Cities with the Highest Percentage of Households Residing in Detached Homes in Idaho

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Detached Home Residency
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Idaho
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Percentage of Households Residing in Detached Homes in Idaho

0.0%
100.0%
Cities with the Highest Percentage of Households Residing in Detached Homes in Idaho Map

Cities with the Highest Percentage of Households Residing in Detached Homes in Idaho

City Detached Home Residency vs State vs National
1. Avimor 100.0% 74.1% (+25.9)#1 62.5% (+37.5)#152
2. Yellow Pine 100.0% 74.1% (+25.9)#2 62.5% (+37.5)#722
3. Gannett 100.0% 74.1% (+25.9)#3 62.5% (+37.5)#742
4. Fernwood 100.0% 74.1% (+25.9)#4 62.5% (+37.5)#1,399
5. Fernan Lake Village 100.0% 74.1% (+25.9)#5 62.5% (+37.5)#1,462
6. Conkling Park 100.0% 74.1% (+25.9)#6 62.5% (+37.5)#1,501
7. De Smet 100.0% 74.1% (+25.9)#7 62.5% (+37.5)#1,565
8. Hope 100.0% 74.1% (+25.9)#8 62.5% (+37.5)#1,804
9. Viola 100.0% 74.1% (+25.9)#9 62.5% (+37.5)#2,222
10. Hamer 100.0% 74.1% (+25.9)#11 62.5% (+37.5)#2,497
11. Oxford 100.0% 74.1% (+25.9)#12 62.5% (+37.5)#2,498
12. Lowman 100.0% 74.1% (+25.9)#13 62.5% (+37.5)#2,743
13. Clayton 100.0% 74.1% (+25.9)#14 62.5% (+37.5)#2,885
14. Coolin 100.0% 74.1% (+25.9)#15 62.5% (+37.5)#3,017
15. Drummond 100.0% 74.1% (+25.9)#16 62.5% (+37.5)#3,097
16. Clifton 99.5% 74.1% (+25.4)#17 62.5% (+37.0)#3,156
17. Hayden Lake 99.0% 74.1% (+24.9)#18 62.5% (+36.5)#3,297
18. St Charles 98.2% 74.1% (+24.1)#19 62.5% (+35.7)#3,614
19. Dayton 97.5% 74.1% (+23.4)#20 62.5% (+35.0)#3,899
20. Pierce 96.8% 74.1% (+22.7)#21 62.5% (+34.3)#4,250
21. Hidden Springs 96.4% 74.1% (+22.3)#22 62.5% (+33.9)#4,420
22. Malad City 96.2% 74.1% (+22.1)#23 62.5% (+33.7)#4,530
23. Wardner 96.2% 74.1% (+22.1)#24 62.5% (+33.7)#4,550
24. Reubens 95.7% 74.1% (+21.6)#25 62.5% (+33.2)#4,818
25. Robie Creek 95.4% 74.1% (+21.3)#26 62.5% (+32.9)#4,947
26. Notus 95.3% 74.1% (+21.2)#27 62.5% (+32.8)#5,000
27. Weston 95.3% 74.1% (+21.2)#28 62.5% (+32.8)#5,003
28. Ucon 94.6% 74.1% (+20.5)#29 62.5% (+32.1)#5,334
29. Lewisville 94.6% 74.1% (+20.5)#30 62.5% (+32.1)#5,349
30. Mullan 94.4% 74.1% (+20.3)#31 62.5% (+31.9)#5,416
31. Carey 93.9% 74.1% (+19.8)#32 62.5% (+31.4)#5,691
32. Dover 93.8% 74.1% (+19.7)#33 62.5% (+31.3)#5,752
33. Smiths Ferry 93.8% 74.1% (+19.7)#34 62.5% (+31.3)#5,784
34. Iona 93.7% 74.1% (+19.6)#35 62.5% (+31.2)#5,801
35. Rockford Bay 93.7% 74.1% (+19.6)#36 62.5% (+31.2)#5,832
36. Downey 93.4% 74.1% (+19.3)#37 62.5% (+30.9)#5,983
37. Arimo 93.2% 74.1% (+19.1)#38 62.5% (+30.7)#6,084
38. Bloomington 92.1% 74.1% (+18.0)#39 62.5% (+29.6)#6,701
39. Dalton Gardens 92.0% 74.1% (+17.9)#40 62.5% (+29.5)#6,723
40. Kuna 91.5% 74.1% (+17.4)#41 62.5% (+29.0)#7,007
41. Island Park 91.4% 74.1% (+17.3)#42 62.5% (+28.9)#7,114
42. Shoshone 91.2% 74.1% (+17.1)#43 62.5% (+28.7)#7,200
43. Silverton 91.1% 74.1% (+17.0)#44 62.5% (+28.6)#7,280
44. Cambridge 91.1% 74.1% (+17.0)#45 62.5% (+28.6)#7,289
45. Swan Valley 91.1% 74.1% (+17.0)#46 62.5% (+28.6)#7,294
46. Troy 90.4% 74.1% (+16.3)#47 62.5% (+27.9)#7,708
47. Albion 90.3% 74.1% (+16.2)#48 62.5% (+27.8)#7,768
48. Rockland 90.3% 74.1% (+16.2)#49 62.5% (+27.8)#7,779
49. Eagle 90.1% 74.1% (+16.0)#50 62.5% (+27.6)#7,843
50. Georgetown 89.8% 74.1% (+15.7)#51 62.5% (+27.3)#8,056
51. Star 89.4% 74.1% (+15.3)#52 62.5% (+26.9)#8,231
52. Inkom 89.3% 74.1% (+15.2)#53 62.5% (+26.8)#8,311
53. Tyhee 88.8% 74.1% (+14.7)#54 62.5% (+26.3)#8,643
