Cities with the Highest Percentage of Not-for-profit Organizations in Oklahoma

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Not-for-profit Organizations
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Oklahoma
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Percentage of Not-for-profit Organizations in Oklahoma

0.0%
80.0%
Cities with the Highest Percentage of Not-for-profit Organizations in Oklahoma Map

Cities with the Highest Percentage of Not-for-profit Organizations in Oklahoma

City % Employed in Not-for-profit vs State vs National
1. Lotsee 66.7% 6.9% (+59.8)#1 8.4% (+58.2)#87
2. Zion 53.3% 6.9% (+46.5)#2 8.4% (+44.9)#148
3. Briartown 43.9% 6.9% (+37.0)#3 8.4% (+35.5)#241
4. Hillsdale 38.7% 6.9% (+31.9)#4 8.4% (+30.3)#319
5. May 37.5% 6.9% (+30.6)#5 8.4% (+29.1)#348
6. Sentinel 35.5% 6.9% (+28.6)#6 8.4% (+27.1)#379
7. Cloud Creek 33.3% 6.9% (+26.5)#7 8.4% (+24.9)#446
8. Albion 33.3% 6.9% (+26.5)#8 8.4% (+24.9)#454
9. Boley 32.3% 6.9% (+25.4)#9 8.4% (+23.8)#487
10. Hastings 29.4% 6.9% (+22.6)#10 8.4% (+21.0)#608
11. Boynton 28.6% 6.9% (+21.7)#11 8.4% (+20.1)#650
12. Colony 28.2% 6.9% (+21.4)#12 8.4% (+19.8)#676
13. Martha 27.3% 6.9% (+20.4)#13 8.4% (+18.8)#724
14. Foster 26.7% 6.9% (+19.9)#14 8.4% (+18.3)#764
15. Grant 25.3% 6.9% (+18.4)#15 8.4% (+16.8)#863
16. Agra 25.0% 6.9% (+18.1)#16 8.4% (+16.6)#879
17. Slick 24.6% 6.9% (+17.7)#17 8.4% (+16.1)#937
18. Tipton 23.0% 6.9% (+16.1)#18 8.4% (+14.5)#1,107
19. Medicine Park 22.3% 6.9% (+15.4)#19 8.4% (+13.8)#1,182
20. Dover 21.0% 6.9% (+14.1)#20 8.4% (+12.5)#1,381
21. Sportmans Shores 20.8% 6.9% (+14.0)#21 8.4% (+12.4)#1,407
22. Peckham 20.8% 6.9% (+14.0)#22 8.4% (+12.4)#1,412
23. Covington 20.0% 6.9% (+13.1)#23 8.4% (+11.6)#1,544
24. Pump Back 19.8% 6.9% (+12.9)#24 8.4% (+11.3)#1,608
25. Cookson 19.7% 6.9% (+12.8)#25 8.4% (+11.2)#1,623
26. Eldon 19.6% 6.9% (+12.7)#26 8.4% (+11.1)#1,634
27. Nash 19.5% 6.9% (+12.7)#27 8.4% (+11.1)#1,649
28. Oak Hill-Piney 19.4% 6.9% (+12.5)#28 8.4% (+10.9)#1,674
29. Park Hill 18.9% 6.9% (+12.1)#29 8.4% (+10.5)#1,782
30. Ballou 18.0% 6.9% (+11.1)#30 8.4% (+9.53)#2,052
31. Deer Creek 17.9% 6.9% (+11.0)#31 8.4% (+9.41)#2,088
32. Tenkiller 17.8% 6.9% (+10.9)#32 8.4% (+9.31)#2,113
33. New Eucha 17.6% 6.9% (+10.7)#33 8.4% (+9.14)#2,162
34. Burlington 17.1% 6.9% (+10.3)#34 8.4% (+8.70)#2,315
35. Hennepin 17.1% 6.9% (+10.2)#35 8.4% (+8.63)#2,337
36. Redbird 17.0% 6.9% (+10.1)#36 8.4% (+8.54)#2,375
37. Oaks 16.9% 6.9% (+10.1)#37 8.4% (+8.48)#2,394
38. Arcadia 16.7% 6.9% (+9.81)#38 8.4% (+8.22)#2,494
39. Hodgen 16.7% 6.9% (+9.81)#39 8.4% (+8.22)#2,500
40. Terlton 16.7% 6.9% (+9.81)#40 8.4% (+8.22)#2,503
41. Chewey 16.1% 6.9% (+9.23)#41 8.4% (+7.65)#2,734
42. Lone Chimney 15.4% 6.9% (+8.53)#42 8.4% (+6.94)#3,109
43. Whippoorwill 15.4% 6.9% (+8.53)#43 8.4% (+6.94)#3,112
44. Dennis 15.2% 6.9% (+8.33)#44 8.4% (+6.75)#3,208
45. Caney 15.2% 6.9% (+8.32)#45 8.4% (+6.73)#3,213
46. Shady Grove Cdp Cherokee County 14.8% 6.9% (+7.97)#46 8.4% (+6.39)#3,437
47. Headrick 14.7% 6.9% (+7.85)#47 8.4% (+6.26)#3,514
48. Redbird Smith 14.6% 6.9% (+7.78)#48 8.4% (+6.19)#3,566
49. Byron 14.3% 6.9% (+7.43)#49 8.4% (+5.84)#3,840
50. Cleora 14.2% 6.9% (+7.34)#50 8.4% (+5.76)#3,881
51. Kinta 14.1% 6.9% (+7.26)#51 8.4% (+5.67)#3,936
52. Weleetka 14.1% 6.9% (+7.24)#52 8.4% (+5.65)#3,947
