Cities with the Highest Percentage of Private Company Employees in Indiana

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Private Company Employees
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Indiana
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Percentage of Private Company Employees in Indiana

0.0%
100.0%
Cities with the Highest Percentage of Private Company Employees in Indiana Map

Cities with the Highest Percentage of Private Company Employees in Indiana

City % Private Company Employees vs State vs National
1. Philadelphia 100.0% 70.9% (+29.1)#1 66.9% (+33.1)#29
2. Boggstown 100.0% 70.9% (+29.1)#2 66.9% (+33.1)#36
3. Ontario 100.0% 70.9% (+29.1)#3 66.9% (+33.1)#61
4. Tippecanoe 100.0% 70.9% (+29.1)#4 66.9% (+33.1)#89
5. Fair Oaks 100.0% 70.9% (+29.1)#5 66.9% (+33.1)#106
6. Miami 100.0% 70.9% (+29.1)#6 66.9% (+33.1)#109
7. Tyner 100.0% 70.9% (+29.1)#7 66.9% (+33.1)#135
8. Forest 100.0% 70.9% (+29.1)#8 66.9% (+33.1)#139
9. Wolflake 100.0% 70.9% (+29.1)#9 66.9% (+33.1)#140
10. Lake Bruce 100.0% 70.9% (+29.1)#10 66.9% (+33.1)#154
11. Freetown 100.0% 70.9% (+29.1)#11 66.9% (+33.1)#160
12. Hoffman Lake 100.0% 70.9% (+29.1)#12 66.9% (+33.1)#189
13. Goldsmith 100.0% 70.9% (+29.1)#13 66.9% (+33.1)#197
14. Maxwell 100.0% 70.9% (+29.1)#14 66.9% (+33.1)#199
15. Adams 100.0% 70.9% (+29.1)#15 66.9% (+33.1)#222
16. Lincoln 100.0% 70.9% (+29.1)#16 66.9% (+33.1)#225
17. Craigville 100.0% 70.9% (+29.1)#17 66.9% (+33.1)#236
18. Centerton 100.0% 70.9% (+29.1)#18 66.9% (+33.1)#242
19. Royerton 100.0% 70.9% (+29.1)#19 66.9% (+33.1)#250
20. Scott 100.0% 70.9% (+29.1)#20 66.9% (+33.1)#276
21. Eugene 100.0% 70.9% (+29.1)#21 66.9% (+33.1)#278
22. Stewartsville 100.0% 70.9% (+29.1)#22 66.9% (+33.1)#290
23. Huron 100.0% 70.9% (+29.1)#23 66.9% (+33.1)#297
24. Foster 100.0% 70.9% (+29.1)#24 66.9% (+33.1)#306
25. East Oolitic 100.0% 70.9% (+29.1)#25 66.9% (+33.1)#310
26. Canton 100.0% 70.9% (+29.1)#26 66.9% (+33.1)#330
27. Canaan 100.0% 70.9% (+29.1)#28 66.9% (+33.1)#335
28. Cates 100.0% 70.9% (+29.1)#29 66.9% (+33.1)#336
29. Holiday Woods 100.0% 70.9% (+29.1)#30 66.9% (+33.1)#349
30. Eden 100.0% 70.9% (+29.1)#31 66.9% (+33.1)#353
31. Toad Hop 100.0% 70.9% (+29.1)#32 66.9% (+33.1)#354
32. Urbana 100.0% 70.9% (+29.1)#33 66.9% (+33.1)#378
33. Bear Lake 100.0% 70.9% (+29.1)#34 66.9% (+33.1)#379
34. Otisco 100.0% 70.9% (+29.1)#35 66.9% (+33.1)#388
35. Heltonville 100.0% 70.9% (+29.1)#36 66.9% (+33.1)#392
36. Boxley 100.0% 70.9% (+29.1)#37 66.9% (+33.1)#426
37. Keystone 100.0% 70.9% (+29.1)#38 66.9% (+33.1)#429
38. New Amsterdam 100.0% 70.9% (+29.1)#39 66.9% (+33.1)#430
39. Laud 100.0% 70.9% (+29.1)#40 66.9% (+33.1)#441
40. Cortland 100.0% 70.9% (+29.1)#41 66.9% (+33.1)#442
41. Burrows 100.0% 70.9% (+29.1)#42 66.9% (+33.1)#446
42. St. Omer 100.0% 70.9% (+29.1)#43 66.9% (+33.1)#458
43. Cross Plains 100.0% 70.9% (+29.1)#44 66.9% (+33.1)#476
44. Letts 100.0% 70.9% (+29.1)#45 66.9% (+33.1)#484
45. Hillisburg 100.0% 70.9% (+29.1)#46 66.9% (+33.1)#496
46. Florence 100.0% 70.9% (+29.1)#47 66.9% (+33.1)#510
47. Ireland 100.0% 70.9% (+29.1)#48 66.9% (+33.1)#523
48. Pleasantville 100.0% 70.9% (+29.1)#49 66.9% (+33.1)#527
49. Colburn 100.0% 70.9% (+29.1)#50 66.9% (+33.1)#545
50. Lake Cicott 100.0% 70.9% (+29.1)#51 66.9% (+33.1)#553
51. Coal 100.0% 70.9% (+29.1)#52 66.9% (+33.1)#557
52. Preble 100.0% 70.9% (+29.1)#53 66.9% (+33.1)#585
