Cities with the Highest Percentage of Private Company Employees in Pennsylvania

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Private Company Employees
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Pennsylvania
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Percentage of Private Company Employees in Pennsylvania

0.0%
100.0%
Cities with the Highest Percentage of Private Company Employees in Pennsylvania Map

Cities with the Highest Percentage of Private Company Employees in Pennsylvania

City % Private Company Employees vs State vs National
1. The Hideout 100.0% 68.2% (+31.8)#1 66.9% (+33.1)#1
2. Yukon 100.0% 68.2% (+31.8)#2 66.9% (+33.1)#28
3. Van Voorhis 100.0% 68.2% (+31.8)#3 66.9% (+33.1)#53
4. West Waynesburg 100.0% 68.2% (+31.8)#4 66.9% (+33.1)#55
5. Oneida 100.0% 68.2% (+31.8)#5 66.9% (+33.1)#77
6. Pikes Creek 100.0% 68.2% (+31.8)#6 66.9% (+33.1)#101
7. Boston 100.0% 68.2% (+31.8)#7 66.9% (+33.1)#126
8. Ackermanville 100.0% 68.2% (+31.8)#8 66.9% (+33.1)#131
9. Mckee 100.0% 68.2% (+31.8)#9 66.9% (+33.1)#158
10. Witmer 100.0% 68.2% (+31.8)#10 66.9% (+33.1)#162
11. Plainfield 100.0% 68.2% (+31.8)#11 66.9% (+33.1)#169
12. Ronks 100.0% 68.2% (+31.8)#12 66.9% (+33.1)#181
13. Summit Station 100.0% 68.2% (+31.8)#13 66.9% (+33.1)#196
14. Sunbrook 100.0% 68.2% (+31.8)#14 66.9% (+33.1)#218
15. Crabtree 100.0% 68.2% (+31.8)#15 66.9% (+33.1)#227
16. Iola 100.0% 68.2% (+31.8)#16 66.9% (+33.1)#247
17. Charlottsville 100.0% 68.2% (+31.8)#17 66.9% (+33.1)#268
18. Fredericksburg 100.0% 68.2% (+31.8)#18 66.9% (+33.1)#299
19. Kiskimere 100.0% 68.2% (+31.8)#20 66.9% (+33.1)#317
20. Ore Hill 100.0% 68.2% (+31.8)#21 66.9% (+33.1)#318
21. Hamorton 100.0% 68.2% (+31.8)#22 66.9% (+33.1)#362
22. Gardners 100.0% 68.2% (+31.8)#23 66.9% (+33.1)#443
23. Carson Valley 100.0% 68.2% (+31.8)#24 66.9% (+33.1)#465
24. Naomi 100.0% 68.2% (+31.8)#25 66.9% (+33.1)#491
25. Fort Fetter 100.0% 68.2% (+31.8)#26 66.9% (+33.1)#537
26. Chalkhill 100.0% 68.2% (+31.8)#27 66.9% (+33.1)#550
27. Monument 100.0% 68.2% (+31.8)#28 66.9% (+33.1)#555
28. Peru 100.0% 68.2% (+31.8)#29 66.9% (+33.1)#584
29. Barrville 100.0% 68.2% (+31.8)#30 66.9% (+33.1)#615
30. Geeseytown 100.0% 68.2% (+31.8)#31 66.9% (+33.1)#640
31. Frankstown 100.0% 68.2% (+31.8)#32 66.9% (+33.1)#672
32. Olivia 100.0% 68.2% (+31.8)#33 66.9% (+33.1)#693
33. Ronco 100.0% 68.2% (+31.8)#34 66.9% (+33.1)#718
34. Seven Springs Borough 100.0% 68.2% (+31.8)#35 66.9% (+33.1)#729
35. Driftwood Borough 100.0% 68.2% (+31.8)#36 66.9% (+33.1)#743
36. Fisherville 100.0% 68.2% (+31.8)#37 66.9% (+33.1)#780
37. Canan Station 100.0% 68.2% (+31.8)#38 66.9% (+33.1)#781
38. Beavertown 100.0% 68.2% (+31.8)#39 66.9% (+33.1)#827
39. S N P J Borough 100.0% 68.2% (+31.8)#40 66.9% (+33.1)#864
40. Jugtown 100.0% 68.2% (+31.8)#41 66.9% (+33.1)#881
41. Point View 100.0% 68.2% (+31.8)#42 66.9% (+33.1)#923
42. Green Hills Borough 100.0% 68.2% (+31.8)#43 66.9% (+33.1)#939
43. Rehrersburg 99.2% 68.2% (+31.0)#44 66.9% (+32.3)#955
44. Bowers 97.9% 68.2% (+29.7)#45 66.9% (+31.0)#975
45. Walnuttown 96.6% 68.2% (+28.4)#46 66.9% (+29.7)#1,005
46. Alfarata 96.2% 68.2% (+28.0)#47 66.9% (+29.3)#1,016
47. Rupert 96.0% 68.2% (+27.8)#48 66.9% (+29.2)#1,022
48. Nemacolin 95.9% 68.2% (+27.7)#49 66.9% (+29.0)#1,027
49. Frizzleburg 95.8% 68.2% (+27.6)#50 66.9% (+28.9)#1,035
50. New Freeport 95.7% 68.2% (+27.4)#51 66.9% (+28.8)#1,039
51. Force 95.6% 68.2% (+27.4)#52 66.9% (+28.7)#1,043
52. Slatedale 95.5% 68.2% (+27.2)#53 66.9% (+28.6)#1,050
53. Hereford 94.4% 68.2% (+26.2)#54 66.9% (+27.5)#1,099
