4.8% 1.4% (+3.39)#51 2.1% (+2.61)#3,963
52. Larchwood 4.8% 1.4% (+3.38)#52 2.1% (+2.61)#3,971
53. Alta 4.7% 1.4% (+3.30)#53 2.1% (+2.52)#4,080
54. Manning 4.6% 1.4% (+3.26)#54 2.1% (+2.49)#4,127
55. Colfax 4.6% 1.4% (+3.19)#55 2.1% (+2.42)#4,223
56. St Anthony 4.5% 1.4% (+3.17)#56 2.1% (+2.40)#4,260
57. Hamburg 4.5% 1.4% (+3.16)#57 2.1% (+2.39)#4,272
58. Wilton 4.3% 1.4% (+2.96)#58 2.1% (+2.18)#4,573
59. Centralia 4.3% 1.4% (+2.91)#59 2.1% (+2.14)#4,634
60. Stacyville 4.2% 1.4% (+2.83)#60 2.1% (+2.05)#4,757
61. Eldora 4.2% 1.4% (+2.82)#61 2.1% (+2.05)#4,763
62. New Hartford 4.2% 1.4% (+2.79)#62 2.1% (+2.02)#4,794
63. Lamont 4.1% 1.4% (+2.77)#63 2.1% (+2.00)#4,840
64. Rockwell City 4.1% 1.4% (+2.75)#64 2.1% (+1.97)#4,887
65. Bellevue 4.1% 1.4% (+2.74)#65 2.1% (+1.97)#4,891
66. Rock Falls 4.1% 1.4% (+2.74)#66 2.1% (+1.96)#4,917
67. Magnolia 4.1% 1.4% (+2.68)#67 2.1% (+1.91)#5,005
68. La Porte City 4.0% 1.4% (+2.67)#68 2.1% (+1.89)#5,018
69. Garber 4.0% 1.4% (+2.63)#69 2.1% (+1.85)#5,103
70. Logan 4.0% 1.4% (+2.61)#70 2.1% (+1.83)#5,142
71. Monroe 4.0% 1.4% (+2.59)#71 2.1% (+1.81)#5,176
72. New Market 4.0% 1.4% (+2.59)#72 2.1% (+1.81)#5,180
73. Struble 3.9% 1.4% (+2.55)#73 2.1% (+1.77)#5,256
74. Birmingham 3.9% 1.4% (+2.54)#74 2.1% (+1.77)#5,261
75. Rutland 3.9% 1.4% (+2.52)#75 2.1% (+1.75)#5,293
76. Center Point 3.9% 1.4% (+2.50)#76 2.1% (+1.73)#5,350
77. Lawton 3.8% 1.4% (+2.42)#77 2.1% (+1.65)#5,494
78. Reasnor 3.8% 1.4% (+2.42)#78 2.1% (+1.65)#5,501
79. Williamsburg 3.8% 1.4% (+2.41)#79 2.1% (+1.64)#5,517
80. Primghar 3.7% 1.4% (+2.37)#80 2.1% (+1.59)#5,621
81. Mechanicsville 3.7% 1.4% (+2.37)#81 2.1% (+1.59)#5,623
82. Deep River 3.7% 1.4% (+2.33)#82 2.1% (+1.56)#5,698
83. Middle Amana 3.7% 1.4% (+2.30)#83 2.1% (+1.53)#5,760
84. Clarinda 3.7% 1.4% (+2.30)#84 2.1% (+1.52)#5,770
85. Laurel 3.7% 1.4% (+2.30)#85 2.1% (+1.52)#5,780
86. West Branch 3.6% 1.4% (+2.26)#86 2.1% (+1.49)#5,853
87. Riverdale 3.6% 1.4% (+2.25)#87 2.1% (+1.47)#5,875
88. Park View 3.6% 1.4% (+2.23)#88 2.1% (+1.45)#5,910
89. Palo 3.6% 1.4% (+2.23)#89 2.1% (+1.45)#5,917
90. Somers 3.6% 1.4% (+2.20)#90 2.1% (+1.42)#5,977
91. Meriden 3.6% 1.4% (+2.20)#91 2.1% (+1.42)#5,978
92. Carpenter 3.6% 1.4% (+2.20)#92 2.1% (+1.42)#5,980
93. Superior 3.5% 1.4% (+2.14)#93 2.1% (+1.36)#6,103
94. Eddyville 3.5% 1.4% (+2.13)#94 2.1% (+1.35)#6,110
95. Steamboat Rock 3.5% 1.4% (+2.11)#95 2.1% (+1.33)#6,183
96. Paullina 3.5% 1.4% (+2.08)#96 2.1% (+1.31)#6,234
97. Grafton 3.4% 1.4% (+2.08)#97 2.1% (+1.30)#6,257
98. Elkader 3.4% 1.4% (+2.03)#98 2.1% (+1.25)#6,380
99. Garwin 3.4% 1.4% (+2.02)#99 2.1% (+1.24)#6,405
100. Northboro 3.4% 1.4% (+2.02)#100 2.1% (+1.24)#6,410

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Security & Protection in Iowa?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Security & Protection in Iowa are:
#1
100.0%
#2
19.4%
#3
16.7%
#4
14.5%
#5
14.3%
#6
13.1%
#7
12.7%
#8
11.8%
#9
11.4%
#10
11.3%
What city has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Security & Protection in Iowa?
River Sioux has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Security & Protection in Iowa with 100.0%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Security & Protection in the State of Iowa?
Percentage of Population Employed in Security & Protection in Iowa is 1.4%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Security & Protection in the United States?
Percentage of Population Employed in Security & Protection in the United States is 2.1%.