Cities with the Highest Percentage of Not-for-profit Organizations in South Dakota

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Not-for-profit Organizations
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
South Dakota
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Percentage of Not-for-profit Organizations in South Dakota

0.0%
100.0%
Cities with the Highest Percentage of Not-for-profit Organizations in South Dakota Map

Cities with the Highest Percentage of Not-for-profit Organizations in South Dakota

City % Employed in Not-for-profit vs State vs National
1. Spink Colony 100.0% 11.4% (+88.6)#1 8.4% (+91.6)#21
2. Cameron Colony 100.0% 11.4% (+88.6)#2 8.4% (+91.6)#23
3. Spring Lake Colony 100.0% 11.4% (+88.6)#3 8.4% (+91.6)#26
4. Rockport Colony 100.0% 11.4% (+88.6)#4 8.4% (+91.6)#32
5. Millerdale Colony 78.6% 11.4% (+67.2)#5 8.4% (+70.1)#55
6. Golden View Colony 73.1% 11.4% (+61.7)#6 8.4% (+64.6)#68
7. Corn Creek 70.0% 11.4% (+58.6)#7 8.4% (+61.6)#72
8. Lantry 57.1% 11.4% (+45.8)#8 8.4% (+48.7)#122
9. Batesland 55.0% 11.4% (+43.6)#9 8.4% (+46.6)#135
10. Spring Creek Colony 50.0% 11.4% (+38.6)#10 8.4% (+41.6)#172
11. Soldier Creek 46.7% 11.4% (+35.3)#11 8.4% (+38.2)#203
12. New Witten 42.4% 11.4% (+31.0)#12 8.4% (+34.0)#260
13. Wentworth 41.9% 11.4% (+30.6)#13 8.4% (+33.5)#263
14. Horse Creek 39.3% 11.4% (+27.9)#14 8.4% (+30.8)#301
15. St Francis 34.2% 11.4% (+22.8)#15 8.4% (+25.7)#424
16. Bath 34.0% 11.4% (+22.7)#16 8.4% (+25.6)#430
17. Claremont 31.4% 11.4% (+20.0)#17 8.4% (+22.9)#521
18. Dallas 31.1% 11.4% (+19.8)#18 8.4% (+22.7)#530
19. Marty 31.0% 11.4% (+19.7)#19 8.4% (+22.6)#536
20. Broadland 28.6% 11.4% (+17.2)#20 8.4% (+20.1)#659
21. Claire City 28.0% 11.4% (+16.6)#21 8.4% (+19.6)#685
22. Bancroft 27.8% 11.4% (+16.4)#22 8.4% (+19.3)#696
23. Vale 27.7% 11.4% (+16.3)#23 8.4% (+19.2)#702
24. Chamberlain 26.8% 11.4% (+15.4)#24 8.4% (+18.3)#759
25. Bath Corner 26.7% 11.4% (+15.3)#25 8.4% (+18.2)#771
26. Morningside 26.6% 11.4% (+15.2)#26 8.4% (+18.1)#781
27. Two Strike 25.0% 11.4% (+13.6)#27 8.4% (+16.6)#881
28. Kranzburg 24.2% 11.4% (+12.8)#28 8.4% (+15.7)#977
29. Pine Lakes Addition 24.1% 11.4% (+12.8)#29 8.4% (+15.7)#981
30. Oacoma 23.9% 11.4% (+12.5)#30 8.4% (+15.4)#1,014
31. Martin 23.4% 11.4% (+12.0)#31 8.4% (+14.9)#1,063
32. Gary 22.2% 11.4% (+10.8)#32 8.4% (+13.8)#1,188
33. Chancellor 21.5% 11.4% (+10.1)#33 8.4% (+13.1)#1,291
34. Tyndall 21.5% 11.4% (+10.1)#34 8.4% (+13.0)#1,296
35. Wall 21.1% 11.4% (+9.69)#35 8.4% (+12.6)#1,362
36. Johnson Siding 20.0% 11.4% (+8.62)#36 8.4% (+11.6)#1,539
37. Richland 20.0% 11.4% (+8.62)#37 8.4% (+11.6)#1,554
38. Marvin 20.0% 11.4% (+8.62)#38 8.4% (+11.6)#1,574
39. Mission 19.9% 11.4% (+8.56)#39 8.4% (+11.5)#1,579
40. Wood 19.0% 11.4% (+7.67)#40 8.4% (+10.6)#1,749
41. Blackhawk 19.0% 11.4% (+7.58)#41 8.4% (+10.5)#1,766
42. Pierre 18.4% 11.4% (+7.02)#42 8.4% (+9.95)#1,907
43. Anderson 17.6% 11.4% (+6.22)#43 8.4% (+9.16)#2,154
44. Lake Andes 17.5% 11.4% (+6.16)#44 8.4% (+9.10)#2,180
45. Wilmot 17.1% 11.4% (+5.75)#45 8.4% (+8.68)#2,321
46. Brentford 17.1% 11.4% (+5.69)#46 8.4% (+8.63)#2,343
47. Viborg 17.0% 11.4% (+5.61)#47 8.4% (+8.54)#2,369
48. Crook 17.0% 11.4% (+5.60)#48 8.4% (+8.54)#2,373
49. Garretson 16.7% 11.4% (+5.37)#49 8.4% (+8.31)#2,443
50. Willow Lake 16.5% 11.4% (+5.13)#50 8.4% (+8.07)#2,551
51. White River 16.5% 11.4% (+5.10)#51 8.4% (+8.04)#2,559
52. Dell Rapids 16.2% 11.4% (+4.79)#52 8.4% (+7.73)#2,705
