Cities with the Highest Percentage of Households Heated by Utility Gas in Oklahoma

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Utility Gas Heating
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Oklahoma
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Percentage of Households Heated by Utility Gas in Oklahoma

0.0%
100.0%
Cities with the Highest Percentage of Households Heated by Utility Gas in Oklahoma Map

Cities with the Highest Percentage of Households Heated by Utility Gas in Oklahoma

City Utility Gas Heating vs State vs National
1. Deer Creek 100.0% 50.5% (+49.5)#1 47.1% (+52.9)#161
2. Felt 100.0% 50.5% (+49.5)#2 47.1% (+52.9)#167
3. Fay 100.0% 50.5% (+49.5)#3 47.1% (+52.9)#198
4. Bryant 100.0% 50.5% (+49.5)#4 47.1% (+52.9)#265
5. Avard 100.0% 50.5% (+49.5)#5 47.1% (+52.9)#267
6. Texola 100.0% 50.5% (+49.5)#6 47.1% (+52.9)#275
7. Lotsee 100.0% 50.5% (+49.5)#7 47.1% (+52.9)#290
8. Smith Village 95.1% 50.5% (+44.6)#8 47.1% (+48.0)#498
9. Orlando 94.9% 50.5% (+44.4)#9 47.1% (+47.8)#517
10. Woodlawn Park 93.9% 50.5% (+43.4)#10 47.1% (+46.8)#618
11. Hardesty 90.0% 50.5% (+39.5)#11 47.1% (+42.9)#1,293
12. Tonkawa Tribal Housing 90.0% 50.5% (+39.5)#12 47.1% (+42.9)#1,294
13. Hitchcock 90.0% 50.5% (+39.5)#13 47.1% (+42.9)#1,304
14. Texhoma 89.2% 50.5% (+38.7)#14 47.1% (+42.1)#1,485
15. Sentinel 89.1% 50.5% (+38.6)#15 47.1% (+42.0)#1,505
16. Forgan 88.6% 50.5% (+38.1)#16 47.1% (+41.5)#1,633
17. Willow 88.6% 50.5% (+38.1)#17 47.1% (+41.5)#1,636
18. Blackwell 86.8% 50.5% (+36.3)#18 47.1% (+39.7)#2,098
19. Nichols Hills 86.6% 50.5% (+36.1)#19 47.1% (+39.5)#2,167
20. Blair 86.6% 50.5% (+36.1)#20 47.1% (+39.5)#2,182
21. Jet 86.6% 50.5% (+36.1)#21 47.1% (+39.5)#2,184
22. Mangum 86.5% 50.5% (+36.0)#22 47.1% (+39.4)#2,198
23. Copan 86.5% 50.5% (+36.0)#23 47.1% (+39.4)#2,209
24. Tyrone 86.4% 50.5% (+35.9)#24 47.1% (+39.3)#2,251
25. Boise City 85.9% 50.5% (+35.4)#25 47.1% (+38.8)#2,401
26. Mccord 85.8% 50.5% (+35.3)#26 47.1% (+38.7)#2,440
27. Bessie 85.7% 50.5% (+35.2)#27 47.1% (+38.6)#2,472
28. Burns Flat 85.4% 50.5% (+34.9)#28 47.1% (+38.3)#2,573
29. Keyes 85.3% 50.5% (+34.8)#29 47.1% (+38.2)#2,634
30. Wardville 83.0% 50.5% (+32.5)#30 47.1% (+35.9)#3,417
31. Beaver 81.9% 50.5% (+31.4)#31 47.1% (+34.8)#3,803
32. Mccurtain 81.4% 50.5% (+30.9)#32 47.1% (+34.3)#4,008
33. Rocky 81.3% 50.5% (+30.8)#33 47.1% (+34.2)#4,059
34. Dover 81.2% 50.5% (+30.7)#34 47.1% (+34.1)#4,102
35. Valley Brook 80.9% 50.5% (+30.4)#35 47.1% (+33.8)#4,205
36. Coyle 80.9% 50.5% (+30.4)#36 47.1% (+33.8)#4,209
37. Forest Park 80.8% 50.5% (+30.3)#37 47.1% (+33.7)#4,245
38. Dale 80.8% 50.5% (+30.3)#38 47.1% (+33.7)#4,252
39. Laverne 80.4% 50.5% (+29.9)#39 47.1% (+33.3)#4,385
40. Drummond 80.4% 50.5% (+29.9)#40 47.1% (+33.3)#4,395
41. Reydon 80.3% 50.5% (+29.8)#41 47.1% (+33.2)#4,431
42. Braman 80.3% 50.5% (+29.8)#42 47.1% (+33.2)#4,434
43. Gould 80.0% 50.5% (+29.5)#43 47.1% (+32.9)#4,570
44. Lake Aluma 80.0% 50.5% (+29.5)#44 47.1% (+32.9)#4,573
45. Hominy 79.9% 50.5% (+29.4)#45 47.1% (+32.8)#4,589
46. New Cordell 79.7% 50.5% (+29.2)#46 47.1% (+32.6)#4,660
47. Mooreland 79.6% 50.5% (+29.1)#47 47.1% (+32.5)#4,719
48. Butler 79.6% 50.5% (+29.1)#48 47.1% (+32.5)#4,729
49. Verdigris 79.4% 50.5% (+28.9)#49 47.1% (+32.3)#4,777
50. Fort Supply 79.0% 50.5% (+28.5)#50 47.1% (+31.9)#4,931
51. Jenks 78.6% 50.5% (+28.1)#51 47.1% (+31.5)#5,073
52. East Duke 78.6% 50.5% (+28.1)#52 47.1% (+31.5)#5,104
