Cities with the Highest Percentage of Private Company Employees in North Dakota

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Private Company Employees
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
North Dakota
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Percentage of Private Company Employees in North Dakota

0.0%
100.0%
Cities with the Highest Percentage of Private Company Employees in North Dakota Map

Cities with the Highest Percentage of Private Company Employees in North Dakota

City % Private Company Employees vs State vs National
1. Caledonia 100.0% 60.4% (+39.6)#1 66.9% (+33.1)#561
2. Fortuna 100.0% 60.4% (+39.6)#2 66.9% (+33.1)#642
3. Manning 100.0% 60.4% (+39.6)#3 66.9% (+33.1)#659
4. Long Creek 100.0% 60.4% (+39.6)#4 66.9% (+33.1)#662
5. Erie 100.0% 60.4% (+39.6)#5 66.9% (+33.1)#673
6. Englevale 100.0% 60.4% (+39.6)#6 66.9% (+33.1)#715
7. Wolford 100.0% 60.4% (+39.6)#7 66.9% (+33.1)#759
8. Embden 100.0% 60.4% (+39.6)#8 66.9% (+33.1)#764
9. Dahlen 100.0% 60.4% (+39.6)#9 66.9% (+33.1)#787
10. Kramer 100.0% 60.4% (+39.6)#10 66.9% (+33.1)#808
11. Loma 100.0% 60.4% (+39.6)#11 66.9% (+33.1)#814
12. Cathay 100.0% 60.4% (+39.6)#12 66.9% (+33.1)#831
13. De Lamere 100.0% 60.4% (+39.6)#13 66.9% (+33.1)#850
14. Overly 100.0% 60.4% (+39.6)#14 66.9% (+33.1)#876
15. Mylo 100.0% 60.4% (+39.6)#15 66.9% (+33.1)#905
16. Nash 100.0% 60.4% (+39.6)#16 66.9% (+33.1)#933
17. Grano 100.0% 60.4% (+39.6)#17 66.9% (+33.1)#950
18. Maxbass 96.2% 60.4% (+35.9)#18 66.9% (+29.3)#1,017
19. Regan 95.6% 60.4% (+35.2)#19 66.9% (+28.7)#1,046
20. Ludden 94.4% 60.4% (+34.1)#20 66.9% (+27.6)#1,098
21. Cleveland 94.2% 60.4% (+33.8)#21 66.9% (+27.3)#1,114
22. Luverne 94.1% 60.4% (+33.8)#22 66.9% (+27.2)#1,119
23. Dunn Center 93.6% 60.4% (+33.2)#23 66.9% (+26.7)#1,146
24. Ardoch 92.3% 60.4% (+32.0)#24 66.9% (+25.4)#1,251
25. Conway 92.3% 60.4% (+32.0)#25 66.9% (+25.4)#1,255
26. Grace City 90.0% 60.4% (+29.6)#26 66.9% (+23.1)#1,469
27. Ruthville 88.4% 60.4% (+28.1)#27 66.9% (+21.5)#1,671
28. Flaxton 88.2% 60.4% (+27.9)#28 66.9% (+21.3)#1,702
29. Berlin 88.0% 60.4% (+27.6)#29 66.9% (+21.1)#1,732
30. Makoti 87.9% 60.4% (+27.5)#30 66.9% (+21.0)#1,749
31. Sarles 87.5% 60.4% (+27.1)#31 66.9% (+20.6)#1,826
32. Hunter 87.0% 60.4% (+26.7)#32 66.9% (+20.1)#1,899
33. Cayuga 85.7% 60.4% (+25.4)#33 66.9% (+18.8)#2,164
34. North River 84.2% 60.4% (+23.9)#34 66.9% (+17.3)#2,549
35. Epping 83.9% 60.4% (+23.6)#35 66.9% (+17.0)#2,636
36. Oriska 83.9% 60.4% (+23.6)#36 66.9% (+17.0)#2,640
37. Beulah 83.8% 60.4% (+23.5)#37 66.9% (+16.9)#2,660
38. Fingal 83.5% 60.4% (+23.1)#38 66.9% (+16.6)#2,738
39. Gascoyne 83.3% 60.4% (+23.0)#39 66.9% (+16.4)#2,811
40. Hazen 82.8% 60.4% (+22.4)#40 66.9% (+15.9)#2,964
41. Halliday 82.6% 60.4% (+22.2)#41 66.9% (+15.7)#3,025
42. Alice 81.8% 60.4% (+21.5)#42 66.9% (+14.9)#3,311
43. Hamilton 81.0% 60.4% (+20.6)#43 66.9% (+14.1)#3,683
44. Coleharbor 80.8% 60.4% (+20.4)#44 66.9% (+13.9)#3,742
45. Gardner 80.5% 60.4% (+20.1)#45 66.9% (+13.6)#3,872
46. Sheldon 80.2% 60.4% (+19.8)#46 66.9% (+13.3)#4,017
47. Spiritwood Lake 80.0% 60.4% (+19.6)#47 66.9% (+13.1)#4,120
48. Esmond 79.5% 60.4% (+19.1)#48 66.9% (+12.6)#4,384
49. Apple Valley 78.6% 60.4% (+18.2)#49 66.9% (+11.7)#4,924
50. Ayr 78.6% 60.4% (+18.2)#50 66.9% (+11.7)#4,943
51. Kathryn 78.3% 60.4% (+17.9)#51 66.9% (+11.4)#5,133
52. Ross 77.9% 60.4% (+17.5)#52 66.9% (+11.0)#5,359
53. Finley 77.9% 60.4% (+17.5)#53 66.9% (+11.0)#5,372