54. Basalt 88.7% 74.1% (+14.6)#55 62.5% (+26.2)#8,713
55. Moreland 88.3% 74.1% (+14.2)#56 62.5% (+25.8)#8,944
56. Oakley 88.3% 74.1% (+14.2)#57 62.5% (+25.8)#8,958
57. Parker 88.3% 74.1% (+14.2)#58 62.5% (+25.8)#8,961
58. Grace 88.2% 74.1% (+14.1)#59 62.5% (+25.7)#9,005
59. Mackay 87.9% 74.1% (+13.8)#60 62.5% (+25.4)#9,202
60. Newdale 87.3% 74.1% (+13.2)#61 62.5% (+24.8)#9,588
61. Mccammon 87.1% 74.1% (+13.0)#62 62.5% (+24.6)#9,669
62. Craigmont 86.4% 74.1% (+12.3)#63 62.5% (+23.9)#10,104
63. Ferdinand 86.1% 74.1% (+12.0)#64 62.5% (+23.6)#10,297
64. Potlatch 86.0% 74.1% (+11.9)#65 62.5% (+23.5)#10,341
65. Deary 86.0% 74.1% (+11.9)#66 62.5% (+23.5)#10,355
66. Rathdrum 85.2% 74.1% (+11.1)#67 62.5% (+22.7)#10,827
67. Garden Valley 85.1% 74.1% (+11.0)#68 62.5% (+22.6)#10,934
68. Middleton 84.1% 74.1% (+10.00)#69 62.5% (+21.6)#11,552
69. Bellevue 83.9% 74.1% (+9.80)#70 62.5% (+21.4)#11,696
70. Winchester 83.9% 74.1% (+9.80)#71 62.5% (+21.4)#11,725
71. Princeton 83.9% 74.1% (+9.80)#72 62.5% (+21.4)#11,728
72. Fairfield 83.7% 74.1% (+9.60)#73 62.5% (+21.2)#11,826
73. Minidoka 83.7% 74.1% (+9.60)#74 62.5% (+21.2)#11,840
74. Eden 83.5% 74.1% (+9.40)#75 62.5% (+21.0)#11,955
75. Greenleaf 83.3% 74.1% (+9.20)#76 62.5% (+20.8)#12,030
76. White Bird 83.3% 74.1% (+9.20)#77 62.5% (+20.8)#12,080
77. Genesee 83.2% 74.1% (+9.10)#78 62.5% (+20.7)#12,120
78. Meridian 83.0% 74.1% (+8.90)#79 62.5% (+20.5)#12,224
79. Bancroft 82.6% 74.1% (+8.50)#80 62.5% (+20.1)#12,528
80. Grangeville 82.5% 74.1% (+8.40)#81 62.5% (+20.0)#12,569
81. Kootenai 82.5% 74.1% (+8.40)#82 62.5% (+20.0)#12,584
82. Spirit Lake 82.3% 74.1% (+8.20)#83 62.5% (+19.8)#12,718
83. Paris 82.3% 74.1% (+8.20)#84 62.5% (+19.8)#12,733
84. Menan 82.2% 74.1% (+8.10)#85 62.5% (+19.7)#12,777
85. Buhl 82.1% 74.1% (+8.00)#86 62.5% (+19.6)#12,815
86. Declo 81.9% 74.1% (+7.80)#87 62.5% (+19.4)#12,964
87. Rockford 81.4% 74.1% (+7.30)#88 62.5% (+18.9)#13,270
88. Irwin 81.3% 74.1% (+7.20)#89 62.5% (+18.8)#13,334
89. Murphy 81.1% 74.1% (+7.00)#90 62.5% (+18.6)#13,458
90. Kellogg 81.0% 74.1% (+6.90)#91 62.5% (+18.5)#13,487
91. Placerville 81.0% 74.1% (+6.90)#92 62.5% (+18.5)#13,527
92. Smelterville 80.9% 74.1% (+6.80)#93 62.5% (+18.4)#13,565
93. Lapwai 80.8% 74.1% (+6.70)#94 62.5% (+18.3)#13,618
94. Shelley 80.6% 74.1% (+6.50)#95 62.5% (+18.1)#13,716
95. Franklin 80.4% 74.1% (+6.30)#96 62.5% (+17.9)#13,863
96. Rupert 80.3% 74.1% (+6.20)#97 62.5% (+17.8)#13,908
97. Hazelton 80.3% 74.1% (+6.20)#98 62.5% (+17.8)#13,926
98. Orofino 80.2% 74.1% (+6.10)#99 62.5% (+17.7)#13,970
99. Montpelier 80.0% 74.1% (+5.90)#100 62.5% (+17.5)#14,073
100. Osburn 79.8% 74.1% (+5.70)#101 62.5% (+17.3)#14,264

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Households Residing in Detached Homes in Idaho?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Households Residing in Detached Homes in Idaho are:
#1
100.0%
#2
100.0%
#3
100.0%
#4
100.0%
#5
100.0%
#6
100.0%
#7
100.0%
#8
100.0%
#9
100.0%
#10
100.0%
What city has the Highest Percentage of Households Residing in Detached Homes in Idaho?
Yellow Pine has the Highest Percentage of Households Residing in Detached Homes in Idaho with 100.0%.
What is the Percentage of Households Residing in Detached Homes in the State of Idaho?
Percentage of Households Residing in Detached Homes in Idaho is 74.1%.
What is the Percentage of Households Residing in Detached Homes in the United States?
Percentage of Households Residing in Detached Homes in the United States is 62.5%.