Cities with the Highest Percentage of Private Company Employees in Iowa

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Private Company Employees
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Iowa
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Percentage of Private Company Employees in Iowa

0.0%
100.0%
Cities with the Highest Percentage of Private Company Employees in Iowa Map

Cities with the Highest Percentage of Private Company Employees in Iowa

City % Private Company Employees vs State vs National
1. Center Junction 100.0% 66.8% (+33.2)#1 66.9% (+33.1)#325
2. Swedesburg 100.0% 66.8% (+33.2)#2 66.9% (+33.1)#399
3. Stone City 100.0% 66.8% (+33.2)#3 66.9% (+33.1)#407
4. Lowell 100.0% 66.8% (+33.2)#4 66.9% (+33.1)#416
5. Yarmouth 100.0% 66.8% (+33.2)#5 66.9% (+33.1)#453
6. Thornburg 100.0% 66.8% (+33.2)#6 66.9% (+33.1)#610
7. Irvington 100.0% 66.8% (+33.2)#7 66.9% (+33.1)#637
8. Rochester 100.0% 66.8% (+33.2)#8 66.9% (+33.1)#665
9. Thayer 100.0% 66.8% (+33.2)#9 66.9% (+33.1)#689
10. Anderson 100.0% 66.8% (+33.2)#10 66.9% (+33.1)#690
11. Clio 100.0% 66.8% (+33.2)#11 66.9% (+33.1)#709
12. Little Cedar 100.0% 66.8% (+33.2)#12 66.9% (+33.1)#717
13. Rathbun 100.0% 66.8% (+33.2)#13 66.9% (+33.1)#726
14. East Amana 100.0% 66.8% (+33.2)#14 66.9% (+33.1)#744
15. Portland 100.0% 66.8% (+33.2)#15 66.9% (+33.1)#788
16. Mona 100.0% 66.8% (+33.2)#16 66.9% (+33.1)#795
17. Leando 100.0% 66.8% (+33.2)#17 66.9% (+33.1)#820
18. Burchinal 100.0% 66.8% (+33.2)#18 66.9% (+33.1)#838
19. Toeterville 100.0% 66.8% (+33.2)#19 66.9% (+33.1)#839
20. Hayfield 100.0% 66.8% (+33.2)#20 66.9% (+33.1)#851
21. Elkport 100.0% 66.8% (+33.2)#21 66.9% (+33.1)#867
22. Argo 100.0% 66.8% (+33.2)#23 66.9% (+33.1)#895
23. Big Rock 100.0% 66.8% (+33.2)#24 66.9% (+33.1)#896
24. Bartlett 100.0% 66.8% (+33.2)#25 66.9% (+33.1)#897
25. River Sioux 100.0% 66.8% (+33.2)#26 66.9% (+33.1)#935
26. Jacksonville 100.0% 66.8% (+33.2)#27 66.9% (+33.1)#940
27. Bankston 100.0% 66.8% (+33.2)#28 66.9% (+33.1)#947
28. Harris 95.3% 66.8% (+28.5)#29 66.9% (+28.5)#1,053
29. Exline 94.6% 66.8% (+27.8)#30 66.9% (+27.7)#1,088
30. Williamson 94.4% 66.8% (+27.6)#31 66.9% (+27.6)#1,096
31. Ricketts 94.1% 66.8% (+27.3)#32 66.9% (+27.2)#1,118
32. Pacific Junction 93.5% 66.8% (+26.7)#33 66.9% (+26.6)#1,152
33. Van Wert 93.1% 66.8% (+26.3)#34 66.9% (+26.2)#1,181
34. Udell 92.9% 66.8% (+26.0)#35 66.9% (+26.0)#1,203
35. Searsboro 92.5% 66.8% (+25.7)#36 66.9% (+25.6)#1,224
36. Rodman 92.3% 66.8% (+25.5)#37 66.9% (+25.4)#1,253
37. Crystal Lake 91.9% 66.8% (+25.1)#38 66.9% (+25.0)#1,282
38. Mooar 91.6% 66.8% (+24.7)#39 66.9% (+24.7)#1,316
39. Northboro 91.5% 66.8% (+24.7)#40 66.9% (+24.6)#1,321
40. Osterdock 91.4% 66.8% (+24.6)#41 66.9% (+24.5)#1,326
41. Luzerne 91.4% 66.8% (+24.6)#42 66.9% (+24.5)#1,327
42. Morrison 91.3% 66.8% (+24.5)#43 66.9% (+24.4)#1,340
43. Clayton 90.6% 66.8% (+23.8)#44 66.9% (+23.7)#1,396
44. West Chester 90.3% 66.8% (+23.4)#45 66.9% (+23.4)#1,438
45. Delphos 90.0% 66.8% (+23.2)#46 66.9% (+23.1)#1,472
46. Benton 90.0% 66.8% (+23.2)#47 66.9% (+23.1)#1,473
47. Burr Oak 89.8% 66.8% (+23.0)#48 66.9% (+22.9)#1,490
48. Ralston 89.7% 66.8% (+22.8)#49 66.9% (+22.8)#1,519
49. Olin 89.6% 66.8% (+22.7)#50 66.9% (+22.7)#1,533
50. Rome 89.4% 66.8% (+22.5)#51 66.9% (+22.5)#1,568
51. Popejoy 88.9% 66.8% (+22.0)#52 66.9% (+22.0)#1,609
52. Orchard 88.9% 66.8% (+22.0)#53 66.9% (+22.0)#1,610