53. Tunnelton 100.0% 70.9% (+29.1)#54 66.9% (+33.1)#594
54. New Lisbon 100.0% 70.9% (+29.1)#55 66.9% (+33.1)#620
55. Eckerty 100.0% 70.9% (+29.1)#56 66.9% (+33.1)#627
56. Dresser 100.0% 70.9% (+29.1)#57 66.9% (+33.1)#644
57. London 100.0% 70.9% (+29.1)#58 66.9% (+33.1)#651
58. Vistula 100.0% 70.9% (+29.1)#59 66.9% (+33.1)#677
59. Spartanburg 100.0% 70.9% (+29.1)#60 66.9% (+33.1)#691
60. Peppertown 100.0% 70.9% (+29.1)#61 66.9% (+33.1)#704
61. Jalapa 100.0% 70.9% (+29.1)#62 66.9% (+33.1)#710
62. Emison 100.0% 70.9% (+29.1)#63 66.9% (+33.1)#747
63. Helmer 100.0% 70.9% (+29.1)#64 66.9% (+33.1)#760
64. Judson 100.0% 70.9% (+29.1)#65 66.9% (+33.1)#771
65. Cass 100.0% 70.9% (+29.1)#66 66.9% (+33.1)#772
66. Jerome 100.0% 70.9% (+29.1)#67 66.9% (+33.1)#782
67. Rainsville 100.0% 70.9% (+29.1)#68 66.9% (+33.1)#802
68. Hamburg 100.0% 70.9% (+29.1)#69 66.9% (+33.1)#822
69. Deputy 100.0% 70.9% (+29.1)#70 66.9% (+33.1)#856
70. Saline 100.0% 70.9% (+29.1)#71 66.9% (+33.1)#897
71. Stillwell 100.0% 70.9% (+29.1)#72 66.9% (+33.1)#898
72. Elrod 100.0% 70.9% (+29.1)#73 66.9% (+33.1)#910
73. Clifford 97.9% 70.9% (+27.0)#74 66.9% (+31.0)#973
74. Sidney 97.3% 70.9% (+26.4)#75 66.9% (+30.4)#988
75. Vera Cruz 96.9% 70.9% (+25.9)#76 66.9% (+30.0)#994
76. Liberty Center 96.3% 70.9% (+25.4)#77 66.9% (+29.4)#1,012
77. Coesse 95.9% 70.9% (+24.9)#78 66.9% (+29.0)#1,026
78. Servia 95.9% 70.9% (+24.9)#79 66.9% (+29.0)#1,029
79. Shipshewana Lake 94.9% 70.9% (+23.9)#80 66.9% (+28.0)#1,068
80. Adams Lake 94.8% 70.9% (+23.9)#81 66.9% (+28.0)#1,072
81. Leiters Ford 94.7% 70.9% (+23.7)#82 66.9% (+27.8)#1,081
82. Amity 94.7% 70.9% (+23.7)#83 66.9% (+27.8)#1,083
83. Lake Dalecarlia 94.5% 70.9% (+23.6)#84 66.9% (+27.6)#1,093
84. Country Squire Lakes 94.3% 70.9% (+23.3)#85 66.9% (+27.4)#1,107
85. Judah 94.2% 70.9% (+23.3)#86 66.9% (+27.3)#1,110
86. Geneva 93.2% 70.9% (+22.3)#87 66.9% (+26.4)#1,170
87. Bethel 92.7% 70.9% (+21.8)#88 66.9% (+25.9)#1,207
88. Wellsboro 92.7% 70.9% (+21.8)#89 66.9% (+25.8)#1,214
89. Otwell 92.7% 70.9% (+21.8)#90 66.9% (+25.8)#1,215
90. Arcola 92.5% 70.9% (+21.5)#91 66.9% (+25.6)#1,230
91. Salamonia 92.3% 70.9% (+21.4)#92 66.9% (+25.4)#1,243
92. Perkinsville 92.1% 70.9% (+21.2)#93 66.9% (+25.2)#1,268
93. Liberty Mills 92.0% 70.9% (+21.0)#94 66.9% (+25.1)#1,279
94. Leavenworth 91.4% 70.9% (+20.5)#95 66.9% (+24.5)#1,330
95. Wall Lake 91.4% 70.9% (+20.4)#96 66.9% (+24.5)#1,333
96. Crandall 91.2% 70.9% (+20.3)#97 66.9% (+24.4)#1,350
97. Saltillo 91.1% 70.9% (+20.1)#98 66.9% (+24.2)#1,363
98. Marengo 91.0% 70.9% (+20.0)#99 66.9% (+24.1)#1,369
99. Wingate 90.1% 70.9% (+19.1)#100 66.9% (+23.2)#1,456
100. Pine Village 89.8% 70.9% (+18.9)#101 66.9% (+22.9)#1,487

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Private Company Employees in Indiana?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Private Company Employees in Indiana are:
#1
100.0%
#2
100.0%
#3
100.0%
#4
100.0%
#5
100.0%
#6
100.0%
#7
100.0%
#8
100.0%
#9
100.0%
#10
100.0%
What city has the Highest Percentage of Private Company Employees in Indiana?
Freetown has the Highest Percentage of Private Company Employees in Indiana with 100.0%.
What is the Percentage of Private Company Employees in the State of Indiana?
Percentage of Private Company Employees in Indiana is 70.9%.
What is the Percentage of Private Company Employees in the United States?
Percentage of Private Company Employees in the United States is 66.9%.