Cities with the Highest Percentage of Private Company Employees in Maryland

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Private Company Employees
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Maryland
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Percentage of Private Company Employees in Maryland

0.0%
100.0%
Cities with the Highest Percentage of Private Company Employees in Maryland Map

Cities with the Highest Percentage of Private Company Employees in Maryland

City % Private Company Employees vs State vs National
1. Eckhart Mines 100.0% 58.2% (+41.8)#1 66.9% (+33.1)#44
2. Hutton 100.0% 58.2% (+41.8)#2 66.9% (+33.1)#176
3. Breathedsville 100.0% 58.2% (+41.8)#3 66.9% (+33.1)#207
4. Franklin 100.0% 58.2% (+41.8)#4 66.9% (+33.1)#267
5. Allen 100.0% 58.2% (+41.8)#5 66.9% (+33.1)#277
6. Cearfoss 100.0% 58.2% (+41.8)#6 66.9% (+33.1)#293
7. Pecktonville 100.0% 58.2% (+41.8)#7 66.9% (+33.1)#360
8. Greensburg 100.0% 58.2% (+41.8)#8 66.9% (+33.1)#372
9. Bivalve 100.0% 58.2% (+41.8)#9 66.9% (+33.1)#410
10. Barrelville 100.0% 58.2% (+41.8)#10 66.9% (+33.1)#588
11. Little Orleans 100.0% 58.2% (+41.8)#11 66.9% (+33.1)#589
12. Dawson 100.0% 58.2% (+41.8)#12 66.9% (+33.1)#600
13. Woodland 100.0% 58.2% (+41.8)#13 66.9% (+33.1)#697
14. Big Spring 100.0% 58.2% (+41.8)#14 66.9% (+33.1)#821
15. Elliott 100.0% 58.2% (+41.8)#15 66.9% (+33.1)#848
16. Ocean 100.0% 58.2% (+41.8)#16 66.9% (+33.1)#868
17. San Mar 98.9% 58.2% (+40.7)#17 66.9% (+32.1)#958
18. Tilghmanton 93.6% 58.2% (+35.3)#18 66.9% (+26.7)#1,145
19. Sandy Hook 92.4% 58.2% (+34.1)#19 66.9% (+25.5)#1,238
20. Jugtown 92.2% 58.2% (+34.0)#20 66.9% (+25.3)#1,257
21. Luke 92.1% 58.2% (+33.9)#21 66.9% (+25.2)#1,269
22. Downsville 91.6% 58.2% (+33.4)#22 66.9% (+24.7)#1,314
23. Corriganville 89.2% 58.2% (+30.9)#23 66.9% (+22.3)#1,578
24. Bloomington 88.7% 58.2% (+30.5)#24 66.9% (+21.8)#1,633
25. Worton 88.7% 58.2% (+30.4)#25 66.9% (+21.8)#1,638
26. Choptank 88.4% 58.2% (+30.2)#26 66.9% (+21.5)#1,672
27. Libertytown 87.6% 58.2% (+29.4)#27 66.9% (+20.8)#1,787
28. Tolchester 87.6% 58.2% (+29.4)#28 66.9% (+20.7)#1,789
29. Rawlings 86.3% 58.2% (+28.1)#29 66.9% (+19.4)#2,023
30. Templeville 86.1% 58.2% (+27.9)#30 66.9% (+19.2)#2,061
31. Fairlee 83.9% 58.2% (+25.7)#31 66.9% (+17.0)#2,638
32. Sabillasville 83.4% 58.2% (+25.2)#32 66.9% (+16.5)#2,758
33. Leitersburg 83.2% 58.2% (+24.9)#33 66.9% (+16.3)#2,835
34. Lisbon 82.9% 58.2% (+24.6)#34 66.9% (+16.0)#2,947
35. St George Island 82.5% 58.2% (+24.2)#35 66.9% (+15.6)#3,066
36. West Denton 81.6% 58.2% (+23.4)#36 66.9% (+14.7)#3,390
37. Barclay 81.2% 58.2% (+22.9)#37 66.9% (+14.3)#3,577
38. Garretts Mill 80.8% 58.2% (+22.6)#38 66.9% (+14.0)#3,715
39. Bagtown 80.5% 58.2% (+22.3)#39 66.9% (+13.6)#3,856
40. Crumpton 80.4% 58.2% (+22.2)#40 66.9% (+13.5)#3,908
41. Pondsville 79.4% 58.2% (+21.1)#41 66.9% (+12.5)#4,464
42. Langley Park 79.1% 58.2% (+20.9)#42 66.9% (+12.2)#4,611
43. Mount Lena 78.9% 58.2% (+20.7)#43 66.9% (+12.1)#4,700
44. Lewistown 78.9% 58.2% (+20.7)#44 66.9% (+12.0)#4,722
45. Loch Lynn Heights 77.5% 58.2% (+19.3)#45 66.9% (+10.6)#5,598
46. Fishing Creek 77.3% 58.2% (+19.0)#46 66.9% (+10.4)#5,735
47. Pinesburg 77.2% 58.2% (+18.9)#47 66.9% (+10.3)#5,819
48. Bier 76.4% 58.2% (+18.1)#48 66.9% (+9.49)#6,389
49. East Riverdale 76.2% 58.2% (+18.0)#49 66.9% (+9.32)#6,507
50. Midland 76.2% 58.2% (+18.0)#50 66.9% (+9.32)#6,509
51. Quantico 75.5% 58.2% (+17.2)#51 66.9% (+8.57)#7,103
52. Marydel 75.0% 58.2% (+16.8)#52 66.9% (+8.11)#7,506
53. Eldorado 75.0% 58.2% (+16.8)#53 66.9% (+8.11)#7,527
