Cities with the Highest Percentage of Not-for-profit Organizations in Indiana

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Not-for-profit Organizations
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Indiana
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Percentage of Not-for-profit Organizations in Indiana

0.0%
100.0%
Cities with the Highest Percentage of Not-for-profit Organizations in Indiana Map

Cities with the Highest Percentage of Not-for-profit Organizations in Indiana

City % Employed in Not-for-profit vs State vs National
1. Groverton 100.0% 9.8% (+90.2)#1 8.4% (+91.6)#5
2. Blocher 100.0% 9.8% (+90.2)#2 8.4% (+91.6)#18
3. Hemlock 100.0% 9.8% (+90.2)#3 8.4% (+91.6)#22
4. Burney 100.0% 9.8% (+90.2)#4 8.4% (+91.6)#29
5. South Milford 83.7% 9.8% (+73.9)#5 8.4% (+75.3)#49
6. Stroh 67.7% 9.8% (+57.9)#6 8.4% (+59.3)#80
7. Buckskin 57.1% 9.8% (+47.4)#7 8.4% (+48.7)#121
8. Brownsville 55.6% 9.8% (+45.8)#8 8.4% (+47.1)#128
9. Beaver Dam 51.9% 9.8% (+42.1)#9 8.4% (+43.4)#157
10. Lewis 51.3% 9.8% (+41.5)#10 8.4% (+42.8)#161
11. Griffin 50.0% 9.8% (+40.2)#11 8.4% (+41.6)#173
12. Hedrick 49.2% 9.8% (+39.4)#12 8.4% (+40.7)#190
13. Paris Crossing 46.7% 9.8% (+36.9)#13 8.4% (+38.2)#205
14. Elizaville 44.4% 9.8% (+34.7)#14 8.4% (+36.0)#234
15. Twelve Mile 44.1% 9.8% (+34.3)#15 8.4% (+35.6)#239
16. Indian Village 40.4% 9.8% (+30.6)#16 8.4% (+31.9)#277
17. Mace 40.0% 9.8% (+30.2)#17 8.4% (+31.6)#284
18. Grammer 39.2% 9.8% (+29.4)#18 8.4% (+30.8)#306
19. Burnett 38.7% 9.8% (+28.9)#19 8.4% (+30.3)#317
20. St Meinrad 38.5% 9.8% (+28.8)#20 8.4% (+30.1)#327
21. Leopold 36.4% 9.8% (+26.6)#21 8.4% (+27.9)#367
22. Metz 36.0% 9.8% (+26.2)#22 8.4% (+27.6)#373
23. Lake Santee 35.6% 9.8% (+25.8)#23 8.4% (+27.1)#377
24. Waynesville 35.5% 9.8% (+25.7)#24 8.4% (+27.1)#378
25. Shepardsville 34.8% 9.8% (+25.0)#25 8.4% (+26.3)#405
26. Notre Dame 34.3% 9.8% (+24.5)#26 8.4% (+25.9)#418
27. Nyona Lake 33.3% 9.8% (+23.6)#27 8.4% (+24.9)#447
28. Boone Grove 33.3% 9.8% (+23.6)#28 8.4% (+24.9)#456
29. River Forest 33.3% 9.8% (+23.6)#29 8.4% (+24.9)#460
30. Pulaski 31.2% 9.8% (+21.5)#30 8.4% (+22.8)#526
31. Sims 31.0% 9.8% (+21.3)#31 8.4% (+22.6)#537
32. Richland 30.6% 9.8% (+20.8)#32 8.4% (+22.1)#554
33. Upland 30.6% 9.8% (+20.8)#33 8.4% (+22.1)#555
34. Laconia 29.4% 9.8% (+19.6)#34 8.4% (+21.0)#609
35. Duneland Beach 29.2% 9.8% (+19.4)#35 8.4% (+20.7)#620
36. Blanford 28.6% 9.8% (+18.8)#36 8.4% (+20.1)#649
37. Azalia 28.6% 9.8% (+18.8)#37 8.4% (+20.1)#651
38. Mays 28.6% 9.8% (+18.8)#38 8.4% (+20.1)#652
39. North Crows Nest 27.9% 9.8% (+18.1)#39 8.4% (+19.5)#690
40. Oswego 27.8% 9.8% (+18.1)#40 8.4% (+19.4)#692
41. Roseland 27.0% 9.8% (+17.2)#41 8.4% (+18.6)#748
42. Johnson 26.6% 9.8% (+16.8)#42 8.4% (+18.1)#780
43. Rocky Ripple 25.7% 9.8% (+15.9)#43 8.4% (+17.2)#837
44. Martinsburg 25.6% 9.8% (+15.8)#44 8.4% (+17.1)#844
45. Palestine 25.5% 9.8% (+15.7)#45 8.4% (+17.0)#848
46. Willow Branch 25.0% 9.8% (+15.2)#46 8.4% (+16.6)#891
47. Oldenburg 24.5% 9.8% (+14.8)#47 8.4% (+16.1)#939
48. Shoals 24.3% 9.8% (+14.5)#48 8.4% (+15.8)#973
49. Browns Crossing 24.0% 9.8% (+14.2)#49 8.4% (+15.5)#1,001
50. Culver 24.0% 9.8% (+14.2)#50 8.4% (+15.5)#1,003
51. St Mary Of The Woods 23.7% 9.8% (+13.9)#51 8.4% (+15.2)#1,031
52. New Washington 23.2% 9.8% (+13.4)#52 8.4% (+14.8)#1,082
53. Prospect 23.1% 9.8% (+13.3)#53 8.4% (+14.6)#1,090