53. Wakita 13.7% 6.9% (+6.87)#53 8.4% (+5.28)#4,215
54. Helena 13.7% 6.9% (+6.85)#54 8.4% (+5.27)#4,225
55. Woodlawn Park 13.2% 6.9% (+6.35)#55 8.4% (+4.76)#4,618
56. Hooker 13.1% 6.9% (+6.23)#56 8.4% (+4.65)#4,704
57. Stoney Point 13.0% 6.9% (+6.18)#57 8.4% (+4.60)#4,741
58. Longtown 13.0% 6.9% (+6.10)#58 8.4% (+4.51)#4,817
59. Arnett 12.9% 6.9% (+6.02)#59 8.4% (+4.43)#4,912
60. Shattuck 12.7% 6.9% (+5.84)#60 8.4% (+4.25)#5,092
61. Byng 12.7% 6.9% (+5.83)#61 8.4% (+4.24)#5,099
62. Fitzhugh 12.5% 6.9% (+5.64)#62 8.4% (+4.06)#5,252
63. Sugden 12.5% 6.9% (+5.64)#63 8.4% (+4.06)#5,282
64. West Siloam Springs 12.4% 6.9% (+5.59)#64 8.4% (+4.00)#5,326
65. Wanette 12.4% 6.9% (+5.50)#65 8.4% (+3.92)#5,410
66. Wayne 12.3% 6.9% (+5.40)#66 8.4% (+3.81)#5,515
67. Milfay 12.2% 6.9% (+5.39)#67 8.4% (+3.80)#5,535
68. Arpelar 12.1% 6.9% (+5.22)#68 8.4% (+3.64)#5,704
69. Sperry 12.0% 6.9% (+5.12)#69 8.4% (+3.54)#5,800
70. Lowrey 11.7% 6.9% (+4.84)#70 8.4% (+3.26)#6,099
71. Mooreland 11.7% 6.9% (+4.82)#71 8.4% (+3.23)#6,140
72. Greasy 11.5% 6.9% (+4.68)#72 8.4% (+3.09)#6,313
73. Osage 11.4% 6.9% (+4.57)#73 8.4% (+2.98)#6,447
74. Nicut 11.3% 6.9% (+4.46)#74 8.4% (+2.88)#6,567
75. The Village 11.2% 6.9% (+4.34)#75 8.4% (+2.75)#6,725
76. Piedmont 11.2% 6.9% (+4.34)#76 8.4% (+2.75)#6,726
77. Preston 11.1% 6.9% (+4.25)#77 8.4% (+2.67)#6,834
78. Valley Park 11.1% 6.9% (+4.25)#78 8.4% (+2.67)#6,862
79. Welling 10.8% 6.9% (+3.97)#79 8.4% (+2.39)#7,230
80. Jay 10.8% 6.9% (+3.90)#80 8.4% (+2.32)#7,311
81. Sweetwater 10.6% 6.9% (+3.75)#81 8.4% (+2.16)#7,547
82. Morrison 10.6% 6.9% (+3.74)#82 8.4% (+2.15)#7,564
83. Lyons Switch 10.5% 6.9% (+3.60)#83 8.4% (+2.02)#7,741
84. Sportsmen Acres 10.4% 6.9% (+3.50)#84 8.4% (+1.92)#7,890
85. Norwood 10.4% 6.9% (+3.50)#85 8.4% (+1.92)#7,892
86. Wetumka 10.4% 6.9% (+3.50)#86 8.4% (+1.91)#7,894
87. Lone Wolf 10.2% 6.9% (+3.38)#87 8.4% (+1.79)#8,108
88. Sallisaw 10.2% 6.9% (+3.34)#88 8.4% (+1.75)#8,169
89. Bartlesville 10.2% 6.9% (+3.32)#89 8.4% (+1.74)#8,185
90. Langston 10.2% 6.9% (+3.31)#90 8.4% (+1.73)#8,208
91. Paoli 10.0% 6.9% (+3.14)#91 8.4% (+1.56)#8,435
92. Indianola 10.0% 6.9% (+3.14)#92 8.4% (+1.56)#8,463
93. Fort Towson 9.9% 6.9% (+3.09)#93 8.4% (+1.50)#8,531
94. Glencoe 9.8% 6.9% (+2.98)#94 8.4% (+1.39)#8,705
95. Greenfield 9.8% 6.9% (+2.90)#95 8.4% (+1.31)#8,843
96. Fort Cobb 9.7% 6.9% (+2.89)#96 8.4% (+1.30)#8,853
97. Nowata 9.7% 6.9% (+2.84)#97 8.4% (+1.25)#8,929
98. Baron 9.7% 6.9% (+2.84)#98 8.4% (+1.25)#8,936
99. Scipio 9.7% 6.9% (+2.82)#99 8.4% (+1.23)#8,978
100. Brushy 9.6% 6.9% (+2.77)#100 8.4% (+1.18)#9,072

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Not-for-profit Organizations in Oklahoma?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Not-for-profit Organizations in Oklahoma are:
#1
66.7%
#2
53.3%
#3
38.7%
#4
37.5%
#5
35.5%
#6
33.3%
#7
33.3%
#8
32.3%
#9
29.4%
#10
28.6%
What city has the Highest Percentage of Not-for-profit Organizations in Oklahoma?
Lotsee has the Highest Percentage of Not-for-profit Organizations in Oklahoma with 66.7%.
What is the Percentage of Not-for-profit Organizations in the State of Oklahoma?
Percentage of Not-for-profit Organizations in Oklahoma is 6.9%.
What is the Percentage of Not-for-profit Organizations in the United States?
Percentage of Not-for-profit Organizations in the United States is 8.4%.