Cities with the Highest Percentage of Households Residing in Detached Homes in Nebraska

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Detached Home Residency
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Nebraska
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Percentage of Households Residing in Detached Homes in Nebraska

0.0%
100.0%
Cities with the Highest Percentage of Households Residing in Detached Homes in Nebraska Map

Cities with the Highest Percentage of Households Residing in Detached Homes in Nebraska

City Detached Home Residency vs State vs National
1. Glenwood 100.0% 72.8% (+27.2)#1 62.5% (+37.5)#379
2. Kennard 100.0% 72.8% (+27.2)#2 62.5% (+37.5)#573
3. Davenport 100.0% 72.8% (+27.2)#3 62.5% (+37.5)#696
4. Hoskins 100.0% 72.8% (+27.2)#4 62.5% (+37.5)#709
5. Riverdale 100.0% 72.8% (+27.2)#5 62.5% (+37.5)#752
6. Woodland Hills 100.0% 72.8% (+27.2)#6 62.5% (+37.5)#783
7. St Libory 100.0% 72.8% (+27.2)#7 62.5% (+37.5)#796
8. Guide Rock 100.0% 72.8% (+27.2)#8 62.5% (+37.5)#802
9. Bruning 100.0% 72.8% (+27.2)#9 62.5% (+37.5)#844
10. Otoe 100.0% 72.8% (+27.2)#10 62.5% (+37.5)#877
11. Lindsay 100.0% 72.8% (+27.2)#11 62.5% (+37.5)#888
12. Verdon 100.0% 72.8% (+27.2)#12 62.5% (+37.5)#986
13. Yankee Hill 100.0% 72.8% (+27.2)#13 62.5% (+37.5)#1,034
14. Lawrence 100.0% 72.8% (+27.2)#14 62.5% (+37.5)#1,037
15. Western 100.0% 72.8% (+27.2)#15 62.5% (+37.5)#1,074
16. Dunbar 100.0% 72.8% (+27.2)#16 62.5% (+37.5)#1,117
17. Thedford 100.0% 72.8% (+27.2)#17 62.5% (+37.5)#1,131
18. Holstein 100.0% 72.8% (+27.2)#18 62.5% (+37.5)#1,134
19. Overland 100.0% 72.8% (+27.2)#19 62.5% (+37.5)#1,144
20. Carleton 100.0% 72.8% (+27.2)#20 62.5% (+37.5)#1,217
21. Ruskin 100.0% 72.8% (+27.2)#21 62.5% (+37.5)#1,255
22. Cheney 100.0% 72.8% (+27.2)#22 62.5% (+37.5)#1,287
23. Max 100.0% 72.8% (+27.2)#23 62.5% (+37.5)#1,386
24. Sunol 100.0% 72.8% (+27.2)#24 62.5% (+37.5)#1,396
25. Princeton 100.0% 72.8% (+27.2)#25 62.5% (+37.5)#1,518
26. Malmo 100.0% 72.8% (+27.2)#26 62.5% (+37.5)#1,542
27. Belden 100.0% 72.8% (+27.2)#27 62.5% (+37.5)#1,599
28. Colon 100.0% 72.8% (+27.2)#28 62.5% (+37.5)#1,622
29. St Helena 100.0% 72.8% (+27.2)#29 62.5% (+37.5)#1,663
30. Cordova 100.0% 72.8% (+27.2)#30 62.5% (+37.5)#1,668
31. Winslow 100.0% 72.8% (+27.2)#31 62.5% (+37.5)#1,682
32. Riverton 100.0% 72.8% (+27.2)#32 62.5% (+37.5)#1,752
33. Heartwell 100.0% 72.8% (+27.2)#33 62.5% (+37.5)#1,755
34. Steinauer 100.0% 72.8% (+27.2)#34 62.5% (+37.5)#1,756
35. Roscoe 100.0% 72.8% (+27.2)#35 62.5% (+37.5)#1,764
36. Comstock 100.0% 72.8% (+27.2)#36 62.5% (+37.5)#1,765
37. Filley 100.0% 72.8% (+27.2)#37 62.5% (+37.5)#1,809
38. Loretto 100.0% 72.8% (+27.2)#38 62.5% (+37.5)#1,829
39. Salem 100.0% 72.8% (+27.2)#39 62.5% (+37.5)#1,876
40. Bow Valley 100.0% 72.8% (+27.2)#40 62.5% (+37.5)#1,900
41. Martin 100.0% 72.8% (+27.2)#41 62.5% (+37.5)#1,943
42. Melia 100.0% 72.8% (+27.2)#42 62.5% (+37.5)#1,990
43. Holmesville 100.0% 72.8% (+27.2)#43 62.5% (+37.5)#2,017
44. Harbine 100.0% 72.8% (+27.2)#44 62.5% (+37.5)#2,040
45. King Lake 100.0% 72.8% (+27.2)#45 62.5% (+37.5)#2,041
46. Reynolds 100.0% 72.8% (+27.2)#46 62.5% (+37.5)#2,078
47. Bristow 100.0% 72.8% (+27.2)#47 62.5% (+37.5)#2,113
48. Hubbell 100.0% 72.8% (+27.2)#48 62.5% (+37.5)#2,114
49. Abie 100.0% 72.8% (+27.2)#49 62.5% (+37.5)#2,189
50. Belvidere 100.0% 72.8% (+27.2)#50 62.5% (+37.5)#2,190
51. Fontanelle 100.0% 72.8% (+27.2)#51 62.5% (+37.5)#2,206
52. Archer 100.0% 72.8% (+27.2)#52 62.5% (+37.5)#2,265
