Cities with the Highest Percentage of Not-for-profit Organizations in Iowa

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Not-for-profit Organizations
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Iowa
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Percentage of Not-for-profit Organizations in Iowa

0.0%
100.0%
Cities with the Highest Percentage of Not-for-profit Organizations in Iowa Map

Cities with the Highest Percentage of Not-for-profit Organizations in Iowa

City % Employed in Not-for-profit vs State vs National
1. Argyle 100.0% 8.8% (+91.2)#1 8.4% (+91.6)#24
2. Conway 100.0% 8.8% (+91.2)#2 8.4% (+91.6)#30
3. Frytown 48.6% 8.8% (+39.8)#3 8.4% (+40.1)#195
4. Gillett Grove 47.1% 8.8% (+38.3)#4 8.4% (+38.6)#202
5. Augusta 44.4% 8.8% (+35.7)#5 8.4% (+36.0)#232
6. Jolley 44.4% 8.8% (+35.7)#6 8.4% (+36.0)#235
7. Loveland 38.5% 8.8% (+29.7)#7 8.4% (+30.0)#330
8. Fairport 37.7% 8.8% (+29.0)#8 8.4% (+29.3)#339
9. Maharishi Vedic City 36.6% 8.8% (+27.9)#9 8.4% (+28.2)#359
10. Yorktown 36.4% 8.8% (+27.6)#10 8.4% (+27.9)#365
11. Buck Grove 35.0% 8.8% (+26.2)#11 8.4% (+26.6)#397
12. Macksburg 34.9% 8.8% (+26.1)#12 8.4% (+26.4)#400
13. Kingston 32.0% 8.8% (+23.2)#13 8.4% (+23.6)#498
14. Balltown 30.8% 8.8% (+22.0)#14 8.4% (+22.3)#547
15. St Olaf 30.2% 8.8% (+21.4)#15 8.4% (+21.7)#573
16. Diamondhead Lake 29.8% 8.8% (+21.1)#16 8.4% (+21.4)#593
17. Weston 29.8% 8.8% (+21.1)#17 8.4% (+21.4)#594
18. Archer 27.9% 8.8% (+19.1)#18 8.4% (+19.4)#691
19. Brunsville 27.5% 8.8% (+18.8)#19 8.4% (+19.1)#711
20. Decorah 26.8% 8.8% (+18.1)#20 8.4% (+18.4)#757
21. Lamoni 26.3% 8.8% (+17.6)#21 8.4% (+17.9)#799
22. Arcadia 25.3% 8.8% (+16.5)#22 8.4% (+16.8)#864
23. Lester 24.4% 8.8% (+15.7)#23 8.4% (+16.0)#946
24. Centralia 24.3% 8.8% (+15.5)#24 8.4% (+15.8)#971
25. Auburn 24.2% 8.8% (+15.4)#25 8.4% (+15.7)#980
26. Garber 24.0% 8.8% (+15.2)#26 8.4% (+15.6)#998
27. Grinnell 23.3% 8.8% (+14.5)#27 8.4% (+14.8)#1,073
28. Downey 23.1% 8.8% (+14.3)#28 8.4% (+14.6)#1,096
29. Le Roy 22.2% 8.8% (+13.5)#29 8.4% (+13.8)#1,201
30. Moorland 22.1% 8.8% (+13.3)#30 8.4% (+13.7)#1,213
31. Greene 22.1% 8.8% (+13.3)#31 8.4% (+13.6)#1,219
32. Struble 22.0% 8.8% (+13.2)#32 8.4% (+13.6)#1,229
33. Mcintire 21.1% 8.8% (+12.3)#33 8.4% (+12.6)#1,370
34. Oakland Acres 21.0% 8.8% (+12.2)#34 8.4% (+12.6)#1,377
35. Hansell 20.8% 8.8% (+12.0)#35 8.4% (+12.3)#1,425
36. St Lucas 20.0% 8.8% (+11.2)#36 8.4% (+11.6)#1,557
37. Elk Horn 19.7% 8.8% (+11.0)#37 8.4% (+11.3)#1,610
38. Vining 19.4% 8.8% (+10.7)#38 8.4% (+11.0)#1,659
39. Cylinder 19.2% 8.8% (+10.5)#39 8.4% (+10.8)#1,701
40. Oak Hills 19.1% 8.8% (+10.4)#40 8.4% (+10.7)#1,721
41. Wahpeton 19.0% 8.8% (+10.2)#41 8.4% (+10.5)#1,767
42. Rose Hill 18.7% 8.8% (+9.94)#42 8.4% (+10.3)#1,840
43. Tingley 18.3% 8.8% (+9.58)#43 8.4% (+9.89)#1,931
44. Lockridge 18.3% 8.8% (+9.53)#44 8.4% (+9.84)#1,950
45. Raymond 18.3% 8.8% (+9.52)#45 8.4% (+9.84)#1,952
46. Bentley 18.2% 8.8% (+9.43)#46 8.4% (+9.74)#1,977
47. Millerton 18.2% 8.8% (+9.43)#47 8.4% (+9.74)#1,989
48. Larchwood 17.9% 8.8% (+9.10)#48 8.4% (+9.41)#2,085
49. Pella 17.7% 8.8% (+8.93)#49 8.4% (+9.24)#2,124
50. Kiron 17.6% 8.8% (+8.83)#50 8.4% (+9.14)#2,163
51. Waverly 17.6% 8.8% (+8.83)#51 8.4% (+9.14)#2,164
52. North Buena Vista 17.5% 8.8% (+8.74)#52 8.4% (+9.06)#2,200
