Cities with the Highest Percentage of Private Company Employees in South Dakota

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Private Company Employees
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
South Dakota
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Percentage of Private Company Employees in South Dakota

0.0%
100.0%
Cities with the Highest Percentage of Private Company Employees in South Dakota Map

Cities with the Highest Percentage of Private Company Employees in South Dakota

City % Private Company Employees vs State vs National
1. Swift Bird 100.0% 60.3% (+39.7)#1 66.9% (+33.1)#245
2. Vienna 100.0% 60.3% (+39.7)#2 66.9% (+33.1)#405
3. Cottonwood 100.0% 60.3% (+39.7)#3 66.9% (+33.1)#506
4. Burbank 100.0% 60.3% (+39.7)#4 66.9% (+33.1)#520
5. Brentwood Colony 100.0% 60.3% (+39.7)#5 66.9% (+33.1)#576
6. Sunset Colony 100.0% 60.3% (+39.7)#6 66.9% (+33.1)#638
7. Ideal 100.0% 60.3% (+39.7)#7 66.9% (+33.1)#654
8. Dolton 100.0% 60.3% (+39.7)#9 66.9% (+33.1)#685
9. Oral 100.0% 60.3% (+39.7)#10 66.9% (+33.1)#687
10. Mansfield 100.0% 60.3% (+39.7)#11 66.9% (+33.1)#694
11. Artas 100.0% 60.3% (+39.7)#12 66.9% (+33.1)#705
12. Orland Colony 100.0% 60.3% (+39.7)#13 66.9% (+33.1)#722
13. Altamont 100.0% 60.3% (+39.7)#14 66.9% (+33.1)#723
14. Aurora Center 100.0% 60.3% (+39.7)#15 66.9% (+33.1)#752
15. Wetonka 100.0% 60.3% (+39.7)#16 66.9% (+33.1)#887
16. Gann Valley 100.0% 60.3% (+39.7)#17 66.9% (+33.1)#900
17. Storla 100.0% 60.3% (+39.7)#18 66.9% (+33.1)#937
18. Verdon 100.0% 60.3% (+39.7)#19 66.9% (+33.1)#943
19. Albee 100.0% 60.3% (+39.7)#20 66.9% (+33.1)#944
20. Wonderland Homes 97.9% 60.3% (+37.6)#21 66.9% (+31.0)#974
21. Twin Brooks 94.7% 60.3% (+34.4)#22 66.9% (+27.8)#1,080
22. Erwin 94.4% 60.3% (+34.2)#23 66.9% (+27.6)#1,097
23. Lane 93.3% 60.3% (+33.0)#24 66.9% (+26.4)#1,162
24. Chelsea 91.9% 60.3% (+31.6)#25 66.9% (+25.0)#1,287
25. Fruitdale 90.6% 60.3% (+30.3)#26 66.9% (+23.7)#1,395
26. Camp Crook 90.0% 60.3% (+29.7)#27 66.9% (+23.1)#1,471
27. Brant Lake South 89.6% 60.3% (+29.3)#28 66.9% (+22.7)#1,527
28. Yale 89.6% 60.3% (+29.3)#29 66.9% (+22.7)#1,528
29. Interior 87.5% 60.3% (+27.2)#30 66.9% (+20.6)#1,822
30. Hetland 87.5% 60.3% (+27.2)#31 66.9% (+20.6)#1,827
31. Stockholm 85.7% 60.3% (+25.4)#32 66.9% (+18.8)#2,155
32. Utica 85.7% 60.3% (+25.4)#33 66.9% (+18.8)#2,161
33. Seneca 85.7% 60.3% (+25.4)#34 66.9% (+18.8)#2,163
34. Montrose 85.0% 60.3% (+24.7)#35 66.9% (+18.1)#2,335
35. Peever 84.0% 60.3% (+23.7)#36 66.9% (+17.1)#2,616
36. Chester 83.3% 60.3% (+23.0)#37 66.9% (+16.4)#2,780
37. Astoria 83.3% 60.3% (+23.0)#38 66.9% (+16.4)#2,785
38. Artesian 82.7% 60.3% (+22.4)#39 66.9% (+15.8)#2,997
39. Big Stone City 82.3% 60.3% (+22.0)#40 66.9% (+15.4)#3,119
40. Nisland 82.1% 60.3% (+21.9)#41 66.9% (+15.3)#3,168
41. Dimock 81.1% 60.3% (+20.8)#42 66.9% (+14.2)#3,625
42. Hitchcock 80.6% 60.3% (+20.3)#43 66.9% (+13.7)#3,847
43. Midland 80.3% 60.3% (+20.0)#44 66.9% (+13.4)#3,968
44. Bryant 80.2% 60.3% (+19.9)#45 66.9% (+13.3)#3,988
45. Florence 79.6% 60.3% (+19.3)#46 66.9% (+12.7)#4,326
46. Kadoka 79.3% 60.3% (+19.0)#47 66.9% (+12.4)#4,514
47. North Sioux City 79.3% 60.3% (+19.0)#48 66.9% (+12.4)#4,520
48. Cresbard 79.1% 60.3% (+18.8)#49 66.9% (+12.2)#4,635
49. Alpena 79.0% 60.3% (+18.7)#50 66.9% (+12.1)#4,662
50. Mound City 78.9% 60.3% (+18.7)#51 66.9% (+12.1)#4,706
51. Cavour 78.7% 60.3% (+18.4)#52 66.9% (+11.8)#4,852
52. South Shore 78.5% 60.3% (+18.2)#53 66.9% (+11.6)#4,968