53. Inavale 100.0% 72.8% (+27.2)#53 62.5% (+37.5)#2,303
54. Saronville 100.0% 72.8% (+27.2)#54 62.5% (+37.5)#2,329
55. Thayer 100.0% 72.8% (+27.2)#55 62.5% (+37.5)#2,350
56. Moorefield 100.0% 72.8% (+27.2)#56 62.5% (+37.5)#2,375
57. Elyria 100.0% 72.8% (+27.2)#57 62.5% (+37.5)#2,396
58. Oak 100.0% 72.8% (+27.2)#58 62.5% (+37.5)#2,401
59. Richfield 100.0% 72.8% (+27.2)#59 62.5% (+37.5)#2,449
60. Anoka 100.0% 72.8% (+27.2)#60 62.5% (+37.5)#2,507
61. Deweese 100.0% 72.8% (+27.2)#61 62.5% (+37.5)#2,539
62. Surprise 100.0% 72.8% (+27.2)#62 62.5% (+37.5)#2,540
63. Burr 100.0% 72.8% (+27.2)#63 62.5% (+37.5)#2,554
64. Foster 100.0% 72.8% (+27.2)#64 62.5% (+37.5)#2,555
65. Seneca 100.0% 72.8% (+27.2)#65 62.5% (+37.5)#2,614
66. Beacon View 100.0% 72.8% (+27.2)#66 62.5% (+37.5)#2,615
67. Cotesfield 100.0% 72.8% (+27.2)#67 62.5% (+37.5)#2,624
68. Crab Orchard 100.0% 72.8% (+27.2)#68 62.5% (+37.5)#2,655
69. Venice 100.0% 72.8% (+27.2)#69 62.5% (+37.5)#2,673
70. Sholes 100.0% 72.8% (+27.2)#70 62.5% (+37.5)#2,691
71. Nora 100.0% 72.8% (+27.2)#72 62.5% (+37.5)#2,693
72. Hendley 100.0% 72.8% (+27.2)#73 62.5% (+37.5)#2,694
73. Linoma Beach 100.0% 72.8% (+27.2)#74 62.5% (+37.5)#2,707
74. Lushton 100.0% 72.8% (+27.2)#75 62.5% (+37.5)#2,728
75. Strang 100.0% 72.8% (+27.2)#76 62.5% (+37.5)#2,747
76. Barada 100.0% 72.8% (+27.2)#77 62.5% (+37.5)#2,767
77. Nenzel 100.0% 72.8% (+27.2)#78 62.5% (+37.5)#2,805
78. Gilead 100.0% 72.8% (+27.2)#79 62.5% (+37.5)#2,833
79. Westerville 100.0% 72.8% (+27.2)#80 62.5% (+37.5)#2,851
80. Lisco 100.0% 72.8% (+27.2)#81 62.5% (+37.5)#2,866
81. Inland 100.0% 72.8% (+27.2)#82 62.5% (+37.5)#2,911
82. Poole 100.0% 72.8% (+27.2)#83 62.5% (+37.5)#2,912
83. Johnstown 100.0% 72.8% (+27.2)#84 62.5% (+37.5)#2,913
84. Bazile Mills 100.0% 72.8% (+27.2)#87 62.5% (+37.5)#2,954
85. Lorenzo 100.0% 72.8% (+27.2)#88 62.5% (+37.5)#2,955
86. Tamora 100.0% 72.8% (+27.2)#89 62.5% (+37.5)#2,956
87. Stockham 100.0% 72.8% (+27.2)#90 62.5% (+37.5)#2,957
88. Gross 100.0% 72.8% (+27.2)#91 62.5% (+37.5)#2,973
89. Kramer 100.0% 72.8% (+27.2)#92 62.5% (+37.5)#2,988
90. Stockville 100.0% 72.8% (+27.2)#93 62.5% (+37.5)#3,028
91. Parks 100.0% 72.8% (+27.2)#94 62.5% (+37.5)#3,029
92. Brownlee 100.0% 72.8% (+27.2)#95 62.5% (+37.5)#3,046
93. Emerald 100.0% 72.8% (+27.2)#96 62.5% (+37.5)#3,070
94. Cowles 100.0% 72.8% (+27.2)#97 62.5% (+37.5)#3,081
95. Hildreth 99.5% 72.8% (+26.7)#98 62.5% (+37.0)#3,165
96. Campbell 99.2% 72.8% (+26.4)#99 62.5% (+36.7)#3,246
97. Ashton 99.1% 72.8% (+26.3)#100 62.5% (+36.6)#3,278
98. Duncan 99.0% 72.8% (+26.2)#101 62.5% (+36.5)#3,298
99. Bladen 99.0% 72.8% (+26.2)#102 62.5% (+36.5)#3,315
100. Exeter 98.9% 72.8% (+26.1)#103 62.5% (+36.4)#3,339

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Households Residing in Detached Homes in Nebraska?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Households Residing in Detached Homes in Nebraska are:
#1
100.0%
#2
100.0%
#3
100.0%
#4
100.0%
#5
100.0%
#6
100.0%
#7
100.0%
#8
100.0%
#9
100.0%
#10
100.0%
What city has the Highest Percentage of Households Residing in Detached Homes in Nebraska?
Glenwood has the Highest Percentage of Households Residing in Detached Homes in Nebraska with 100.0%.
What is the Percentage of Households Residing in Detached Homes in the State of Nebraska?
Percentage of Households Residing in Detached Homes in Nebraska is 72.8%.
What is the Percentage of Households Residing in Detached Homes in the United States?
Percentage of Households Residing in Detached Homes in the United States is 62.5%.