Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Females in Nebraska

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Highest Poverty | Single Female
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Nebraska
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Females in Nebraska

0.0%
100.0%
Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Females in Nebraska Map

Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Females in Nebraska

City Single Female Poverty vs State vs National
1. Henderson 100.0% 22.5% (+77.5)#1 24.1% (+75.9)#110
2. Lyman 100.0% 22.5% (+77.5)#2 24.1% (+75.9)#336
3. Table Rock 100.0% 22.5% (+77.5)#3 24.1% (+75.9)#385
4. Guide Rock 100.0% 22.5% (+77.5)#4 24.1% (+75.9)#428
5. Diller 100.0% 22.5% (+77.5)#5 24.1% (+75.9)#498
6. Fordyce 100.0% 22.5% (+77.5)#6 24.1% (+75.9)#511
7. Haigler 100.0% 22.5% (+77.5)#7 24.1% (+75.9)#644
8. Sunol 100.0% 22.5% (+77.5)#8 24.1% (+75.9)#674
9. Cordova 100.0% 22.5% (+77.5)#9 24.1% (+75.9)#758
10. Alvo 100.0% 22.5% (+77.5)#10 24.1% (+75.9)#770
11. Bow Valley 100.0% 22.5% (+77.5)#11 24.1% (+75.9)#817
12. Harrisburg 100.0% 22.5% (+77.5)#12 24.1% (+75.9)#881
13. Liberty 100.0% 22.5% (+77.5)#13 24.1% (+75.9)#911
14. Oxford 91.7% 22.5% (+69.2)#14 24.1% (+67.6)#1,010
15. Union 85.7% 22.5% (+63.2)#15 24.1% (+61.6)#1,149
16. Thurston 85.7% 22.5% (+63.2)#16 24.1% (+61.6)#1,155
17. Hoskins 84.6% 22.5% (+62.1)#17 24.1% (+60.5)#1,177
18. Hemingford 83.3% 22.5% (+60.8)#18 24.1% (+59.3)#1,205
19. Linwood 83.3% 22.5% (+60.8)#19 24.1% (+59.3)#1,230
20. Fullerton 81.6% 22.5% (+59.1)#20 24.1% (+57.5)#1,279
21. Colon 80.0% 22.5% (+57.5)#21 24.1% (+55.9)#1,352
22. Arapahoe 77.8% 22.5% (+55.3)#22 24.1% (+53.7)#1,417
23. North Loup 77.8% 22.5% (+55.3)#23 24.1% (+53.7)#1,433
24. Grafton 77.8% 22.5% (+55.3)#24 24.1% (+53.7)#1,439
25. Malcolm 76.9% 22.5% (+54.4)#25 24.1% (+52.8)#1,471
26. Shickley 75.0% 22.5% (+52.5)#26 24.1% (+50.9)#1,559
27. Talmage 75.0% 22.5% (+52.5)#27 24.1% (+50.9)#1,577
28. Verdigre 72.0% 22.5% (+49.5)#28 24.1% (+47.9)#1,726
29. Glenvil 71.4% 22.5% (+48.9)#29 24.1% (+47.4)#1,758
30. Trumbull 71.4% 22.5% (+48.9)#30 24.1% (+47.4)#1,766
31. Curtis 68.8% 22.5% (+46.2)#31 24.1% (+44.7)#1,961
32. Nebraska City 68.7% 22.5% (+46.2)#32 24.1% (+44.6)#1,968
33. Stuart 68.4% 22.5% (+45.9)#33 24.1% (+44.3)#1,993
34. Orchard 66.7% 22.5% (+44.2)#34 24.1% (+42.6)#2,122
35. Chapman 66.7% 22.5% (+44.2)#35 24.1% (+42.6)#2,142
36. Maywood 66.7% 22.5% (+44.2)#36 24.1% (+42.6)#2,144
37. Farnam 66.7% 22.5% (+44.2)#37 24.1% (+42.6)#2,179
38. Republican City 66.7% 22.5% (+44.2)#38 24.1% (+42.6)#2,189
39. Miller 66.7% 22.5% (+44.2)#39 24.1% (+42.6)#2,192
40. Farwell 66.7% 22.5% (+44.2)#40 24.1% (+42.6)#2,213
41. Henry 66.7% 22.5% (+44.2)#41 24.1% (+42.6)#2,220
42. Broken Bow 65.2% 22.5% (+42.7)#42 24.1% (+41.1)#2,303
43. Terrytown 64.4% 22.5% (+41.9)#43 24.1% (+40.4)#2,361
44. Ord 63.7% 22.5% (+41.2)#44 24.1% (+39.7)#2,420
45. Santee 63.6% 22.5% (+41.1)#45 24.1% (+39.6)#2,437
46. Callaway 60.0% 22.5% (+37.5)#46 24.1% (+35.9)#2,814
47. Odell 60.0% 22.5% (+37.5)#47 24.1% (+35.9)#2,835
48. Melbeta 60.0% 22.5% (+37.5)#48 24.1% (+35.9)#2,861
49. Roca 60.0% 22.5% (+37.5)#49 24.1% (+35.9)#2,864
50. Elgin 58.3% 22.5% (+35.8)#50 24.1% (+34.3)#3,046
51. O Neill 57.4% 22.5% (+34.9)#51 24.1% (+33.3)#3,131
52. Benkelman 57.1% 22.5% (+34.6)#52 24.1% (+33.1)#3,155
