Cities with the Highest Percentage of Households Residing in Detached Homes in Minnesota

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Detached Home Residency
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Minnesota
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Percentage of Households Residing in Detached Homes in Minnesota

0.0%
100.0%
Cities with the Highest Percentage of Households Residing in Detached Homes in Minnesota Map

Cities with the Highest Percentage of Households Residing in Detached Homes in Minnesota

City Detached Home Residency vs State vs National
1. St. John's University 100.0% 66.5% (+33.5)#1 62.5% (+37.5)#108
2. Redby 100.0% 66.5% (+33.5)#2 62.5% (+37.5)#169
3. Martin Lake 100.0% 66.5% (+33.5)#3 62.5% (+37.5)#263
4. Ponemah 100.0% 66.5% (+33.5)#4 62.5% (+37.5)#273
5. Woodland 100.0% 66.5% (+33.5)#5 62.5% (+37.5)#434
6. Sunfish Lake 100.0% 66.5% (+33.5)#6 62.5% (+37.5)#441
7. Minnetonka Beach 100.0% 66.5% (+33.5)#7 62.5% (+37.5)#532
8. Pine Springs 100.0% 66.5% (+33.5)#8 62.5% (+37.5)#554
9. Marion 100.0% 66.5% (+33.5)#9 62.5% (+37.5)#640
10. Lakeland Shores 100.0% 66.5% (+33.5)#10 62.5% (+37.5)#714
11. Ceylon 100.0% 66.5% (+33.5)#11 62.5% (+37.5)#860
12. Dunnell 100.0% 66.5% (+33.5)#12 62.5% (+37.5)#866
13. Bigelow 100.0% 66.5% (+33.5)#13 62.5% (+37.5)#894
14. Greenwald 100.0% 66.5% (+33.5)#14 62.5% (+37.5)#1,007
15. Heidelberg 100.0% 66.5% (+33.5)#15 62.5% (+37.5)#1,067
16. Flensburg 100.0% 66.5% (+33.5)#16 62.5% (+37.5)#1,098
17. Marietta 100.0% 66.5% (+33.5)#17 62.5% (+37.5)#1,188
18. Okabena 100.0% 66.5% (+33.5)#18 62.5% (+37.5)#1,208
19. Easton 100.0% 66.5% (+33.5)#19 62.5% (+37.5)#1,251
20. Woodstock 100.0% 66.5% (+33.5)#20 62.5% (+37.5)#1,257
21. Leota 100.0% 66.5% (+33.5)#21 62.5% (+37.5)#1,400
22. Clements 100.0% 66.5% (+33.5)#22 62.5% (+37.5)#1,424
23. Danvers 100.0% 66.5% (+33.5)#23 62.5% (+37.5)#1,425
24. Silver Creek 100.0% 66.5% (+33.5)#24 62.5% (+37.5)#1,429
25. Dumont 100.0% 66.5% (+33.5)#25 62.5% (+37.5)#1,437
26. High Forest 100.0% 66.5% (+33.5)#26 62.5% (+37.5)#1,481
27. Ball Club 100.0% 66.5% (+33.5)#27 62.5% (+37.5)#1,590
28. Perley 100.0% 66.5% (+33.5)#28 62.5% (+37.5)#1,595
29. Alpha 100.0% 66.5% (+33.5)#30 62.5% (+37.5)#1,630
30. Knife River 100.0% 66.5% (+33.5)#31 62.5% (+37.5)#1,633
31. Norcross 100.0% 66.5% (+33.5)#32 62.5% (+37.5)#1,733
32. Roscoe 100.0% 66.5% (+33.5)#33 62.5% (+37.5)#1,734
33. Minneiska 100.0% 66.5% (+33.5)#34 62.5% (+37.5)#1,747
34. Alberta 100.0% 66.5% (+33.5)#35 62.5% (+37.5)#1,751
35. Lastrup 100.0% 66.5% (+33.5)#36 62.5% (+37.5)#1,775
36. Garvin 100.0% 66.5% (+33.5)#37 62.5% (+37.5)#1,801
37. Fort Ripley 100.0% 66.5% (+33.5)#38 62.5% (+37.5)#1,898
38. Dundee 100.0% 66.5% (+33.5)#39 62.5% (+37.5)#1,909
39. Wanda 100.0% 66.5% (+33.5)#40 62.5% (+37.5)#1,935
40. Beltrami 100.0% 66.5% (+33.5)#41 62.5% (+37.5)#1,954
41. Hazel Run 100.0% 66.5% (+33.5)#42 62.5% (+37.5)#1,955
42. West Union 100.0% 66.5% (+33.5)#43 62.5% (+37.5)#1,980
43. Nimrod 100.0% 66.5% (+33.5)#45 62.5% (+37.5)#1,999
44. De Graff 100.0% 66.5% (+33.5)#46 62.5% (+37.5)#2,000
45. Comstock 100.0% 66.5% (+33.5)#47 62.5% (+37.5)#2,004
46. Whipholt 100.0% 66.5% (+33.5)#48 62.5% (+37.5)#2,016
47. Whalan 100.0% 66.5% (+33.5)#49 62.5% (+37.5)#2,045
48. Ihlen 100.0% 66.5% (+33.5)#50 62.5% (+37.5)#2,046
49. Trosky 100.0% 66.5% (+33.5)#51 62.5% (+37.5)#2,074
50. Kenneth 100.0% 66.5% (+33.5)#52 62.5% (+37.5)#2,091
51. Roy Lake 100.0% 66.5% (+33.5)#53 62.5% (+37.5)#2,142
52. Essig 100.0% 66.5% (+33.5)#54 62.5% (+37.5)#2,174