53. Corsica 16.1% 11.4% (+4.72)#53 8.4% (+7.66)#2,729
54. Colonial Pine Hills 16.1% 11.4% (+4.70)#54 8.4% (+7.64)#2,740
55. Tabor 15.9% 11.4% (+4.48)#55 8.4% (+7.42)#2,855
56. Carthage 15.6% 11.4% (+4.20)#56 8.4% (+7.14)#2,993
57. Menno 15.5% 11.4% (+4.16)#57 8.4% (+7.09)#3,024
58. Howard 15.5% 11.4% (+4.13)#58 8.4% (+7.07)#3,033
59. Winner 15.4% 11.4% (+4.02)#59 8.4% (+6.96)#3,083
60. Blunt 15.4% 11.4% (+4.00)#60 8.4% (+6.94)#3,098
61. Sioux Falls 15.2% 11.4% (+3.87)#61 8.4% (+6.80)#3,176
62. Harrisburg 15.2% 11.4% (+3.86)#62 8.4% (+6.80)#3,178
63. Colton 15.1% 11.4% (+3.69)#63 8.4% (+6.63)#3,276
64. Rosebud 15.0% 11.4% (+3.58)#64 8.4% (+6.52)#3,353
65. Huron 14.8% 11.4% (+3.37)#65 8.4% (+6.31)#3,485
66. Crooks 14.7% 11.4% (+3.30)#66 8.4% (+6.24)#3,528
67. Canistota 14.6% 11.4% (+3.27)#67 8.4% (+6.20)#3,557
68. Mitchell 14.6% 11.4% (+3.23)#68 8.4% (+6.16)#3,586
69. Hermosa 14.3% 11.4% (+2.90)#69 8.4% (+5.84)#3,786
70. Brant Lake 14.3% 11.4% (+2.90)#70 8.4% (+5.84)#3,821
71. Wallace 14.3% 11.4% (+2.90)#71 8.4% (+5.84)#3,822
72. Groton 14.3% 11.4% (+2.89)#72 8.4% (+5.83)#3,844
73. White Lake 14.2% 11.4% (+2.82)#73 8.4% (+5.76)#3,884
74. Ethan 14.2% 11.4% (+2.82)#74 8.4% (+5.75)#3,887
75. Emery 14.2% 11.4% (+2.80)#75 8.4% (+5.74)#3,898
76. Avon 14.0% 11.4% (+2.64)#76 8.4% (+5.58)#4,007
77. Parkston 13.9% 11.4% (+2.49)#77 8.4% (+5.43)#4,116
78. Wagner 13.7% 11.4% (+2.37)#78 8.4% (+5.30)#4,194
79. Redfield 13.7% 11.4% (+2.33)#79 8.4% (+5.27)#4,224
80. Ashland Heights 13.7% 11.4% (+2.28)#80 8.4% (+5.21)#4,260
81. Delmont 13.6% 11.4% (+2.26)#81 8.4% (+5.19)#4,283
82. Angostura 13.6% 11.4% (+2.26)#82 8.4% (+5.19)#4,287
83. Centerville 13.6% 11.4% (+2.21)#83 8.4% (+5.14)#4,330
84. Vermillion 13.6% 11.4% (+2.20)#84 8.4% (+5.14)#4,332
85. Kadoka 13.6% 11.4% (+2.19)#85 8.4% (+5.13)#4,338
86. Yankton 13.3% 11.4% (+1.96)#86 8.4% (+4.89)#4,503
87. Lower Brule 13.3% 11.4% (+1.95)#87 8.4% (+4.89)#4,508
88. Cherry Creek 13.3% 11.4% (+1.95)#88 8.4% (+4.89)#4,512
89. Frederick 13.2% 11.4% (+1.83)#89 8.4% (+4.76)#4,616
90. St Lawrence 13.2% 11.4% (+1.78)#90 8.4% (+4.71)#4,650
91. Warner 13.1% 11.4% (+1.73)#91 8.4% (+4.66)#4,686
92. Madison 13.1% 11.4% (+1.69)#92 8.4% (+4.63)#4,719
93. Hartford 12.9% 11.4% (+1.57)#93 8.4% (+4.50)#4,823
94. Rapid Valley 12.7% 11.4% (+1.35)#94 8.4% (+4.28)#5,051
95. North Spearfish 12.7% 11.4% (+1.28)#95 8.4% (+4.22)#5,122
96. De Smet 12.5% 11.4% (+1.17)#96 8.4% (+4.10)#5,207
97. Worthing 12.5% 11.4% (+1.17)#97 8.4% (+4.10)#5,208
98. Trent 12.3% 11.4% (+0.965)#98 8.4% (+3.90)#5,429
99. Rapid City 12.3% 11.4% (+0.874)#99 8.4% (+3.81)#5,518
100. Mobridge 12.2% 11.4% (+0.863)#100 8.4% (+3.80)#5,537

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Not-for-profit Organizations in South Dakota?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Not-for-profit Organizations in South Dakota are:
#1
70.0%
#2
55.0%
#3
46.7%
#4
42.4%
#5
41.9%
#6
34.2%
#7
34.0%
#8
31.4%
#9
31.1%
#10
31.0%
What city has the Highest Percentage of Not-for-profit Organizations in South Dakota?
Corn Creek has the Highest Percentage of Not-for-profit Organizations in South Dakota with 70.0%.
What is the Percentage of Not-for-profit Organizations in the State of South Dakota?
Percentage of Not-for-profit Organizations in South Dakota is 11.4%.
What is the Percentage of Not-for-profit Organizations in the United States?
Percentage of Not-for-profit Organizations in the United States is 8.4%.