53. Wolbach 57.1% 22.5% (+34.6)#53 24.1% (+33.1)#3,196
54. Shubert 57.1% 22.5% (+34.6)#54 24.1% (+33.1)#3,202
55. Mason City 57.1% 22.5% (+34.6)#55 24.1% (+33.1)#3,212
56. Oakland 56.9% 22.5% (+34.4)#56 24.1% (+32.8)#3,242
57. Laurel 56.8% 22.5% (+34.2)#57 24.1% (+32.7)#3,254
58. Clarkson 56.2% 22.5% (+33.7)#58 24.1% (+32.2)#3,315
59. Murray 56.2% 22.5% (+33.7)#59 24.1% (+32.2)#3,321
60. Upland 55.6% 22.5% (+33.0)#60 24.1% (+31.5)#3,425
61. Macy 54.5% 22.5% (+32.0)#61 24.1% (+30.5)#3,529
62. Clarks 54.5% 22.5% (+32.0)#62 24.1% (+30.5)#3,541
63. Cedar Bluffs 53.6% 22.5% (+31.1)#63 24.1% (+29.5)#3,685
64. Alma 52.6% 22.5% (+30.1)#64 24.1% (+28.6)#3,821
65. Winnebago 52.6% 22.5% (+30.1)#65 24.1% (+28.6)#3,823
66. Wood River 52.3% 22.5% (+29.8)#66 24.1% (+28.2)#3,870
67. Osmond 51.6% 22.5% (+29.1)#67 24.1% (+27.5)#3,972
68. Blair 51.5% 22.5% (+29.0)#68 24.1% (+27.5)#3,980
69. Minden 50.5% 22.5% (+28.0)#69 24.1% (+26.5)#4,088
70. Genoa 50.0% 22.5% (+27.5)#70 24.1% (+25.9)#4,182
71. Eustis 50.0% 22.5% (+27.5)#71 24.1% (+25.9)#4,251
72. Herman 50.0% 22.5% (+27.5)#72 24.1% (+25.9)#4,268
73. Campbell 50.0% 22.5% (+27.5)#73 24.1% (+25.9)#4,286
74. Litchfield 50.0% 22.5% (+27.5)#74 24.1% (+25.9)#4,295
75. Clearwater 50.0% 22.5% (+27.5)#75 24.1% (+25.9)#4,312
76. Harrison 50.0% 22.5% (+27.5)#76 24.1% (+25.9)#4,331
77. Western 50.0% 22.5% (+27.5)#77 24.1% (+25.9)#4,348
78. Waco 50.0% 22.5% (+27.5)#78 24.1% (+25.9)#4,378
79. Bruno 50.0% 22.5% (+27.5)#79 24.1% (+25.9)#4,427
80. Brock 50.0% 22.5% (+27.5)#80 24.1% (+25.9)#4,428
81. Arthur 50.0% 22.5% (+27.5)#81 24.1% (+25.9)#4,432
82. Eddyville 50.0% 22.5% (+27.5)#82 24.1% (+25.9)#4,433
83. Mcgrew 50.0% 22.5% (+27.5)#83 24.1% (+25.9)#4,442
84. Holdrege 48.6% 22.5% (+26.1)#84 24.1% (+24.6)#4,597
85. Otoe 48.3% 22.5% (+25.8)#85 24.1% (+24.2)#4,662
86. Hampton 47.4% 22.5% (+24.9)#86 24.1% (+23.3)#4,834
87. Alda 46.8% 22.5% (+24.3)#87 24.1% (+22.7)#4,939
88. Nickerson 46.7% 22.5% (+24.2)#88 24.1% (+22.6)#4,962
89. Pleasanton 46.2% 22.5% (+23.6)#89 24.1% (+22.1)#5,052
90. Gordon 45.8% 22.5% (+23.3)#90 24.1% (+21.7)#5,117
91. David City 45.0% 22.5% (+22.5)#91 24.1% (+20.9)#5,249
92. Burwell 45.0% 22.5% (+22.5)#92 24.1% (+20.9)#5,251
93. Cedar Rapids 44.4% 22.5% (+21.9)#93 24.1% (+20.4)#5,362
94. Creighton 43.9% 22.5% (+21.4)#94 24.1% (+19.8)#5,485
95. Harvard 43.8% 22.5% (+21.3)#95 24.1% (+19.7)#5,500
96. Coleridge 42.9% 22.5% (+20.4)#96 24.1% (+18.8)#5,697
97. Greeley Center 42.9% 22.5% (+20.4)#97 24.1% (+18.8)#5,706
98. Brule 41.7% 22.5% (+19.2)#98 24.1% (+17.6)#6,019
99. Pawnee City 40.9% 22.5% (+18.4)#99 24.1% (+16.8)#6,186
100. Spalding 40.9% 22.5% (+18.4)#100 24.1% (+16.8)#6,190

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Females in Nebraska?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Females in Nebraska are:
#1
100.0%
#2
100.0%
#3
100.0%
#4
100.0%
#5
100.0%
#6
100.0%
#7
100.0%
#8
100.0%
#9
100.0%
#10
100.0%
What city has the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Females in Nebraska?
Henderson has the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Females in Nebraska with 100.0%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Single Females in the State of Nebraska?
Poverty Level Among Single Females in Nebraska is 22.5%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Single Females in the United States?
Poverty Level Among Single Females in the United States is 24.1%.