53. Renner Corner 78.2% 60.3% (+17.9)#54 66.9% (+11.3)#5,183
54. Colman 77.5% 60.3% (+17.2)#55 66.9% (+10.6)#5,579
55. Hayti 77.5% 60.3% (+17.2)#56 66.9% (+10.6)#5,604
56. Badger 76.9% 60.3% (+16.6)#57 66.9% (+10.0)#5,992
57. Fairview 76.8% 60.3% (+16.5)#58 66.9% (+9.90)#6,092
58. Aurora 76.8% 60.3% (+16.5)#59 66.9% (+9.90)#6,094
59. Davis 76.7% 60.3% (+16.5)#60 66.9% (+9.86)#6,129
60. Volga 76.7% 60.3% (+16.4)#61 66.9% (+9.84)#6,138
61. Westport 76.5% 60.3% (+16.2)#62 66.9% (+9.58)#6,330
62. Strandburg 76.5% 60.3% (+16.2)#63 66.9% (+9.58)#6,334
63. Ortley 76.5% 60.3% (+16.2)#64 66.9% (+9.58)#6,335
64. Ramona 76.3% 60.3% (+16.0)#65 66.9% (+9.40)#6,449
65. Baltic 76.2% 60.3% (+15.9)#66 66.9% (+9.26)#6,561
66. Revillo 75.9% 60.3% (+15.6)#67 66.9% (+9.02)#6,755
67. Vivian 75.9% 60.3% (+15.6)#68 66.9% (+8.97)#6,790
68. Hudson 75.4% 60.3% (+15.1)#69 66.9% (+8.54)#7,126
69. Sinai 75.3% 60.3% (+15.1)#70 66.9% (+8.45)#7,197
70. Columbia 75.3% 60.3% (+15.0)#71 66.9% (+8.37)#7,265
71. Mount Vernon 75.2% 60.3% (+14.9)#72 66.9% (+8.28)#7,342
72. Boulder Canyon 75.1% 60.3% (+14.8)#73 66.9% (+8.18)#7,427
73. Draper 75.0% 60.3% (+14.7)#74 66.9% (+8.11)#7,542
74. Brandt 74.6% 60.3% (+14.3)#75 66.9% (+7.69)#7,856
75. Ree Heights 74.1% 60.3% (+13.8)#76 66.9% (+7.19)#8,324
76. Pringle 73.9% 60.3% (+13.6)#77 66.9% (+6.99)#8,523
77. La Bolt 73.8% 60.3% (+13.5)#78 66.9% (+6.92)#8,580
78. Toronto 73.7% 60.3% (+13.4)#79 66.9% (+6.83)#8,656
79. Egan 73.5% 60.3% (+13.2)#80 66.9% (+6.64)#8,836
80. Bath Corner 73.3% 60.3% (+13.0)#81 66.9% (+6.45)#9,037
81. Lake Norden 73.3% 60.3% (+13.0)#82 66.9% (+6.42)#9,057
82. White 73.1% 60.3% (+12.8)#83 66.9% (+6.22)#9,258
83. Gayville 73.0% 60.3% (+12.8)#84 66.9% (+6.16)#9,324
84. Crooks 73.0% 60.3% (+12.7)#85 66.9% (+6.09)#9,388
85. Lake Preston 72.7% 60.3% (+12.4)#86 66.9% (+5.84)#9,628
86. Garden City 72.7% 60.3% (+12.4)#87 66.9% (+5.84)#9,644
87. Ravinia 72.7% 60.3% (+12.4)#88 66.9% (+5.84)#9,649
88. Colton 72.6% 60.3% (+12.3)#89 66.9% (+5.72)#9,766
89. Tolstoy 72.4% 60.3% (+12.1)#90 66.9% (+5.53)#10,003
90. North Spearfish 72.0% 60.3% (+11.8)#91 66.9% (+5.16)#10,362
91. Britton 71.4% 60.3% (+11.1)#92 66.9% (+4.54)#10,972
92. Mission Hill 71.4% 60.3% (+11.1)#93 66.9% (+4.54)#10,996
93. Java 71.4% 60.3% (+11.1)#94 66.9% (+4.54)#11,006
94. Sherman 71.4% 60.3% (+11.1)#95 66.9% (+4.54)#11,028
95. Andover 71.4% 60.3% (+11.1)#96 66.9% (+4.54)#11,032
96. Broadland 71.4% 60.3% (+11.1)#97 66.9% (+4.54)#11,040
97. Elk Point 71.3% 60.3% (+11.0)#98 66.9% (+4.44)#11,133
98. Tea 71.3% 60.3% (+11.0)#99 66.9% (+4.40)#11,167
99. Keystone 71.2% 60.3% (+10.9)#100 66.9% (+4.27)#11,299
100. Henry 70.8% 60.3% (+10.5)#101 66.9% (+3.95)#11,663

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Private Company Employees in South Dakota?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Private Company Employees in South Dakota are:
#1
100.0%
#2
100.0%
#3
100.0%
#4
100.0%
#5
100.0%
#6
100.0%
#7
100.0%
#8
100.0%
#9
100.0%
#10
100.0%
What city has the Highest Percentage of Private Company Employees in South Dakota?
Vienna has the Highest Percentage of Private Company Employees in South Dakota with 100.0%.
What is the Percentage of Private Company Employees in the State of South Dakota?
Percentage of Private Company Employees in South Dakota is 60.3%.
What is the Percentage of Private Company Employees in the United States?
Percentage of Private Company Employees in the United States is 66.9%.