54. New Trenton 23.0% 9.8% (+13.2)#54 8.4% (+14.5)#1,106
55. Hanna 22.6% 9.8% (+12.9)#55 8.4% (+14.2)#1,143
56. Ora 22.5% 9.8% (+12.7)#56 8.4% (+14.1)#1,160
57. Needmore 22.5% 9.8% (+12.7)#57 8.4% (+14.0)#1,165
58. Sandborn 22.2% 9.8% (+12.4)#58 8.4% (+13.7)#1,205
59. Fairmount 22.1% 9.8% (+12.4)#59 8.4% (+13.7)#1,208
60. Henryville 22.1% 9.8% (+12.3)#60 8.4% (+13.6)#1,215
61. Pittsboro 22.0% 9.8% (+12.3)#61 8.4% (+13.6)#1,221
62. Brimfield 21.7% 9.8% (+11.9)#62 8.4% (+13.2)#1,272
63. East Enterprise 21.4% 9.8% (+11.6)#63 8.4% (+13.0)#1,302
64. Solsberry 21.3% 9.8% (+11.6)#64 8.4% (+12.9)#1,320
65. Newbern 21.3% 9.8% (+11.5)#65 8.4% (+12.8)#1,332
66. Newberry 21.3% 9.8% (+11.5)#66 8.4% (+12.8)#1,333
67. Maples 21.2% 9.8% (+11.5)#67 8.4% (+12.8)#1,338
68. Onward 21.1% 9.8% (+11.3)#68 8.4% (+12.7)#1,352
69. Eaton 21.0% 9.8% (+11.3)#69 8.4% (+12.6)#1,374
70. Mellott 21.0% 9.8% (+11.2)#70 8.4% (+12.5)#1,384
71. Cory 20.9% 9.8% (+11.2)#71 8.4% (+12.5)#1,390
72. Groveland 20.7% 9.8% (+10.9)#72 8.4% (+12.2)#1,436
73. Merriam 20.6% 9.8% (+10.9)#73 8.4% (+12.2)#1,448
74. Schaefer Lake 20.5% 9.8% (+10.7)#74 8.4% (+12.1)#1,463
75. Dune Acres 20.1% 9.8% (+10.3)#75 8.4% (+11.7)#1,514
76. Freelandville 20.0% 9.8% (+10.2)#76 8.4% (+11.6)#1,537
77. Newburgh 19.7% 9.8% (+9.89)#77 8.4% (+11.2)#1,621
78. Winamac 19.5% 9.8% (+9.70)#78 8.4% (+11.0)#1,653
79. Knox 19.4% 9.8% (+9.62)#79 8.4% (+11.0)#1,667
80. Country Club Heights 19.3% 9.8% (+9.54)#80 8.4% (+10.9)#1,681
81. Mount Etna 19.3% 9.8% (+9.50)#81 8.4% (+10.8)#1,691
82. Decker 19.2% 9.8% (+9.41)#82 8.4% (+10.7)#1,707
83. Hartsville 18.9% 9.8% (+9.14)#83 8.4% (+10.5)#1,776
84. Trafalgar 18.9% 9.8% (+9.11)#84 8.4% (+10.4)#1,785
85. Elizabethtown 18.9% 9.8% (+9.09)#85 8.4% (+10.4)#1,794
86. Ulen 18.9% 9.8% (+9.09)#86 8.4% (+10.4)#1,795
87. Bennetts Switch 18.8% 9.8% (+9.02)#87 8.4% (+10.4)#1,807
88. North Manchester 18.7% 9.8% (+8.89)#88 8.4% (+10.2)#1,846
89. Winfield 18.6% 9.8% (+8.84)#89 8.4% (+10.2)#1,854
90. Judyville 18.5% 9.8% (+8.77)#90 8.4% (+10.1)#1,873
91. Brookston 18.5% 9.8% (+8.69)#91 8.4% (+10.0)#1,892
92. Westphalia 18.4% 9.8% (+8.59)#92 8.4% (+9.92)#1,917
93. Spencerville 18.2% 9.8% (+8.46)#93 8.4% (+9.79)#1,964
94. Yorktown 18.2% 9.8% (+8.43)#94 8.4% (+9.76)#1,968
95. Alfordsville 18.2% 9.8% (+8.40)#95 8.4% (+9.74)#1,986
96. Cree Lake 17.9% 9.8% (+8.17)#96 8.4% (+9.50)#2,061
97. Austin 17.8% 9.8% (+8.05)#97 8.4% (+9.39)#2,095
98. Michiana Shores 17.7% 9.8% (+7.90)#98 8.4% (+9.24)#2,128
99. Stendal 17.5% 9.8% (+7.68)#99 8.4% (+9.02)#2,210
100. Vernon 17.2% 9.8% (+7.41)#100 8.4% (+8.74)#2,296

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Not-for-profit Organizations in Indiana?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Not-for-profit Organizations in Indiana are:
#1
50.0%
#2
40.4%
#3
38.5%
#4
35.6%
#5
34.8%
#6
34.3%
#7
33.3%
#8
31.0%
#9
30.6%
#10
30.6%
What city has the Highest Percentage of Not-for-profit Organizations in Indiana?
Griffin has the Highest Percentage of Not-for-profit Organizations in Indiana with 50.0%.
What is the Percentage of Not-for-profit Organizations in the State of Indiana?
Percentage of Not-for-profit Organizations in Indiana is 9.8%.
What is the Percentage of Not-for-profit Organizations in the United States?
Percentage of Not-for-profit Organizations in the United States is 8.4%.