53. La Salle 100.0% 66.5% (+33.5)#55 62.5% (+37.5)#2,193
54. Nashua 100.0% 66.5% (+33.5)#56 62.5% (+37.5)#2,243
55. Myrtle 100.0% 66.5% (+33.5)#57 62.5% (+37.5)#2,258
56. Ronneby 100.0% 66.5% (+33.5)#58 62.5% (+37.5)#2,259
57. Nassau 100.0% 66.5% (+33.5)#59 62.5% (+37.5)#2,272
58. St Rosa 100.0% 66.5% (+33.5)#60 62.5% (+37.5)#2,305
59. Manchester 100.0% 66.5% (+33.5)#61 62.5% (+37.5)#2,322
60. Dovray 100.0% 66.5% (+33.5)#62 62.5% (+37.5)#2,379
61. Fish Lake 100.0% 66.5% (+33.5)#63 62.5% (+37.5)#2,392
62. Wilder 100.0% 66.5% (+33.5)#64 62.5% (+37.5)#2,420
63. Sargeant 100.0% 66.5% (+33.5)#65 62.5% (+37.5)#2,437
64. Delhi 100.0% 66.5% (+33.5)#66 62.5% (+37.5)#2,491
65. Humboldt 100.0% 66.5% (+33.5)#67 62.5% (+37.5)#2,492
66. Urbank 100.0% 66.5% (+33.5)#68 62.5% (+37.5)#2,556
67. Hatfield 100.0% 66.5% (+33.5)#69 62.5% (+37.5)#2,582
68. Cedar Mills 100.0% 66.5% (+33.5)#70 62.5% (+37.5)#2,625
69. Sedan 100.0% 66.5% (+33.5)#71 62.5% (+37.5)#2,626
70. Kerrick 100.0% 66.5% (+33.5)#72 62.5% (+37.5)#2,715
71. Leonard 100.0% 66.5% (+33.5)#73 62.5% (+37.5)#2,789
72. Cobden 100.0% 66.5% (+33.5)#74 62.5% (+37.5)#2,811
73. Manhattan Beach 100.0% 66.5% (+33.5)#75 62.5% (+37.5)#2,871
74. Barry 100.0% 66.5% (+33.5)#76 62.5% (+37.5)#2,897
75. Florence 100.0% 66.5% (+33.5)#77 62.5% (+37.5)#2,914
76. Donaldson 100.0% 66.5% (+33.5)#78 62.5% (+37.5)#3,009
77. Goodland 100.0% 66.5% (+33.5)#79 62.5% (+37.5)#3,010
78. Kinbrae 100.0% 66.5% (+33.5)#80 62.5% (+37.5)#3,059
79. Boy River 100.0% 66.5% (+33.5)#81 62.5% (+37.5)#3,093
80. Grant 99.9% 66.5% (+33.4)#82 62.5% (+37.4)#3,114
81. Dellwood 99.0% 66.5% (+32.5)#83 62.5% (+36.5)#3,295
82. Storden 99.0% 66.5% (+32.5)#84 62.5% (+36.5)#3,311
83. Lansing 98.9% 66.5% (+32.4)#85 62.5% (+36.4)#3,349
84. Credit River 98.8% 66.5% (+32.3)#86 62.5% (+36.3)#3,352
85. St Marys Point 98.8% 66.5% (+32.3)#87 62.5% (+36.3)#3,371
86. Biscay 98.8% 66.5% (+32.3)#88 62.5% (+36.3)#3,379
87. Shelly 98.8% 66.5% (+32.3)#89 62.5% (+36.3)#3,380
88. Oronoco 98.7% 66.5% (+32.2)#90 62.5% (+36.2)#3,392
89. Lismore 98.7% 66.5% (+32.2)#91 62.5% (+36.2)#3,405
90. Chickamaw Beach 98.7% 66.5% (+32.2)#92 62.5% (+36.2)#3,408
91. Alden 98.4% 66.5% (+31.9)#93 62.5% (+35.9)#3,510
92. Peterson 98.1% 66.5% (+31.6)#94 62.5% (+35.6)#3,645
93. Avoca 98.1% 66.5% (+31.6)#95 62.5% (+35.6)#3,658
94. Afton 98.0% 66.5% (+31.5)#96 62.5% (+35.5)#3,665
95. Gary 98.0% 66.5% (+31.5)#97 62.5% (+35.5)#3,682
96. Granada 98.0% 66.5% (+31.5)#98 62.5% (+35.5)#3,686
97. Conger 98.0% 66.5% (+31.5)#99 62.5% (+35.5)#3,693
98. Harding 97.8% 66.5% (+31.3)#100 62.5% (+35.3)#3,773
99. Bingham Lake 97.8% 66.5% (+31.3)#101 62.5% (+35.3)#3,774
100. Minnetrista 97.7% 66.5% (+31.2)#102 62.5% (+35.2)#3,783

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Households Residing in Detached Homes in Minnesota?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Households Residing in Detached Homes in Minnesota are:
#1
100.0%
#2
100.0%
#3
100.0%
#4
100.0%
#5
100.0%
#6
100.0%
#7
100.0%
#8
100.0%
#9
100.0%
#10
100.0%
What city has the Highest Percentage of Households Residing in Detached Homes in Minnesota?
Redby has the Highest Percentage of Households Residing in Detached Homes in Minnesota with 100.0%.
What is the Percentage of Households Residing in Detached Homes in the State of Minnesota?
Percentage of Households Residing in Detached Homes in Minnesota is 66.5%.
What is the Percentage of Households Residing in Detached Homes in the United States?
Percentage of Households Residing in Detached Homes in the United States is 62.5%.