Cities with the Highest Percentage of Private Company Employees in Wisconsin

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Private Company Employees
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Wisconsin
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Percentage of Private Company Employees in Wisconsin

0.0%
100.0%
Cities with the Highest Percentage of Private Company Employees in Wisconsin Map

Cities with the Highest Percentage of Private Company Employees in Wisconsin

City % Private Company Employees vs State vs National
1. Paac Ciinak 100.0% 69.5% (+30.5)#1 66.9% (+33.1)#577
2. Shopiere 95.5% 69.5% (+26.0)#2 66.9% (+28.6)#1,047
3. Big Falls 93.8% 69.5% (+24.3)#3 66.9% (+26.9)#1,133
4. Bluffview 93.2% 69.5% (+23.7)#4 66.9% (+26.3)#1,171
5. Oxford 92.4% 69.5% (+22.9)#5 66.9% (+25.5)#1,235
6. Poy Sippi 91.7% 69.5% (+22.2)#6 66.9% (+24.8)#1,296
7. Edmund 91.7% 69.5% (+22.2)#7 66.9% (+24.8)#1,301
8. Pembine 91.5% 69.5% (+22.0)#8 66.9% (+24.6)#1,320
9. Wabeno 91.4% 69.5% (+21.9)#9 66.9% (+24.5)#1,334
10. Cazenovia 90.4% 69.5% (+20.9)#10 66.9% (+23.5)#1,415
11. Woodford 89.7% 69.5% (+20.2)#11 66.9% (+22.8)#1,517
12. Radisson 89.2% 69.5% (+19.7)#12 66.9% (+22.3)#1,579
13. Nichols 89.1% 69.5% (+19.6)#13 66.9% (+22.2)#1,583
14. Tony 88.5% 69.5% (+19.0)#14 66.9% (+21.6)#1,663
15. Angelica 88.5% 69.5% (+19.0)#15 66.9% (+21.6)#1,664
16. St Nazianz 88.2% 69.5% (+18.7)#16 66.9% (+21.3)#1,707
17. Navarino 87.9% 69.5% (+18.4)#17 66.9% (+21.0)#1,747
18. Wheeler 87.8% 69.5% (+18.3)#18 66.9% (+20.9)#1,758
19. Burnett 87.2% 69.5% (+17.6)#19 66.9% (+20.3)#1,870
20. Birchwood 87.1% 69.5% (+17.6)#20 66.9% (+20.2)#1,872
21. Cataract 87.1% 69.5% (+17.6)#21 66.9% (+20.2)#1,873
22. Lake Tomahawk 87.1% 69.5% (+17.6)#22 66.9% (+20.2)#1,889
23. Ironton 87.1% 69.5% (+17.5)#23 66.9% (+20.2)#1,896
24. Eland 85.9% 69.5% (+16.4)#24 66.9% (+19.0)#2,108
25. Humbird 85.8% 69.5% (+16.3)#25 66.9% (+18.9)#2,127
26. Glen Flora 85.7% 69.5% (+16.2)#26 66.9% (+18.8)#2,159
27. Hager City 85.6% 69.5% (+16.1)#27 66.9% (+18.7)#2,181
28. Mindoro 85.5% 69.5% (+16.0)#28 66.9% (+18.6)#2,210
29. Seymour 85.4% 69.5% (+15.9)#29 66.9% (+18.5)#2,234
30. Clyman 85.3% 69.5% (+15.8)#30 66.9% (+18.4)#2,258
31. Batavia 85.2% 69.5% (+15.7)#31 66.9% (+18.3)#2,276
32. Amery 85.2% 69.5% (+15.7)#32 66.9% (+18.3)#2,283
33. Houlton 85.2% 69.5% (+15.7)#33 66.9% (+18.3)#2,290
34. Saukville 85.1% 69.5% (+15.6)#34 66.9% (+18.2)#2,312
35. Taycheedah 85.1% 69.5% (+15.6)#35 66.9% (+18.2)#2,321
36. Boaz 85.0% 69.5% (+15.5)#36 66.9% (+18.1)#2,344
37. Clayton 84.8% 69.5% (+15.3)#37 66.9% (+17.9)#2,395
38. Kellnersville 84.5% 69.5% (+15.0)#38 66.9% (+17.6)#2,475
39. Juneau 84.2% 69.5% (+14.7)#39 66.9% (+17.3)#2,536
40. Black Creek 84.0% 69.5% (+14.5)#40 66.9% (+17.1)#2,623
41. Emerald 83.8% 69.5% (+14.3)#41 66.9% (+16.9)#2,659
42. Fredonia 83.7% 69.5% (+14.2)#42 66.9% (+16.8)#2,695
43. North Fond Du Lac 83.7% 69.5% (+14.2)#43 66.9% (+16.8)#2,697
44. Mattoon 83.6% 69.5% (+14.1)#44 66.9% (+16.7)#2,719
45. Big Foot Prairie 83.3% 69.5% (+13.8)#45 66.9% (+16.4)#2,800
46. Bay City 83.0% 69.5% (+13.5)#46 66.9% (+16.1)#2,885
47. Brillion 82.9% 69.5% (+13.4)#47 66.9% (+16.0)#2,924
48. Almena 82.9% 69.5% (+13.4)#48 66.9% (+16.0)#2,930
49. Lewis 82.9% 69.5% (+13.4)#49 66.9% (+16.0)#2,946
50. Diamond Bluff 82.7% 69.5% (+13.2)#50 66.9% (+15.8)#2,985
51. Merrimac 82.7% 69.5% (+13.2)#51 66.9% (+15.8)#2,986
52. Dalton 82.7% 69.5% (+13.2)#52 66.9% (+15.8)#2,988