53. Tonkawa 78.3% 50.5% (+27.8)#53 47.1% (+31.2)#5,197
54. Hollis 78.2% 50.5% (+27.7)#54 47.1% (+31.1)#5,245
55. Bradley 77.9% 50.5% (+27.4)#55 47.1% (+30.8)#5,351
56. Minco 77.6% 50.5% (+27.1)#56 47.1% (+30.5)#5,451
57. Turpin 77.4% 50.5% (+26.9)#57 47.1% (+30.3)#5,537
58. Fairview 77.3% 50.5% (+26.8)#58 47.1% (+30.2)#5,558
59. Canton 77.1% 50.5% (+26.6)#59 47.1% (+30.0)#5,650
60. Schulter 77.1% 50.5% (+26.6)#60 47.1% (+30.0)#5,651
61. Marlow 77.0% 50.5% (+26.5)#61 47.1% (+29.9)#5,671
62. Goltry 76.9% 50.5% (+26.4)#62 47.1% (+29.8)#5,737
63. Perry 76.7% 50.5% (+26.2)#63 47.1% (+29.6)#5,788
64. Newkirk 76.6% 50.5% (+26.1)#64 47.1% (+29.5)#5,853
65. Olustee 76.6% 50.5% (+26.1)#65 47.1% (+29.5)#5,859
66. Bixby 76.4% 50.5% (+25.9)#66 47.1% (+29.3)#5,913
67. Asher 76.3% 50.5% (+25.8)#67 47.1% (+29.2)#5,980
68. Altus 76.2% 50.5% (+25.7)#68 47.1% (+29.1)#5,992
69. Granite 76.2% 50.5% (+25.7)#69 47.1% (+29.1)#6,011
70. Rocky Point 76.1% 50.5% (+25.6)#70 47.1% (+29.0)#6,062
71. Waynoka 75.9% 50.5% (+25.4)#71 47.1% (+28.8)#6,147
72. Lone Wolf 75.9% 50.5% (+25.4)#72 47.1% (+28.8)#6,157
73. Wakita 75.8% 50.5% (+25.3)#73 47.1% (+28.7)#6,202
74. Corn 75.6% 50.5% (+25.1)#74 47.1% (+28.5)#6,271
75. Medford 75.5% 50.5% (+25.0)#75 47.1% (+28.4)#6,312
76. The Village 75.3% 50.5% (+24.8)#76 47.1% (+28.2)#6,366
77. Grandview 74.9% 50.5% (+24.4)#77 47.1% (+27.8)#6,527
78. Alva 74.8% 50.5% (+24.3)#78 47.1% (+27.7)#6,549
79. Frederick 74.8% 50.5% (+24.3)#79 47.1% (+27.7)#6,551
80. Sand Springs 74.4% 50.5% (+23.9)#80 47.1% (+27.3)#6,708
81. Pawnee 74.4% 50.5% (+23.9)#81 47.1% (+27.3)#6,724
82. Toppers 74.4% 50.5% (+23.9)#82 47.1% (+27.3)#6,730
83. Cement 74.3% 50.5% (+23.8)#83 47.1% (+27.2)#6,774
84. Morris 74.1% 50.5% (+23.6)#84 47.1% (+27.0)#6,848
85. Ramona 74.1% 50.5% (+23.6)#85 47.1% (+27.0)#6,854
86. Mallard Bay 74.1% 50.5% (+23.6)#86 47.1% (+27.0)#6,858
87. Fairfax 73.8% 50.5% (+23.3)#87 47.1% (+26.7)#6,945
88. Grandfield 73.7% 50.5% (+23.2)#88 47.1% (+26.6)#6,988
89. Glenpool 73.6% 50.5% (+23.1)#89 47.1% (+26.5)#7,010
90. South Coffeyville 73.5% 50.5% (+23.0)#90 47.1% (+26.4)#7,079
91. Snyder 73.4% 50.5% (+22.9)#91 47.1% (+26.3)#7,108
92. Davidson 73.3% 50.5% (+22.8)#92 47.1% (+26.2)#7,144
93. Dacoma 73.3% 50.5% (+22.8)#93 47.1% (+26.2)#7,146
94. Crescent 73.2% 50.5% (+22.7)#94 47.1% (+26.1)#7,172
95. Dill City 73.2% 50.5% (+22.7)#95 47.1% (+26.1)#7,185
96. Bartlesville 73.1% 50.5% (+22.6)#96 47.1% (+26.0)#7,187
97. Kingfisher 72.9% 50.5% (+22.4)#97 47.1% (+25.8)#7,278
98. Depew 72.9% 50.5% (+22.4)#98 47.1% (+25.8)#7,297
99. Fair Oaks 72.9% 50.5% (+22.4)#99 47.1% (+25.8)#7,307
100. Barnsdall 72.8% 50.5% (+22.3)#100 47.1% (+25.7)#7,331

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Households Heated by Utility Gas in Oklahoma?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Households Heated by Utility Gas in Oklahoma are:
#1
100.0%
#2
100.0%
#3
100.0%
#4
100.0%
#5
95.1%
#6
94.9%
#7
93.9%
#8
90.0%
#9
90.0%
#10
89.2%
What city has the Highest Percentage of Households Heated by Utility Gas in Oklahoma?
Deer Creek has the Highest Percentage of Households Heated by Utility Gas in Oklahoma with 100.0%.
What is the Percentage of Households Heated by Utility Gas in the State of Oklahoma?
Percentage of Households Heated by Utility Gas in Oklahoma is 50.5%.
What is the Percentage of Households Heated by Utility Gas in the United States?
Percentage of Households Heated by Utility Gas in the United States is 47.1%.