54. Sharpsburg 74.9% 58.2% (+16.6)#54 66.9% (+7.99)#7,620
55. Crisfield 74.7% 58.2% (+16.4)#55 66.9% (+7.79)#7,772
56. Powellville 74.3% 58.2% (+16.1)#56 66.9% (+7.44)#8,080
57. Robinwood 74.3% 58.2% (+16.0)#57 66.9% (+7.37)#8,147
58. Finzel 74.2% 58.2% (+16.0)#58 66.9% (+7.32)#8,193
59. Elkton 74.2% 58.2% (+16.0)#59 66.9% (+7.31)#8,197
60. Perryman 73.9% 58.2% (+15.6)#60 66.9% (+6.97)#8,538
61. Cockeysville 73.5% 58.2% (+15.3)#61 66.9% (+6.61)#8,866
62. New Carrollton 73.5% 58.2% (+15.2)#62 66.9% (+6.58)#8,896
63. Point Of Rocks 73.4% 58.2% (+15.2)#63 66.9% (+6.52)#8,944
64. Baltimore Highlands 73.3% 58.2% (+15.0)#64 66.9% (+6.36)#9,108
65. Hillsboro 73.1% 58.2% (+14.8)#65 66.9% (+6.19)#9,295
66. Buckeystown 73.0% 58.2% (+14.7)#66 66.9% (+6.08)#9,397
67. Bowmans Addition 72.9% 58.2% (+14.6)#67 66.9% (+6.01)#9,463
68. Fairplay 72.7% 58.2% (+14.5)#68 66.9% (+5.84)#9,629
69. Dundalk 72.6% 58.2% (+14.4)#69 66.9% (+5.73)#9,759
70. Emmitsburg 72.6% 58.2% (+14.3)#70 66.9% (+5.71)#9,784
71. Funkstown 72.6% 58.2% (+14.3)#71 66.9% (+5.67)#9,822
72. Spencerville 72.5% 58.2% (+14.3)#72 66.9% (+5.66)#9,837
73. Williston 72.5% 58.2% (+14.3)#73 66.9% (+5.63)#9,869
74. Williamsport 72.3% 58.2% (+14.1)#74 66.9% (+5.43)#10,096
75. Edmonston 72.0% 58.2% (+13.8)#75 66.9% (+5.14)#10,385
76. Chillum 72.0% 58.2% (+13.7)#76 66.9% (+5.10)#10,433
77. Greensboro 71.9% 58.2% (+13.6)#77 66.9% (+5.00)#10,520
78. Sharptown 71.7% 58.2% (+13.4)#78 66.9% (+4.79)#10,730
79. Henderson 71.4% 58.2% (+13.2)#79 66.9% (+4.54)#11,005
80. Galestown 71.4% 58.2% (+13.2)#80 66.9% (+4.54)#11,021
81. Herald Harbor 71.3% 58.2% (+13.1)#81 66.9% (+4.44)#11,132
82. Secretary 71.3% 58.2% (+13.0)#82 66.9% (+4.40)#11,168
83. Dames Quarter 71.2% 58.2% (+13.0)#83 66.9% (+4.35)#11,216
84. Pittsville 71.1% 58.2% (+12.9)#84 66.9% (+4.23)#11,347
85. Smithsburg 71.0% 58.2% (+12.7)#85 66.9% (+4.09)#11,495
86. Fountainhead Orchard Hills 70.6% 58.2% (+12.3)#86 66.9% (+3.68)#11,972
87. Willards 70.3% 58.2% (+12.0)#87 66.9% (+3.38)#12,299
88. Brunswick 70.2% 58.2% (+11.9)#88 66.9% (+3.30)#12,374
89. Stevensville 70.0% 58.2% (+11.8)#89 66.9% (+3.11)#12,516
90. Wilson Conococheague 69.9% 58.2% (+11.7)#90 66.9% (+3.03)#12,641
91. Lansdowne 69.8% 58.2% (+11.6)#91 66.9% (+2.92)#12,757
92. Hagerstown 69.5% 58.2% (+11.2)#92 66.9% (+2.58)#13,133
93. Essex 69.4% 58.2% (+11.2)#93 66.9% (+2.56)#13,153
94. Princess Anne 69.4% 58.2% (+11.2)#94 66.9% (+2.54)#13,184
95. Highfield Cascade 69.4% 58.2% (+11.2)#95 66.9% (+2.52)#13,208
96. Potomac Park 69.3% 58.2% (+11.0)#96 66.9% (+2.40)#13,340
97. Burnt Mills 69.3% 58.2% (+11.0)#97 66.9% (+2.37)#13,362
98. Mardela Springs 69.1% 58.2% (+10.9)#98 66.9% (+2.24)#13,517
99. Overlea 69.1% 58.2% (+10.8)#99 66.9% (+2.18)#13,578
100. Romancoke 69.1% 58.2% (+10.8)#100 66.9% (+2.17)#13,593

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Private Company Employees in Maryland?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Private Company Employees in Maryland are:
#1
100.0%
#2
100.0%
#3
100.0%
#4
100.0%
#5
100.0%
#6
100.0%
#7
100.0%
#8
100.0%
#9
100.0%
#10
100.0%
What city has the Highest Percentage of Private Company Employees in Maryland?
Eckhart Mines has the Highest Percentage of Private Company Employees in Maryland with 100.0%.
What is the Percentage of Private Company Employees in the State of Maryland?
Percentage of Private Company Employees in Maryland is 58.2%.
What is the Percentage of Private Company Employees in the United States?
Percentage of Private Company Employees in the United States is 66.9%.