53. Dane 82.7% 69.5% (+13.2)#53 66.9% (+15.8)#2,989
54. Independence 82.6% 69.5% (+13.1)#54 66.9% (+15.7)#3,004
55. Deer Park 82.6% 69.5% (+13.1)#55 66.9% (+15.7)#3,030
56. Butler 82.5% 69.5% (+13.0)#56 66.9% (+15.6)#3,051
57. Winneconne 82.5% 69.5% (+13.0)#57 66.9% (+15.6)#3,058
58. Bancroft 82.5% 69.5% (+13.0)#58 66.9% (+15.6)#3,060
59. Coloma 82.5% 69.5% (+13.0)#59 66.9% (+15.6)#3,065
60. Polonia 82.4% 69.5% (+12.9)#60 66.9% (+15.5)#3,083
61. Junction City 82.4% 69.5% (+12.9)#61 66.9% (+15.5)#3,087
62. Endeavor 82.2% 69.5% (+12.7)#62 66.9% (+15.3)#3,155
63. Hilbert 82.1% 69.5% (+12.6)#63 66.9% (+15.2)#3,172
64. Neosho 82.1% 69.5% (+12.6)#64 66.9% (+15.2)#3,181
65. Edgar 82.0% 69.5% (+12.5)#65 66.9% (+15.2)#3,213
66. Woodman 82.0% 69.5% (+12.5)#66 66.9% (+15.1)#3,242
67. Darien 81.9% 69.5% (+12.4)#67 66.9% (+15.0)#3,271
68. Ogdensburg 81.8% 69.5% (+12.3)#68 66.9% (+14.9)#3,296
69. Whittlesey 81.8% 69.5% (+12.3)#69 66.9% (+14.9)#3,302
70. Hingham 81.7% 69.5% (+12.2)#70 66.9% (+14.8)#3,344
71. Lynxville 81.6% 69.5% (+12.1)#71 66.9% (+14.7)#3,385
72. Clintonville 81.4% 69.5% (+11.9)#72 66.9% (+14.5)#3,481
73. Lime Ridge 81.4% 69.5% (+11.9)#73 66.9% (+14.5)#3,498
74. Oconto Falls 81.2% 69.5% (+11.7)#74 66.9% (+14.3)#3,575
75. Marquette 81.2% 69.5% (+11.7)#75 66.9% (+14.3)#3,579
76. Hustisford 81.2% 69.5% (+11.7)#76 66.9% (+14.3)#3,584
77. Viola 81.2% 69.5% (+11.7)#77 66.9% (+14.3)#3,585
78. Granton 81.1% 69.5% (+11.6)#78 66.9% (+14.3)#3,595
79. Chili 81.1% 69.5% (+11.6)#79 66.9% (+14.2)#3,619
80. Rubicon 81.1% 69.5% (+11.6)#80 66.9% (+14.2)#3,623
81. Long Lake 81.1% 69.5% (+11.6)#81 66.9% (+14.2)#3,628
82. Casco 81.1% 69.5% (+11.6)#82 66.9% (+14.2)#3,635
83. Cameron 81.0% 69.5% (+11.5)#83 66.9% (+14.1)#3,658
84. Knapp 80.9% 69.5% (+11.4)#84 66.9% (+14.0)#3,688
85. Marinette 80.8% 69.5% (+11.3)#85 66.9% (+13.9)#3,720
86. Lohrville 80.6% 69.5% (+11.1)#86 66.9% (+13.8)#3,803
87. Omro 80.6% 69.5% (+11.1)#87 66.9% (+13.7)#3,812
88. La Valle 80.6% 69.5% (+11.1)#88 66.9% (+13.7)#3,817
89. Eureka 80.6% 69.5% (+11.1)#89 66.9% (+13.7)#3,842
90. Poynette 80.5% 69.5% (+11.0)#90 66.9% (+13.6)#3,863
91. Waterloo 80.5% 69.5% (+11.0)#91 66.9% (+13.6)#3,864
92. Kieler 80.4% 69.5% (+10.9)#92 66.9% (+13.5)#3,891
93. Greenleaf 80.4% 69.5% (+10.9)#93 66.9% (+13.5)#3,900
94. Whitelaw 80.3% 69.5% (+10.8)#94 66.9% (+13.5)#3,936
95. Ontario 80.3% 69.5% (+10.8)#95 66.9% (+13.4)#3,946
96. Taylor 80.3% 69.5% (+10.8)#96 66.9% (+13.4)#3,952
97. Rock Springs 80.2% 69.5% (+10.7)#97 66.9% (+13.3)#3,998
98. Elk Mound 80.1% 69.5% (+10.6)#98 66.9% (+13.2)#4,074
99. Trempealeau 80.1% 69.5% (+10.6)#99 66.9% (+13.2)#4,077
100. Newald 80.0% 69.5% (+10.5)#100 66.9% (+13.1)#4,129

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Private Company Employees in Wisconsin?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Private Company Employees in Wisconsin are:
#1
93.8%
#2
93.2%
#3
92.4%
#4
91.7%
#5
91.7%
#6
91.5%
#7
91.4%
#8
90.4%
#9
89.7%
#10
89.2%
What city has the Highest Percentage of Private Company Employees in Wisconsin?
Big Falls has the Highest Percentage of Private Company Employees in Wisconsin with 93.8%.
What is the Percentage of Private Company Employees in the State of Wisconsin?
Percentage of Private Company Employees in Wisconsin is 69.5%.
What is the Percentage of Private Company Employees in the United States?
Percentage of Private Company Employees in the United States is 66.9%.