54. Gilby 77.6% 60.4% (+17.2)#54 66.9% (+10.7)#5,535
55. Des Lacs 77.5% 60.4% (+17.2)#55 66.9% (+10.6)#5,574
56. Michigan City 77.1% 60.4% (+16.8)#56 66.9% (+10.3)#5,831
57. York 76.9% 60.4% (+16.6)#57 66.9% (+10.0)#6,008
58. Christine 76.2% 60.4% (+15.9)#58 66.9% (+9.35)#6,481
59. Amenia 76.0% 60.4% (+15.6)#59 66.9% (+9.11)#6,682
60. Hague 75.9% 60.4% (+15.5)#60 66.9% (+8.97)#6,787
61. Killdeer 75.0% 60.4% (+14.6)#61 66.9% (+8.11)#7,470
62. Harmon 74.8% 60.4% (+14.4)#62 66.9% (+7.89)#7,698
63. Neche 74.7% 60.4% (+14.3)#63 66.9% (+7.80)#7,765
64. Abercrombie 74.6% 60.4% (+14.2)#64 66.9% (+7.70)#7,841
65. Gwinner 74.5% 60.4% (+14.2)#65 66.9% (+7.65)#7,886
66. Streeter 74.4% 60.4% (+14.0)#66 66.9% (+7.47)#8,052
67. Arthur 74.3% 60.4% (+14.0)#67 66.9% (+7.45)#8,062
68. Selz 74.2% 60.4% (+13.8)#68 66.9% (+7.31)#8,211
69. Drayton 73.7% 60.4% (+13.3)#69 66.9% (+6.80)#8,685
70. Verona 73.5% 60.4% (+13.2)#70 66.9% (+6.64)#8,839
71. Page 73.3% 60.4% (+13.0)#71 66.9% (+6.45)#9,032
72. Watford City 72.6% 60.4% (+12.3)#72 66.9% (+5.76)#9,727
73. Alexander 72.6% 60.4% (+12.3)#73 66.9% (+5.75)#9,738
74. Arnegard 72.6% 60.4% (+12.3)#74 66.9% (+5.73)#9,758
75. Mapleton 72.5% 60.4% (+12.1)#75 66.9% (+5.59)#9,924
76. Pekin 72.2% 60.4% (+11.9)#76 66.9% (+5.33)#10,186
77. Emerado 71.7% 60.4% (+11.3)#77 66.9% (+4.81)#10,707
78. Great Bend 71.4% 60.4% (+11.1)#78 66.9% (+4.54)#11,034
79. Alsen 71.4% 60.4% (+11.1)#79 66.9% (+4.54)#11,036
80. Hamberg 71.4% 60.4% (+11.1)#80 66.9% (+4.54)#11,037
81. Tappen 71.3% 60.4% (+10.9)#81 66.9% (+4.41)#11,155
82. Williston 71.2% 60.4% (+10.8)#82 66.9% (+4.31)#11,259
83. Deering 71.2% 60.4% (+10.8)#83 66.9% (+4.27)#11,314
84. Dwight 71.0% 60.4% (+10.6)#84 66.9% (+4.08)#11,522
85. Horace 70.9% 60.4% (+10.5)#85 66.9% (+4.00)#11,593
86. Courtenay 70.6% 60.4% (+10.2)#86 66.9% (+3.70)#11,960
87. Granville 70.5% 60.4% (+10.2)#87 66.9% (+3.66)#11,984
88. Mooreton 70.5% 60.4% (+10.2)#88 66.9% (+3.62)#12,026
89. Wahpeton 70.3% 60.4% (+9.92)#89 66.9% (+3.38)#12,295
90. Forest River 70.0% 60.4% (+9.65)#90 66.9% (+3.11)#12,544
91. Egeland 70.0% 60.4% (+9.65)#91 66.9% (+3.11)#12,548
92. Butte 70.0% 60.4% (+9.65)#92 66.9% (+3.11)#12,550
93. Kindred 69.9% 60.4% (+9.57)#93 66.9% (+3.04)#12,640
94. Galesburg 69.8% 60.4% (+9.42)#94 66.9% (+2.88)#12,802
95. Dickinson 69.5% 60.4% (+9.16)#95 66.9% (+2.62)#13,097
96. Hannaford 69.4% 60.4% (+9.04)#96 66.9% (+2.50)#13,233
97. Reeder 69.2% 60.4% (+8.88)#97 66.9% (+2.34)#13,405
98. Berthold 68.8% 60.4% (+8.46)#98 66.9% (+1.92)#13,867
99. Wyndmere 68.5% 60.4% (+8.15)#99 66.9% (+1.62)#14,174
100. Sheyenne 68.3% 60.4% (+7.94)#100 66.9% (+1.40)#14,412

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Private Company Employees in North Dakota?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Private Company Employees in North Dakota are:
#1
100.0%
#2
100.0%
#3
100.0%
#4
100.0%
#5
100.0%
#6
100.0%
#7
100.0%
#8
100.0%
#9
100.0%
#10
100.0%
What city has the Highest Percentage of Private Company Employees in North Dakota?
Caledonia has the Highest Percentage of Private Company Employees in North Dakota with 100.0%.
What is the Percentage of Private Company Employees in the State of North Dakota?
Percentage of Private Company Employees in North Dakota is 60.4%.
What is the Percentage of Private Company Employees in the United States?
Percentage of Private Company Employees in the United States is 66.9%.