54. North Vandergrift 94.4% 68.2% (+26.2)#55 66.9% (+27.5)#1,101
55. Canoe Creek 94.3% 68.2% (+26.1)#56 66.9% (+27.5)#1,104
56. Slickville 94.0% 68.2% (+25.8)#57 66.9% (+27.1)#1,123
57. Herminie 93.9% 68.2% (+25.7)#58 66.9% (+27.0)#1,130
58. Union Deposit 93.6% 68.2% (+25.4)#59 66.9% (+26.7)#1,143
59. Grindstone 93.5% 68.2% (+25.3)#60 66.9% (+26.6)#1,153
60. Midway 93.3% 68.2% (+25.1)#61 66.9% (+26.4)#1,163
61. Slovan 93.1% 68.2% (+24.9)#62 66.9% (+26.2)#1,178
62. Mocanaqua 93.0% 68.2% (+24.8)#63 66.9% (+26.1)#1,189
63. Rossiter 93.0% 68.2% (+24.8)#64 66.9% (+26.1)#1,192
64. Ranshaw 92.6% 68.2% (+24.4)#65 66.9% (+25.7)#1,218
65. Bradenville 92.4% 68.2% (+24.2)#66 66.9% (+25.5)#1,234
66. Glasgow Borough 91.8% 68.2% (+23.6)#67 66.9% (+24.9)#1,292
67. Mount Aetna 91.8% 68.2% (+23.6)#68 66.9% (+24.9)#1,293
68. Colver 91.2% 68.2% (+23.0)#69 66.9% (+24.3)#1,356
69. Webster 90.9% 68.2% (+22.7)#70 66.9% (+24.0)#1,375
70. New Morgan Borough 90.9% 68.2% (+22.7)#71 66.9% (+24.0)#1,378
71. Towamensing Trails 90.7% 68.2% (+22.5)#72 66.9% (+23.9)#1,389
72. Hickory Hills 90.6% 68.2% (+22.4)#73 66.9% (+23.7)#1,394
73. Shirleysburg Borough 90.6% 68.2% (+22.4)#74 66.9% (+23.7)#1,402
74. Mifflin Borough 90.4% 68.2% (+22.2)#75 66.9% (+23.6)#1,413
75. Timber Hills 90.3% 68.2% (+22.1)#76 66.9% (+23.4)#1,429
76. South Heights Borough 90.3% 68.2% (+22.1)#77 66.9% (+23.4)#1,431
77. Friesville 90.2% 68.2% (+22.0)#78 66.9% (+23.4)#1,440
78. Shippingport Borough 90.2% 68.2% (+22.0)#79 66.9% (+23.3)#1,444
79. Coalport Borough 90.0% 68.2% (+21.7)#80 66.9% (+23.1)#1,474
80. East Altoona 89.7% 68.2% (+21.5)#81 66.9% (+22.9)#1,502
81. North Philipsburg 89.4% 68.2% (+21.2)#82 66.9% (+22.5)#1,558
82. Stevens 89.4% 68.2% (+21.2)#83 66.9% (+22.5)#1,563
83. Culp 88.9% 68.2% (+20.7)#84 66.9% (+22.0)#1,614
84. Caln 88.9% 68.2% (+20.7)#85 66.9% (+22.0)#1,620
85. Birchwood Lakes 88.7% 68.2% (+20.5)#86 66.9% (+21.9)#1,627
86. James City 88.7% 68.2% (+20.5)#87 66.9% (+21.8)#1,637
87. Wyano 88.5% 68.2% (+20.3)#88 66.9% (+21.6)#1,654
88. Koppel Borough 88.3% 68.2% (+20.1)#89 66.9% (+21.5)#1,679
89. Orchard Hills 88.3% 68.2% (+20.1)#90 66.9% (+21.4)#1,681
90. Sickles Corner 88.3% 68.2% (+20.1)#91 66.9% (+21.4)#1,683
91. Idaville 88.3% 68.2% (+20.1)#92 66.9% (+21.4)#1,684
92. Morea 88.2% 68.2% (+20.0)#93 66.9% (+21.3)#1,698
93. Waller 88.2% 68.2% (+20.0)#94 66.9% (+21.3)#1,699
94. Newburg Borough Clearfield County 88.0% 68.2% (+19.8)#95 66.9% (+21.1)#1,730
95. Blue Ridge Summit 87.8% 68.2% (+19.6)#96 66.9% (+21.0)#1,754
96. Hebron 87.6% 68.2% (+19.4)#97 66.9% (+20.7)#1,798
97. Mcknightstown 87.5% 68.2% (+19.3)#98 66.9% (+20.7)#1,801
98. Franklin Borough 87.5% 68.2% (+19.3)#99 66.9% (+20.6)#1,808
99. Benson Borough 87.5% 68.2% (+19.3)#100 66.9% (+20.6)#1,815
100. Hazen 87.5% 68.2% (+19.3)#101 66.9% (+20.6)#1,816

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Private Company Employees in Pennsylvania?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Private Company Employees in Pennsylvania are:
#1
100.0%
#2
100.0%
#3
100.0%
#4
100.0%
#5
100.0%
#6
100.0%
#7
100.0%
#8
100.0%
#9
100.0%
#10
100.0%
What city has the Highest Percentage of Private Company Employees in Pennsylvania?
The Hideout has the Highest Percentage of Private Company Employees in Pennsylvania with 100.0%.
What is the Percentage of Private Company Employees in the State of Pennsylvania?
Percentage of Private Company Employees in Pennsylvania is 68.2%.
What is the Percentage of Private Company Employees in the United States?
Percentage of Private Company Employees in the United States is 66.9%.