53. Shannon City 88.9% 66.8% (+22.0)#54 66.9% (+22.0)#1,612
54. Webster 88.7% 66.8% (+21.9)#55 66.9% (+21.8)#1,632
55. Chelsea 88.4% 66.8% (+21.5)#56 66.9% (+21.5)#1,676
56. West Amana 88.4% 66.8% (+21.5)#57 66.9% (+21.5)#1,678
57. Arthur 88.2% 66.8% (+21.4)#58 66.9% (+21.3)#1,695
58. Oyens 87.5% 66.8% (+20.7)#59 66.9% (+20.6)#1,817
59. Kelley 87.2% 66.8% (+20.3)#60 66.9% (+20.3)#1,860
60. Percival 87.2% 66.8% (+20.3)#61 66.9% (+20.3)#1,865
61. Modale 87.1% 66.8% (+20.2)#62 66.9% (+20.2)#1,888
62. Montpelier 86.6% 66.8% (+19.7)#63 66.9% (+19.7)#1,976
63. Barnes City 86.5% 66.8% (+19.7)#64 66.9% (+19.7)#1,986
64. Livermore 86.4% 66.8% (+19.6)#65 66.9% (+19.5)#2,012
65. Galt 86.4% 66.8% (+19.5)#66 66.9% (+19.5)#2,020
66. Albion 86.3% 66.8% (+19.5)#67 66.9% (+19.4)#2,024
67. Promise City 86.2% 66.8% (+19.4)#68 66.9% (+19.3)#2,044
68. Lacona 86.1% 66.8% (+19.2)#69 66.9% (+19.2)#2,073
69. Garrison 85.7% 66.8% (+18.9)#70 66.9% (+18.8)#2,145
70. Cincinnati 85.7% 66.8% (+18.9)#71 66.9% (+18.8)#2,150
71. Plano 85.7% 66.8% (+18.9)#72 66.9% (+18.8)#2,160
72. Hardy 85.7% 66.8% (+18.9)#73 66.9% (+18.8)#2,165
73. Delta 85.6% 66.8% (+18.8)#74 66.9% (+18.7)#2,183
74. Conroy 85.5% 66.8% (+18.7)#75 66.9% (+18.6)#2,198
75. Conesville 85.5% 66.8% (+18.6)#76 66.9% (+18.6)#2,203
76. Farmersburg 85.4% 66.8% (+18.5)#77 66.9% (+18.5)#2,243
77. Masonville 85.4% 66.8% (+18.5)#78 66.9% (+18.5)#2,247
78. High Amana 85.2% 66.8% (+18.3)#79 66.9% (+18.3)#2,291
79. Frederika 85.1% 66.8% (+18.3)#80 66.9% (+18.3)#2,300
80. Mount Auburn 84.7% 66.8% (+17.9)#81 66.9% (+17.8)#2,405
81. Waterville 84.5% 66.8% (+17.7)#82 66.9% (+17.6)#2,472
82. Klemme 84.5% 66.8% (+17.6)#83 66.9% (+17.6)#2,477
83. Rutland 84.4% 66.8% (+17.6)#84 66.9% (+17.5)#2,498
84. Leland 84.3% 66.8% (+17.4)#85 66.9% (+17.4)#2,527
85. Valeria 84.2% 66.8% (+17.4)#86 66.9% (+17.3)#2,550
86. Jackson Junction 84.2% 66.8% (+17.4)#87 66.9% (+17.3)#2,552
87. Monmouth 84.1% 66.8% (+17.2)#88 66.9% (+17.2)#2,593
88. Marysville 84.0% 66.8% (+17.2)#89 66.9% (+17.1)#2,619
89. Thompson 83.4% 66.8% (+16.6)#90 66.9% (+16.5)#2,763
90. Gibson 83.3% 66.8% (+16.5)#91 66.9% (+16.4)#2,809
91. Russell 83.2% 66.8% (+16.3)#92 66.9% (+16.3)#2,837
92. Salix 83.0% 66.8% (+16.2)#93 66.9% (+16.1)#2,887
93. Dolliver 82.9% 66.8% (+16.1)#94 66.9% (+16.0)#2,914
94. Deloit 82.8% 66.8% (+16.0)#95 66.9% (+15.9)#2,961
95. Chillicothe 82.8% 66.8% (+15.9)#96 66.9% (+15.9)#2,973
96. Castana 82.6% 66.8% (+15.8)#97 66.9% (+15.7)#3,011
97. California Junction 82.6% 66.8% (+15.8)#98 66.9% (+15.7)#3,015
98. Spring Hill 82.6% 66.8% (+15.8)#99 66.9% (+15.7)#3,016
99. Ionia 82.5% 66.8% (+15.7)#100 66.9% (+15.6)#3,052
100. Buffalo 82.5% 66.8% (+15.6)#101 66.9% (+15.6)#3,056

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Private Company Employees in Iowa?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Private Company Employees in Iowa are:
#1
100.0%
#2
100.0%
#3
100.0%
#4
100.0%
#5
100.0%
#6
100.0%
#7
100.0%
#8
100.0%
#9
100.0%
#10
100.0%
What city has the Highest Percentage of Private Company Employees in Iowa?
Center Junction has the Highest Percentage of Private Company Employees in Iowa with 100.0%.
What is the Percentage of Private Company Employees in the State of Iowa?
Percentage of Private Company Employees in Iowa is 66.8%.
What is the Percentage of Private Company Employees in the United States?
Percentage of Private Company Employees in the United States is 66.9%.