53. Graettinger 17.4% 8.8% (+8.60)#53 8.4% (+8.91)#2,258
54. Sanborn 17.0% 8.8% (+8.27)#54 8.4% (+8.58)#2,355
55. Clermont 16.9% 8.8% (+8.16)#55 8.4% (+8.47)#2,398
56. Middle Amana 16.9% 8.8% (+8.16)#56 8.4% (+8.47)#2,402
57. Hull 16.8% 8.8% (+8.04)#57 8.4% (+8.35)#2,432
58. New Sharon 16.7% 8.8% (+7.94)#58 8.4% (+8.25)#2,455
59. Olds 16.7% 8.8% (+7.91)#59 8.4% (+8.22)#2,484
60. Sharpsburg 16.7% 8.8% (+7.91)#60 8.4% (+8.22)#2,496
61. Arlington 16.3% 8.8% (+7.58)#61 8.4% (+7.89)#2,623
62. Lewis 16.2% 8.8% (+7.44)#62 8.4% (+7.75)#2,690
63. Calamus 16.1% 8.8% (+7.37)#63 8.4% (+7.68)#2,723
64. Meriden 16.1% 8.8% (+7.31)#64 8.4% (+7.63)#2,747
65. Park View 16.0% 8.8% (+7.29)#65 8.4% (+7.60)#2,758
66. Calumet 15.8% 8.8% (+7.03)#66 8.4% (+7.35)#2,889
67. Luther 15.7% 8.8% (+6.97)#67 8.4% (+7.29)#2,925
68. Ryan 15.7% 8.8% (+6.91)#68 8.4% (+7.22)#2,953
69. Sherrill 15.6% 8.8% (+6.82)#69 8.4% (+7.13)#2,999
70. Le Grand 15.4% 8.8% (+6.67)#70 8.4% (+6.98)#3,078
71. Rudd 15.2% 8.8% (+6.49)#71 8.4% (+6.80)#3,173
72. Mallard 15.2% 8.8% (+6.48)#72 8.4% (+6.79)#3,182
73. Leighton 15.2% 8.8% (+6.42)#73 8.4% (+6.73)#3,216
74. Elma 15.2% 8.8% (+6.41)#74 8.4% (+6.72)#3,220
75. Carroll 15.1% 8.8% (+6.38)#75 8.4% (+6.69)#3,245
76. Fairfield 15.1% 8.8% (+6.35)#76 8.4% (+6.66)#3,259
77. Dayton 15.1% 8.8% (+6.30)#77 8.4% (+6.61)#3,285
78. Coalville 15.0% 8.8% (+6.29)#78 8.4% (+6.60)#3,295
79. Washburn 15.0% 8.8% (+6.28)#79 8.4% (+6.59)#3,305
80. Chester 14.9% 8.8% (+6.17)#80 8.4% (+6.48)#3,375
81. Sioux Center 14.9% 8.8% (+6.12)#81 8.4% (+6.43)#3,401
82. Davis City 14.9% 8.8% (+6.09)#82 8.4% (+6.41)#3,423
83. Farnhamville 14.8% 8.8% (+6.08)#83 8.4% (+6.39)#3,435
84. Rockford 14.8% 8.8% (+6.08)#84 8.4% (+6.39)#3,436
85. Tennant 14.8% 8.8% (+6.06)#85 8.4% (+6.37)#3,452
86. Paullina 14.8% 8.8% (+5.99)#86 8.4% (+6.31)#3,488
87. Little Rock 14.7% 8.8% (+5.91)#87 8.4% (+6.22)#3,545
88. Panorama Park 14.7% 8.8% (+5.91)#88 8.4% (+6.22)#3,547
89. Doon 14.7% 8.8% (+5.90)#89 8.4% (+6.21)#3,555
90. Shambaugh 14.6% 8.8% (+5.88)#90 8.4% (+6.19)#3,571
91. Marathon 14.6% 8.8% (+5.83)#91 8.4% (+6.14)#3,598
92. North Washington 14.5% 8.8% (+5.79)#92 8.4% (+6.10)#3,628
93. Rickardsville 14.5% 8.8% (+5.76)#93 8.4% (+6.07)#3,646
94. Ossian 14.4% 8.8% (+5.66)#94 8.4% (+5.97)#3,706
95. Lake Mills 14.3% 8.8% (+5.59)#95 8.4% (+5.90)#3,754
96. Burt 14.1% 8.8% (+5.39)#96 8.4% (+5.70)#3,913
97. Sumner 14.0% 8.8% (+5.23)#97 8.4% (+5.55)#4,030
98. Humeston 14.0% 8.8% (+5.20)#98 8.4% (+5.51)#4,057
99. University Park 13.9% 8.8% (+5.17)#99 8.4% (+5.48)#4,073
100. Clive 13.9% 8.8% (+5.14)#100 8.4% (+5.45)#4,094

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Not-for-profit Organizations in Iowa?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Not-for-profit Organizations in Iowa are:
#1
100.0%
#2
48.6%
#3
47.1%
#4
44.4%
#5
38.5%
#6
36.6%
#7
36.4%
#8
35.0%
#9
34.9%
#10
30.8%
What city has the Highest Percentage of Not-for-profit Organizations in Iowa?
Conway has the Highest Percentage of Not-for-profit Organizations in Iowa with 100.0%.
What is the Percentage of Not-for-profit Organizations in the State of Iowa?
Percentage of Not-for-profit Organizations in Iowa is 8.8%.
What is the Percentage of Not-for-profit Organizations in the United States?
Percentage of Not-for-profit Organizations in the United States is 8.4%.